Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Measure C: A closer look at Lodi's complicated and controversial groundwater issue

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Saturday, June 5, 2010 12:00 am

Winegrape growers Charlie Starr and Jackson Morehead have much in common. Both rely on groundwater to irrigate their crops and for personal use in their homes. Both have scenic views of the San Joaquin Valley peeking between their manicured rows of winegrapes. Both have family members who worked the land before them. And both see the water level in their wells decreasing.

But there is one area in which the men strongly disagree: How they will vote on Measure C on Tuesday.

"This has been a multi-generational problem and it will require a multi-generational solution," said Starr.

Morehead contends the problem grows from a variety of factors and that there may not even be a definite solution.

"I don't think we can charge groundwater given our soil composition," he said. "Even if we could, the water doesn't know or care where the district's boundaries are. Once it goes underground, there is noting that keeps the water within the district's borders."

Watermelons and controversy

In the early days of agriculture in Lodi, watermelons were the bumper crop. In some cases, growers didn't even need to irrigate the melons because the groundwater was so close to the surface, the roots of the plants could reach down and tap into the precious resource.

However, Lodi's population increased and the demand for food went up with it. Growers continued to produce sizable yields and were ultimately forced to dig wells to supply water. As the years progressed, the water levels in the wells gradually decreased.

Some wells around town have needed to be deepened as the groundwater level continues to lower. People on both sides of the issue agree that more groundwater is being taken out of the ground than can be naturally restored.

But addressing the groundwater problem has proven complicated — and controversial.

The arguments around Measure C date back to May 2007. That's when the North San Joaquin Water Conservation District approved a charge on those who pump groundwater that was met with stern resistance. While district directors acted within the confines of state law when they enacted the charge, officials have admitted that they didn't do enough to inform the public about it. North San Joaquin's board of directors levied the groundwater charge without a full vote by district residents. It conducted a "protest hearing" under Proposition 218 rules, in which a non-vote counted as a "yes" vote.

The backlash from those charged a fee resulted in the creation of Measure V. It aimed to block the district from levying a charge to raise money for projects and equipment without direct voter approval.

Now comes Measure C. It would repeal Measure V and enable the district to pursue a process to enact and collect a fee to recharge the area's diminished groundwater basin.

North San Joaquin leaders say the money they hope to collect if Measure C passes would be used to repair infrastructure and help create delivery systems so the agency can make the most of its 20,000 acre-foot allocation of wet-year water. The district serves 6,000 well owners. It serves the city of Lodi generally east of Ham Lane, as well as Acampo, Victor, Lockeford and Clements.

Voters approved Measure V in November 2008. It was in the same election that district residents also elected the initiative's creator, Bryan Pilkington, to the board.

The next chapter before voters Tuesday is in the form of Measure C.

Supporters of Measure C argue that it is part of a long-term solution to replenish the area's groundwater basin — and that its failure could be catastrophic for area water rights. Proponents don't feel Measure C is a cure-all, but rather a vital piece of the puzzle that leads to a more sustainable future. Measure C is endorsed by the Lodi City Council, the Lodi Chamber of Commerce, the Groundwater Banking Authority, and the San Joaquin Farm Bureau.

Those against the measure argue that it only helps a minority of growers and may not even accomplish what it sets out to do. Critics argue that the board is not to be trusted, and that approval of Measure C is equal to giving the district a blank check.

Opponents contend they won't be able to access the surface water the district would make available because it wouldn't be cost-feasible for them to tap into potential delivery systems.

One farmer who says 'no'

On a recent morning, Morehead was sitting at his dining room table amidst clippings of News-Sentinel articles and advertisements for Measure C. The cluttered table was a direct contrast to the rest of the organized home, decorated with hunting trophies of ducks, moose and elk.

He owns 250 acres in Acampo, and believes those who stand to benefit the most from the passage of Measure C live on the opposite side of the district from him, west of Highway 99 and north of the Mokelumne River.

The pace of his speech was quite deliberate as he explained his opposition to Measure C.

"It will only benefit a handful of people," he said.

One of his biggest problems with Measure C has to do with Tracy Lake, a dry lakebed toward the northwest border of the district.

In a recent meeting, the district applied for a grant that could enable it to look into developing Tracy Lake as a recharge pond. If the grant were to be accepted and Measure C were to pass, the district said it could look into using the combination of funds for the project.

When approving the process to apply for the grant, the board argued Tracy Lake could be used by nearby landowners to draw surface water from the pond, and other water would percolate down and make its way toward the depleting groundwater basin.

Pilkington and Morehead believe the Tracy Lake project, if it moves forward, would mainly benefit large grape growers near the lake who are pushing hard for Measure C.

Filling up Tracy Lake won't help him, Morehead said. He argues against the district's plan for the lake, pointing to the adjacent roads, highway and trees as obstacles that can't be overcome when it comes to building a network of pipes that could deliver surface water to his land.

"It's not going to happen," he said. "The people who benefit should pay the costs."

Morehead has 10 wells on his property, and some are declining more than others. While this is a concern for him, Morehead said the money that could potentially be spent on projects that come with the passage could be better spent by him to maintain his property.

Although supporters of Measure C argue that its passage will lead to less government, Morehead strongly disagrees.

"I'd rather take my money and fend for myself," he said.

Morehead reaches for a pot filled with water representing the area's groundwater basin. Tilting the pot to the left, he says that water flows to the point of least resistance. He puts an index finger on the right side of the pot, demonstrating where his property lies, away from where the water rushes.

"You can replenish it," he says of the basin. "But it has to be raised an awful lot for the groundwater level over here to go up even an inch or two."

The hydrologists and geologists Morehead has talked to have told him it takes between 50 years and centuries for water to make its way from the Sierra snowpack to the local groundwater basin, he said. He's concerned that if the district creates a plan for groundwater recharge that isn't successful, it would be years before anyone realized and made a plan to correct it.

Morehead fears that potential voters haven't educated themselves about the issue and will be swayed by the advertisements in the News-Sentinel and signs in yards around town.

"They will see this picture of a little girl drinking clean water, and that will sway them," said Morehead, holding a clipping from a "Yes on C" ad in a recent edition of the News-Sentinel. "We need to take a common-sense approach and not react to stuff like this."

Another grower's positive view of Measure C

On the other side of the issue is Starr, who grows Zinfandel grapes on 10 acres. His parents owned the land before selling it to the couple Starr bought it from in 2006. Family is one of the biggest reasons he supports the measure.

Starr says its passage is crucial to the sustainability of the region for future generations.

Like Morehead, Starr knew little of the district until going to his mailbox one day in 2007 and opening a bill for groundwater pumping. It was at that time he decided to get informed on the issues and started attending district meetings.

He has one well on the property that was drilled in 1996, a decade before he bought the property.

Like other Measure C supporters, Starr argues that keeping local control of groundwater is paramount. He believes that if the ballot measure fails, the district takes another step towards losing its water rights to other local agencies or even the state.

"We need to keep control of our water as local as possible," he said.

While he understands why some people don't trust the board, Starr said it's now a non-issue since there are so many newly appointed board members in the years since the initial charge was enacted.

"Everyone has a right to express their opinion, but they need to focus on the overall problem," he said. "We need to maintain a clean, abundant water supply."

Touring his property and observing his drip-irrigation lines, Starr said it's important to remember that Measure C only repeals Measure V. It does not immediately enact a new fee on those who pump water.

"There is still more to the process if Measure C passes," he said.

Measure C, if passed, wouldn't immediately enact a new charge on groundwater pumping. It would give the district the right to pursue a process to impose and collect a fee in conjunction with the state's water code and constitution.

He also agrees with statements made by district manager Ed Steffani, who has said on repeated occasions that the defeat of Measure C could mean the end of the agency.

"If they can't use the water rights, then it shouldn't be called a district," Starr said.

Like other Measure C supporters, Starr doesn't see the passage of the initiative as the silver bullet that immediately restores the groundwater basin to its early-1900s levels and rebuilds the district's crumbling pipelines overnight. Instead, he sees it as a critical piece for the board to move forward and prove to the state that it can use what it is legally allowed to take.

He views it as a single step in a longer journey.

"Right now we are on a path where we are not sustainable as an agricultural community or as a community in general," he said. "North San Joaquin can't solve the whole problem. It will take a concerted effort from all of us. We all have to do our part."

Starr fears the defeat of Measure C would push the burden onto future generations. The problem has been clear for some time, and a solution is long overdue, he said.

Like Morehead, Starr doesn't live near Tracy Lake and wouldn't benefit from that specific project, but said helping deliver surface water eases the overall burden on the basin.

He agrees in principle with Morehead that some wells will continue to go down, but a different outlook needs to be taken.

"There will be wells that won't show improvement at a rate that some owners may want," he said. "But a well going down a quarter-foot a year is better than it going down a foot a year."

Looking toward the future

When voters ultimately decide the fate of Measure C on Tuesday, it will certainly be the end of one chapter and the start of another. If Measure C wins, the district can begin the process of exploring and collecting a fee on those who pump groundwater.

Critics will still have opportunities to influence how much the charge is and how — or even if — it is ultimately enacted.

Those who support the charge will likely embrace the possibilities of new pipes, delivery systems and percolation ponds.

If Measure C fails, it remains unclear what exactly will happen to the district. While the district won't shut down the next day, members of the board have repeatedly said the consequences could be dire and could lead to a judge ruling on how the water rights in the region are distributed. Opponents of Measure C refer to that possibility as a scare tactic designed to push the measure past voters.

Back on their respective farms, Starr and Morehead contemplate the importance of the measure and what it means for the future of Lodi. Both are concerned about what will happen at the polls on Tuesday. They, like the rest of the voters in the area, must wait and see.

Contact reporter Jordan Guinn at jordang@lodinews.com.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

29 comments:

  • posted at 11:33 am on Tue, Jun 8, 2010.

    Posts:

    GrayCloud: The problem with the Water supply has to do with the market for Booze!

     
  • posted at 11:27 am on Tue, Jun 8, 2010.

    Posts:

    There was no Measure C on my ballot nor was it offered at the Polling Place on Kettleman. What's the deal? Not that I care anyway.

     
  • posted at 2:09 pm on Sun, Jun 6, 2010.

    Posts:

    Lodiwine: well said concerning Pre$$ure, you beat him like a rented mule. If you have a firearm, buy all the rounds you can now, the present administration will make an attempt to limit the amount you can purchase, it`s coming.

     
  • posted at 2:07 pm on Sun, Jun 6, 2010.

    Posts:

    pre$$ure$on wrote on Jun 6, 2010 11:43 AM:" All joking aside:Are you trying to say that alll this time you expected us bloggers to believe the CRAP you spew, that NOW you suddenly confess that you were joking?Well, I'll be danged.As for making a joke of people who give of themselves to the community, be it mowing, volunteering in a nursing home or hospital, a food bank, animal shelter, and on and on.... "Shame on you for being so selfish, that you can't give of yourself to help others and choose to only whine in these blogs."

     
  • posted at 9:49 am on Sun, Jun 6, 2010.

    Posts:

    pre$$sur$on: I carry a concealed weapon also and it has nothing to do with being corrupted by greed. We live next to one of the most crime-ridden cities in america (stockton) and liberal wackos like yourself seem to want to invite them in with open arms. Not on my watch!

     
  • posted at 9:20 am on Sun, Jun 6, 2010.

    Posts:

    pre$$ur$on: God forbid that family pass on their hard earned wealth to subsequent generations. You seem to harbor a nefarious ill-will towards the wine and grape community in Lodi. I know many of the farmers who you lable as "GOB's" and I can honestly say that they do more for this community than most. You berate anyone with land or money mistakenly thinking that hard work is the same a ill-gotten gains. Your Marxist attitude perpetuates the major problems our country.

     
  • posted at 8:12 am on Sun, Jun 6, 2010.

    Posts:

    get ur facts straight...i did some research over the weekend and asked around town and u guys are throwing crap at a wall to see what sticks just to get measure c to fail... shame on u and to T and C, thanks for the good posting and volunteer work. we need many more people like you that are willing to do something productive and beneficial for our community

     
  • posted at 7:34 am on Sun, Jun 6, 2010.

    Posts:

    On an outside chance, perhaps you could name names of the good `ol boys. I have heard you mention GOB`s a hundred times but never a name. Do they only come out at night to steel cans from garbage cans.I knew it was to good to last.Since you read my post, nothing was mentioned about a firearm, still you bring that up. Evidently finding some dirt on me is getting to a point that you must keep repeating yourself. As I said a long time ago, your posts are like water off a ducks back as far as I am concerned, and certainly not to be taken seriously. In all your posts, you have slipped back into Mr. Negitive, and just when I thought there was hope for you. I`m a happy camper, to get up with no pain and have a cup of coffee, a great way to start the day. Try it sometime, it doesn`t hurt.

     
  • posted at 6:43 am on Sun, Jun 6, 2010.

    Posts:

    All joking aside:Now here's a real definition of the good old boys network:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_ol'_boy_networkAnd lodiwine, you're even more naive than T&C. Just read this honest definition of the good old boys network. This definition describes the Lodi-Stockton good old boys network to a tee. And I'm not jealous of any of them. Most got everything they had from grandpa, who gave his wealth to his son and each generation has gotten corrupted with their greed and they're the ones that have to go to bed at night worrying. Why do you think many carry a concealed weapon? Could it be fear of someone from a past "business" transaction or even someone they've bullied or cheated? If you think the good old boys aren't alive and well in this area, then you are very naive.

     
  • posted at 5:20 am on Sun, Jun 6, 2010.

    Posts:

    pre$$ur$on: Your extreme paranoia about this shadowy network of "good ol boys" is beyond preposterous. You resent anyone and everyone that has actually succeded in life (unlike yourself). Please continue to make assinine comments that make no sense. Your arguments against measure C have convinced me to vote yes. Please move to a communist country where you can expect a meager handout and everyone is equal regardless of work ethic.

     
  • posted at 4:30 am on Sun, Jun 6, 2010.

    Posts:

    Gee, thanks for the nice remarks, T&C, but you must really be out of touch. I hear the bus drivers don't even talk to you anymore since you were such an anti-union advocate and didn't want them to organize and get some decent wages and representation for themselves. T&C, just because my opinion differs from yours, I'm supposed to stop commenting? If you're so stupid as to defend the good ol' boys, maybe yu should be one of their wannabes. And, by the way, do you have any comments relating to this issue and this dysfunctional water board other than to cry on my shoulder? Those wealthy good ol" boys will be proud of you for mowing their lawn. That's a great first step to becoming a wannabe lapdog gofer for the good ol' boys.

     
  • posted at 3:38 am on Sun, Jun 6, 2010.

    Posts:

    pre$$ure$on wrote on Jun 5, 2010 6:43 PM:"I guess they''re used to their lapdogs jumping when they say so, Huh?"You sure do alot of guessing in these blogs, don't you?

     
  • posted at 3:36 am on Sun, Jun 6, 2010.

    Posts:

    pre$$ure$on wrote on Jun 5, 2010 9:16 AM:" Observer, it was on my non-partisan absentee ballot which has been mailed with a resounding NO on C only because of the shady characters involved, along with the good old boy farmers and growers who want to claim the majority of the water for themselves."pre$$ur$on... I have seen you accuse the City Council of being "Good old boys"... The Mayor, Real estate agents and now farmers. I am nervous to ask you this question....."Is there Anyone in Lodi who you believe is NOT a (GOB)?"

     
  • posted at 3:33 am on Sun, Jun 6, 2010.

    Posts:

    pre$$ure$on wrote on Jun 5, 2010 6:57 AM:"The city council, chamber and city of Lodi endorses them because they are on the higher rung of the good old boys pig trough. "When you run out of this "Imaginary "Good Old Boy" Paranoia what on earth will you do to fill your time?I pushed a lawn mower over to Kettleman and Central to clean up that empty lot at the traffic light and then mowed the Kettleman & Stockton (Two corners so both areas look more clean.) I just didn't want to spend my time worrying about those pesky "Good Old Boys" when this weather is ideal for doing something positive in the community. Tell us, besides reflecting only the negative, what good have you done lately?

     
  • posted at 3:29 am on Sun, Jun 6, 2010.

    Posts:

    Hey pre$$ur$on.... here is an interesting link regarding the issue of "Recharge".http://www.engineeringnews.co.za/article/artificial-recharge-has-a-role-to-play-in-water-managment-2008-12-12

     
  • posted at 3:26 am on Sun, Jun 6, 2010.

    Posts:

    pre$$ure$on wrote on Jun 5, 2010 6:57 AM:Just looking at the shady characters involved in this water district, not only the greedy and dysfunctional board members, but those large, water hoarders and wasters that are the big voices who let their money and attorneys talk for them.One theme you always seem to reflect to us bloggers pre$$ur$on... is "This incessant resentment of anyone who is successful, has more money then you, or has control over things you have no control over."There is a lesson to be learned from all this.

     
  • posted at 2:08 am on Sun, Jun 6, 2010.

    Posts:

    Ross Farrow: I live east of Ham Lane, and Measure C was not on my absentee ballot.

     
  • posted at 5:36 pm on Sat, Jun 5, 2010.

    Posts:

    dogs, I was referring to the people on the dysfunctional water board. You got a guilty conscience or what? I assume you were referring to my blog? Did you grab that .38 again?

     
  • posted at 3:53 pm on Sat, Jun 5, 2010.

    Posts:

    To: jbhiker: Where in the world did you come up with this ?? "Rich people are squandering our water! Who, where, when, how, what ??

     
  • posted at 3:33 pm on Sat, Jun 5, 2010.

    Posts:

    Well now that we have Meters, maybe they could force rationing? This has happened in every state I have an office in. Utah and Texas as well as California. When will the rich be made to PAY for their unbridled use of resources? We are NOT all equal, damnit! Rich people are squandering our water!

     
  • posted at 2:23 pm on Sat, Jun 5, 2010.

    Posts:

    I happen to live west of Ham Ln. I am not rich nor do I waste water, and above all I along with my neighbors are not dysfunctional. Since you do not know me or even the area I live in I would appreciate you choosing your words more carefully. I suggest reading Ross Farrow`s 10:57 post, perhaps that will help explane the situation. West of Ham Ln., we are in a different water district.

     
  • posted at 1:44 pm on Sat, Jun 5, 2010.

    Posts:

    Frank your right, especially if you read Brian Pilkington`s post. This is truly Taxation without Representation since we are paying and do not have a voice in the vote. Looks like it`s a case of bend over and kiss your azz good-bye.

     
  • posted at 11:59 am on Sat, Jun 5, 2010.

    Posts:

    Ahhh, but Observer and Dogs4you I guarantee you will help pay for this tax added to Lodi's water bill.

     
  • posted at 9:04 am on Sat, Jun 5, 2010.

    Posts:

    Lodi Citizens Living West of Ham LaneAt the recent Lodi City Council Meeting which endorsed Measure C, Mr. Prima, a former Lodi City Employee, mentioned the fact that everyone in Lodi Pays this Water Tax. Mr. Prima didn't elaborate, but I will clarify the important issue I discussed with the council members. In 1948 Lodi was a small town and never went West of Ham Lane, therefore, the North San Joaquin Water District never went West of Ham Lane. The Lodi City Council has been paying the $200,000.00 Water Tax every year from the general funds that they collect from the entire City of Lodi. In reality this is truly a case of, "Taxation without Representation". Everyone West of Ham Lane Pays the Water Tax, but does not get an opportunity to Vote on any of the North San Joaquin Water District issues. I feel very sorry for everyone West of Ham Lane paying this Water Tax, but has no voice in how the Water District is managed. If you have any further questions, please write pilkington4water@frys.com .Thank you, Bryan Pilkington, Director NSJWCD and Member, Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn.

     
  • posted at 7:28 am on Sat, Jun 5, 2010.

    Posts:

    Ross: thanks for clearing up that issue , I like Observer live west of Ham Lane and evidently don`t have a say in the matter.

     
  • Ross Farrow posted at 5:57 am on Sat, Jun 5, 2010.

    Ross Farrow Posts: 104

    Observer: My guess is that you live west of Ham Lane. If so, you do not live in the North San Joaquin Water Conservation District. Therefore, Measure C would not be on your ballot. Land west of Ham is in the Woodbridge Irrigation District, which is not involved in the Measure C vote.

     
  • posted at 4:16 am on Sat, Jun 5, 2010.

    Posts:

    Observer, it was on my non-partisan absentee ballot which has been mailed with a resounding NO on C only because of the shady characters involved, along with the good old boy farmers and growers who want to claim the majority of the water for themselves.

     
  • posted at 3:31 am on Sat, Jun 5, 2010.

    Posts:

    This measure was not on my absentee ballot. Are we not voting on this issue if we are residents of Lodi? I'm confused.

     
  • posted at 1:57 am on Sat, Jun 5, 2010.

    Posts:

    Mr. Morehead and Pilkington seem to have researched the issue thoroughly, even asking for data from hydrologists and those familiar with recharge, which hasn't been proven to even be effective, nor even possible, while Mr. Starr seems to depend on the likes of Mr. Steffani, the district manager of the dysfunctional water district. Just looking at the shady characters involved in this water district, not only the greedy and dysfunctional board members, but those large, water hoarders and wasters that are the big voices who let their money and attorneys talk for them. I urge a vote NO on MEASURE C only for the fact that they only serve one another and care about no one else, only water and profits for themselves. This dysfunctional water board needs to be dissolved and reorganized and allowing one person, one vote when it comes to any issues concerning their little "bully pulpit" of the present. Some of the shady characters and shenanigans of the proponents of C are downright uninformed and present more spin than truth. The city council, chamber and city of Lodi endorses them because they are on the higher rung of the good old boys pig trough.

     

Video

Popular Stories

Poll

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists