default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Citizen leads push for hiring ordinance in Galt

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 12:00 am

Even though the Galt City Council struck down the idea of a local hiring ordinance in December, it will be back on its agenda Tuesday night.

Citizen Gene Davenport, who serves on the Planning Commission as an alternate, will request that the council puts the ordinance on the November ballot.

"It's a good idea, especially in this economy. When building starts up again people could catch a job in town rather than going to another area like Elk Grove," Davenport said.

His proposal would require contractors who take Public Works or other city improvement jobs valued at $100,000 or more to hire 50 percent of their employees locally.

Councilman Andrew Meredith had originally proposed a local hiring ordinance that required contractors to hire between 20 to 50 percent of labor locally, depending on the size of the contract. He suggested it as a trial ordinance.

Meredith and Councilman Donald Haines voted for the trial ordinance while Mayor Randy Shelton and Councilwoman Barbara Payne voted against. Councilman Darryl Clare was absent from the meeting, and because the vote was split, the ordinance failed.

Davenport, who works as the chief dispatcher for longshore workers at the Port of Stockton, wanted to take up the cause because he served on a labor council and saw developers come into communities and not hire anyone locally.

"It's a developer's dream to do that, but it's not a worker's dream, and it's not a community's dream because these developers will come and go," he said.

If the council approves putting the ordinance on the ballot, city staff will still have to draft the language and bring it back to the council for approval, City Clerk Liz Aguire said. Conservatively, she said it will cost $1,200 to $1,500 to place it on the ballot.

If the council does not approve putting it on the ballot, Davenport said he is prepared to collect signatures for it.

The ordinance includes an escape clause if the contractor cannot find enough local people with needed skills to work on the project. The contractor would have to show the city it made a "good faith effort" to hire local residents by completing six or more recruitment strategies.

Some of the strategies include helping residents complete job application forms, conducting interviews within 5 to 10 miles of the location of the contract, or advertising the jobs in newspapers, on job boards and in public places.

On the agenda Tuesday night, the item will be under Haines' name, even though Meredith was originally the councilmember pushing for it.

"It really is to show that it's not just one person pushing this. It's something a broad spectrum of the community supports," Meredith said.

At the meeting, Meredith plans to waive his compensation for the rest of his term to pay for the cost to get it on the ballot, so that will not be a hindrance. Councilmembers make $300 a month.

Meredith said he hopes he will be able to work with the rest of the council to convince them to support Davenport's suggested ordinance or the one Meredith originally proposed.

Here's the basic breakdown of Meredith's ordinance, which changes depending on the contract price:

  • $50,000 to $125,000: The contractor will have to hire 50 percent of its employees, including any subcontractors, from Galt.
  • $125,001 to $250,000: The contractor will have to hire 30 percent of its workforce from Galt.
  • More than 250,000: The contractor will hire no less than 20 percent.

Davenport said he is open to a compromise and just wants to see the city move forward with the ordinance.

"I want something that is firm, concrete and will protect local people," Davenport said.

Contact reporter Maggie Creamer at maggiec@lodinews.com or read her blog at www.lodinews.com/blogs/citybuzz.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.


  • posted at 11:29 am on Tue, Mar 23, 2010.


    why are all three main stories on GALT???? who lives there...lol

  • posted at 4:23 am on Tue, Mar 23, 2010.


    Check out the city of Stockton's new hiring ordinance for city public works jobs, Their requires that those local hires be a full time resident of Stockton for at least one year to keep these local contractors from bringing cheaper help from outside the area that has enacted this ordinance. Don't for a minute think your "honest" local contractors like Diede, Reed, and Stephens, among others, don't use real cheap laborers from outside their areas. If cities and town used union contractors on all publics works jobs, they'd use qualified journeyman and apprentices and would be assured of getting the job done right the first time, under or on budget, and on time. It's a government, OSHA, I believe that each employee also be safety certified and those who operate equipment must also be certified to operate even a forklift. That's only for public works projects, Cogito, I believe. Any jobs such as shopping malls, manufacturing plants, office complexes and similar projects would be exempt and private ventures wouldn't be affected. With project bidders on projects coming from Oregon, Nevada and southern California with ridiculously low bids it will keep them honest having local employees monitoring them.

  • posted at 3:53 am on Tue, Mar 23, 2010.


    What a stupid idea. So, you have a workforce of 10 employees who have worked for you for a decade. In order to get a contract with Galt, you have to tell 3 of them to stay home and hire 3 locals who you don't even know, and who don't have a job? Does this sound like a stupid idea to anyone else?



Popular Stories


Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 109


Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists