Was The Duke a better Rooster Cogburn than Jeff Bridges?
-
Print
-
Create a hardcopy of this page
-
Font Size:
-
Default font size
-
Larger font size
Posted: Monday, February 7, 2011 5:00 pm
|
Updated: 6:12 pm, Mon Feb 7, 2011.
Was The Duke a better Rooster Cogburn than Jeff Bridges?
Posted on
February 7, 2011
I enjoyed the Coen Brothers' version of "True Grit" so I thought
it would be interesting to compare it to the original featuring The
Duke in his Oscar-winning role as Marshall Reuben "Rooster"
Cogburn.
But there really isn't any comparison.
The original, released in 1969, just doesn't hold up to the new
version.
• John Wayne had amazing screen presence, granted. He was huge
and charismatic and had a voice that cut like a chainsaw. You could
not not notice him. Problem is, Wayne's swagger and size dwarfed
everyone else in the movie, especially Kim Darby as Mattie
Ross.
The Rooster played by Jeff Bridges is more interesting, more
human, and leaves space for a splendidly nuanced performance by
Hailee Steinfeld as Mattie.
• The Coens know how to write and direct dialogue. Lines that
were uttered with staccato sameness in Version One, with the right
timing and setup, become funny or ironic in the new Grit. For
example:
Lawyer Goudy: Now, I believe you testified that you backed away
from Aaron Wharton?
Rooster Cogburn: That's right.
Lawyer Goudy: Which direction were you going?
Rooster Cogburn: I always go backwards when I'm backing up.
• Director of original Grit, Henry Hathaway, was prolific but
drew little critical acclaim. He pumped out over 60 movies in his
career, including many Westerns, such as `Nevada Smith,' with Steve
McQueen.
• One treat in the original: A turn by Robert Duvall as Lucky
Ned Pepper.
I grew up watching and admiring John Wayne. As I said, he had a
commanding presence.
But The Duke was not the most dextrous of actors and True Grit,
the first time around, was little more than a slightly above
average Western.
Posted in
Battle royale
on
Monday, February 7, 2011 5:00 pm.
Updated: 6:12 pm.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days. You will see 10 articles for free before being asked to register, and then you can view 10 additional articles by registering or logging in. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) free articles remaining ((%remaining_reg%) before being asked to register and (%remaining_sub%) before being asked to subscribe). Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) free articles remaining ((%remaining_reg%) before being asked to register and (%remaining_sub%) before being asked to subscribe). Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thanks for visiting Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 free articles every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) total free articles remaining ((%remaining_reg%) before being asked to register and (%remaining_sub%) before being asked to subscribe). Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You have viewed (%viewed%) of your 20 free pages in 30 days. Please login or register at this time and enjoy the next (%remaining%) articles free of charge. After your 20 free articles, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. Because you have already viewed this article, you may view it again as many times as you would like without subtracting from your remaining free article views.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for registering on Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) remaining. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) remaining. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days, and you currently have (%remaining%) remaining. Then, if you enjoy our site and want full access, we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading Lodinews.com. You're entitled to view 20 articles for free every 30 days. This is your last free article this period. On your next article we'll ask you to purchase an affordable subscription.
(%remaining%) Remaining
Thank you for reading 20 free articles on our site. You can come back at the end of your 30-day period for another 20 free articles, or you can purchase a subscription at this time and continue to enjoy valuable local news and information. If you need help, please contact our office at 209-369-2761.
Darrell Baumbach posted at 7:07 pm on Mon, Feb 7, 2011.
To me, the magic of any John wayne movie was John Wayne... the script or acting skills were irrelevent .... simular to a clint Eastwood movie. I think Rich Hanners measurment in comparing the two movies is not very useful to the reader.