default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Cutting off electricity theft in Lodi

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, May 5, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 6:09 am, Fri May 6, 2011.

It starts with a power cord fed under the fence into a neighbor’s backyard. Or a resident tampers with their meter box or electrical panel and bypasses the shut-off measures.

The outcome is electricity theft that results in other ratepayers picking up the tab — and more importantly, is a public safety hazard, city spokesman Jeff Hood said.

Subscription Required

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?



You must login to view the full content on this page.

Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?



More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • roy bitz posted at 10:04 pm on Thu, May 5, 2011.

    roy bitz Posts: 503

    I would like to see more give and take on this matter.
    Does it makes good business sense to "dedicate" ( I hope this does not mean hire) a full time and a part time position to deal with this problem?
    If the city is planning to re-assign current employees to deal with this matter--does this mean these employees were not needed in the first place?
    If the city is hiring additional personnel to deal with this problem will these people be able to resolve the problem on a cost effective basis?
    If the city has done the homework and determined this a good value for rate payers--I am in support. of "dedicating" a full time and a part time position to deal with it.
    If not----I am opposed. Very simple!

  • Doug Chaney posted at 11:31 am on Thu, May 5, 2011.

    Doug Chaney Posts: 1232

    Mr. Hood, wouldn't the same apply to water thieves? I see a large semi trailer up on legs at the west end of the Reynolds Ranc project, off Harney, 5000 gallons or so, that's hooked up to a city fire hydrant with no water meter/backflow/check valve setup that could possibly contaminate the underground water supply without some type of check valve/backflow setup. Do they pay for their water or does the developer/contractor get it free gratis from Lodi ratepayers?

  • Doug Chaney posted at 9:48 am on Thu, May 5, 2011.

    Doug Chaney Posts: 1232

    Mr. Lechner, would it be yourself that gets paid overtime for those "random hours", I assume overtime since most don't use lights during LEUD regular hours, to play detective to catch those who are in violation? I would think since the Community Improvement Division issues the citations that thry should be the department to verify those infractions. LEUD is too full of management and staff, as from my internet research of LEUD and the NCPA, it appears that the NCPA seems to be calling the shots for LEUD through Larry Hansen, who is also chairman of the board of this dysfunctional and costly group, and LEUD management merely utilizes suggestions and orders from this organization. It was between Larry Hansen and the NCPA back in 2005 or so that were assumed responsible for buying the spot power that dropped half of its value soon after that nearly bankrypted LEUD and left the utility nearly $200,000,000 in debt and dropped their credit rating down several brackets, there causing ratepayers of LEUD being forced to pay absurd electric rates and that instituted "ECA cost adjustment" that we still pay today, which is nothing more than an adjustment that guarantees that LEUD and NCPA profit neatly no matter how the electric supply market adjusts, to avoid another catastrophy like the one in 2005. Now, with a "member of the NCPA family" as director and Larry Hansen as chairman of the NCPA board, Lodians continue to pay some of the highest residential rates in the nation. Last time I checked the average nationwide cost per KWH, .095, ours here in Lodi is .142 baseline, .145 over and another .0017 for cost adjustment. That's nearly .05 kwh more than the national average. With the new Lodi energy center, those costs are surely going to rise significantly and the major benefactor will be the NCPA, who apparently will be owner-operator. Management, staff and unneeded programs for large businesses need to be cutback in favor of residential cutbacks and more hands on field employees and residential solar rebates and systems.

  • roy bitz posted at 8:43 am on Thu, May 5, 2011.

    roy bitz Posts: 503

    This article says the city is "dedicating" a full time and a part time position to address electricity theft---that while most of the $500,000 annually written off is due to non payment of bills, some of it is due to theft.
    Hopefully, "dedicating" a full time and a part time employee to resolving theft, will be a good investment of resources.

  • Joe Baxter posted at 8:21 am on Thu, May 5, 2011.

    Joe Baxter Posts: 1913

    I would rather imagine people who steal electricity could care less about their own safety or the safety of anyone else.

  • Robert Jacobs posted at 6:13 am on Thu, May 5, 2011.

    Robert Jacobs Posts: 298

    The CEO could take a 50% cut in pay each year. The board members could take a 50% cut in pay. And you could cut your workers pay about 10% annually and stop all overtime pay from now until the end of time!

    These things would not only help with those who steal electricity but would also help reduce cost overall and then you could start issuing refund checks to your customers.

    There you go problem solved...



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists