default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Proposed Green Tech High School Academy draws critics

Some say price tag for academy is too high — and payoff too uncertain

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

View Green Tech High School Academy in a larger map

Posted: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 8:43 am, Tue Sep 13, 2011.

Lodi Unified School District has already spent hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars laying the groundwork for a new school that some trustees say they can’t support.

The district’s proposed Green Tech High School Academy would be the first of its kind in California. It would provide college and career preparatory learning while focusing on sustainable environmental practices.

The proposed facility, scheduled for a fall 2014 opening, will be an active part of the educational process. For example, an on-site water treatment plant will be used as a teaching tool, as will solar panels installed in parking areas.

There would also be an agricultural component where students will be able to grow food, have it prepared in the school kitchen and enjoy the fruits of their labor in an outdoor dining area.

Among the academy’s top supporters are Assistant Superintendent Art Hand, board president George Neely and several site administrators.

Lodi High School assistant principal Jeff Palmquist and Bill Atterberry, who oversees the district’s adult school program, have been working on the plan for months. Unlike other building projects, the district has opted to first decide on the educational specifications before construction begins.

Palmquist said the academy builds on concepts the district is already using through ROP and other career tech programs.

“They’ve been successful in engaging students and giving them skills beyond only academics,” he said.

Focusing on three major themes of green technology — design, build, grow — the district believes the facility and its curriculum will provide graduating students with the opportunity to secure jobs directly in a new job market, or to develop their own businesses related to green technology, according to the educational philosophy detailed in a report by hired consultants Total School Solutions.

But a study released in July by the non-partisan Brookings Institution found that clean-technology jobs accounted for just 2 percent of employment nationwide and only slightly more — 2.2 percent — in Silicon Valley, the birthplace of many new jobs of this kind.

Rather than adding jobs, the study found, the sector actually lost 492 positions from 2003 to 2010 in the South Bay Area.

Palmquist sees the Green Tech Academy as a site to help students districtwide. For example, he said, it could be a gathering place for groups such as the Science Olympiad and agricultural departments at other high schools wanting to test a product or idea.

Each academy student would be issued a laptop to access not only the school’s wireless network, but digital textbooks as well. Due to the nature of the school, there would be no library.

The idea of a green school is not new, Palmquist said, adding that what makes Lodi Unified’s idea unique is combining sustainability practices with career technical paths.

“It’s the way that we’re putting it together that’s innovative,” he said.

But the project has its share of critics.

Parent Paul Verdegaal called it the wrong idea at the wrong time.

“The district is struggling just to keep things going and can’t even keep up with curriculum,” he said, pointing to the number of high school graduates who take remedial courses in college. “The sustainability thing is a nice concept ... but sustainability comes from doing what my parents told me: ‘When you leave the room, turn the light out.’

“There’s a lot of interest in providing green skills in Lodi Unified, but right away I thought, ‘Gee, that’s a lot of money we’re going to spend right now.’”

$37 million price tag

The district is banking on innovative funding to pay for the new school in the North Stockton area.

It is staff’s plan that construction of the $37 million facility would be funded by federal grants, state building funds, private partnerships and other sources. The remaining balance could come from Measure L, the school bond approved by North Stockton voters last decade, according to Neely.

Fellow trustee Ron Heberle is skeptical.

“Now is not the time for an expense of this magnitude,” he told his peers last month, adding that three weeks into the new school year, staff was still struggling to find desks for all of the district’s students.

“I don’t want this project to be a drain. Opening this school will have a rippling effect on our current schools. You open a new school, you limit opportunities for other students,” Heberle said.

Not only are he and other trustees concerned with the school’s construction price tag, but its ongoing operating costs are not yet figured into the budget.

But Neely insists the money to build the academy is not the same funding that buys paper and other school supplies.

“We will still be challenged at that level with or without this project,” he said. “This does not have to be a distraction, but an addition.”

Teachers’ union president Jeff Johnston disagrees and points to the requirement of general fund money to pay for teachers and other operating costs once the academy is complete. He also said that spending $37 million for construction is not the best public relations move for a district that has struggled in recent years not to lay off employees.

His wife, fellow teacher Nanci Johnston, was a bit more eloquent at a meeting last month.

“Right now, the house is broken,” she said of the district. “Instead of building the new one and moving into it, you fix the old house.”

‘Expensive experiment’

The site, just off Lower Sacramento Road between McNair and Bear Creek high schools, was purchased by the district at about the same time with specific plans to build a middle school.

The project had been in the discussion phase for at least five years when Atterberry tossed the idea out.

To date, the district has paid $32,000 to Total School Solutions. For an additional $60,000, it plans to retain the consultants through construction which could begin next summer, according to Hand.

Last month, trustees pressed Hand as to whether there were similar academies Lodi Unified could review. He said the district’s would be pioneers in the effort.

“We don’t need to be first,” Heberle said at a recent board meeting. “This is a very expensive experiment.”

Verdegaal isn’t convinced either, and points to a number of failed green projects across the nation.

“It appears that LUSD is once again chasing pipe dreams at great cost in money and opportunities for students to actually learn, especially with reduced budgets,” he said. “Their new education solution to under-performance, drop-outs, and achievement gaps is a green academy.”

Verdegaal said he was once very interested in the district’s politics, and attended nearly every school board meeting for 10 years when the district was moving away from year-round school. His four children have since graduated.

During that time, he saw trustees approve one curriculum program after another and then witnessed students coming out of school with “fuzzy” math skills, he said.

“My experience over the years is (that) they are getting short changed. Can’t we focus on curriculum instead of building a new academy?” he said.

Verdegaal is also the farm adviser for the University of California Cooperative Extension in San Joaquin County where green ideas come up regularly. Additionally, he sees students who don’t understand science or math, key subjects in creating sustainable practices.

But much of it is about control, not actual practices, he said. Growers, for example, get more points for following sustainable guidelines instead of doing it for the right reasons.

As money allows, the district has been working its way through a list compiled by another consultant in 2008 to identify places it could save money by going green.

Hand is personally at the forefront of these plans and said the district has implemented more than $1.8 million in energy savings, to date.

Other energy-saving projects include a solar parking lot at the district office, a compressed natural gas school bus filling station used by the city in the past and revamping both Lodi high school gymnasiums with new ceiling lights.

The board has narrowly approved moving forward with the Green Tech Academy concept. Last month trustees Heberle and Ruth Davis voted against the plan, while trustee Michael Abdallah abstained without publicly providing a reason.

The final design should be up for a vote by year’s end.

Still, trustees Joe Nava and Bonnie Cassel, who calls herself an “eternal optimist,” are excited about the academy. Nava said he’s convinced by a presentation to the board that it’s a good project.

But in the end, Heberle and his wife, retired teacher Susan Heberle, disagreed with Cassel and Nava.

“It’s $37 million. You have students not sitting in desks and in classrooms that are not painted,” Susan Heberle said. “Right now doesn’t seem to be the right time.”

Hand understands the concern, he said, but is quick to add he’s never built a project where someone wasn’t against it.

“I believe we can build this school and improve our other schools with the concepts we develop here,” he said.

Contact reporter Jennifer Bonnett at jenniferb@lodinews.com.

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • Ed Miller posted at 1:26 pm on Wed, Sep 14, 2011.

    Ed946 Posts: 70

    Here we go again. The school system, our most expensive, tax-supported charity, exists to teach our children the 3Rs; i.e., reading, writing, arithmetic. At this, they fail year after year. Want proof? Businesses will not accept a high school diploma for decent paying jobs because high school graduates typically cannot read, write or perform math competently, let alone think critically.

    The school system fails for multiple reasons but the prime one is the persistent social engineering of our children. Lodi Unified School District’s Green Tech High School Academy is the latest example of pushing ideology and ecotheology instead of critical thinking. This facility would focus “on sustainable environmental practices” per the Sentinel, code words for UN’s Agenda 21 political and ecotheology agenda. Furthermore, green technologies are not ready for prime time and may never be. Without the government’s protection and promotion, they would be stuck in R&D. Windmills kill endangered birds, ethanol consumes more energy than it produces while competing with the food supply, solar is so uncompetitive that the government must subsidize the cost by 50%, compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) will cause the next Super Fund for mercury contamination of ground water, and the list goes on.

    No, invest in conventional schools while focusing on the 3Rs and critical thinking skills; these skills are applicable to anything in the future including green technologies. Avoid the current political, ideological, and ecotheology indoctrination promoted by the schools and the politicians.

  • Kim Parigoris posted at 5:21 pm on Tue, Sep 13, 2011.

    Kim Parigoris Posts: 469

    I would just feel so much better if we had some people in our local, state and federal government that had some business background. People that have had to make ends meet with no grants, funds, bonds, or "free: money. People who have had to make a payroll and maybe had to charge it on their personal VISA to do so. It just seems like our elected officials (and unelected bureaucrats) grab every shiny object that comes along, and get sold by every consultant, and snake oil salesman that shows them the latest fad. I wish they would spend OUR money like it was coming out of their own pocket, because it is coming out of ours. And the money tree is about out of leaves..

  • Jackson Scott posted at 2:45 pm on Tue, Sep 13, 2011.

    Jackson Scott Posts: 382

    I think a TECH Academy during boom times is a great idea! Not every student is going to college and old fashioned trade classes & new style tech classes are needed. But these are bust times and we must watch every penny!

    MY REAL PROBLEM is with the article. Jennifer quotes several LUSD Trustees, the LEA Union President, one parent, and then also quotes the Union Presidents Wife who is a Teaching Coach, and a Trustees Wife who is a retired teacher. Seems a tad biased to me.

  • Kim Parigoris posted at 10:45 am on Tue, Sep 13, 2011.

    Kim Parigoris Posts: 469

    Here is some information on Total School Solutions from 2008 -

    As we continue our series on the impact of former CBO Tahir Ahad and his prviate educational consulting company, Total School Solutions (TSS), it is important to note that TSS has contracts and projects in districts across the state of California and beyond. Their webpage lists as clients, 61 such districts including, Waterford Unified School District.

    Waterford is a small town of approximately 8,500 just east of Modesto. On Sunday, March 2, 2008, the Modesto Bee ran an investigative report about fiscal mismanagement performed by their Superintendent Howard Cohen and his relationship with Total School Solutions.

    A contract with a Bay Area consulting firm, Total School Solutions, was ratified as a $33,000 agreement to polish the district's master plan but turned out to be an open-ended contract that cost the district $124,000 before it was canceled with the work unfinished.

    Read more: http://www.modbee.com/2008/03/02/227668/report-rips-waterford-spending.html#ixzz1XrA0t8yQ

  • Kim Parigoris posted at 10:37 am on Tue, Sep 13, 2011.

    Kim Parigoris Posts: 469

    I understand that Kevin, and agree that there are ones that are doing well. But I also agree that these need to be privately driven, not just government funded. It seems that our government just does not stop and ponder things well any more- they go off half cocked spending billions of dollars on hair brained schemes before they do the research. We simply can not afford to keep investing in iffy propositions, on our dime! American has always succeeded on private and innovative ingenuity...let's keep it that way.

  • Kevin Paglia posted at 9:06 am on Tue, Sep 13, 2011.

    Kevin Paglia Posts: 1880

    Kim, please tell me one industry that hasn't had businesses go under, especially with the current economic times.

    And for all the green businesses that had folded, there are dozens who are doing good and growing. If you search or Best green tech companies you will find a lot on green businesses that are doing good. Green Tech and the businesses associated with it is still in its infancy, just because it wasn't born running doesn't mean it should be put down. Give it time and support, if not financial at least tolerance, and let's see where this can go.

    But i do think the driving force needs to be the marketplace, not government funding, tax dollars. I want the Green Tech to move on it's own, not with Government pushing it along.

    I wish I had some $$ to devote for Green tech, I got a couple Ideas that I would be interested in seeing in the market place that aren't yet. Maybe after i get some land where i can have a workshop I can work on some of these ideas and see where they go.

  • Kim Parigoris posted at 7:08 am on Tue, Sep 13, 2011.

    Kim Parigoris Posts: 469

    When are well intended environmentalists going to realize that their "movement" has been hijacked by a self serving, power and money hungry movement bigger than them? Take Solyndra, after receiving $528 million dollars in federal funding (otherwise known as the American taxpayer) the Energy Department agreed to restructure their loan and give them 10 years to pay back the loan instead of the original 7, and pushed the first payment back to 2013. (In other words, the American taxpayer did not see a dime returned from their investment). 6 weeks before the company closed their doors, they were reqssuring Congress that there was no danger of that happening.
    "Green Vehicles" in Salinas California shut their doors after the City of Salinas gave them $540,000 in addition to the $187,000 that the California Energy Commission (California taxpayer money) gave them. Where's teh money? All gone.
    When is the citizenry of this country going to wake up that they are being scammed? Plain and simple- this whole green thing has turned in to a debacle and a total sham- at the cost of the American Taxpayer.



Popular Stories



Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists