Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Delta mulls response to grand jury report

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Monday, July 14, 2008 10:00 pm

Paul Fairbrook had one suggestion for how the San Joaquin Delta College Board of Trustees could respond to a critical report by the San Joaquin County Grand Jury.

"I think you should apologize to the citizens of Stockton for allowing this to happen," he told the board during a board meeting Monday.

Trustees had gathered to discuss their response to the jury's report that lambasted them for wasting millions of taxpayer dollars and violating the Brown Act.

The allegations stem from the school's $250 million Measure L bonds. Numerous delays and cost overruns have plauged many of the bond projects, most notably at the Mountain House campus project where costs have grown past $55 million.

Fairbrook, who was Delta's interim food services director in 1997 and a former commissioner for the Port of Stockton, said he remembered controversy gripped the port commission in the '70s. He said those commissioners had to be thrown out of office then and the same should be applied to Delta's board today.

Trustees said drafting a response to the jury's report will take several days and they were not prepared to answer each claim made in the jury's report.

"I don't think we have had time to sit here and answer each one," Trustee Ted Simas said. "Many of the points they made are true. We know that. Some of them are not."

Matt Wetstein, Delta's interim dean of planning, research and regional education, said he was most troubled by the alleged violations of the Brown Act, the state's open meetings law.

He said the trustees need to improve how they list the topics they plan on discussing during meetings.

"For the credibility of the college you have to get better at how you agendize items," he said.

Delta college has 90 days to draft a response, which must address each point of the jury's report.

Contact City Editor Andrew Adams at andrewa@lodinews.com.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

4 comments:

  • posted at 11:24 am on Wed, Jul 16, 2008.

    Posts:

    Well you must love ineffeciency t&C. (Is that another blog name?) You have had a group that has investigated for six to twelve months, leveled charges and then leaves. How long is it going to take the new Grand Jury to get up to speed? It seems like a complete waste of time and taxpayer money.

     
  • posted at 3:41 pm on Tue, Jul 15, 2008.

    Posts:

    Observer, they don't want the gob's and WASP's to know ahead of time who to "entice". Who knows what funny little events could take place during that interim time? No wonder you don't get it.

     
  • posted at 11:37 am on Tue, Jul 15, 2008.

    Posts:

    One thing I never quite understood. The Grand Jury issues their year-end report and then disbands and a new Grand Jury is appointed. Any response required by a Grand Jury report goes to the newly appointed Grand Jury who has no little or no background. Doesn't make any sense to me. The response should go to the Grand Jury that did the investigation.

     
  • posted at 4:24 am on Tue, Jul 15, 2008.

    Posts:

    Book em, Dano! ROFLMAO 90 days and counting down.

     

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 7

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists