Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Galt to lose millions if it does not keep redevelopment agency

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, July 21, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 6:09 am, Thu Jul 21, 2011.

A petition filed by two groups against the state of California for unconstitutionally influencing the elimination of redevelopment agencies could possibly be a major player in whether Galt is able to move forward with its Old Town building projects.

Galt has had to halt its Old Town Relocation Project due to the fact that two trailer bills in the state budget prohibit cities from using their redevelopment agencies for building projects unless cities first pay the government a specified amount of money to keep the agency open.

Subscription Required

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

You must login to view the full content on this page.

Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

4 comments:

  • Doug Chaney posted at 8:22 pm on Thu, Jul 21, 2011.

    Doug Chaney Posts: 1232

    It will be a problem for little towns like Galt to come up with a million cash when they are already living off borrowwed money. Unless they're like livable, lovable Lodi who has a garbage company that "donated" a million bucks to them. But the payback was a seven year extension on the garbage contract with no worries about having someone coming in with a bid for probably half what they charge. The three amigos are shrewd businessmen, but lousy councilmen that represent themselves and not the taxpayers and voters of Lodi, IMO. Galt would be very hard pressed to come up with that amount of money on a moments notice.

     
  • Jackson Scott posted at 5:07 pm on Thu, Jul 21, 2011.

    Jackson Scott Posts: 386

    Davis is paying the State about $3M and keeping $8M. Otherwise they lose it all.

    Doug, think outside the box.

     
  • Josh Morgan posted at 1:34 pm on Thu, Jul 21, 2011.

    Josh Morgan Posts: 533

    Let me think about this for one millisecond........invest $1 million and a return of $9 million.

     
  • Doug Chaney posted at 12:05 pm on Thu, Jul 21, 2011.

    Doug Chaney Posts: 1232

    The thing that would concern me is the fact that if Galt decides to pay and the budget deficit doesn't improve soon, which many finance and economy experts predict may drag on for years, that the state politicians won't dump redevelopment altogether and keep Galt's money anyway?

     
Readers Choice Awards 2014

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Featured Events

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists