Nifty techniques not enough for new ‘Spider Man’
-
Print
-
Create a hardcopy of this page
-
Font Size:
-
Default font size
-
Larger font size
Courtesy photograph
Nifty techniques not enough for new ‘Spider Man’
Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone star in “The Amazing Spider-Man.”
Infographic
- ‘The Amazing Spider-Man’
-
★★ 1/2 (out of four)
2012, Dir. Marc Webb, U.S., PG-13“The Amazing Spider-Man” is rated PG-13 for mild violence and profanity.
- New films
-
‘The Dark Knight Rises’
Director: Christopher Nolan.
Starring: Christian Bale, Michael Caine.
The plot: A new terrorist overwhelms Gotham’s finest, and the Dark Knight resurfaces to protect the city that has branded him an enemy.
Genre: Action, adventure.
Rating: PG-13.
‘The Queen of Versailles’
Director: Lauren Greenfield.
Starring: Jackie Siegel, David Siegel.
The plot: A documentary that follows a billionaire couple as they begin to construct a mansion inspired by Versailles.
Genre: Documentary.
Rating: PG.
- Film roundup
-
“Brave”
★★★ 1/2 (out of four)
The film has been given a lukewarm recommendation by a majority of published critics, but many others have labeled it as Pixar’s first true misfire, and even its defenders seem half-hearted at best. But don’t be fooled by the overly cynical (and possibly sexist) nay-sayers — “Brave” represents Pixar at its best (or close to it, anyway), and is surely one of the most rewarding times you’ll have at the movies this summer.
Posted: Friday, July 13, 2012 7:49 am
|
Updated: 9:14 am, Fri Jul 13, 2012.
Nifty techniques not enough for new ‘Spider Man’
I fancy myself a halfway intelligent person, but I always seem to make the most head-smackingly stupid mistakes. A “for instance” would be the fact that I didn’t realize the News-Sentinel had an early deadline for the Fourth of July holiday, and found myself prepping for a late screening of “Magic Mike” as I discovered that the Lodi Living section was getting ready to go to press. It seems my stupidity knows no bounds.
But we’re back in the swing of things this week with a look at “The Amazing Spider-Man,” which puts us squarely back in the inexplicable summer funk we’ve been suffering for months with little reprieve. Bright side: There are a few promising titles now playing in wide release (“Ted,” “Savages” and the aforementioned “Magic Mike”), and I’ll play catch-up with at least one of them next week since the impending release of “The Dark Knight” has ensured that no “real” films are opening this weekend.
An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety.
You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.
Login
Or, use your
linked account:
Current print subscribers
Need an account? Create one now.
Or, use your
linked account:
kAmx’> 36EE:?8 E92E E96J’C6 2== AC6EEJ 8C62E 4@>A2C65 E@ E96 4@>A6E:E:@?[ 2?5 x >2J 92G6 >256 2?@E96C @?6 @7 >J C68C6EE23=6 >:DE2<6D 3J C@==:?8 E96 5:46 H:E9 “$A:56C\|2?” :?DE625 @7 ECFDE:?8 :? E96 AC@G6? E2=6?ED @7 $E6G6? $@56C36C89 2?5 $6E9 |24u2C=2?6] {:G6 2?5 =62C?]k^Am
kAm~?6 @7 E96 >@C6 2>3:E:@FD DFA6C96C@ C63@@ED @7 C646?E J62CD[ “%96 p>2K:?8 $A:56C\|2?” 2:>D E@ C6>@G6 :ED6=7 2D >F49 2D A@DD:3=6 7C@> $2> #2:>:’D 4@>A2C2E:G6=J =:89E962CE65 EC:=@8J @7 24E:@? DA64E24=6D] %2<:?8 2 A286 7C@> r9C:DE@A96C }@=2?’D :?4C65:3=J DF446DD7F= q2E>2? 7:=>D[ 5:C64E@C |2C4 (633 2?5 9:D DE23=6 @7 D4C66?HC:E6CD 92G6 72D9:@?65 2 72C >@C6 3C@@5:?8 !6E6C !2C<6C^$A:56C\|2? E92? H6’C6 FD65 E@[ 2?5 D:EF2E65 9:> :? 2 H@C=5 E92E :D 72C >@C6 C62=:DE:4 E92? E96 3C:89E[ “4@>:4\3@@<J” F?:G6CD6 4C62E65 3J #2:>:] %96 C6DF=ED 2C6 ]]] DEC2?86[ 7@C =24< @7 2 36EE6C H@C5]k^Am
kAm~?6 4@F=5 2C8F6 E92E E9:D DFA6C96C@ :D >@C6 DF:E65 E@ E96 G:3C2?E 4@=@CD 2?5 62DJ 492C>D 56=:G6C65 3J E96 7:CDE E9C66 “$A:56C\|2?” 7:=>D[ 2?5 E96 52C< 2==6JD 2?5 6I:DE6?E:2= BF2?52C:6D D9@F=5 36 =67E 7@C }@=2? 2=@?6 E@ 6IA=@C6] qFE x’> ?@E DFC6 x 3FJ E96 :562 E92E E96 q2E>2? >@G:6D 92G6 2 >@?@A@=J @? 52C<?6DD 2?5 C62=:D>] %96C6’D ?@E9:?8 :?96C6?E=J “HC@?8” H:E9 E@J:?8 H:E9 5:776C6?E 2AAC@2496D 2?5 E@?6D :? E96 C62=> @7 E96 DFA6C96C@ 86?C6[ 2?5 :? 2?J 42D6 >2<:?8 2?@E96C 7:=> :? E96 G6:? @7 #2:>:’D EC:=@8J H@F=5 >2<6 E9:D D66> =:<6 6G6? >@C6 @7 2 C692D9 E92? :E 2=C625J 5@6D] x? 724E[ x 8:G6 E96 2AAC@AC:2E6=J ?2>65 (633 3C@H?:6 A@:?ED 7@C 2E =62DE A@DD6DD:?8 E96 G:D:@? E@ ECJ D@>6E9:?8 ?6H 2?5 C6=2E:G6=J 3@=5 H:E9 E9:D 492C24E6C]k^Am
kAmu@C 2 H9:=6[ :E 6G6? =@@<65 =:<6 96 >:89E DF44665] uC@> E96 @A6?:?8 D46?6D[ “%96 p>2K:?8 $A:56C\|2?” :D 2 92?5D@>6 7:=>[ H6==\D9@E 2?5 2DD6>3=65 3J 2 7:=>>2<6C H:E9 @3G:@FD ?2EFC2= E2=6?E W(633 AC6G:@FD=J 96=>65 E96 67764E:G6=J 3:EE6CDH66E C@>2?46 “,d__. s2JD @7 $F>>6C”X] (633 4=62C=J <?@HD 9@H E@ FD6 2 42>6C2[ 2?5 9:D !~' D9@ED @7 $A:56J DH:?8:?8 E9C@F89 E96 DEC66ED @7 }6H *@C< 2C6 >@C6 :>>65:2E6=J 2CC6DE:?8 E92? 2?JE9:?8 #2:>: H2D 23=6 E@ AC6D6?E @G6C E96 4@FCD6 @7 E9C66 7:=>D] p?5 E96 D46?6D 56A:4E:?8 !2C<6C WA=2J65 3J 7FEFC6 ~D42C H:??6C p?5C6H v2C7:6=5[ @7 “%96 $@4:2= }6EH@C<” 72>6X 7:CDE =62C?:?8 E@ 92C?6DD 9:D ?6H7@F?5 A@H6CD E2A :?E@ 2 86?F:?6 D6?D6 @7 5:D4@G6CJ E92E 6=F565 (633’D AC65646DD@C]k^Am
kAmw@H6G6C[ 2E E96 6?5 @7 E96 52J E9:D :D 2 DFA6C96C@ 24E:@? 7=:4<[ 2?5 ?:7EJ 42>6C2 EC:4<D 2?5 26DE96E:4 ?@5D E@ }6H w@==JH@@5 2?5 uC6?49 }6H (2G6 7:=>>2<:?8 42? @?=J 86E J@F D@ 72C] tG6?EF2==J[ E96 A6@A=6 56>2?5 E@ E96 6?E6CE2:?65] p?5 D:?46 E96 A=@E :ED6=7 W2 5:DA@D23=6 C6H@C<:?8 @7 E96 6I24E D2>6 @C:8:? DE@CJ H6 D2H ;FDE `_ J62CD 28@X :D 72C E@@ H62< E@ DFAA@CE 2 EH@ 9@FC\A=FD >@G:6[ E96 =2DE 92=7 @7 E96 7:=> 9:?86D @? E96 24E:@? 2D $A:56C\|2? 5@6D 32EE=6 H:E9 %96 {:K2C5[ E96 9@CC:3=J >FE2E65 7@C> @7 C6?@H?65 86?6E:4D C6D62C496C sC] rFCE r@??@CD W#9JD x72?DX]k^Am
kAm&?7@CEF?2E6=J[ E9@F89 (633 5@6D 2 5646?E ;@3 @7 92?5=:?8 E96 <:?6E:4D @7 2? 24E:@? D6BF6?46[ :E’D ;FDE ?@E 2== E92E E9C:==:?8 E@ H2E49 @FC 96C@ 7:89E 2 8:2?E =:K2C5] %96:C 7:89E D46?6D 2C6 DEC:4E=J 3J E96 ?F>36CD[ H:E9 ?@ C62= H:E @C 7=2:C E@ 5:DE:?8F:D9 E96> 7C@> E96 =:E6C2==J 9F?5C65D @7 D:>:=2C D46?6D H6’G6 D66? 2?5 J2H?65 2E 367@C6]k^Am
kAm%9:D =62G6D E96 42DE E@ A:4< FA E96 A:646D[ 2?5 2=E9@F89 v2C7:6=5 2?5 C@>2?E:4 :?E6C6DE t>>2 $E@?6 W2D E66?286 D4:6?E:DE vH6? $E246JX 2C6 3@E9 :>>6?D6=J 2AA62=:?8 2?5 E2=6?E65 J@F?8 24E@CD[ E96 4=F?<J D4C66?A=2J ?6G6C C62==J 2==@HD E96> E:>6 E@ “4=:4<]” xE 5@6D?’E 96=A E92E $E246J :D @?=J 2EEC24E65 E@ !2C<6C 27E6C 9:D EC2?D7@C>2E:@? 7:?5D 9:> 362E:?8 FA D49@@= 3F==:6D[ A2:?E:?8 96C 2D 2 EJA:42= 52?86C\D66<:?8 E2CE H9@ 72==D 7@C E96 325 3@J]k^Am
kAmxE’D 2== <:?5 @7 2 >6DD[ 2?5 6G6? E9@F89 “%96 p>2K:?8 $A:56C\|2?” :D 2 8@@5\=@@<:?8 7:=> H:E9 D@>6 567:?:E6 9:89 A@:?ED[ x D66 =:EE=6 A@E6?E:2= 7@C 2 7FEFC6 H:E9 E9:D 7C2?49:D6] !6C92AD :? 2?@E96C 564256 E96J’== ECJ 282:?[ 2?5 3J E96? H6’== 2== 92G6 =62C?65 E92E 2? 2AA62=:?8 42DE 2?5 4@>A6E6?E 7:=>>2<6C 2C6 ?@E ?646DD2C:=J 6?@F89 E@ D2G6 2 >@G:6 H9@D6 D4C66?HC:E6CD 92G6 ?@ :562 9@H E@ E6== 2 DE@CJ]k^Am
kAmk6>my2D@? (2==:D :D 2 }6HD\$6?E:?6= 4@AJ 65:E@C] w6 42? 36 C624965 2E k2 9C67lQ>2:=E@i;2D@?H2==:Do4@>42DE]?6EQm;2D@?H2==:Do4@>42DE]?6Ek^2m]k^6>mk^Am
Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761.
You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.
Login
Or, use your
linked account:
Current print subscribers
Need an account? Create one now.
Posted in
Jason wallis
on
Friday, July 13, 2012 7:49 am.
Updated: 9:14 am.
| Tags:
Comics,
Spider-man,
Sam Raimi,
The Amazing Spider-man,
Marc Webb,
Lizard,
Andrew Garfield,
Peter Parker,
Gwen Stacy,
Christopher Nolan,
The Dark Knight,
Seth Macfarlane,
Steven Soderbergh,
Emma Stone,
Batman
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days. You will see 10 articles for free before being asked to register, and then you can view 10 additional articles by registering or logging in. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) free articles remaining ((%remaining_reg%) before being asked to register and (%remaining_sub%) before being asked to subscribe). Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) free articles remaining ((%remaining_reg%) before being asked to register and (%remaining_sub%) before being asked to subscribe). Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) total free articles remaining ((%remaining_reg%) before being asked to register and (%remaining_sub%) before being asked to subscribe). Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You have viewed (%viewed%) of your 20 free pages in 30 days. Please login or register at this time and enjoy the next (%remaining%) articles free of charge. After your 20 free articles, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. Because you have already viewed this article, you may view it again as many times as you would like without subtracting from your remaining free article views.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for registering on Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) remaining. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) remaining. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) remaining. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days. This is your last free article this period. On your next article we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761.
Chris Wallace posted at 1:00 pm on Sat, Jul 14, 2012.
Before Nolan achieved success with pulling Batman from it's comic book and comic book movie environments and placing it into a seemingly real world setting, Sam Raimi did the same with Spider Man. So while in the 70's were would believe a man can fly, 2002 we believed a teenager could crawl up a wall.
Both Spider Man and its sequel were very enjoyable movies. Then came Spider Man 3.
Spider Man 3 did well at the box office (and I cannot understand why), but it received a lot of criticism. So due to studios being studios and actors geting raises SM4 never happened.
Fast forward to the curret Spider Man reboot. I myself was skeptical to the point of disinterested, and who could blame me: strange casting of Sally Field and Martin Sheen, the fact that Emma Stone would be in it, and the previews that showcased awkward first person video game like footage. But let me tell ya- I enjoyed it... maybe even more that Raimi's films.
I have no problem with starting over, just as long as the finished prouct was enjoyable. We have a completely diferent take on the mythology, with different motivations of the hero and a diferent set of rules for the characters to adhere to.
While this Spidey's origins shared similarities with the origins of other Spideys, we have to face the fact that you cannot stray too far from the whole "bitten-by-a-___ spider" routine. Yet liberties were taken to make this diferent than Raimi's almost to a fault. Sometimes it felt like different for the sake of being different instead of different to serve the story. But the result was a refreshing take of the mythology while maintaing it's familiarity with its core principles.
Originally peter was simply an orphan being raised by his aunt and uncle. Now we have the deaths of his parents shrouded in mystery, intrique, and nefarious circumstances. While Raimi's Parker was grounded in reality, Webb's walks a tightrope of comic book camp and real world brooding. Webb's take on Parker is very dark, motivated in part by what I would describe as revenge- but the comic book camp is upheld by the bright colors of his super suit, he supreme sarcasm of its wearer, and the high technology of his out of this world web shooters. Sometimes this balancing act works, like when Peter would come home very battered with serious need to heal and sometimes it stumbles like when his powers manifest in a subway, and one of the results is when he accidentally rips off a (hot) girl's shirt.
After the death of Ben, May becomes an extreme secondary character, making way for the by-the-book police officer who would arrest an old lady for putting a quarter in someone elses meter... and who also happens to be the father of Peter's love interest. I disagree that Gwen was reduced to brainy girl attracted to bad boys- it was established early on that here attraction to Peter was based on him standing up to bullies like Flash Thompson.
The movie falls from the real world and plunges back into bright world of comics wih the film's atagonist- Dr. Conners a.k.a. the Lizard. With his super hi-techy lab in Osborn Tower or his makeshift lab in the subway Conners comes off as the typical genius in a trenchcoat who may or may not be evil. Altho we are meant to sympathise with him and his plight, we are not able to feel the same with Conners as we did with Doctor Octopus. However is metamorphosis and rampage as the Lizard are well done, as are the fight scenes- which also dip into the suspensefull at times.
I haven't liked Emma Stone in much except Zombieland, but I actually liked her portrayal as Gwen in this film, altho like the lizard her role was rooted firmly in the comics with her teenage genius abilities to crank out a syrum in a lab with equipment that other people probably have to spend years in school to learn how to use. Unfortunately, if these films follow any Spider Man comic history things don't look good for her future.
Despite a few flaws- including corny dialogue from time to time- I really enjoyed this film... a little more so than Raimi's. I saw it in 3D and this became a must get 3D Blu Ray purchase. I have grave concerns for the sequel tho- it has already been confirmed that it will be penned by Roberto Oci and Alex Kurtzman, the duo who gives us a lazily written Transformers (saved by Bay), a lackluster Star Trek (saved by Abrams) and Cowboys and Aliens which some say cannot be saved. Thesed two have also given us the fantasic Zorro sequel and Eagel Eye (tongue firmly planted in cheek). Can the directing talents of Webb save the next installment of Spiderman from the mediocrity of Orci and Kurtzman?