default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Expensive insurance needless?

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, February 28, 2008 10:00 pm

Property owners in northwest Lodi and much of Woodbridge may not require expensive flood insurance after all.

Lodi and San Joaquin County officials are working together to make minor repairs to berms and levees that they hope will convince the Federal Emergency Management Authority to remove the neighborhoods from high-risk status.

Subscription Required

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?



You must login to view the full content on this page.

Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?



Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • posted at 5:25 am on Fri, Feb 29, 2008.


    I'm glad you climbed on your soapbox Tom Carlson - excellent posts.

  • posted at 4:25 am on Fri, Feb 29, 2008.


    But this is not a public protection issue. It is a tax issue, and FEMA likes the idea of tax and spend. We need to put every one of our elected officals on the spot about their plan to protect the citizens from this flood danger. And if their response is to tax us more or require expensive flood insurance, then those officials need to be voted out of office. Sorry for the long 3 posts. I will get off my soapbox now.

  • posted at 4:22 am on Fri, Feb 29, 2008.


    I asked Congressman McNerney at his Feb 22nd "town hall" to be our advocate against this FEMA tax. He tried to say it was a county issue. FEMA is a federal agency. If the issue is the levies don't protect us, why doesn't he go to Washington and grab one of those neat earmarks that seem to be handed out like candy and bring it back to fix the levies. Wouldn't public protection be a good use of those funds? Heck, I would vote for him if he brought a few tax $ home.

  • posted at 4:19 am on Fri, Feb 29, 2008.


    I applaude the county and city working together to shore up the levies. My issue is that the 100 year flood is a myth. Since Commanche was built, there is no possible 100 year flood. The only way the Mokolume floods is if the dam breaks or is improperly managed during the wet season. FEMA is a joke and there insurance is not insurance, but a tax to pay for the costs of the New Orleans federal welfare program operated by FEMA. Someone is going to pay for the unhealthy trailers down there.

  • posted at 3:26 am on Fri, Feb 29, 2008.


    It's good to see Lodi and Woodbridge taking a pro-active approach to this potential threat. Shoring up the levies, making sure the excess sediment is removed from the delta and rivers, having an area where flood waters can run to are all excellent *preventative* measures.

    There should also be some type of evacuation plan, in advance, to prevent chaos and maintain order. Those living near potential flood areas should definitely still purchase insurance; but this should be an option - a type of "buyer beware" in that if one chooses to live there, be prepared.

  • posted at 2:20 am on Fri, Feb 29, 2008.


    are these improvements to benefit General Mills or the residents? the flood water covers about 1/4 of General Mills property. What would Lodi do if they finally jumped ship and left? It does not bother me, i dont live in the effected areas. I would be surprised if FEMA approves the levee, if it only took $10,000 to fix up a levee other citys would do the same. But other cities have to put slurry walls in the levees and have maintenance records for it as well. that costs more that $10,000.

  • posted at 2:13 am on Fri, Feb 29, 2008.


    So, after Lodi makes these 'minor repairs' to the berms and levees, what happens when there IS a flood? Since FEMA might be convinced to withdraw the insurance requirement, who is going to foot the bill? The taxpayers (again)?



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists