Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Justice says state's reviews of death sentences dysfunctional

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, January 10, 2008 10:00 pm

California's chief justice on Thursday said the state Supreme Court is being overwhelmed by reviews of death penalty cases and wants the process modified through a constitutional amendment.

Chief Justice Ronald George said the state's process for reviewing death sentences is dysfunctional, forcing years of delays before cases are fully reviewed and convicts are executed.

He proposed changing California's constitutional requirement that the state Supreme Court directly review all death sentences. Under his proposal, the justices would send most death sentence appeals to appellate courts instead of hearing the cases themselves.

They would keep only those cases that require a quick decision or would set precedent for large numbers of condemned inmates, while retaining the right to review any appellate court's decision.

The court receives between 25 and 40 death penalty cases a year and would transfer up to 30 to the appeals court, George said.

"Thoughtful individuals on both sides of the death penalty debate should be able to agree on one thing: The existing system for handling capital appeals in California is dysfunctional and needs reform," George told the California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice.

Death penalty appeals account for nearly 25 percent of the roughly 120 opinions the high court issues each year. That is up from less than 10 percent a few decades ago, George said.

San Joaquin County sends convicts to death row virtually every year, and the case getting the most attention in the last couple years is Michael Angelo Morales.
He has been behind bars since the January 1981 rape and murder of 17-year-old Terri Lynn Winchell, a Tokay High School senior, and he was almost executed in February 2006. Citing concerns that California's lethal injection process might not be painless, and thus violate Constitutional rights against cruel and unusual punishment, a judge halted the proceedings.
California's lethal injection procedures are now being revamped, but the state is also watching a U.S. Supreme Court case concerning the same protocol. The Court heard arguments on the matter Monday and is expected to issue an opinion by this summer.
Chief Justice Ronald George's suggestion to change California's death penalty appeal process won't affect Morales. His case had been reviewed by all courts and the only remaining matter is the lethal injection issue.
- News-Sentinel staff.

The increase is interfering with the seven justices' primary mission, which is to interpret the law in the nation's largest state court system, he said. It also is compounding a yearlong backlog of death penalty appeals.

"I view this as a real crisis," George said. "We either become totally a death penalty court, do nothing else … or we just resign ourselves to the fact that the backlog is just going to become worse and worse and worse."

California has the nation's largest death row, with 670 condemned prisoners. The appeals process typically drags out for 20 years or more.

Thursday's hearing was the first of three the commission plans over the next three months as it considers whether California's death penalty system is fair and can be improved.

George said he hopes the commission will recommend that legislators put his proposal on the November ballot.

"If you're going to have a death penalty, it should be one that functions," George told reporters outside the hearing.

State Assemblyman Todd Spitzer, R-Orange, said he doubts George's proposal can get the two-thirds vote from lawmakers that would be needed to put the measure before voters.

Many lawmakers who oppose the death penalty are happy with state and federal judicial delays that have led to a virtual moratorium on executions, he said. That could force supporters to seek a ballot initiative to bypass reluctant lawmakers, Spitzer said.

"He's virtually screaming for some relief to be able to properly review death penalty appeals in California," Spitzer said.

Natasha Minsker, death penalty policy director for the American Civil Liberties Union, said the answer isn't to merely add another layer of judicial review.

"It's just a shell game. It doesn't fix the core problem," Minsker said outside the hearing.

California's protracted appellate process, designed to prevent execution of convicts who might actually be innocent, is so expensive and unwieldy that it isn't worth the money, particularly as the state struggles with a massive budget deficit, she said.

"Sentencing people to die in prison (life sentences without parole) is a cheaper and more affordable alternative," Minsker said.

© 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 98

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists