default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

No new jury for Dutra

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 10:00 pm

Sarah Dutra's chances of getting a jury to give her a lighter sentence for manslaughter and let her out of jail have been all but dashed by a state appeals court.

Sarah Dutra

In an order that was sent out last week and filed Tuesday, the Third District Court of Appeals ruled that a judge alone will reevaluate Dutra's 11-year sentence for manslaughter.

Dutra, now 27, was convicted of manslaughter for helping poison her boss, attorney Larry McNabney, with horse tranquilizer on Sept. 11, 2001, at a horse show in Southern California. She was accused of helping McNabney's wife, Elisa, hide the man's body in a refrigerator in his Woodbridge home, then lying to clients and family about his whereabouts.

Elisa McNabney, whose identity was later revealed as Laren Sims and a host of other names, fled the state four months later. She was captured in Florida, where she committed suicide in a jail cell.

Dutra, then a college student in Sacramento, stood trial on murder charges. After two months of testimony, a San Joaquin County jury convicted her of the lesser charge of voluntary manslaughter.

The crime carries a penalty of three, six or 11 years in state prison. At the time, California law required that judges hand down the middle term unless they found aggravating or mitigating factors to support one of the other terms.

In Dutra's case, Garber gave her the maximum sentence and pointed to the $150,000 in settlement checks intended for McNabney's clients, which Dutra helped his wife cash and spend.

As the case worked through the appeals process, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed an unrelated sentence, ruling in 2004 that a jury should decide such sentencing factors rather than a judge.

Dutra's case was one of many sent back for a new sentencing hearing, meaning that a new jury would have to be impaneled and would have to hear the facts all over again.

But in July, the California Supreme Court changed sentencing law so that a judge is not required to issue the middle term of a sentence. Instead, the judge may hand down any of the three terms. For those cases that had been sent back for sentencing trials, a judge can reconsider the original sentence, rather than place the matter before a jury.

Local prosecutors in August asked the appellate court to clarify Dutra's case and on Sept. 11 - six years to the day that McNabney disappeared - justices said the matter may be heard by a judge rather than a jury. Their decision was given to all parties involved and then filed Tuesday.

Dutra, who has been held in the county jail since her case was brought back in March, is scheduled to return to court Oct. 1. A trial date of Oct. 29 has been stayed and will likely be canceled.

Contact reporter Layla Bohm at layla@lodinews.com.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • posted at 3:19 pm on Sun, Sep 23, 2007.


    Lodian, she was so taken advantage of she didn't have the common decency to not attend a party at a dead guys house with the dead guy in the freezer!!

  • posted at 7:00 pm on Wed, Sep 19, 2007.


    Another case where the harshest sentence was handed down to a young person being taken advantage of by an adult.

  • posted at 2:29 pm on Wed, Sep 19, 2007.


    She will still have a good portion of her life left when she gets out. Perhaps she can do something good with it. For now, I think she is where she belongs.

  • posted at 10:02 am on Wed, Sep 19, 2007.


    looks like she needs a hug

  • posted at 7:47 am on Wed, Sep 19, 2007.


    I think she still looks cute. Let her out!

  • posted at 2:38 am on Wed, Sep 19, 2007.


    Ha! What a way to waste you youth / early adulthood. Greed is an evil thing and Dutra is a good example of where it can lead. Dutra looks like hell and she deserves every bit of it.



Popular Stories


Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 90


Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists