default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

North San Joaquin Water Conservation District moves closer to grant project

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 12:00 am | Updated: 7:54 am, Thu Sep 1, 2011.

Specifics of a grant project for the North San Joaquin Water Conservation District are progressing and a final proposal could be available in the coming weeks. However, a decision must be made soon because the deadline to secure funding is approaching.

The Tracy Lake project, a proposal from area growers to fill a temporary lake with water and draw from it throughout the year, was discussed by directors for the district on Monday evening.

The district was awarded a $300,000 grant for the project in June and is determining if it will accept the money. It has until the end of September to finalize engineering documents, environmental reports and funding specifics for the project. To help support the project, the board is considering creating an improvement district, which would require the beneficiaries of the project to foot the cost. If successful, it could secure operations for the district, which has struggled to obtain funding in recent years, supporters say.

“If you can do this, it forms a financing model,” said Jennifer Spaletta, an attorney for Herum Crabtree, a law firm representing the landowners supporting the project. “If this falls apart, it’s very bad.”

To move the project forward, the board voted 3-1 to waive its standard bidding process for engineering and California Environmental Quality Act work.

“Since the Franzias are paying for the bids themselves, it doesn’t need to be opened up to bid,” said Director Joe Petersen.

If the district accepts the project, construction firms will be able to place written bids.

Directors Petersen, Mark Beck and Hugh Scanlon approved the motion. Chairman Bryan Pilkington voted against the motion and Director Marden Wilbur was absent from Monday’s meeting due to a prior commitment.

Beck and Scanlon sit on a steering committee for the project and will continue to meet with the players of the deal in the coming days. They will report to the board in mid-September.

The district’s next meeting will take place Sept. 15 at 6 p.m. at a location to be determined.

Contact reporter Jordan Guinn at jordang@lodinews.com.

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • phillip montgomery posted at 9:46 pm on Tue, Aug 30, 2011.

    phillip montgomery Posts: 8

    Mr. Pilkington, if your purpose in heading this board was to disillusion and frustrate the actual constituents who give a crap about this district and its water rights, job well done. Your blatant obstructionism and fillibustering attempts to keep anything productive from happening on this board are also keeping citizens like myself from actually caring any more. I have become so frustrated by you and your puppets attempts to discredit and break this water district that I finally threw in the towel. Job well done, I don't care anymore and I hope the state does come in and take our water rights. They couldn't so a worse job than you so what do I have to lose?

  • mizzo roberts posted at 1:26 pm on Tue, Aug 30, 2011.

    mizzo roberts Posts: 59

    Chairman Pilkington sometimes is absent. Water is important issue. He was the only negative vote, so he did not agree with the others. The water board needs to agree more often.



Popular Stories



Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists