Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

'Let it happen … I'll get over it'

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, January 17, 2008 10:00 pm

Residents of what could become an expanded flood plain zone in Woodbridge and northwest Lodi were angry at the idea of having to pay as much as $1,400 per year for flood insurance.


Connie George

"It's horrible. They're out of their frickin' mind," said Connie George, who has lived on Mosswood Drive for seven years. "We're so protected, with our parks being dug out."

George and other residents referred to nearby Peterson Park, which has playing fields below street level to collect stormwater.

But the recently released maps refer to flood areas created by a "100-year flood," which would spill over the Mokelumne River and overwhelm the city's catch basins.

Statistically speaking, a 100-year flood means that the Lodi area has a one percent chance each year to face disaster, said Steve Winkler, San Joaquin County's deputy public works director.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency drew preliminary flood plain maps that would include all of Woodbridge, plus the part of Lodi generally west of Lodi Lake, west of Mills Avenue and as far south as White Oak Way.


Cal Pitto

If the new flood plain map is approved about a year from now, homeowners could pay as much as $1,400 per year, according to FEMA regional engineer Kathy Schaefer. But if the insurance is purchased before the final map is adopted, it will be less than $800 per year, Schaefer said.

"You're protecting your family for as much (money) as your cable bill," she added.

Currently, flood insurance costs $317 per year for a $250,000 house containing $100,000 worth of contents, according to the city of Lodi and two local insurance agents.

However, homeowners who have fully paid off their residence and aren't making mortgage payments are exempt from the requirement to purchase insurance, Schaefer said.

"But we strongly encourage everyone to buy flood insurance," she said.

FEMA officials will meet on Tuesday with Lodi and Stockton city officials to determine if the boundaries are accurate, Schaefer said. Tuesday's meeting at 1 p.m. in Stockton is not a public meeting, as previously reported. A public meeting will be held at a later date.


Floodwaters overflow the banks of Lodi Lake in 1955. (Courtesy photo)

Based on information from the two cities, San Joaquin County and the public, the boundaries might change before the final map is approved a year from now, Schaefer said.

"They're draft, working maps," she said. "We want the map to be accurate."

Maps are being revised as FEMA converts its paper maps into a digital GIS format, Schaefer said. In converting the maps, she said, FEMA engineers discovered that the levees protecting northwest Lodi and Woodbridge haven't been certified by a licensed professional engineer or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. That means that FEMA has to go on the assumption that there is no levee to protect the area, Schaefer said.

Cal Pitto, who has lived on Evergreen Drive for 13 years, lives about 150 feet north of White Oak Way, so he's barely within the preliminary flood plain area.

"Man's that's hard to swallow," Pitto said. "When is this flood supposed to happen? After global warning and before the ice age?"

Pitto doesn't see how his neighborhood would flood, because it would require Camanche Dam east of Clements to break.

George, who lives on Mosswood Drive, said homeowners should be able to choose whether or not to purchase flood insurance.

A public meeting will be held at a date to be announced later. A meeting scheduled for 1 p.m. Tuesday in Stockton is a private session with the Stockton and San Joaquin County Public Works departments.
Lodi residents may submit public comments by Feb. 15 to the city's Public Works Department, 221 W. Pine St., Lodi, CA 95240.
Residents in Woodbridge and other unincorporated areas may submit comments to the San Joaquin County Public Works Department, 1810 E. Hazelton Ave., Stockton, CA 95205. Comments will be forwarded to the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
FEMA is looking for factual errors only, so people submitting comments would need to have better survey information than FEMA has, said FEMA Regional Engineer Kathy Schaefer.
"If they don't like what they see, that's another story," she said.
Source: Federal Emergency Management Agency.

"We live with or without earthquake insurance," George said. "They take away too much of our rights.

"If it goes wrong, we'll pay for it, like our fence went down," she said. "My neighbor and I are paying for it."

Two residents from northwest Lodi and one from Woodbridge were also critical of the FEMA proposal, but they declined to give their names.

Pitto said that with many homeowners already facing foreclosures, the cost of flood insurance could force more people to sell their homes.

Ron Baldwin, who heads the county's Office of Emergency Services, admits that FEMA's maps are somewhat arbitrary when it comes to drawing the line at White Oak Way.

"This is somewhat of an academic exercise," said Baldwin, who says that his office has nothing to do with FEMA or the flood plain map.

Pitto and other residents say they're not concerned about a catastrophic flood hitting the Lodi area.

"If it happens, frickin' let it happen," Pitto said. "I'll get over it."

Contact reporter Ross Farrow at rossf@lodinews.com.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

6 comments:

  • posted at 7:39 am on Fri, Jan 18, 2008.

    Posts:

    I did buy my flood insurance today. I was told the maximum amount you can insure is $250,000 plus $100,000 contents eventhough my home is appraised at $425,000. It cost #317 and I must wait 30 days for it to go into effect. If the flood plane is changed I was told the cost would go up to around $500.

     
  • posted at 4:31 am on Fri, Jan 18, 2008.

    Posts:

    "However, homeowners who have fully paid off their residence and aren't making mortgage payments are exempt from the requirement to purchase insurance, Schaefer said." Let me get this right, homeowners *only* have to pay for flood insurance as long as the BANK has a stake in their property; is that it? Sounds like a SCAM to me. With all of the so-called insurance premiums constantly going up; while the "insured" has to fight like he's pulling teeth to get a claim honored, maybe it's time to take another look at the insurance industry - ALL the areas that "insurance" covers because, it seems to me, that the only people who are "covered" by insurance are those who work for the insurance companies.

     
  • posted at 4:16 am on Fri, Jan 18, 2008.

    Posts:

    If there is a 1% chance of a devastating earthquake (or any other natural disaster for that matter) doing the same kind of damage, then why are we not forced to purchase earthquake/tornado/typhoon/godzilla damage ?

     
  • posted at 3:21 am on Fri, Jan 18, 2008.

    Posts:

    Educator, you are 110% right. But we're dealing with BIG Government. Of course you and I, the middle class taxpayer, will get the shaft. Right now I just glad I didn't buy in Park West.

     
  • posted at 3:04 am on Fri, Jan 18, 2008.

    Posts:

    As taxpayers under the FEMA program you end up paying for uninsured and other losses in other parts of the country. Recall the floods along the Mississippi
    years ago or more locally the annual flooding in Rio Linda. FEMA is going to cover its losses on your backs-they have already done it here in Woodland through the same gun to the head approach as they are using in this article and it hasn't flooded here since Noah. Oh yeah we get jacked on our rates each year to help cover losses like Katrina.

     
  • posted at 2:18 am on Fri, Jan 18, 2008.

    Posts:

    People should have the right to not buy flood insurance. But we as taxpayers should then not spend money to rebuild uninsured houses when they flood.

     

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 187

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists