Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

San Joaquin County looking into absentee-only voting ballots

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, September 1, 2010 12:00 am | Updated: 5:47 am, Thu Sep 2, 2010.

By 2012, voters in San Joaquin County may not have a polling place in which to cast their ballot. Instead, they may be required to vote by absentee ballot only. County officials are exploring the idea of a vote-by-mail-only system because it could save the county considerable money, Registrar of Voters Austin Erdman told the Board of Supervisors on Tuesday.

In fact, that’s already the trend. Only 25 percent of the voters who cast ballots in the June primary in San Joaquin County went to their local school, church, community center or neighbor’s garage to vote, Erdman said. That translates to only 11 percent of the county’s registered voters.

Subscription Required

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

You must login to view the full content on this page.

Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

11 comments:

  • Jerome Kinderman posted at 2:01 pm on Thu, Sep 2, 2010.

    Jerome R Kinderman Posts: 2350

    Ms. Coe, the reason you may be required to vote absentee is that the number of voters in your district cannot justify having its own polling site. While I certainly understand the cost of voting, I agree that there has to be a better way.

    Many districts combine their polling locations, but are still required to have separate staffs on site to handle voters from the two districts separately. Certainly there should be a happy medium to this problem, such as finally using those electronic voting machines.

    Speaking of which, as a poll worker for a number of years now, I have yet to have one voter request to use the electronic machines. But before each election since becoming the leader of my polling location, I've had to attend a training session on the setup, operation and shutting down of these machines – before EACH election! And yes, they’re required to pay me for the privilege.

    I think using their brains rather than limiting the way we vote would resolve much of the problems. But common sense seems to be in short supply these days.

     
  • wendy coe posted at 10:02 pm on Wed, Sep 1, 2010.

    wendy coe Posts: 39

    I have already received a notice that I would have to vote absentee. Sorry, but I think this is wrong, and do not trust the system that my vote will ever be counted. I like the fact that I can exercise my vote, put it in the box. Taking time to do this constitutional right, is the American way. Technology yes, but do not take my right away to be present.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 5:52 pm on Wed, Sep 1, 2010.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Mary... I didnt think of that one...if I remember right.. Bob Dornan was voted out in California and later it was discovered that there were hundreds more votes counted than voters who registered... I think " voting the cemetery" is alive and well in California too....

     
  • Mary Henschel posted at 5:17 pm on Wed, Sep 1, 2010.

    Mary Henschel Posts: 46

    One type of fraud that won't be easily safeguarded against is known affectionately in Chicago Land as "Voting the Cemetery". Workers create numerous false registrations by getting names from headstones, and these deceased voters all vote "absentee". Of course, it's hard for the dead to vote any other way, but look for this to become very common if SJ Co. goes completely Vote By Mail.

     
  • Jerome Kinderman posted at 4:28 pm on Wed, Sep 1, 2010.

    Jerome R Kinderman Posts: 2350

    On the other hand, I would be more inclined to support the use of online voting than this ridiculous idea. Of course, the process would have to be designed to ensure that fraudulent voting is kept to a minimum (unfortunately, there's never been a way to completely eliminate fraud). It would take considerable work to figure that out, however.

     
  • Jerome Kinderman posted at 4:18 pm on Wed, Sep 1, 2010.

    Jerome R Kinderman Posts: 2350

    Austin Erdman suggests that this idea would “… [give] voters a longer opportunity to study the ballot and find answers to their questions.” This is simply not true. As it stands now, by law we are required to have a sample ballot mailed to us a certain number of days prior to the election, before the absentee ballot is mailed under the current system. That sample is identical to the actual ballot that we either use to mail it in or cast at a polling station on election day.

    I wonder why he would make such a claim. Anytime someone suggests tampering with the election process, I'm suspicious.

     
  • Jerome Kinderman posted at 4:10 pm on Wed, Sep 1, 2010.

    Jerome R Kinderman Posts: 2350

    This is a terrible idea if it's going to become mandatory.

    Elections are designed to take place during specified hours on one specified day. In other words, everything that leads up to that one twelve-hour period is what we are to base our votes upon.

    If we were forced to vote before the actual election day, we would be required to make our decisions before the electioneering is complete. Quite often things come to light just before those polls open that could alter our decisions. In order for absentee votes to be counted, they need to arrive on or before election day, thereby eliminating the ability of voters to wait until the very last minute to cast their votes, as should be their absolute right.

    As a permanent absentee voter, I've chosen to vote this way. During some elections I wait until election day to deliver my ballot to an election site, thereby ensuring that it will be counted along with the rest of those who cast their ballots that day. Yet sometimes I'll mail it in. But it is MY choice to do so.

    I don't think anyone has ever challenged this type of voting in the past, but if San Joaquin County forces it on me, I'll do all I can to stop it.

     
  • Sam Heller posted at 3:42 pm on Wed, Sep 1, 2010.

    Sam Heller Posts: 176

    I think it is a great idea ... and a money saver. I have been voting this way for years and find it so convenient.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 1:18 pm on Wed, Sep 1, 2010.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    I agree david... there is no way to prevent fraud all together.... but the easier it is to do the more of it we will have.... its much easier to get an elderly person to sign a mail form that it is to have them physically vote... therefore voter fraud would increase...

     
  • David Diskin posted at 9:41 am on Wed, Sep 1, 2010.

    David Diskin Posts: 183

    You bring up an important point, Darrell, but the same problem exists with walk-in voter stations.

    Theoretically, I could strongarm people (or pay them) for voting to my preference when they walk into the poll station.

    For verification, I could simply require them to use their cell phone to snap a photo of their completed voting ballot or the computer's confirmation screen.

    Granted your way is certainly easier to control, but the current way isn't perfect either.

    I'm not really sure what the best solution is.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 8:47 am on Wed, Sep 1, 2010.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Are their any concerns of voter fraud increase due to mail option. Example, lets say I am a grandpa and have a wife, 4 children and 50 grandchildren... I have them all come over for a big barbecue and ask them to all bring their mail in ballets as their ticket to the free food...and bring as many friends as they like for a free dinner and the same ticket in ... then all they do is sign and date their vote card, blank, and enjoy the evening... end of day, I'm getting a lot of votes the way I like it... I would think there would be many situations where vote by mail is a problem... Maybe a strong wife who dominates her husband fills out the vote for him... or maybe a son with a mom in a rest-home can say... sign this mom.... situations are endless... I understand that vote by mail saves money, but at what cost?

     
Readers Choice Awards 2014

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists