Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

San Joaquin County wants more money from Lodi to pay for property rezoning

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Monday, April 20, 2009 10:00 pm

The Lodi City Council allocated $500,000 in November to pay for property rezoning along the Armstrong Road corridor to keep the area agricultural, but San Joaquin County staff claim that isn't enough.

County Community Development Director Kerry Sullivan said Monday that the city of Lodi needs to pay either $122,000 or $160,000 extra to cover the county's expenses to process a specific plan and environmental impact report to rezone land in the Armstrong Road area.

Subscription Required

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

You must login to view the full content on this page.

Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

8 comments:

  • posted at 10:37 am on Tue, Apr 21, 2009.

    Posts:

    It was a great meeting today. It is very clear that the supervisors are not sold on this plan. I have lived here my entire life. I too am against this plan.How do you ruin great farmland? Let Lodi's CC try to take control.I plan on fighting their EIR every step of the way. I was so glad to hear Mr Ornellas share my concerns. It is clear Lodi cannot handle it's own issues. I do not want them meddling in my farming business.

     
  • posted at 9:38 am on Tue, Apr 21, 2009.

    Posts:

    Leave it alone. This was supposed to be a greenbelt area forever. Just because some greedy land owners want to develop and thne bail to Montana. Forget about it.

     
  • posted at 4:23 am on Tue, Apr 21, 2009.

    Posts:

    Geez...what a waste of MORE money!

     
  • posted at 4:09 am on Tue, Apr 21, 2009.

    Posts:

    4AStrongLodi, you are so correct. Lodi will have NO SAY over our land. We are out of their jurisdiction.

     
  • posted at 4:06 am on Tue, Apr 21, 2009.

    Posts:

    Rhodie, we are outside of both Stockton's and Lodi's boundaries. We answer to the county only. If you look at both general plans (good for the next 30 years) neither cities are going to grow this way. It is a waste of your money.Even if Lodi pays for it, us landowners will never let Lodi or Stockton control over us. Lodi has already spent $500,000 with Hitchcock's plan 5 years ago. Here goes another 1/2 million down the toilet.

     
  • posted at 3:42 am on Tue, Apr 21, 2009.

    Posts:

    No way! We shouldn't be spending a penny on this. Armstrong is not within City limits and the landowners want no restrictions put on them (or influenced) by the City of Lodi. It's a huge waste of our taxpayer dollars.

     
  • posted at 3:06 am on Tue, Apr 21, 2009.

    Posts:

    Ross, Maybe you can let us as readers know. Just what is the city's authority over the Armstrong territory?

     
  • posted at 3:05 am on Tue, Apr 21, 2009.

    Posts:

    Either I'm confused or the city of Lodi is.Sam, help me out here. Isn't Armstrong outside of the city's circle of politics? Why do they keep trying to pass policies for a stretch of land they have no authority over?

     
Readers Choice Awards 2014

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists