default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

San Joaquin County Grand Jury grills Woodbridge Sanitary District

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, June 8, 2011 11:01 am | Updated: 9:49 am, Thu Jun 23, 2011.

The San Joaquin County Grand Jury has accused the Woodbridge Sanitary District of a litany of improprieties in its operations.

The small district, which provides sewer service to Woodbridge, has allegedly committed payroll fraud, fiscal mismanagement, falsified state water records, harassed employees, used nepotism and favoritism, failed to adequately train employees and lacked board polices and procedures, according to a grand jury report issued on Wednesday.

The sanitary district board has already corrected some of the issues that were cited, according to the grand jury report. They include approving the purchase of an employee time clock and developing job descriptions, credit card policies and a personnel manual.

Nevertheless, the grand jury didn’t mince its words.

“The poor management and board oversight does not merit the public’s trust,” the report reads. “The board is doing a disservice to constituents by the lack of policy and procedures, which limits transparency of policy and fiscal decisions.

“Board members are poorly informed or do not take seriously their policy and fiduciary responsibilities, prudent fiscal stewardship and accountability, planning responsibilities or oversight of effective management,” according to the report.

The grand jury maintains that it is vitally important for Woodbridge residents to become more involved in the sanitary board’s decisions.

Members of a grand jury committee attended several Woodbridge Sanitary District board meetings, interviewed all five elected board members, General Manager Luis Ching, employees, former employees, the State Water Resources Control Board compliance investigators and those who filed the original complaint to the grand jury.

Jurors said they reviewed more than 1,000 pages of documentation, including board agendas, minutes, time sheets, purchase orders, credit card statements, audit findings and State Water Resources Control Board regulations.

Board President Doug Colucci declined to comment on the report, deferring inquiries to attorney Mia Brown, who represents the district.

Brown said she can’t comment on the allegations at this time, but the district has already been working with the grand jury on some of its findings.

“It is what it is, unfortunately,” Brown said about the report.

Woodbridge resident Mary Avanti said she wasn’t surprised about the grand jury’s findings.

“I think they nailed it,” said Avanti, who attends sanitary board meetings on a regular basis. “I feel vindicated. We’re taking ratepayers’ money, and we’re throwing it away.”

The sanitary district board of directors is required to respond to the allegations in writing to the presiding Superior Court judge by Sept. 20.

Contact reporter Ross Farrow at rossf@lodinews.com.

More about

More about

More about

Reference Links

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • Dave Christy posted at 8:12 am on Thu, Jun 9, 2011.

    Dave Christy Posts: 27

    Fraud, fiscal mismanagement, falsified records,, lack of policies and procedures, sounds to me that they are right on par with all Government operations. The Grand Jury is starting at the very bottom, they're going to be very busy.

  • Josh Morgan posted at 3:54 pm on Wed, Jun 8, 2011.

    Josh Morgan Posts: 529

    Just wait until they get done with the San Joaquin Water District.

  • Doug Chaney posted at 3:20 pm on Wed, Jun 8, 2011.

    Doug Chaney Posts: 1232

    I'd hope the free spending Woodbridge Irrigation District would be next. Aren't both entities basically controlled by the local wealthy, greedy good old boys? For such a tiny district with few employees, why such a large new office building? And the recent purchase of land by one of these entities? Woodbridge is a wealthy little town controlled by the local, wealthy interests with no oversight at all and greed seems to be the motivating factor driving this rich community.



Popular Stories



Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists