default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

City of Lodi in midst of negotiations with almost all of its unions

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, December 17, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 7:12 am, Sat Dec 17, 2011.

The city of Lodi is in the middle of negotiations with nine of its 10 bargaining groups to reach new contracts before they expire on Dec. 31.

The city planned for all of the contracts to come due at the same time, city spokesman Jeff Hood said. The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers is the only union not negotiating because their contract does not end until 2013.

Subscription Required

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?



You must login to view the full content on this page.

Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?



More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • roy bitz posted at 9:13 pm on Sun, Dec 18, 2011.

    roy bitz Posts: 503

    Thanks for clarifying Darrell.
    I continue my drum beat on the surface water treatment project because it is so outrageous---so much money for virtually no benefit to rate payers.
    I do this hoping certain city council members will realize this was a bad idea and learn to make better decisions in the future.
    As to negotiations between the city and city employee unions--no doubt in my mind that total compensation is unrealistic and unsustainable.
    I believe we have too many city employees---too many city vehicles--too many city facilities and generally too many city functions that could be handled better by private sector companies bidding competitively for the services provided by city entities---painting, street sweeping---whatever. I believe competing private enterprises can provide the necessary services and at a much lower cost than what we now have.

  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 11:47 am on Sun, Dec 18, 2011.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Roy stated....Darrell--- How would the elimination of wasteful spending become a recipe for future economic problems?

    Sorry I was unclear Roy. I was agreeing with you that wasteful spending like you identified is a big problem. However, the decision however, has already been implemented and is a matter of history. The wage and benefit situation is history as well as too much has been promised and cannot possibly be supported. For the unions to ignore that they negotiated the current salary and benefits based on predictions of very high tax revenue that turned out to be false, is in my mind, a recipe for future economic problems? It is not fair to the tax payer.

  • roy bitz posted at 9:32 am on Sun, Dec 18, 2011.

    roy bitz Posts: 503

    How would the elimination of wasteful spending become a recipe for future economic problems?
    I believe the council's spending on this project sends a very wrong message---that concessions from employees are necessary because we choose to borrow tens of millions to fund this bridge to nowhere---regardless of current economic conditions.

  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 3:51 am on Sun, Dec 18, 2011.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    Very good point Roy concerning wasteful spending. However, it is a recipe for future economic problems. Two wrongs do not make a right.

  • roy bitz posted at 8:47 pm on Sat, Dec 17, 2011.

    roy bitz Posts: 503

    Maybe if the city council spent tax payer money more prudently, city employees would be willing to make more concessions.
    Here is what I am talking about:
    Three council gentlemen recently committed rate payers to a fund a massive surface water treatment plant. The council constantly whines about the difficult economic times and still hands rate payers a bill for abouit six million dollars a year to pay for a plant we do not need now, or in the foreseeable future
    This project will do virtually nothing to preserve our ground water anyade the quality of our drinking water.
    If I were a union negotiater I would ignore the city's "needs" for concessions as long as the three council gentlemen spend spend spend on pet projects such as this.

  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 5:33 am on Sat, Dec 17, 2011.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9405

    "Will we try to negotiate that? I don't know," Johnson said.

    and..."I do think that the majority of our bargaining units recognize there is an issue

    Sounds to me like the relationship between the unions and the city are very cozy and close. I would expect the city to be firm and demand maximum reductions to make the budget work without having to have lay offs. Who cares if they go on strike? This is not business as usual. Maybe the city needs a new team to represent the taxpayers interests.



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists