default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

City of Lodi plans to reduce pool hours, hike fees

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 5:58 am, Wed May 30, 2012.

In March, Mary Nester went to her doctor and received bad news: She needed to go on cholesterol medication.

Nester told her doctor to give her some time to fix the problem with exercise, and started going to the Hutchins Street Square pool about three times a week. Five weeks later, Nester was not only feeling more active, but her cholesterol was back to a good level.

"I look forward to coming," she said. "I'm so grateful for this pool."

Nester's story is common among the group of Hutchins Street Square pool users who regularly use the pool to help a variety of conditions, including arthritis and joint pain.

But the city has struggled over the years to balance the pool's budget, and this year is no exception.

For the current fiscal year, which ends June 30, the Hutchins pool cost $210,000, but there was only $65,000 in revenue, resulting in a loss of $145,000, said Jeff Hood, interim Parks, Recreation and Cultural Services director.

To help reduce the gap, Hood said the city plans to raise fees and reduce pool hours. Adult passes will increase from $3.75 per swim for a Lodi resident to $4.75. Senior and disabled prices will go from $2.50 to $3.50 for a Lodi resident.

Starting June 11, the pool will also be closed starting at 2 p.m. on Tuesday and Thursday, and will no longer be open on Saturdays. Hood said the department looked at daily attendance rates for a 10-week period and drafted five schedules before deciding on one.

"It's going to take a major change in the way we operate to make a difference in the budget. ... We simply have to take a first step," Hood said.

For the last 15 years, Lodi resident Gayle McBride has come to the Hutchins Street Square pool to cure her aches and pains. McBride worries that some people who schedule their work-outs on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday will no longer receive the benefits of the pool.

"It cuts some people totally out. The pool is primarily for people who need to keep their lives going," McBride said.

About 50 people attended a meeting with Hood last Wednesday where he gave a presentation on the pool's challenges and explained why the city was planning to reduce hours and increase fees.

Hood said the city should save between $20,000 to $25,000 with fewer hours and increase revenue by $30,000 to $35,000 with the fees.

"At least it's no longer a six-figure loss. We then will have to manage hours to make sure we are being cost-effective with our staff," Hood said.

Costs for the pool include $156,000 in part-time labor, $25,000 for heating and filtering, $3,500 in chemicals and $2,500 for janitorial services. There are also costs for administration, maintenance and finance.

When looking at the budget, Hood said the city is also expecting several repairs. The city has to spend $1,800 to repair the exterior double doors and $11,000 to repair a pipe for the heating, ventilation and air conditioning system that was damaged by copper thieves. The biggest item will be $50,000 to repair the 24-year-old pool lining, which is failing, Hood said.

Dee Phillips has used the pool for the last 21 years because she has three prostheses, and a doctor recommended she start swimming. She said many of the swimmers are worried the cuts are the start of the city closing down the pool.

"They are going to chase us away one way or the other," she said. "This is the only exercise I get. Without this, I'm a couch potato."

But Hood said city staff realize the pool is a valuable asset, and there are no plans to close it.

"We will not be closing the pool," he said. "The pool will continue to operate. We are faced with a lot of challenges to make it financially feasible to operate it on a daily basis."

When talking with concerned pool users, Hood said they often stress the health benefits. He personally understands how important the pool is because his son has juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and had two joint surgeries by the age of 13.

His son's only form of exercise for six months was swimming at Hutchins.

"I've been there, I know," Hood said. "Any recommendation that I make regarding the function of the pool, I do understand what it means for people, their health and their quality of life."

While in the pool Tuesday, McBride suggested the city look into a fundraiser to help with the pool's operations. McBride said she would like to see an option where people could choose to pay more for their monthly pool pass as a donation to help with daily operations.

But McBride said there would need to be a guarantee that the money would go for the operation of the pool and would not get shifted elsewhere in the aquatics program.

She also said they are planning to ask local businesses to help sponsor the pool.

The department is open to suggestions, Hood said, but still needs structural changes because one-time money will only go so far. Instead he would recommend the donations go toward repairs for the aging pool.

He also said several people argued that the city should take money from other programs to pay for the pool.

"I will not reduce park maintenance any more, I will not charge more for youth sports, and I'm not willing to increase the rental rates for picnic shelters simply to be able to afford to operate the pool the way we are," Hood said.

The city of Lodi's Recreation Commission will discuss the reduced hours and fee hike at its monthly meeting at 7 p.m. Tuesday at Carnegie Forum, 305 W. Pine St.

Contact reporter Maggie Creamer at maggiec@lodinews.com. Read her blog at www.lodinews.com/blogs/citybuzz.

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • John Ring posted at 10:07 pm on Wed, May 30, 2012.

    John Ring Posts: 34

    From a recovery standpoint if the pool at Hutchins is indeed at the higher end then perhaps the city should apply the same standard to other facilities/services it provides. From a pure math standpoint the pool is one of the more expensive items but again it is about choices. Over the years the facility has povided a lot of benefit for many people in the community. My point is that if the city and community cannot afford to maintain the pool anymore there is potentially another facility, private, that should be considered.

  • roy bitz posted at 4:38 pm on Wed, May 30, 2012.

    roy bitz Posts: 489

    Good idea Mr. Ring.
    I realize the compromise presented by the city here---increasing usage rates and reducing access would only cover about half the total annual cost of maintaining the pool and swim program but this is a heck of a lot more than is being recovered by so many other city sponsored programs and facilities.
    I chimed in on this issue because it appears to me this program is important mostly to only senior citizens and is therefore a low priority.
    If the city plans to "mothball" the pool or remove it and replace it with something that can pay it's way I am all for it.

  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 3:48 pm on Wed, May 30, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9403

    John Ring stated...My feeling, as I have stated before on this site, is to work with the local fitness club, twin arbors to provide this service to the city residents. At $3.50 to $4.50 per visit twin arbors becomes a viable alternative.

    Thoughtful idea! Not only would it reduce expense and overhead, but reduce liability for any kind of negligence resulting in possible lawsuits. I cannot think of a reason why John's suggestion should not be taken.

  • John Ring posted at 2:21 pm on Wed, May 30, 2012.

    John Ring Posts: 34

    Pools by nature are expensive to operate. In reading the article it appears to me the city is trying to recover only a portion of the existing annual deficit by increasing fees. The city still needs to fund the repairs that are needed for the pool. The article makes no mention of programs other than basic swimming and exercise at the pool. Some CPR and lifeguarding classes are done there as well, for a cost. My feeling, as I have stated before on this site, is to work with the local fitness club, twin arbors to provide this service to the city residents. At $3.50 to $4.50 per visit twin arbors becomes a viable alternative. At their main location they have two pools, one indoor, one outdoor, heated year round. They offer exercise classes at the indoor facility. In addition they have a spa, sauna,steam room, cardio eauipment and weights available at no extra cost. Three visits a week at $3.50/visit equals $42/month. Starting to get close to what the club charges. Maybe the city could provide a subsidy for a period of time. I see many seniors using the pool at twin arbors in probably the same fashion at Hutchins. The city is losing 200k a year at the pool, ongoing maintenance and now a new liner is needed. To make the math work you would have to charge the users more than any other pool facility in town. Its all about choices. We as residents can continue to fund the pool at a large deficit and forgo something else in the city.

  • roy bitz posted at 11:19 am on Wed, May 30, 2012.

    roy bitz Posts: 489

    it's use.

  • roy bitz posted at 11:18 am on Wed, May 30, 2012.

    roy bitz Posts: 489

    " We simply have to take a first step"---sounds to me like the decision to close this facility has been made.
    I believe the city is treating this public pool and those that use it, differently than it treats other public facilities such as the skate park, tennis courts, parks, the grape bowl etc. It seems the city expects to recover the entire cost of operating this one by increasing user fees 30 to 40% and reducing access.
    The city incurs substantial "fixed costs" here even if no one ever uses Hutchins pool. It seems the city wants to recover not just the "incremental costs" associated with



Popular Stories


Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 37


Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists