Lodinews.com

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Am I really going there?

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, July 14, 2011 3:42 pm | Updated: 6:20 pm, Thu Jul 14, 2011.

Yep. I'm really going there.

But only because I've been asked: "What do you think about the Casey Anthony verdict?"

So - here goes. It's a touchy subject. I've ranted before about people or groups who I believe to be less than stellar examples of humanity and got some strong feedback. Some of it unprintable.

But this case is well-known that unless you live in a cave or on a remote island, you must have heard of it and you must have an opinion.

The million dollar question is "Was justice served?"

To which I say "of course not." There is no justice that exists for a murdered toddler. Whether her mother was found guilty, given the death penalty, or - as happened - acquitted, no justice was served. It's that simple. A young life was taken and we will probably never know what actually happened ... but justice? Nope.

Of interest to me is the fact that jurors are in hiding and actually leaving their homes and moving elsewhere because of threats from the public. Given the fact that this case brought about insurmountable anger and rage from the public I can understand a bit of animosity toward the jurors. It was high profile and heinous.

But the public needs to back the hell off.

The jurors did what they were brought on board to do. They listened to hard evidence; they saw what were likely some horrendous images; they heard a whole pile of speculation and theory. The jurors got what the jurors got. And at the end of the day, there remained too much reasonable doubt to imprison someone for life. No matter what the public thinks. No matter what Nancy Grace thinks. No matter what you and I think.

It sounds simple, and it is. And it is not.

I served on a jury for an assault case a couple of years ago. We heard testimony from the victim, witnesses and other acquaintances of the accused. The defendant never took the stand, which was probably in his best interest. But it was a felony charge that would have carried a long prison sentence if he were found guilty. The same thing happened, however, in the Anthony case: Acquittal. When we convened to discuss the evidence, the case, what we knew and didn't know - we could not prove that the defendant was guilty. A couple of jurors tried to find something to make it stick. But it was simply not possible. One said "Well ... I think he did something!" And I said "That may be. But you can't send someone to prison because you think they did something." And, to be honest, most of us were pretty sure he did "something." But the evidence was not there and the case could not be proved. I came away from that experience with a new appreciation of what juries go through.

And that's what our justice system is based upon. Many people have been wrongly convicted, many have been acquitted when it's clear that they're guilty of ... something. And some have been convicted on mostly circumstantial evidence and we're all pretty much okay with that (Scott Peterson right a bell?).

I think much of the world expected Casey Anthony would be convicted and would have been fine, or even elated, by that decision. The acquittal shocked me also, to be sure.

Is Anthony an immoral sociopath who put the needs of her daughter last? Yes. Is she a conniving manipulator who put her family through the ringer? Absolutely. Would I trust her with the care of any children I loved? Hell and No.

But the trial is over and whatever brand of hell that she's created for herself will continue to swarm around her for a long, long time.

Those who are angered by the jury's decision should redirect their energy. Next time you get a jury summons, quit finding excuses to back out of it. Quit making stuff up because you "don't have time," or "can't afford it." Stop backing away and step up. When they say "a jury of your peers," it doesn't mean "a group of unemployed or bored individuals who are out of excuses and may or may not be invested in the process."

Get involved and see how it works. Create your own definition of justice.

That said ... my heart breaks for little Caylee Anthony.

May she finally rest in peace.

 

 

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Use your real name. You must register with your full first and last name before you can comment. (And don't pretend you're someone else.)
  • 2 Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually oriented language.
  • 3 Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
  • 4 Be truthful. Don't lie about anyone or anything. Don't post unsubstantiated allegations, rumors or gossip that could harm the reputation of a person, company or organization.
  • 5 Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 6 Stay on topic. Make sure your comments are about the story. Don't insult each other.
  • 7 Tell us if the discussion is getting out of hand. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 8 Share what you know, and ask about what you don't.

Welcome to the discussion.

2 comments:

  • kathryn williams posted at 11:01 am on Wed, Jul 20, 2011.

    kathryn williams Posts: 1

    Well said. The system ain't perfect but it's better than anything else I've seen.

     
  • Brandi Poole posted at 4:27 pm on Thu, Jul 14, 2011.

    Brandi Poole Posts: 79

    I believe that you put it as plainly as possible. I have been on a jury, the guy was obviously guilty (to us, the jury) But the absolute proof was not there. i didn't want to put him back out there, none of us did. If there was proof, I believe it was the Prosecutor's job to "Bring It!"
    We worked with what we had, and did what the Judge instructed us to do. I am . angry that Casey Anthony was acquitted. My heart breaks for Caylee.
    The jury is the last in a process. Everyone involved before we enter that room has a job to do. Maybe someone dropped the ball before it came to the jury. I believe that the system works more times than it doesn't.
    This was one of the times it didn't, but it shows that the jury WAS doing it's job.

     

Popular Stories

Poll

Should graduations return to the Grape Bowl?

Lodi Unified leaders are moving Lodi and Tokay high school graduations from the Grape Bowl to the Spanos Center at UOP in Stockton. They cite limited seating, costs and unpredictable weather at the Grape Bowl. But others say graduations at the Grape Bowl are an important Lodi tradition, and one reason many supported renovating the stadium. What do you think?

Total Votes: 187

Loading…

Mailing List

Subscribe to a mailing list to have daily news sent directly to your inbox.

  • Breaking News

    Would you like to receive breaking news alerts? Sign up now!

  • News Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily news headlines? Sign up now!

  • Sports Updates

    Would you like to receive our daily sports headlines? Sign up now!

Manage Your Lists