Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Report: Twin tunnels project for Delta will cost more money than it will bring in

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 8:32 am, Tue Jul 17, 2012.

The contested Bay Delta Conservation Plan is not economically justified, according to an independent cost-benefit analysis of the proposed project by the Business Forecasting Center at the University of the Pacific in Stockton.

The centerpiece of the plan is to build twin tunnels running underneath the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta to pull water from the Sacramento River and send it to residents and farmers in Southern California.

Subscription Required

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

You must login to view the full content on this page.

Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

4 comments:

  • Ron Werner posted at 5:23 pm on Tue, Jul 17, 2012.

    Ron Werner Posts: 93

    Mike: The solution to the storage problem you mention is called a reservoir. I think it means reserve. If used in a sentence it would go something like this. Lets build more reserviors to hold water in reserve during wet years to use during dry years. Lets try it your way - Lets build more tunnels to hold water during wet years to use during dry years - IT JUST DOESN"T MAKE SENSE!

     
  • Mike Wade posted at 10:27 am on Tue, Jul 17, 2012.

    farmwater Posts: 5

    What happens if nothing is done to secure a reliable supply of water through the Delta and an improved ecosystem for the estuary? A portion of the water that flows through the Delta reaches 25 million Californians to support their homes and businesses. Farmers use water that flows through the Delta to grow a safe and affordable supply of food, reducing our reliance on food imported from other countries.

    California only has a half-year of water storage available and that supply quickly becomes stretched during years of drought. This year is a good example. Not much rain and snow has fallen to replenish our supplies. As a result, much of the carryover supply from last year has already been allocated and farmers are only receiving 40 and 65 percent of their water supply from State and federal sources.

    California's future water supply will continue to be unreliable if current efforts by the BDCP and the Delta Stewardship Council do not move forward. Those efforts support the 2009 legislative mandate of co-equal goals for both a reliable water supply and an improved ecosystem in the Delta.

    Mike Wade
    California Farm Water Coalition

     
  • Bruce Rubly posted at 8:53 am on Tue, Jul 17, 2012.

    brucerubly Posts: 3

    They forgot some important things...the fish. There is no report of how much money saving the fish will bring in to the Delta , or what about the ocean fisheries, decimated by the lack of water. Tourism in the Delta is a multimillion dollar business,
    How come that wasn't included.
    .

     
  • Kim Parigoris posted at 3:58 am on Tue, Jul 17, 2012.

    Kim Parigoris Posts: 470

    Not to mention the fact that allegedly it has the strong potential to turn the Delta in to a salt marsh...

     
Readers Choice Awards 2014

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Featured Events

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists