Behind this series

The debate surrounding Concept 6

Project Kyosei helps Galt align curriculum

Ripon schools push standard in California API

Leadership vital for schools to excel, education reformers say

Low-achieving schools hope governor’s plan will help

Schools in high-poverty areas struggle with turnover

10 schools tackle action plans

Elder Creek Elementary strives against odds

Reading skills prove pivotal in quest for good education

Does separating kids by talent help or hurt?

Tests should help minority, poor students

No excuses: We must improve our schools

Behind this series

Last year’s Academic Performance Index rankings raised important questions about our public schools.

Though some progress had been made at most Lodi Unified campuses, the API showed our schools lagging others in similar socioeconomic conditions. We seemed to be slipping toward the back of the statewide pack, not elbowing toward the front.

Of special concern were students from poor and disadvantaged backgrounds, who were consistently behind their peers in Lodi Unified.

Are there ways, we wondered, that our schools can make brisker, stronger progress?

That question is answered in a series of stories starting today, and the answer is: Yes.

We checked with educators across California and in Texas and Virginia, where similar testing has been in place for some time looking for strategies and tactics for elevating student achievement.

We also looked for common themes among schools and districts that seem to be outpacing the competition.

Our series is not a blueprint. Nor is it an indictment of Lodi Unified, where many positive efforts are already underway.

Rather, it raises issues and offers ideas we hope will contribute to the progress now underway.

Richard Hanner
Editor


[an error occurred while processing this directive]