Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Lodi Insider’s Guide to the Happiest Place on Earth

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Friday, April 22, 2011 9:30 am | Updated: 8:42 pm, Tue Apr 26, 2011.

Disneyland. The Happiest Place on Earth. The sound of the Disneyland Railroad steam whistle piercing the air. The wind blowing through your hair as you plunge into the darkness of Space Mountain. The aroma of popcorn as you stroll down Main Street U.S.A. The Magic Kingdom.  

Oh, and the crowds packed shoulder to shoulder in the summer heat waiting to see a parade, seemingly endless lines for a minute-long ride, paying $12 for a fast-food hamburger and soda and screaming children because they can’t have that Mickey Mouse shaped balloon that will float out of their hands shortly after you spend far too much money on it.

Subscription Required

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

You must login to view the full content on this page.

Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

Have an online subscription?

Login now

Need an online subscription?

Subscribe

Login

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

Readers Choice Awards 2014

Video

Popular Stories

Send Us Your Snapshots!

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency staff said Friday that the nation should tighten smog rules significantly, a step that would improve air quality in California but force costly new requirements on government and industry.

The EPA staff recommendation is the final step before the rule goes to the agency’s leadership and the White House. As a result of lawsuits by environmental and health groups, the agency must propose a new ozone rule by December and the final rule by October 2015.

Federal standards for ground-level ozone, the main ingredient in smog, have proven deeply contentious because they would compel many states, cities and industries to adopt new measures to cut air pollution at a cost of billions of dollars.

California would be particularly affected since much of the state does not meet the current, weaker standard for ozone that has been in place since 2008.

Ozone is a corrosive gas that forms when pollutants from vehicle tailpipes, power plants and factories bake in sunlight. The gas irritates lungs and airways and can cause asthma attacks, premature deaths, hospital and emergency room visits and millions of missed school and work days.

Pressure has been building for years from the scientific, health and environmental communities to reduce the federal standard for ground-level ozone to between 60 and 70 parts per billion. It is currently at 75 parts per billion, a standard set by the Bush administration that fell short of a recommendation for stricter limits from the EPA’s advisory committee of independent scientists.

The EPA science advisory committee in June recommended strengthening the ozone standard to the 60-to-70-parts-per-billion range, which the agency’s staff echoed in the findings issued Friday.

The committee said “ample scientific evidence” exists that ozone is harmful at lower levels than previously thought, citing studies showing it decreased lung function and increased respiratory symptoms and airway inflammation even at concentrations of 70 parts per billion.

The recommendations are part of a review the EPA is required to complete every five years under the Clean Air Act.

The Obama administration can choose to override the recommendations and adopt a weaker standard, including the current one. Facing enormous pressure from business in 2011, President Barack Obama scuttled the EPA’s more stringent ozone rule, delaying it until after the 2012 presidential election.

But such a move today would likely trigger new litigation, said Paul Cort, a lawyer for Earthjustice, which sued the EPA to order it to issue the new standard.

California will face considerable challenges meeting a tougher ozone limit. The state has 16 areas that do not meet the current ozone standard, said Stanley Young, a spokesman for the state Air Resources Board. Lowering the standard would put even more areas out of compliance, many of them in rural areas, he said.

In California’s South Coast basin, which has the nation’s worst ozone pollution, a tougher federal standard would delay compliance with air quality standards further into the future. To meet the existing ozone standard of 75 parts per billion by a 2032 deadline, local air quality officials calculate they will have to slash by more than 75 percent smog-forming gases called nitrogen oxides.

“We’re going to need to have zero or near-zero emissions across the entire economy, from transportation to businesses, to residences and personal products,” said Sam Atwood, a spokesman for the South Coast Air Quality Management District, which includes Los Angeles and Orange counties.

The San Joaquin Valley also has some of the nation’s worst ozone pollution and is many years away from meeting existing standards.

Anticipating the recommendation, industry representatives and Republican members of Congress have launched a campaign focusing on the monetary costs of a tighter standard, which they argue would be ruinous to the economy.

The National Association of Manufacturers wrote “that a more stringent ozone standard from the Obama administration could reduce GDP by $270 billion per year ... increasing energy costs and placing millions of jobs at risk.”

The EPA staff recommendations swiftly drew criticism from Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla. “With the economy already showing signs that it is losing ground under the administration’s environmental regulations, now is no time to bow to the desires of the extreme environmental lobby here in Washington,” Inhofe said.

Supporters of a tighter standard said industry has long argued that environmental limits would destroy the economy but such predictions have failed to materialize.

“We’ve heard that argument for 40 years,” said Janice Nolen, assistant vice president of national policy at the American Lung Association. “We have evidence showing it’s not true: Since the 1970s, we’ve reduced major air pollutants by 70 percent and the economy has more than doubled.”

———

(Banerjee writes for the Tribune Washington Bureau and Barboza for the Los Angeles Times)

———

©2014 Tribune Co.

Visit Tribune Co. at www.latimes.com

Distributed by MCT Information Services

_____

Topics: t000041079,t000041155,t000036956,t000138311,t000002953,t000047682,t000138309,t000047680,t000002805,g000065558,g000362661,g000066164

Poll

Loading…

Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists