Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

February 8th, 2010
February 6th, 2010
February 5th, 2010
February 4th, 2010
February 3rd, 2010
February 2nd, 2010
February 1st, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT

San Joaquin County supervisors to lay off district attorney workers to aid budget

By Ross Farrow
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Thursday, December 3, 2009 1:36 PM PST

Seven deputy district attorneys in San Joaquin County and an office assistant will start the new year on the unemployment block after the Board of Supervisors voted on Tuesday to lay them off.

The employees will be issued layoff notices on Dec. 18, with their final date of employment being Jan. 1.

The Board of Supervisors decided to issue the layoffs after hearing a dire budget update from County Administrator Manuel Lopez.

County revenues are $14.6 million lower in the first quarter of the 2009-10 fiscal year than what the board budgeted earlier this year. And Lopez predicts the county general fund will have a $54 million shortfall for the 2010-11 fiscal year.

The district attorney's office was singled out for immediate cuts because the Board of Supervisors restored eight deputy D.A. positions and the office assistant on a trial basis for six months to see if the economy recovers.

It didn't.

One position will be eliminated by attrition, since one employee among the restored positions resigned. That position was not filled.

Supervisors rejected District Attorney Jim Willett's request to hold off on the layoff decision until Dec. 8, when Willett can present another idea — using Proposition 64 money to restore five of the positions.

Willett noted that prosecutors are needed because murders continue to occur in the county. San Joaquin County has seen 43 murders as of Tuesday, compared with 36 for all of 2008.

Proposition 64 money would be limited to civil cases because it deals with unfair business practices, said Willett, who plans to address the board on the issue on Dec. 8 anyway.

With the pending layoffs, the District Attorney's Office will no longer be able to prosecute misdemeanor cases, Willett said.

"We need to look back at what we can do to save these jobs," Supervisor Carlos Villapudua said. "It's very scary."

Contact reporter Ross Farrow at rossf@lodinews.com.



San Joaquin County budget basics



First quarter, 2009-10 fiscal year.

General fund shortfall: $54 million.

Net county expenses: $6.4 million over budget, the majority coming from law and justice ($4.2 million) and human services ($2.6 million).

San Joaquin General Hospital: Operating loss $5.1 million in first quarter, which is $2 million greater than what the county projected. The loss for the 2009-10 fiscal year could reach $20 million, $8 million higher than budgeted.

Proposition 172 sales tax revenue: $5.6 million less than budgeted. Revenue goes specifically to the Sheriff's, District Attorney's, Public Defender's and Probation offices.

Mental health: $4.5 million reduction in revenue expected for the fiscal year.

Proposed state budget deficit: $21 billion by the end of the 2010-11 fiscal year.

Source: San Joaquin County

In other action



Williamson Act

The San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors voted on Tuesday to not accept any new Williamson Act applications until at least Sept. 30 of next year. However, nine pending applications will be considered for approval on Dec. 8.

Supervisor Steve Bestolarides said he wanted to honor the nine pending applications because they applied under the current rules.

Future applications will not be honored because the state eliminated $1.7 in payments to the county to compensate for the county's reduced revenue on Williamson Act land.

Under the act, property owners agree to not urbanize their land. In exchange, they pay a lower property tax.

After the meeting, Steve Malcoun, who has a 38-acre walnut orchard east of Morada, said he appreciates the Board of Supervisors' decision to consider his Williamson Act application on Dec. 8.

Ross Farrow

Animal control

The Board of Supervisors agreed to establish a system in which deputy animal control officers volunteer for an on-call list to respond to emergency animal-related calls on nights, weekends and holidays.

During the current fiscal year, the county has provided animal control services for unincorporated areas only from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. weekdays.

San Joaquin County Sheriff Steve Moore said deputies have responded to 121 animal-related calls for after-hours service since July 1. It has taken his deputies too much extra time because deputies aren't as trained in dealing with animals as animal control officers are, Moore said.

Supervisors Larry Ruhstaller and Steve Bestolarides asked county Agricultural Commissioner Scott Hudson, whose department administers animal control, to document what time of day and which days each week animal calls come in. That way, Hudson can schedule his officers on shifts where the greatest call volume can be expected, Ruhstaller said.

Staggering work schedules sounds like a great idea, Hudson said, but it doesn't work with a small staff like San Joaquin County has.

Board chairman Leroy Ornellas asked Hudson if it would be possible to recover at least some of the county's expenses from pet owners if animal control officers have to deal with an animal.

Bestolarides also suggested looking into the possibility of the county contracting with cities' animal control officers for evening and weekend response.

— News-Sentinel staff

Reader Feedback

plmd wrote on Dec 4, 2009 12:46 PM:

" Reply to Newbie,

I haven't noticed any spam from the folks you listed above....but nonetheless I do get a lot of spam.....more of that than fun stuff!!!

Spam sucks!

This is probably a dumb question, but their are no dumb questions right???...what does addy's mean??? "

plmd wrote on Dec 4, 2009 12:41 PM:

" I know Asst. DA's and Admin's work hard to see our law enforcement officers arrests are prosecuted! Otherwise cases the police & investigators work so hard to get arrests on aren't for nothing.

We NEED the Asst. DA's & their support staff to prosecute cases so victims get the deserved justice & criminals off the streets!

We complain about criminals being on the streets - this is why!

IT DOESN'T STOP AT THE ARREST, THAT'S THE BEGINNING!

Those arrests go to the DA for prosecution & justice! W/out prosecution,criminals can laugh at all the work the officers do being for nothing. It totally sucks to see law enforcement's hard work, victims need for justice & safety of the citizens - being an unnecessary expense that needs to be cut!

Let's cut real unnecessary expenses & salaries(maybe w/in the Board itself). Such as expenses for gas to get to/from work/luncheons/dinners/laundry,etc. These funds should be claimed on tax day as a business exp. just like anyone else, if you're that petty you need the lunches/dinners you pretend to talk about business at are in fact work related-Ya right truly doubt it! "

newbie wrote on Nov 26, 2009 12:23 AM:

" Well, well, well...

Seems the powers that be at LNS can't take a little heat. Nice move deleting my posts, you're just fueling the fire.

So I set up this phony e-mail addy to test a theory. Seems to me ever since I started posting on here my junk mail went thru the roof. So I created this e-mail addy to see if it was the LNS selling addy's. Guess what? They are. In the 5 days since creating this addy and registering on LNS I have recieved 18 junk e-mails and had 38 e-mails go directly into the "spam" folder.

Please tell us LNS, how could this have happened when I only used this addy to register for LNS? Are you selling our addy's?

Are you folks getting e-mails entitled;

-Fitness Report
-Nursing Degree
-Military Benfits
-Camyoo
-Credit Report Center

If you are then we you now know where these leaches are getting your addy from. Richie Hanna and your LNS!

Any comments Richie or are you just going to delete these too? "

Aimee wrote on Nov 25, 2009 7:15 AM:

" I'm sorry to see people lose their jobs, but the other attorneys will have to take up the slack - it's not an option to let certain crimes go unprosecuted. Let's put this into perspective...it's not like these people are police officers or firefighters, patrolling the streets or putting out fires. "

Comments on this story are now closed.