default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Man bit in face by Lodi police dog files suit against city, six officers

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, April 9, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 9:06 am, Sat Apr 9, 2011.

A man who was bit in the face by a police dog is suing the city of Lodi and six Lodi Police officers in federal court.

Dean Newhall suffered torn flesh, crushed tissue, punctures and severe nerve damage after a police dog bit him last April.

Subscription Required

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?



You must login to view the full content on this page.

Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?



More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 8:06 pm on Mon, Apr 11, 2011.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Charles stated...The fact that the dog was "retired soon after altercation" shows that the Dept. knew he was not acting with accordance with his responsibilities...

    I think a reasonable person could easily draw the conclusion Charles did. I think a prudent person would look at all the possibilities prior to drawing a conclusion. There are other possibilities in my opinion.

  • Charles Nelson posted at 7:36 pm on Mon, Apr 11, 2011.

    Charles Nelson Posts: 259

    The fact that the dog was "retired soon after altercation" shows that the Dept. knew he was not acting with accordance with his responsibilities. There's no excuse to attack a cuffed perp,who was in custody, and on the ground. An officer should ONLY be able to act in self-defense. It's not the place of Police Officers to dole out punishment of any kind. That's what the courts are for.

  • Carina Nava posted at 2:37 pm on Mon, Apr 11, 2011.

    Carina Nava Posts: 1

    It seems like this is a trend for Lodi K-9s. This didnt come out in the newspaper but a few years ago a neighbor of a policeman was crossing the street to get his mail and the police dog got loose and attacked him while he was crossing the street.

  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 1:34 pm on Mon, Apr 11, 2011.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    But for his bad behavior and actions he took, he would not have a scar... If he has a right to sue, the law should be changed... I think it more the officers should be able to sue him for emotional distress in having to engage in solving the problem this man created. Thank you for naming the lawyer, its good to know who to avoid... I am sure if I stay away from lawyers chasing ambulances, Ill never run into him.

  • Robert Jacobs posted at 11:55 am on Mon, Apr 11, 2011.

    Robert Jacobs Posts: 298

    His attorney, Russell Humphrey, said his client filed the lawsuit because he was in custody and on the ground, handcuffed, when the police dog bit him in the face.

    If the above is true, than this guy has every right to sue. That dog should be controlled at all times, just the fact that the dog jumped out of the cruiser and bit this guy says to me the dog wasn't trained right or is too aggressive!

    Of course even if this is proved and it happened like this guys lawyer says it did, and if the city loses a civil this civil suit, not one of those officers will face any kind of consequence because of it. Because law enforcement are rarely held accountable for their actions.

    I'll keep an eye on this case, that is if the media even reports on this again which many times is the case where law enforcement is concerned.

  • Betty Dean posted at 10:52 am on Mon, Apr 11, 2011.

    Betty Dean Posts: 144

    I agree with all of your posts and he probably wont win in court because they will settle with him before it actually goes to court. Then he will have lots of money while he is in jail and money when he gets out! Now isnt that nice : )

  • Linda Evans posted at 6:00 pm on Sat, Apr 9, 2011.

    Linda Evans Posts: 16

    Police dog brutality!

  • Robert Walker posted at 3:10 pm on Sat, Apr 9, 2011.

    Robert Walker Posts: 10

    What I find interesting is that the dog attacked after Newhall was in handcuffs. Newhall's attorney is giving out the whole victim mentality on this. If Newhall was on drugs and out of his mind, whose to say he didn't continue fighting while handcuffed and on the ground. Maybe the K9 went into protection mode for his handler who was said to have been at the suspects legs "searching" him. Sure Newhall may have stopped for a moment but what if he started back up due to the police trying to search him. Just a thought for anyone looking to join Newhall's side. Mr. Newhall should do something good with his life and go show his scar at high schools in corollation with DARE programs. Maybe his experience could change the course of some young person's life. Just a thought for Mr. Newhall if he happens to read this.

  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 11:09 am on Sat, Apr 9, 2011.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Mr Adams... you said it so well... nothing more to say... except I'm surprised that the lawyer did not serve papers on the police dog as well. This lawyer is as bad as the defendant.

  • Kevin Paglia posted at 10:51 am on Sat, Apr 9, 2011.

    Kevin Paglia Posts: 2348

    I guess Mr. Newhall wasn't so concerned with other peoples safty when he was attacking the police officer with a baton. Imagine the scar Mr. Newhall would have left on the officer if he had been successful in HIS attack. For some reason I don't think he is the kind that would have stopped swinging when the officer was down either.

  • Richard Turner posted at 9:26 am on Sat, Apr 9, 2011.

    Richard Turner Posts: 80

    This man had been at Lawrence park ....that place is so out of hand, I live very close and every day there is a large group of people ...some homeless some not ...doing drugs right in plain view of everyone! they get drunk and fight and use the public bathroom to shoot up. there is a group of people who bring food and supply's to these people every week and I know they mean well ,but it just draws more people to the park .The salvation army doesn't allow people to be drunk or unruly. so when you offer up a place that is uncontrolled you get a result such as lawrance park. with the large number of children that walk to and from school ,you would think something would be done. It probably will be addressed only after something really bad happens to someone that lives on the other side of town.

  • Laura Rouzer posted at 8:32 am on Sat, Apr 9, 2011.

    Laura Rouzer Posts: 57

    I agree with you Mr. Adams.

    If he is so concerned with how the scar is going to affect his future role as a model citizen then maybe it will serve as a reminder to quit drugs...doubtful though if there is a payout.

  • Henry Adams posted at 4:43 am on Sat, Apr 9, 2011.

    Henry Adams Posts: 6

    Play stupid games...
    ...Win stupid prizes

    It amazes me how people fail to take responsibility for their own actions.

    "With a 12-inch scar on your face for the rest of your life, it's going to affect your mental health, relationships and even the ability to get a job," Humphrey said.




Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Featured Events


Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists