Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Woodbridge Irrigation District approves 13-acre land purchase

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Friday, April 8, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 9:26 am, Fri Apr 8, 2011.

The Woodbridge Irrigation District approved the purchase of nearly 13 acres of land on West Turner Road at a board meeting Thursday morning. The property, formerly home to Mainland Nursery, has been vacant for several years after the nursery went bankrupt, said Andy Christensen, general manager for WID in a phone call after the meeting. Mainland Nursery still operates a location on Armstrong Road.

The district will use the property as storage space for its machinery and equipment and will maintain three to four of the structures on site. However, the plastic buildings formerly used to grow items for the nursery will be removed, Christensen said.

Subscription Required

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

You must login to view the full content on this page.

Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

9 comments:

  • Patrick W Maple posted at 5:04 pm on Sat, Apr 9, 2011.

    Pat Maple Posts: 1805

    Never said it was mismanagement...just poor. Adding 10-12 people to do the same job 5 or 6 did seems a bit much. I agree with Mr C also...that is a lot of money for 13 acres. The other fish screens required even more maintenance. Just a question...and another observation.

     
  • Doug Chaney posted at 11:23 am on Sat, Apr 9, 2011.

    Doug Chaney Posts: 1232

    Again, what justifies $460K for less than 13 acres? That land is worth $35K plus an acre? I suspect that someone very well-connected or a local good old boy was the recipient of this "sale"? Did F&M bank make an actual real time appraisal before WID spent taxpayers' money in such a careless manner?

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 10:59 am on Sat, Apr 9, 2011.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2830

    Pat,

    How can the more efficient Dam that probably requires more people to maintain be a government boondoggle? I really don't see where adding 10 more employees in the stretch of 50 years can be considered mismanagement.

     
  • Brian Dockter posted at 10:52 am on Sat, Apr 9, 2011.

    Brian Dockter Posts: 2830

    I remember when there wasn't a fence around the area of the fish screens. Friends and I used to catch small trout at the river side of the fish screens and then leave them on the line and go to the river to catch bass. And the days of watching people try to snag salmon in the fish ladders at the old dam before it was fenced off.

     
  • Patrick W Maple posted at 11:09 am on Fri, Apr 8, 2011.

    Pat Maple Posts: 1805

    Oh yeah...we also got to play in their cement pond and before they put in the fish screens you could actually catch fish in the canal...especially when they let the water out of the dam...I liked the old dam better too.

     
  • Patrick W Maple posted at 11:04 am on Fri, Apr 8, 2011.

    Pat Maple Posts: 1805

    Well Darrell...I probably should know more...but here is how I believe it works. The WID supplies water to farmers for their grapes and some other crops and dairies. The farmers pay for the water. My question is why does it take 15 people or more to run the basically same system that has been in place for over 50 years that was ran by 5 or 6 people. I seems to me to have become another government boondoggle.

    By the way I must thank them for being good neighbors and supplying us with a place to swim in the summer.

     
  • Joe Baxter posted at 11:01 am on Fri, Apr 8, 2011.

    Joe Baxter Posts: 1845

    Every government agency that has figured out how to increase the influx of cash expands accordingly. Not necessarily because the NEED to, more like the have the financial ability to do so. This kind of reminds me of the "goldfish principle". The larger the fish bowl, the bigger the fish grow. Waste? Yep, no doubt.

     
  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 9:34 am on Fri, Apr 8, 2011.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Pat... I have a question. Has there been a dramatic increase in revenue, responsibility and employees that would justify the expense and actions taken? If so, where is the money coming from? Why do they need so much office space? What increase in responsibilities do they have that would require hiring more employees?

     
  • Patrick W Maple posted at 7:00 am on Fri, Apr 8, 2011.

    Pat Maple Posts: 1805

    How is it that Bud Cash, Bob Welsh, Johnny Lowery and a couple of other workers along with their lone secretary could manage the irrigation district's canals, dams and watergates for 45 years without many hitches? We have lived next door to the irrigation facilities since the 40's and use to use the field across the canal for clod fights with the Christy boys, McGarrahs and Turner kids. How has it become this conglomeration?

     
Readers Choice Awards 2014

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists