default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Water deal in the works for Lodi

If approved, proposal could give a boost to North San Joaquin Water Conservation District

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, November 10, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 7:13 am, Sat Nov 10, 2012.

The North San Joaquin Water Conservation District is looking to sell Mokelumne River water to the city of Lodi with the help of the Woodbridge Irrigation District. If the deal goes through, it could be a big boost for North San Joaquin, which has struggled with operational and political turmoil in recent years.

In a nutshell, here is how the deal would work:

North San Joaquin has a conditional water allotment from the Mokelumne of up to 20,000 acre-feet per year. It would look to sell some of that water to Lodi, which just finished a water treatment plant adjacent to the river. Plumbing for the deal would be provided by the Woodbridge Irrigation District, which already sells surface water to Lodi and has the needed infrastructure.

NSJWCD president Joe Petersen said the deal could provide some of the money needed for his district to build the pipes and canals they need to expand their customer base.

Selling to the city would also help prove to state water officials that North San Joaquin has realistic options to use or sell the water it is allotted, he said.

"Today it might not seem so important, but in 20 years it will have been extremely important to keep that water in our community," he said.

North San Joaquin does not have the ability to send their water to the city. For that, they need help from the Woodbridge Irrigation District, which holds the key to Lodi's pipes and canals through the Woodbridge Dam.

That district was not always willing to work with North San Joaquin. Years ago, North San Joaquin filed an application with the state water board to list the Woodbridge Dam as a point of diversion for their district. Directors did not ask WID for permission. As a result, WID filed a protest with the state board, effectively blocking North San Joaquin from accessing the dam.

With a new North San Joaquin board this year, WID has agreed to withdraw that protest and serve as the conveyor for this water sale to the city.

Andy Christensen, manager of the Woodbridge Irrigation District, says that this time the board leadership is different, and WID has control over where the water goes as well as the cost of conveying the water.

Members of the WID board of directors approved a draft letter at Thursday's meeting detailing a plan for North San Joaquin to sell water to the city, using the Woodbridge Dam as their gateway. Next, that letter will go to city staff, and later be considered by the Lodi City Council.

City Attorney Steve Schwabauer said the deal is not confirmed at this point.

"This is still at the staff level," he said. "My best guess is that the water would not flow until next winter."

The water would go through the Lodi Surface Water Treatment Plant, which the city dedicated on Nov. 2. The city is currently purchasing 6,000 acre-feet of Mokelumne River water per year from the Woodbridge Irrigation District, for $1.2 million a year.

The city relies heavily on groundwater, which is being depleted faster than it can be replenished. By using more surface water, the proposed deal might allow the groundwater basin to recharged, Schwabauer said.

City staff hopes the price of the surface water will be equal to the cost of pumping the same amount of water from the wells, making the project cost-neutral.

Lodi uses 20,000 acre-feet of water a year, equal to North San Joaquin's annual wet-year allowance when the East Bay Municipal Utility District has enough water to pass it along.

The final decision will not be made until North San Joaquin has confirmed its water supply for next season. Petersen says they get water about four years out of every seven.

The amount North San Joaquin may sell to the city totals less than 5,000 acre-feet of water.

Petersen said his district is willing to find a reasonable price.

"We're not going to ask constituents of Lodi to do anything silly," he said. "I'm just excited. There's a benefit for all involved. We are not interested in competing with WID; we want to work with them in delivering water."

Contact reporter Sara Jane Pohlman at sarap@lodinews.com.

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • roy bitz posted at 9:33 am on Sun, Nov 11, 2012.

    roy bitz Posts: 489

    I know nothing about any wrongdoing at NSJWCD. I just don't think city rate payers should be forced to pay for any more surface water in order to help offset ground water overdraft.
    City rate payers are being forced ( by our city council ) to pay about five million dollars a year to pay for the 6,000 acre feet of river water and all the costs associated with the new treatment plant to process it----ALL THE COSTS--- Debt service alone is over forty million dollars over the life of this boondoggle.
    Someone please tell me I'm wrong.

  • roy bitz posted at 9:58 pm on Sat, Nov 10, 2012.

    roy bitz Posts: 489

    I believe the city should provide a detailed list of all costs associated with the surface water treatment plant ---- all the costs--- before they commit to purchase even more surface water.
    According to this article the city currently uses 20,000 acre feet of ground water annually--- about 10% of the 200,000 annual overdraft. 90% of the overdraft of our ground water happens outside the city limits and though city folks have little impact on the ground water overdraft, we are forced to pay dearly for polluted but heavily chlorinated surface water while folks outside the city continue to pump pump pump---great tasting chlorine free ground water ---unrestricted and virtually free.
    Please--- someone do a cost/benefit annalysis of the current surface water treatment project before the city buys more river water in order to save our ground water or to pay for infrastructure for NSJWCD.

  • Doug Chaney posted at 9:41 pm on Sat, Nov 10, 2012.

    advocate Posts: 499

    This dysfunctional water district, NSJWCD, that's responsible for the large part of depleting the groundwater supply shouldn't even be considered as an agency to purchase water from and every drop of water they have rights to should be used to replenish that groundwater supply, a lot of it through poor irrigation management and waste, not selling it to line the coffers of their corrupted little group of good old boys until they reveal who the culprits were who devastated this didtrict all those years and are now living comfortably. They know as well as I do who that person is and until the unaccounted for funds, no bid contracts and helping themselves embezzlers are, this still dysfunctional water district should clean their own house before asking for handouts. Of course, they probably figure that Johnson, Katzakian and Johnson, who own the three yes votes to pass anything they want, will take care of the good old boys, most of them plain old winegrape growers. I knew that eventually this unnecessary and unneeded water treatment plant would play into the hands of the NSJWCD and their band of bullies.



Popular Stories


Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 91


Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists