default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Grand jury report finds future of North San Joaquin Water Conservation District in jeopardy

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 12:00 am | Updated: 6:38 am, Wed Jun 27, 2012.

A San Joaquin County Grand Jury report found mismanagement, lack of leadership and an unwillingness to follow policy and legal counsel caused the North San Joaquin Water Conservation District considerable setbacks, financial and otherwise, and could undermine its future.

The report is based on interviews of 2011 board members and past board president Bryan Pilkington, attendance of meetings, complaints lodged by citizens in the district, and reviewing financial reports and legislative documents. The grand jury called the board “dysfunctional” in their former chaos.

President Joe Petersen called the report “a day late and a dollar short” at Monday’s board of directors meeting, adding that it is based on old information.

A major problem cited in the report is a lack of revenue. The district struggles to maintain aging pumps and pipelines, and has a hard time balancing their budget, stated the report.

The report focused on the drama surrounding the groundwater charges the district imposed in 2007 to make improvements. When then-president Bryan Pilkington, “the most outspoken critic,” joined the effort to challenge the charges, it marked the beginning of thousands of dollars going to cover legal and process fees.

Since then, the district has taken no action to collect groundwater charges.

Pilkington did not return a request for comment as of press time.

“I think they’re hinting that we had a good thing going and we screwed it up,” said Petersen, referring to the approval of Measure V by a narrow margin in 2008.

Measure V repealed a groundwater charge imposed by the district in 2007-08, denying the district’s right to collect charges from property owners to improve district pipes and pumps.

The measure made it to the ballot after a citizen initiative was circulated by Pilkington.

Other violations include two board members with a financial interest within the district failing to abstain from a vote to forgive debt owed to the district in groundwater charges.

Board members “constantly” disagreed about water issues and finances. Meeting preparation was lacking. Verbal outbursts and abusive language were common, and Robert’s Rules of Order were ignored, according to complaints and grand jury research.

Directors were reluctant to comment on the specifics of the report, but will address each finding at the next meeting.

“A lot of the stuff in the report is from the past and I don’t want to make any comments on it,” said director Hugh Scanlon. “It may open up old wounds, and I don’t want to open up old wounds until we get something pulled together as a board.”

The report offered a laundry list of recommendations to improve the board’s function. The board must complete the following:

  • Review its own policy manual.
  • Complete Brown Act training, as well as ensure that meeting minutes, notices and agendas are completed and distributed properly.
  • Complete ethics training.
  • Explore new sources of revenue and create a sound fiscal plan with a balanced budget.

The report concludes the district’s actions in 2011 placed their financial future and their ability to survive in jeopardy, as well as cost thousands of dollars in legal and processing fees.

It does note board leadership has changed, from Pilkington to Petersen, and has shown improvement since then.

Petersen hopes the public takes the report with a grain of salt.

“Keep in mind this was the old group. There have been a few improvements since then, I’d like to think,” said Petersen.

But the district has not yet found a way to raise more revenue and maintain its water right, stated the report.

The district has 90 days to respond specifically to each claim in the report.

Contact reporter Sara Jane Pohlman sarap@lodinews.com.

More about

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • Josh Morgan posted at 7:18 am on Wed, Jun 27, 2012.

    Josh Morgan Posts: 529

    Why does this report not surprise me? I just hope they will give the Pilkingtonless board a chance to right the ship.



Popular Stories


Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 67


Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists