Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Lodi Unified School District plans to cut $8.2 million

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 10:00 pm

Teachers, nurses and other community members reasoned and pleaded with Lodi Unified's budget advisory committee Wednesday night at the district office to reconsider some of the options it has proposed to account for its expected $8.2 million reduction in funding.

Last week, Lodi Unified School District released a list of options suggesting where it might make cuts. Those options included eliminating the class-size reduction program at the third-grade level, making deep cuts to transportation and doing away with senior projects.

Subscription Required

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

You must login to view the full content on this page.

Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

31 comments:

  • posted at 11:21 am on Sun, May 4, 2008.

    Posts:

    To dyan: I think you are forgetting the "million dollar" increase in pension for our Supe's 90 day stint as our unelected, probationary interim Superintendent.

     
  • posted at 3:02 am on Sun, May 4, 2008.

    Posts:

    dyan, where is your citation on these salaries? The majority of teachers now have less than 5 years exeperience and do not make that much money. Because the District continues to cut money from the sites, many teachers use their own money for supplies. Also the teachers pay a big chunk for health care, when it is your kids getting them sick. Why do teachers have to pay for benefits? The Big salaries are at the district office. Big pay for the least amount of work.

     
  • posted at 5:58 am on Sat, May 3, 2008.

    Posts:

    80% of a district's budget are salaries and benefits. Teachers' unions cry about low salaries and that California does spend enough on public education, but what they fail to tell you is California is # 3 from the top in the nation on salaries, right behind New York and Connecticut.

     
  • posted at 6:06 pm on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    Whoa Nellie!: We need to trim the fat and the senior project is "fat" that needs to be trimmed. It's not important enough to keep and then cut something else. Don't get rid of things like woodshop, metal shop, art, PE or music etc. Cut this senior project. It's simply not necessary. Cut Ms Cassel's job. That will save some money.

     
  • posted at 1:42 pm on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    Administration! The last thing they'll willingly cut. Ask how many retired principals, et.al. are on the payroll (you know, CONSULTAMTS) getting fat and contributin nil.

     
  • posted at 11:27 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    Cut out bilingual.

     
  • posted at 10:22 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    Why do schools need both a principal and a vice principal and along with them come separate assistants? Seems like with the computer age and software these positions could be reduced to one principal and one computer. When I was in school the principal was also a teacher and boys counselor. And, along with the computer technology and software programs, why have so many different personnel positions been created?

     
  • posted at 9:48 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    Hey anybobdy thought of all the familys that receive FREE LUNCHS ! Maybe they need to tighten that up. If you can't afford to give your kid $2 for lunch then skip the morning mocha. This free lunch system sucks and people are abusing it !!

     
  • posted at 9:07 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    Ivan Dixon? As in the African American who played Sgt. Kinchloe in "Hogan's Heros"??????

     
  • posted at 9:05 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    There is plenty of fat to cut @ LUSD. Too many non-teaching personnel on E.VineSt for one.Having judged the Senior Projects at Lodi High for 2yrs I would encourage LUSD to keep it. Yes, as Cassel states, "It's what the student makes of it." Of the 16+ I've seen only two come to mind that it was obvious the student did not put out any effort at all. Oral & Written Communications Skills are needed for almost all jobs. And with the decline of the English language due to text messaging we need the projects!

     
  • posted at 7:51 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    The school administration is sort of like a mushroom, big and fat on top. Cut from the top, not at the bottom. Do away with duplicate high paying beaucracy. We don't need the fluff.

     
  • posted at 7:40 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    Of course Ms Cassel would oppose to cutting the senior project. She would lose her position. I say cut the senior project. It wasn't in place years back and we all did fine without it.

     
  • posted at 7:08 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    Quit your whining!Why should we pay for public servants when we can just make them all public slaves?

     
  • posted at 6:47 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    I suggest doing the same thing the city should do. Cut all employees back to either 32 or 36 hour work weeks. What do corporations and businesses do when they start losing value? Stiff their stockholders? Give the execs a raise? Slow down production? No. They either fire, layoff or cut back the hours of their employees. The admin side is run like a business, so let's treat it like one and be realistic. The first and foremost solution would be a complete audit by an outside firm to see where every penny is spent and by whom and which department it's accountable to. I don't think that'll ever happen, though.

     
  • posted at 6:37 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    Ivan, you are crazy! My spouse is a teacher and she makes just a moderate salary, barely enough for us to support our own child and live. Would you go to school for 4 plus years, work all day and night grading papers for free??? Get real. It is a job ya know!

     
  • posted at 6:24 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    When any one of you administrators can justify funding for your administration and cut all pork and unnecessary spending, then I'll listen to you about cutting class sizes and layoffs or cutbacks of any personnel that it takes to run the classrooms. I don't believe there is a one of you that could do that without exposing the waste that comes from the administration side.

     
  • posted at 6:18 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    What we consider waste and pork, they consider necessity because they've been in the piggy bank too long without someone holding them accountable. Rather than appointing normal everyday citizens to any watchdog comittees or panels, it's always the well connected and same old family names and ties. Until there's an appropriation committee appointed to actually approve funds or funding, no matter how small, and comprised of Lodians who really care, and permanent cutbacks to the already overloaded administration and its staff, nothing will change. All the money spent to reduce class sizes and buy all those trailers instead of building permanent additions will be completely wasted by throwing them away.

     
  • posted at 5:11 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    First- School board trustees should take the lead by eliminating their pay.Second- cut the fat, like SR.ProjectsThird -Since roughly 85% of the budget is in payroll, reduce ALL employees pay with higher paid personnel taking a higher reduction in pay. (Although all educators say its about the children when it comes done to its not)

     
  • posted at 4:43 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    nice public school system sucks already now you are going to make it suck more!

     
  • posted at 4:35 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    There's an easy solution to this whole problem.Lets have the teachers teach for free.Why should these people get paid to teach our children?They can make plenty of money working part time jobs after school and during the summer.I, for one, am sick of their whining.

     
  • posted at 4:09 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    If you want to look at wasted educational resources. Look at these Links.LUSD--> http://www.lodiusd.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=144&Itemid=83and the San Joaquin County Office of Education--> http://www.sjcoe.org/depts/Look familiar? Now lets look at the state CDE--->http://www.cde.ca.gov/re/di/or/THE SAME THING ONLY MORE LAYERSNow lets also look at www.fcmat.org (California) and we see more layers here.http://www.fcmat.org/stories/storyReader$588HERE IS ANOTHER LAYER.www.casbo.org and http://www.casbo.org/displaystaff.cfmLayers and layers of CALIFORNIA NON-TEACHERS keeps the "tax and spend" Edu-o-cracy in billions.And with ALL of this "support", the LUSD ESC charges a "fee or markup" for classroom paper and supplies as poster "Giovanina" says. This FEE is outrageous AND dishonest. "This is FOR THE KIDS"?

     
  • posted at 3:56 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    ELIMINATE SENIOR PROJECTS!

     
  • posted at 3:38 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    Most of the "non-teaching" jobs in the LUSD are already duplicated at the San Joaquin Office of Education. So, when I recommend "contracting out", it should be to an organization such as the SJCOE WHICH IS ALREADY DOING THE SAME WORK. The SJCOE is also layered with Educrats who DO NOT TEACH. Lets get them busy doing some work. Many of the C&I positions are multiple layered at EACH district, county and state level. The state mandates the Framework, Standards and Curriculum. Annual assessments are based on the above. Duplication and Layering = Waste

     
  • posted at 3:26 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    Perhaps we can start trimming the fraud waste and abuse at the Areida center? Every non-teaching job should be reviewed. Here is a short list. CO= Contract Out S=state C= County 1) Personnel Services - CO 2) Payroll -CO 3) Risk management- CO 4)Purchasing -CO 4) Accounting -CO 5) Accounts payable -CO 6) Purchasing -CO 7) Business office -CO 8) Assessment Research and Evaluation - S 9) Curriculum and Instruction - S 10) Professional Development - S 11) BTSA-state 12) Food Service - CO 13) Community Relations/prevention- S 14)Child Welfare and attendance = C

     
  • posted at 3:10 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    Well it figures! If administration are the ones coming up with the ideas, they are going to make sure they protect themselves. They never look at cutting their own travel or expense accounts, subscriptions, memberships, cutting-edge technology, blackberries, Iphones, meals, remodeling their offices...these are more important than providing services to students. It's kinda like the fox in charge of the henhouse.

     
  • posted at 3:09 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    Instead of making cuts at the highest level where they most need to be made, LUSD royalty would rather throw the students and teachers under the bus, along with the bus drivers. The true colors of the decision makers are embarrassingly evident. Money and power have been and continue to be the priority rather than a quality education for the students of Lodi.

     
  • posted at 3:03 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    Audi 5000, well said.

     
  • posted at 2:55 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    An effective weight-loss program accurately targets the area of fat and flab. In LUSD's case, the fat is at the administrative level and not at the classroom/student level. What if we cut one Superintendent position? With salary, expense account, and benefits, that would pretty much take care of the proposed cut. If that's not enough, cut another Superintendent position. They wouldn't be missed as they have no direct connection with the classroom and students.

     
  • posted at 2:51 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    Senior projects are a joke. If a kid can do the paper the night before and still pass, this was not a stretch.Cut nurses, if you have a student that is sick at the highschool they make you or an adult stay up there with them anyway.Cut the FAT, at the DO!!!Some cuts need to be made, stop buying new curriculum all the time. Cut discretionary spending by the DO. Salaries at the DO need to be looked at closely, they are not at school getting their hands dirty.

     
  • posted at 2:47 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    Most students do their senior projects at the very last possible moment. It is not this amazing project that make the students so much better. They do not keep kids focused in school.and why do we need aperson to sit in an office all day making a 6 figure salary, when the students' education they "care so much about" is being jeopordized? if they really cared about the kids, they wouldnt ask for 6 digits and keep that money in shop classes at Tokay or Drafting classes at Lodi. These are the things that keep kids coming to school. NotSr.Project.

     
  • posted at 1:43 am on Thu, May 1, 2008.

    Posts:

    Yes, cut the Associate Supers position. Plus cut the Vine Street Office's supplies. And stop allowing the district to buy school supplies at a volume discount, then turn around and sell them back to the school site a retail, or higher price. How much money are they making off the schools with that trick? This needs to be investigated.

     
Readers Choice Awards 2014

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists