default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Lodi Unified School District considers advertising at schools

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 6:10 am, Wed Nov 16, 2011.

Fans of Lodi High School sports could soon be cheering on their teams from the Nike Bill and Carol Meehleis gym. Or maybe the Tokay Tigers will practice on the Google athletic field. Even libraries and multipurpose rooms could see a new, sponsored nametag.

The Lodi Unified School District board heard a report Tuesday night detailing a potential advertising contract with Education Funding Partners, a national marketing firm, and gave approval for negotiations to move forward.

The idea is to pick out which school locations might be attractive to advertisers and determine what space is available. Education Funding Partners then connects a Fortune 500 company with that information and comes up with a potential ad design. The company buying the ad space pays for printing and posting.

If the contract doesn’t generate at least $100,000 in revenue in its first year, it would be terminated.

The district would have final approval of the message, design and location of each ad, with each contract coming up through a board meeting.

“Once we have this contract, it doesn’t give them free rein to put everything everywhere,” said board president George Neely.

Art Hand, assistant superintendent of facilities and planning, said the contract would not interfere with local advertising opportunities, because the marketing firm is intent on reeling in the big fish specifically.

Revenue is 100 percent commission-based, with 80 percent going to the district. Eventually, the contract could bring in as much as $10 to $20 per student per year.

But school officials are concerned about the consequences of bringing district fundraising efforts to school sites.

Erik Sandstrom, principal at Tokay High School, said he’s totally torn about the idea of national ads posted at his school.

“It’s sad to say that public schools have to fall back on commercialization,” he said. “Are we selling out? But what other choice do we have?”

One question he had was how the money made from these ads would be divided. If an ad is posted at Millswood Middle School, for example, it is not yet clear whether the funds generated from that particular contract would benefit only Millswood or the entire district. Neely said that issue would be addressed at a later date.

In other action, eight classified positions have been eliminated from Lodi Unified by a resolution approved by the board Tuesday night. These include paraeducators, bilingual aides and community liaisons in North Stockton schools, half coming from Bear Creek High School alone.

Classified union president Paula Calderon said these employees help connect non-English-speaking families with the schools, as well as assist English-language learners in the classroom.

“These are employees who won’t be coming back after Christmas,” she said.

The rational presented in the meeting agenda was that enrollment numbers in that area did not require those positions. California Educational code states that classified employees are subject to layoffs as a result of lack of work or funding.

Calderon’s reaction was one of surprise. She wasn’t aware of the resolution before it was posted through the meeting agenda online Thursday.

“We’re currently in negotiations,” she said. “This was never mentioned.”

Calderon missed the public comment period on the 2011-95 resolution due to a phone call. She attempted to ask questions during the non-agenda item union representative comment period, but was blocked by Neely, who asked that she instead direct her questions to Mike McKilligan, assistant superintendent of personnel, at another time.

However, a handful of teachers who missed the public comment meeting on a public hearing regarding the teacher contract re-opening stepped forward to speak during teacher union president Jeff Johnston’s allotted comment time.

Contact reporter Sara Jane Pohlman at sarap@lodinews.com.

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 2:18 pm on Sat, Nov 19, 2011.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9403

    I think creativity is in order and seeking ways of bringing revenue considering California's economic plight is a no brainer...

    A consensus should be reached and advertising implemented. Nothing is locked in stone. You test it out and continue what works and makes sense and discontinue things that turned out badly.
    Let it evolve and as time goes on, experience will guide us on how to go forward.

  • roy bitz posted at 11:02 pm on Wed, Nov 16, 2011.

    roy bitz Posts: 489

    A few questions:

    Who decides which products or services will be advertised and which will not?
    Will advertisers be given exclusive advertising rights or will competing companies be allowed to purchase advertising?
    How will advertising income be accounted for and how will it be allocated?
    How has the idea of California Lottery money for schools worked out for schools?

    Who d ecides on the value of the advertising?

  • Kim Parigoris posted at 12:06 pm on Wed, Nov 16, 2011.

    Kim Parigoris Posts: 469

    Well, maybe it would be good. Maybe it will help pay for that ridiculous digital sign they have at Lockeford School that says "Lockeford School" and the time (which is wrong and has not been reset after Daylights savings time change) I think most people know that they are at a school, are in Lockeford, and also have a telephone to tell them what time it is. I don't know the backgound of why they had to have one of those- knowing California it might be some ridiculous state mandate- but if not, I would love to know how much that thing cost, and the cost of it being turned on 24/7 (which also doesn't sound very "green" to me, and is leaving a big carbon footprint.) If it was a voluntary decision to purchase it, it is another waste of tax dollars.

  • Kim Lee posted at 11:28 am on Wed, Nov 16, 2011.

    Kim Lee Posts: 1798

    Hmmm... I don't know about this advertising idea.



Popular Stories


Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 30


Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists