default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

Straight Talk for Teens Young people share views on cigarette tax

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Lauren Forcella

Posted: Friday, June 1, 2012 7:22 am | Updated: 9:03 am, Fri Jun 1, 2012.

Dear Straight Talk: I’m following the ballot proposition to add $1 tax to a pack of cigarettes purchased in California. The tax will be used for researching tobacco-related cancers and illnesses. There are claims that the tax increase will reduce the number of young people who light up. If it helps curb new smokers, I’m all for it, but a friend thinks it’s just another tax on the mostly poor and uneducated. Does your panel think this extra cost will be a deterrent for new smokers? — Curious about the youth perspective in Irvine

Elise, 20, Rexburg, Idaho: I support the tax for cancer research. However, if kids want to smoke, I doubt it will affect their decision.

Gregg, 21, Los Angeles: Wrong. I used to smoke, and the biggest reason for stopping was the price. First I cut back as a way to continue, but the cost was still too much and I eventually quit completely.  

Catherine, 25, Hudson, N.Y.: I don’t know anyone who has avoided cigarettes completely (they are everywhere at parties), but I know many who have quit because they couldn’t afford the habit. Anything to discourage young smokers!

Taylor, 15, Santa Rosa: Anything to lower the smoking rate is a good thing! I wish smoking was banned like other drugs.

Omari, 18, Wellington, Fla.: I’ve never smoked and don’t understand the mentality. With the prices, it’s like financially sponsoring your own death. I support the tax increase and think cigarettes should be as illegal as marijuana.

Colin, 18, Sacramento: The California legislature can’t get traction balancing the budget when so much of its revenues (this measure’s included) are mandated as to how they can be spent. Smoking stinks, but Prop 29 is no help to our budget and should be defeated.

Peter, 25, Monterey: Taxing an addictive substance with lots of users will definitely increase revenues. But a dollar-a-pack increase isn’t high enough to significantly deter users. So, yes, it ends up being a tax that mostly targets the poor.

Brandon, 20, Mapleton, Maine: Some young smokers will just switch to pot. Pot-smoking friends say an ounce of pot gives them more “puffs” per dollar than a pack of cigarettes. The cigarette tax is a “stupid” tax. It pays for the stupidity of smoking.

Molly, 20, Berkeley: Cigarettes are already ridiculously expensive. But people don’t start smoking by going out and buying themselves a pack. They start with friends. By the time they start buying, they’re hooked, and their addiction doesn’t disappear because the price is higher. I think the tax will just penalize those who already struggle. How about taxing the tobacco companies instead?

Dear Curious: Well, there you have it. A good range of controversy with over 70 percent of responding panelists supporting the tax. Right now, 1 in 12 teens smoke, and 1 in 3 young adults smoke. Gauging from other states who raised their cigarette tax, the higher price should prevent 220,000 kids from getting addicted and motivate 100,000 adults to quit. That right there gets my vote. The tax will also support tobacco-cessation programs and efforts to stop underage tobacco sales. — Lauren

For more discussion, to ask a question, or inquire about being a youth panelist, visit www.straighttalkTNT.com or write PO Box 963 Fair Oaks, CA 95628.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don’t pretend you’re someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don’t threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don’t insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the ‘Report’ link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.
  • 9 Don’t be a troll.
  • 10 Don’t reveal personal information about other commenters. You may reveal your own personal information, but we advise you not to do so.
  • 11 We reserve the right, at our discretion, to monitor, delete or choose not to post any comment. This may include removing or monitoring posts that we believe violate the spirit or letter of these rules, or that we otherwise determine at our discretion needs to be monitored, not posted, or deleted.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • Ron Werner posted at 3:44 pm on Fri, Jun 1, 2012.

    Ron Werner Posts: 101

    If the backers of Prop 29 really wanted to stop cancer the bill would impose a $1,000 per pak tax not $1.00. This would make cigarette smoking unaffordable and thus eliminate one of the main causes of cancer. But this would also not generate any money for the cancer research companies. So the real intent of this proposition is not to curtail cancer, but to raise money for cancer research. And how did they come up with the amount of $1.00 ? Studies probably showed that people would still consume cigarettes with a $1.00 increase but any more, consuption would drop.
    Once again, this bill is not about people stopping smoking, it is about raising taxes for greedy corporations (albiet they have a nobel cause).



Popular Stories



Your News

News for the community, by the community.

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists