default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Citizen watchdog John Slaughterback keeps an eye on Lodi water projects

He attends every Lodi City Council meeting, studies agenda

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

John Slaughterback

Posted: Saturday, August 3, 2013 12:00 am

The city of Lodi has a citizen watchdog, and he’s trying his best to keep sewer and water prices low. John Slaughterback, a white-haired man in his 70s, has made a ritual of checking in on the Lodi City Council, especially when it comes to items that he thinks could raise water and sewer rates in the future.

He retired 20 years ago from the now-defunct sugar processing plant in Clarksburg, and started tracking the goings-on of city government when he lived in Galt. Two years ago, he moved to Lodi for health reasons and kept up the habit.

“I realized there were a lot of problems and I started watching things. When I came here, I wanted to see what Lodi was doing,” he said.

Every Friday morning, Slaughterback logs on to the city’s website to look up the city council agenda. He keeps his eye out for any projects related to water or sewers, or that appear to have high costs. Slaughterback writes up his thoughts on the item, then makes sure he’s sitting in the audience of the City Council meeting the following Wednesday to make his voice heard.

Most recently, he’s been concerned about a project to inspect and maintain 24 generators related to the city’s well system. There are two large generators, and the other 22 are in storage as backups to run the well pumps. The city council approved awarding a $118,000 contract for the project to Holt of California in West Sacramento on July 17; it was the only company to bid on the project.

Slaughterback could not understand why the city would pay so much to a company based an hour away, when engineers and mechanics are already on the city’s payroll.

Slaughterback’s questioning inspired Councilman Bob Johnson to request a report in June on whether city staff could get the work done.

The city did report that they have workers on staff with the necessary skills to inspect the generators, though the skills are spread around three people. But Public Works Director Wally Sandelin said there was one employee at Holt of California with all the necessary engineering and mechanic skills to get it done himself.

Slaughterback didn’t buy it.

“They kept pushing how complicated the work was,” said Slaughterback. “How much of a problem do we really have if the generators are in storage?”

If the contract went outside the city, Slaughterback feared the company in question would use the entire amount of funding allotted, rather than trying to keep costs low.

But it’s a state law that keeps city projects going to contractors far and wide. California contracts code requires that any projects over $5,000 must be advertised out to all potential bidders. Then, save for a few exceptions, the project must go to the lowest bidder. Even if that’s someone from Sacramento instead of the Central Valley.

This rule goes for any Public Works projects, such as streets, levees, sewerlines or sidewalks, said City Attorney Steve Schwabauer.

In the case of the generators, only one company bid on the projects.

“It went out to multiple vendors. They followed all of the legal requirements,” Schwabauer said. “It’s not unheard of for only one contractor to respond.”

But Slaughterback’s comments prompted one member of the city council to take a closer look.

Councilwoman JoAnne Mounce reviewed the list of those who were notified of the contract, and was satisfied with the number of groups on it.

Mounce agrees with Slaughterback’s efforts to keep costs low, but says that can sometimes be achieved by seeking out more bids than what’s required.

“I’m a fan of doing more than just a minimum. On certain projects, we’re doing just the minimum,” she said. “There are times we could throw the net out further than we do.”

At the July 17 meeting and other times Slaughterback has appeared before the city council, Mounce thanked him for his diligence.

“Lodi’s very fortunate we have someone vocally paying attention to what the council is doing,” she said, adding that other meeting regulars and viewers at home send her weekly emails to share their thoughts on the agenda and council decisions. “With people out there watching, paying attention and asking questions, we have a healthier city.”

Slaughterback is disappointed that the council approved awarding the projects to outside groups, and is keeping a lookout for the next item with a high pricetag.

He’s concerned about water and sewer projects because he says that overspending now leads to raising citizens’ rates later.

“I’m going to be here to look back at all this when they come back at us with rate increases,” he said.

Contact reporter Sara Jane Pohlman at sarap@lodinews.com.

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • Doug Chaney posted at 6:58 am on Sun, Aug 4, 2013.

    advocate Posts: 499

    Mr. Slaughterback, It is just the inner workings of a dysfunctional public works director and the three amigos on city council with the three determining votes that decide ALL issues in Lodi. It appears that which ever contractor lines fhose council reps pockets are the ones who will get the contract. What was the final cost of the unnecessary and unneeded water treatment plant? And how much of that bond money was spent on other projects such as water meters, streets, sidewalks and miscellaneous and charged off to the unnecessary and unneeded water treatment plant? These are questions that always seem to be avoided? Why?



Popular Stories


Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 37


Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists