Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

February 8th, 2010
February 6th, 2010
February 5th, 2010
February 4th, 2010
February 3rd, 2010
February 2nd, 2010
February 1st, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT

Tokay grad files claim over Lodi's Grape Bowl

He says stadium doesn't comply with ADA guides

By Jordan Guinn
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Monday, November 23, 2009 3:38 PM PST

A Tokay High graduate with a degenerative bone disorder has filed a claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act over access at Lodi's Grape Bowl stadium.

Jeremy Hixson, who graduated from Tokay High School in May, filed a claim against city of Lodi employees, the Lodi Unified School District and the Lodi City Council on Friday.


Jeremy Hixson


"The adaptations should have been made a while ago," Hixson said. "They should have put the changes in earlier."

The freshman at University of the Pacific suffers from Osteogenesis Imperfecta, a condition that makes bones extremely fragile. He has suffered more than 30 bone fractures in his life and is confined to a wheelchair. He said his experiences with injuries have made him cautious about placing himself in unsafe situations.

His claim said the city of Lodi ignored the ADA mandates and hasn't made reasonable efforts to make the Grape Bowl compliant.

Hixson said the city's priorities are not in line with meeting ADA-compliance regulations. He said the city had 20 years to make the bathrooms, pathways and other amenities of the Grape Bowl ADA compliant. City officials said Hixson's claim was troubling. A claim must be filed against a public agency before a lawsuit can be lodged.

"I'm never surprised by a lawsuit," said Mayor Larry Hansen. "But I'm disappointed. I felt a real effort was made."

Hansen's feelings were shared by City Attorney Stephen Schwabauer.

"I'm certainly surprised," said Schwabauer. "The city spent over $10,000 to come up with accommodations."

Schwabauer said he understands the Grape Bowl has multimillion dollar problems and they have tried to remedy the situation, but money to make the improvements is scarce.

"We don't have money that grows on trees," he said.

He said improvements that comply with ADA regulations are being done on the Grape Bowl. The synthetic playing surface, a $1.2 million renovation to the stadium recently approved by the City Council, is one of those improvements. The synthetic turf will enable wheelchairs to more easily navigate the field, instead of getting caught in divots or uneven surfaces.

The city is also working on a plan to replace ramps, and ADA-compliant bathrooms are under construction.

"It's a day late and dollar short," Schwabauer said of Hixson's claim.

In April, Hixson sent a letter requesting Lodi Unified School District find a way that would enable him to be able to use his wheelchair on the Grape Bowl's field during the graduation ceremony.

In May, two days before he graduated, Hixson and the city reached an agreement he said was win-win at the time. Hixson rode in a golf cart to his seat and then used a rubber mat to access the podium.

He said the reason he filed the claim on Friday is because he was under the impression that the Grape Bowl wouldn't be used until it was made ADA-compliant.

Hixson said he also accepted the terms for his graduation because he didn't want the ceremony moved to the school's gymnasium. He said it would have unfairly punished his other classmates, who had no say in the matter.

Hixson said he doesn't want any events hosted at the Grape Bowl until ADA compliance issues are addressed.

Schwabauer said he would recommend that the city reject the claim.

The city has 45 days to either accept or reject the claim. It's considered rejected if they don't accept it. If the claim is rejected, Hixson has six months to file a lawsuit.

Contact Jordan Guinn at jordang@lodinews.com

Reader Feedback

Jerome R. Kinderman wrote on Nov 28, 2009 6:07 PM:

" Curiously absent from this entire matter is the subject of "damages." Just how is/was Jeremy Hixson financially hurt?

Moreover, in order to make a claim against the city, something accurately described in the article, he will be required to come up with a dollar amount while also submitting data to substantiate his claim. Still, in light of the events led by Mr. Hixson prior to graduation in May, is anyone here really surprised by this?

Obviously there must be something missing in this story because I can't see where he has any standing to bring either the claim or the subsequent lawsuit. "

Lodian wrote on Nov 27, 2009 4:33 PM:

" We haven't seen you around here on the blogs for quite awhile, govagent. "

govagent wrote on Nov 27, 2009 9:42 AM:

" Am I lost? or was there $300,000 for art here in Lodi, when the money was needed to help the disabled? I was an inspector for HELP during the elections and would go around all the voting places to make sure they were disability friendly. I hope things work out for Lodi and the young man. I dont know why we dont have concerts at the grape bowl like in the late 70s 80s lets get Foreigner back, or have a rock fest to raise money! Yea! "

freespeech wrote on Nov 26, 2009 6:20 PM:

" The replacement of grass for turf was the most insane use of upgrade funds given the state of the poor old grape bowl...how in the world did they justify THAT one? Better yet - whose brother-in-law got the turf contract?! "

kaceace wrote on Nov 25, 2009 7:34 PM:

" I hope Jeremy Hixson wins a millions dollars, and puts on a special motivational event at the Grape Bowl. He can invite all the students in Lodi and share his story with them. That way Lodi could someday be represented by people who stand up for the rights of others, learn to advocate for ideas that are right and fair, and have respect for the rules and regulations of the city. What a concept! GO JEREMY! "

kaceace wrote on Nov 25, 2009 7:17 PM:

" The city spent $10,000 coming up with accomodations?!
What an outrageous statement to make. It implies that they city actually made accomodations of some sort.
Coming up with a plan and following a plan are two different things.
Allocating money is not the same as spending it.
It takes but a minute to "come up" with basic accommodations, like disabled parking, wheelchair seating & accessible restrooms. DUH! If they didn't make any accommodations how did they spend $10,000? They focused on the 1.2 million dollar field and other renovations with total disregard for the law. The city bickered and revised plans for years avoiding their responsibility. They didn't even get the most basic accommodations done! If they were able to say they spent the money and MADE accomodations they wouldn't be in this situation. "

Gator wrote on Nov 25, 2009 10:06 AM:

" Back when this story first appeared in the LNS I did some research and found several manufactures of all terrain wheel chairs that were fully human powered. I did this because the young man professed he wanted to go under his own power to receive his diploma. I was sure a supplier would have been more than happy to loan a chair for the occasion. Well the young
man road in a golf kart. So much for doing it under his own power. I had provided the information to the LNS in plenty of time to contact a supplier.
To file a law suit before working through all channels smacks of look at me
Look at me. Life doesn’t always deal a good hand to a lot of people but the
strong push on and make the best of it. A good example would be the wheel chair racers and single and double amputee runners in the New York City marathon.. “STRIVE TO PERSEVERE” "

jonsey wrote on Nov 25, 2009 9:15 AM:

" If he didn't think the Grape Bowl should be used before it is 100% ADA compliant then he should have made the school change where they had graduation. There seems to be some contradiction here!!! "

sparky595 wrote on Nov 25, 2009 6:36 AM:

" You know, my back hurts when I go watch a movie at the Lodi movie theater. I think I am going to sue them to replace the old chairs with heated/vibrating chairs for my comfort.

My feet hurt when I walk down the city sidewalks. I think I am going to sue to replace them with a rubber/cork matting for my comfort.

The sun is hot in the summer. I think I am going to sue Lodi until they plant large trees in all public areas that are missing them.

When I go to the Grape Festival, sometimes I hear bands playing music that I don't like. I am going to sue Lodi to put up sound barriers around the stage to contain the noise as I may be walking by to get a deep fried twinkie.

If these don't work, I'll keep looking for ways to sue Lodi, because I and the other .5 % of the population that may feel the same as me, need to show the other 99.5% of the population who's the boss around here. "

seriously lodi wrote on Nov 24, 2009 5:13 PM:

" District policy is meant to be followed. For too long the school district has failed to follow guidelines. Maybe this will serve as a wake up call. "

Lodiken wrote on Nov 24, 2009 3:11 PM:

" It is unbelievable how selfish people can be. This guy probably lives off of Government money yet he is probably going to sue the government for something they are already working on. He should lose any social securtiy aid he is getting immediately. Whatever he was getting can go toward the Grape Bowl ADA fund. "

wdbdgdad wrote on Nov 23, 2009 6:17 PM:

" Thank you "richardh" for reinstating the comments on this article.
To Mr. Hixxon: My wife and I are both handicapped and we resent these law suits. They make non handicapped persons resent the "special treatment" that are so often demanded in these suits. They only hurt small businesses,like Chuck's and The Squeeze Inn, and tax payers in this poor economy. Be patent, look around, the changes are coming. Look at all the new wheelchair accessible street corners as well as all the restaurants and stores that weren't acessable ten years ago. Changes are not as quick as we might like, but they are coming as soon as they can be afforded by the city. "

RU4REAL wrote on Nov 23, 2009 5:01 PM:

" I agree with the first comment by Veritas. This smells of ambulance chaser, most likely promising this kid a new Wii system or a years worth of free pizza. Public agencies no longer have the money to bring all facilities under their control up to current codes, and even if they did, the code would change frequently enough that they couldn't afford it anyway. Cities are no different than our own homes. Could any of you afford to make every area of your home fully handicapped accessible? Current building code does not even require this in residential construction. But get ready....'cause it's coming. "

richardh wrote on Nov 23, 2009 4:11 PM:

" From Rich Hanner, editor: Some comments have been removed due to rule violations. Pls. focus on the issues here and refrain from critical comments about the young man who is filing the claim. Thank you. "

eddygreenlee wrote on Nov 21, 2009 1:39 PM:

" That is exactly my point. The 1.2 million should have been spent on real ADA upgrades and not the artifical field. "

dogs4you wrote on Nov 21, 2009 12:41 PM:

" eddygreenlee, for what reason would a person with a disability what to go on the artifical turf in the first place, they certainly don`t play sports. "

turricha2 wrote on Nov 21, 2009 12:13 PM:

" What is next? Our own homes? "

mee thinks wrote on Nov 21, 2009 11:50 AM:

" This is sad. The city accommodated him for graduation and have approved renovations but have to wait till the money is available Does he not pay attention to the economy? People are losing jobs all over and the funds are short at this time. Why sue and take away the little money the city has in its budget? then HE is causing a shortfall. Give Lodi a chance to recover from the economical slump so the improvements CAN be made before you jump the gun and sue... seems he needs a lesson in economics and financial stablilty.... "

eddygreenlee wrote on Nov 21, 2009 11:33 AM:

" As the father of two disabled daughters I am glad that this lawsuit has been brought about. A lawsuit is the only way to keep the City of Lodi responsible to use our money the way it is supposed to be used. And what good is an artifical surface if someone who is disabled cannot get to it. Kind of putting the horse before the cart. "

stucknlodi wrote on Nov 21, 2009 9:11 AM:

" maybe the city will pay him off so he will go away.
with the improvements they are doing out at the grape bowl they still have not addressed getting from stockton street entrance to the stadium like everyone else. if you are handicap you have to been driven to the east side entrance to get to a ramp. I see another complaint to be filed. "

alf wrote on Nov 21, 2009 8:51 AM:

" just hope that mr. hixson stays out of galt. their stadium has even worse ADA access. "

Whoa Nellie! wrote on Nov 21, 2009 8:38 AM:

" Who is really surprised? I'm only curious why it took so long? I saw this coming in May.

My guess is that he has the same lawyer as the guy who is suing Chucks Restaurant in Stockton, and the woman who sued the original Squeeze Inn in Sac. "

ra wrote on Nov 21, 2009 6:55 AM:

" My comments do not imply force, simply a societal need to reduce the number of unethical lawyers. Is this one of those attorneys with magnetic back business cards to throw at the back of ambulances racing to an accident? "

ra wrote on Nov 21, 2009 6:39 AM:

" The ADA although originally well-intentioned must be reworked and reasonable protections for ALL including business owners. Lodi has made an effort. Enough. Shakespeare was right, start here. "

veritas wrote on Nov 21, 2009 6:14 AM:

" There is a very strong scent of a money grubbing lawyer in the air. "

Comments on this story are now closed.