default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

City of Galt settles sexual harassment suit for $600,000

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Monday, March 5, 2012 10:50 am | Updated: 6:59 am, Tue Mar 6, 2012.

The city of Galt has settled a sexual harassment lawsuit against a former employee for $600,000 rather than spend as much or perhaps more defending the suit at trial.

The plaintiff, Angela Long, claimed the city did not protect her from unwanted comments by a fellow employee, David Belser.

The city's liability insurance will pay $600,000, according to the settlement finalized Monday.

Long will receive $325,000, while her San Francisco-based attorney will receive $275,000.

The payments were made by the city's insurance pool, and will have no effect on the city's general fund, according to City Manager Jason Behrmann.

"While the city denies any wrongdoing, it was determined that the settlement of this matter was in the city's best interest from a financial standpoint. The resolution of this case, which includes the voluntary resignation by Long, will allow the public works department to put this matter behind it and move forward," the city said in a written statement.

Debra Kochman, one of Long's attorneys, said the lawsuit was difficult for Long to go through.

"She tried to be a model employee and was a great employee," Kochman said.

Long worked at the city's wastewater treatment plant maintaining operational equipment and taking samples.

As part of the settlement, the city is required to purge Long's employment file, including copies of a performance evaluation, and provide a letter of recommendation for future employment. Until Feb. 15, she was on paid administrative leave.

The parties have spent months in mediation attempting to settle the lawsuit, which claims that the city did not protect Long from provocative comments made by Belser, who was also named in the suit.

The city was informed by its insurance administrators that the cost of defending the case through trial would cost in excess of $500,000 since it was required to hire two attorneys — one to defend the city and another to defend Belser.

An award of even $1 could force the city to reimburse Long for her attorney's fees, at a cost of $575 per hour and expected to exceed $750,000 in total, according to the city.

Long claims Belser used inappropriate slang in describing sexual acts and anatomy, and showed her nude photos on his phone and computer. Even after repeated complaints to her supervisors, Belser was not disciplined for months, according to Sacramento County civil court records.

Long said she repeatedly complained about Belser to supervisor Bo Dahlberg, who she claimed did not act quickly on those concerns. Dahlberg is currently the city's wastewater systems supervisor.

In a deposition last summer, Dahlberg said under oath that just a couple of weeks after Belser began work, Long complained to him that Belser made sexual advances towards her when she was alone with him in a city truck, according to court records. Long allegedly demanded Belser stop the truck so she could get out.

After almost three months, Long said in court documents, she learned that Dahlberg had yet to even talk to Belser about his conduct, much less report it to former Public Works Director Gregg Halliday or human resources, so she went to human resources herself. Long's attorney said Dahlberg had led her to believe that he would handle it.

Records show Belser was let go in fall 2010, shortly after Long reported his alleged behavior to human resources.

Long complained to human resources not only about Belser's harassment, but also that "Dahlberg failed in his supervision" when he did not take action to stop Belser and did not report her complaints as he was supposed to, according to court records.

Contact reporter Jennifer Bonnett at jenniferb@lodinews.com.

More about

More about

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • Darrell Baumbach posted at 10:30 pm on Wed, Mar 7, 2012.

    Darrell Baumbach Posts: 9403

    Ms Long stated...The city failed to follow their own policy and the man they fired was vulgar not only to me the female but to the males also, so much in fact that they all avoided working with him daily and that is how i got stuck with him...

    I am very confused. If the people in question were simply jerks and treated men and women equally bad, why did the jury award anything based on sexual harassment. This sounds like a miscarriage of justice and the money sound be returned. If I were Ms Long, I would donate the award to a charity that handles real sexual harassment cases. This is not fair to anyone.
    I would be very interested in clarification. If one goes simply by what Ms Long stated, sounds like the jury was duped.

  • dan jimenez posted at 2:20 pm on Tue, Mar 6, 2012.

    Pucha Posts: 3

    The City Manager attitude and arrogance has no bounds. The fact that the city insurance is going to pay is not the issuse. Her supervisor, his manager,and the city Manager did not do thier job. And in thier mind's they didn't have to because at city council meeting our inept council keep telling them " we have the best staff ever, they are just geart, we counldn't do with out them!" The city manager down paly's this issuse like it is no big deal BUT IT IS!!!

  • Frederick Goethel posted at 6:44 am on Tue, Mar 6, 2012.

    Frederick Goethel Posts: 50

    Anyone see a pattern developing here? First the former head Park and Rec sues for age discrimination and now this. Someone isn't doing thier job. City Council needs to take a hard look at the City Manager, as apparently he cannot deal with these issues.

  • Jerry Bransom posted at 9:52 pm on Mon, Mar 5, 2012.

    Jerry Bransom Posts: 363

    NO: "Angela Long will receive $325,000, while her San Francisco-based attorney will receive $275,000." should read "Taxpayers will pay more in higher premiums as Angela Long receives $325,000, while her San Francisco-based attorney will receive $275,000 for basically doing the City Manager's job. The City Manager will keep his job and get a raise and more staff."



Popular Stories


Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 99


Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists