Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Some Lodi Unified School District athletes can waive second year of physical education

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 12:00 am

After strong debate Tuesday night, Lodi Unified School District trustees voted to exempt high school student-athletes from a second year of physical education to give them the option of taking an additional academic class instead.

The board voted 6-0, with trustee Joe Nava abstaining, to allow students to have a second year of physical education waived if they meet the three requirements:

They take a full year of physical education in their freshman year.

They pass five of the six components of the state physical fitness test.

They compete in at least two different sports within the same school year. The word “different” was added to the motion at board member Bonnie Cassel’s request, so that students who actually compete in only one sport can’t be credited with two.

The board’s decision affects students at Lodi Unified’s four comprehensive high schools — Lodi, Tokay, Bear Creek and McNair.

Several teachers and parents spoke for and against the change. Currently, students must take two physical education classes to graduate. Some said it would allow someone hoping to become valedictorian to take an additional Advanced Placement class, while others said it would allow other college-bound students take an extra academic course.

However, some people defended the two-year physical education requirement, saying that students would be denied other physical activities, such as dancing, if they took only one year of physical education, said Lodi High School physical education teacher Lynette Haley.

Lodi High School Athletic Director Erin Aitken said the board’s decision could affect 29 male and 17 female student-athletes at Lodi High School.

Lodi High School basketball coach Dave Nutting, whose son is a freshman, told the board that it would be impossible to determine whether a student passes five of the six components of the physical fitness test. For freshmen who take the test, results don’t come in until October of their sophomore year because the state analyzes the results based on the student’s height, weight and body mass index, Nutting said.

Lodi High School teacher Brad Friesen asked how school counselors will be able to schedule students in the spring for the next school year if they don’t know if the student qualifies for the physical education exemption. Students could take physical education in their junior year if they fail the test.

Dawn Vetica, assistant superintendent for secondary schools, said that teachers will have an idea whether a given student is likely to pass the physical fitness test.

Board President Ralph Womack said that trustees must screen through comments that “the sky is falling.”

“I enjoyed P.E. when I went to school. I could have done without it,” Womack said. “Badminton was good — but I didn’t need it.”

Womack said he doesn’t expect a mass exodus from physical education classes, even if students can waive a second year.

Contact reporter Ross Farrow at rossf@lodinews.com.

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

5 comments:

  • Jackson Scott posted at 4:34 pm on Wed, Apr 17, 2013.

    Jackson Scott Posts: 382

    So, all of this b**ls**t with only 46 student-athletes possible?

     
  • Kevin Paglia posted at 12:39 pm on Wed, Apr 17, 2013.

    Kevin Paglia Posts: 1880

    I could see not requiring the second year of PE if, at the end of the first year you are meeting a set standard. Running the mile in so fast, pushups and all those levels of physical standard. But if you still can't run the mile in under the state standard then you need more PE. AND if you can't pass it the second year then you get a third year and lose an elective, same for senior year.

     
  • Josh Morgan posted at 10:04 am on Wed, Apr 17, 2013.

    Josh Morgan Posts: 529

    I'm dating myself here but I can recall when I went to high school you were automatically placed in the last period of the day if you participated in a sport and it was considered a PE class. Of course we were required to have four years of PE at that time as well. If you weren't in a sport that particular semester then you were placed in a general PE class in any one of periods 1-6. And no, this was not in Lodi. I believe that if you participate in a sport it should count towards your PE requirement but at the same time the PE requirement should be for at least two years.

     
  • Robert Molle posted at 9:17 am on Wed, Apr 17, 2013.

    Robert Molle Posts: 42

    Seems the only people opposing this are P.E. teachers....

     
  • T M posted at 6:37 am on Wed, Apr 17, 2013.

    lodilivin39 Posts: 4

    I believe this is a great idea for those students who are heavily involved in outside sports activities. This allows for a much more important class to be taken. Thumbs up!

     

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 91

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists