Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

February 8th, 2010
February 6th, 2010
February 5th, 2010
February 4th, 2010
February 3rd, 2010
February 2nd, 2010
February 1st, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT

Government won't tell truth about health care


Monday, November 9, 2009 6:14 AM PST

My grandfather was the greatest salesman who ever lived — that was before Obama, of course.

I say that not only because of his business acumen, but because he believed that if you just told the truth then you would always have good clients. He also used to say, "If you need to change the name of something more than once, then the name isn't your biggest problem." And so it goes with "government health care."

First, they (Obama and his sales team) called their plan the "single payer," then it morphed into the "public option," to finally evolve into a "co-op with a trigger" — I guess that's so you can blow your head off after you sign up.

What does it all mean? It means that "Team Obama" cannot tell us the truth about their "product" because they know that 80 percent of us won't buy it if we find out what's in it. So they string us along with impassioned rhetoric about our "moral obligation," and how their version of morality will take us toward the satisfaction of our "needs." Please! These people don't know a thing about our needs — like energy and jobs — they only care about what they think we need.

The deception, of course, lies in what we will be forced to sacrifice so that Team Obama can give us what we are allowed to have — smart, aren't they? The problem with their strategy, however, is that it presumes those required to "pay" will do so without the expectation of just compensation.

In other words, Team Obama thinks that those who pay their own bills will gladly pay for someone else. But c'mon — if the "productive class" wanted to subsidize the "non-productive," then we wouldn't be sitting on top of a mountain of unpaid liabilities. Remember the deficit?

And that's what it's really all about, now, isn't it? The government is broke (and broken), and the geniuses in Washington think the only way to save themselves is to build a "bigger program." I'm sorry, but Team Obama's version of socialism is so last century — yes, they can change the name, but they can't change it's malignant spots. Believe it!

Stan Taves
Lodi

Reader Feedback

Lodian wrote on Nov 16, 2009 1:12 PM:

" Why? "

Lodian wrote on Nov 16, 2009 1:12 PM:

" You've enjoyed government assistance for yourself and your family, yet deny others the same. "

Brian wrote on Nov 16, 2009 7:12 AM:

" Lodian,
You need to explain to us why you don't thing Obamacare is flawed. You especially need to address the blue dog
Democrats that may happen upon this blogg who were denied access to Obama's
meetings that were meant to include even the opposition but he threw them under the bus anyway. "

Brian wrote on Nov 16, 2009 7:03 AM:

" Lodian wrote on Nov 15, 2009 3:00 PM:

" Brian thinks he has a copy of my "agenda"? lol! This is very curious, as I've never submitted an "agenda" to this guy. "

-Lodian thinks she has to submit a copy of her agenda here on the bloggs for us to figure out what she's all about. Chuckle. "

Brian wrote on Nov 16, 2009 7:01 AM:

" Lodian still doesn't get it. Perhaps she should re-read my posts at 6:22 and 6:23 and follow the link. Or is she considering going to a blogg discussing the fine attributes of burying one's head in the sand? I suspect she'll do the latter. "

Lodian wrote on Nov 15, 2009 3:08 PM:

" Brian: You've enjoyed government assistance for yourself and your family, yet are in favor of denying others. "

Lodian wrote on Nov 15, 2009 3:00 PM:

" Brian thinks he has a copy of my "agenda"? lol! This is very curious, as I've never submitted an "agenda" to this guy. "

Brian wrote on Nov 15, 2009 8:33 AM:

" Lodian's agenda here isn't about health care reform. It's about convincing me that Obama's flawed bill is his way or the highway. "

sparky595 wrote on Nov 14, 2009 3:03 PM:

" Yes, I am. "

Lodian wrote on Nov 14, 2009 2:06 PM:

" .... and you? "

Lodian wrote on Nov 14, 2009 2:04 PM:

" sparkly: Sure, I'll answer your question. I am fully covered. "

sparky595 wrote on Nov 14, 2009 5:15 AM:

" Lodian, since you have now questioned me about my insurance, and repeatedly question Brian about his, could you let us know about your health insurance status? "

Lodian wrote on Nov 14, 2009 12:10 AM:

" Brian wrote "I am one of millions who don't have employer provided health ins. And I don't have an extra 1000 a month bucks to insure my family."

Is that a "no" on the health insurance question? "

sparky595 wrote on Nov 13, 2009 7:14 AM:

" The liberals will praise the public option, without knowing how it works, how it is paid for, the actual level of HEALTHCARE that you will receive through the program, what changes will happen to current policy holders, what annual premiums will increase to as a result, what medical equipment prices will do, how prescription drug costs will be affected, how the elderly will be affected with 500 billion dollars in cuts, etc., etc. etc.

Cheering for anything this important, without having answers to basic questions that affect you and your family is just plain IGNORANT! "

Brian wrote on Nov 13, 2009 6:42 AM:

" Jaundice wrote:

It would seem that you get your free welfare health care but don't want others to have the option.

Chuckle,
I'll make another attempt at talking to a tree. There are better solutions to health care reform Obama and his cronies
have left out of the bill. Now, since I'm talking to a tree, well..... "

Brian wrote on Nov 13, 2009 6:36 AM:

" Sparky wrote:

With all due respect, I couldn't care less what Brian's coverage is currently. I'm concerned about what this healthcare bill could do to all of us once it is passed. No one wants to talk about the real concerns that real people have about this bill. Who will claim it is a perfect bill with no faults? No one. "

-I always enjoy the exchanges we have. I am one of millions who don't have employer provided health ins. And I don't have an extra 1000 a month bucks to insure my family. The liberals have been contending that if you are against
Obama care you are against health insurance reform. You and I know how
dishonest that charge is. They keep on trying to shove down our throats it's their way or the highway. Obama has taught them well the art of Chicago strong-armed politics. "

sparky595 wrote on Nov 13, 2009 6:07 AM:

" Brian, you point out 20 potential real problems with this current healthcare proposal in congress. What amazes me is that no one here will address those concerns which will affect how over 300 million people receive their healthcare, yet they are very concerned about your insurance.

With all due respect, I couldn't care less what Brian's coverage is currently. I'm concerned about what this healthcare bill could do to all of us once it is passed. No one wants to talk about the real concerns that real people have about this bill. Who will claim it is a perfect bill with no faults? No one. "

Billy Rubin wrote on Nov 13, 2009 5:11 AM:

" Still no insurance, Brian?
And you oppose coverage for your own children - WHY?

It would seem that you get your free welfare health care but don't want others to have the option.

Tell us, won't you, about the heavy contribution YOU make to the 1/6 of the economy you keep regurgitating. "

Brian wrote on Nov 12, 2009 6:23 PM:

" Members of Congress will be subject to the same healthcare as the general public.
Contents of the bill will be available to read at least 72 hours prior to a vote. "

Brian wrote on Nov 12, 2009 6:22 PM:

" http://docs4patientcare.org/
THE 20 BIG LIES IN THE HEALTHCARE REFORM DEBATE
You can keep your insurance if you like it.
You can keep your doctor if you wish.
US healthcare ranks near the bottom of the industrialized world.
Major cause of bankruptcies is related to medical expenses.
14,000 people per day are dying due to lack of medical insurance.
Most doctors support Obamacare as endorsed by organized medicine (AMA).
Senior citizens will not lose any Medicare benefits.
Insurance premiums will be reduced for most Americans.
This plan will only result in tax increases for the super wealthy.
Proposed HC bills are budget "neutral" and will not add to the federal deficit.
There are only 2 choices: the current system or Obamacare.
The Republicans say NO because they lack and alternative plan.
The public "strongly" supports Obamacare and public option.
There will not be any rationing in healthcare.
The government will not interfere between you and your doctor.
Most doctors oppose HCR legislation so they can preserve their income.
This is a "crisis" situation and needs to be passed into law immediately.
A public option will increase competition and not result in a single payer system. cont. "

Lodian wrote on Nov 12, 2009 12:14 AM:

" Bob Hussein Loblaw wrote on Nov 11, 2009 5:36 PM:

" Lodian asked: " Brian: What kind of health insurance do you have today? "

Hopefully the kind that will help restore the blood flow to his brain since he doesn't exercise enough."
-------------------

Oh, maybe that's why he keeps calling me names like "fat"... he's just projecting. Poor Brian. "

Bob Hussein Loblaw wrote on Nov 11, 2009 5:36 PM:

" Lodian asked: " Brian: What kind of health insurance do you have today? "

Hopefully the kind that will help restore the blood flow to his brain since he doesn't exercise enough. "

Lodian wrote on Nov 11, 2009 12:29 PM:

" Brian: What kind of health insurance do you have today? "

danielh wrote on Nov 11, 2009 10:02 AM:

" sven: I don't care about petty nuances that don't matter. "

sven31 wrote on Nov 11, 2009 8:11 AM:

" One bombing in the summer of '81 is not continuous bombing. It's a strike. For all the knowledge you claim to possess, you don't know that even the slightest deviation can cause a nuclear power plant or nuclear bomb making facility can delay or even shut down operations. They are extremely fragile and therefore, need not be bombed on a regular basis. "

Brian wrote on Nov 11, 2009 5:23 AM:

" Billy Rubin wrote on Nov 9, 2009 5:43 AM:

" Why does Stan Taves hate Brian Dockter and Jerome Kinderman so fiercely he would deny them access to basic medical care? "

-Chuckle,

How can Stan Taves, who knows interstate health insurance would bring down the costs of health insurance immensely, possibly be a proponent of denying me and Jerome basic health care?
And since when has a government entitlement program made a profit? I suppose Billy is convinced that further government regulation of the health insurance industry and the takeover of 1/6th of nation's economy is the best
course of action for health care reform.

Suit yourself, Billy. "

danielh wrote on Nov 10, 2009 10:30 PM:

" sven31:

The purpose of my referring to the blown-up nuclear plant was to show that Saddam Hussein's nuclear facilities were the subject of continuous bombing, thereby interference with his nuclear weapons technology programs. "

sven31 wrote on Nov 10, 2009 6:53 PM:

" One more thing about the Iraq power plant.
It was widely believed at the time that even for the Israeli air force this was a little too precise and the speculation was that it was actually blown up from inside, with help from Israeli agents or Iraqi operatives. No citation, just remember reading it in US News or Aviation Week or some such thing back then. It was 28 years ago. "

SVEN31 wrote on Nov 10, 2009 6:15 AM:

" An indication of danielH's drift into dream world:

"In the 1970's, Israel bombed Iraq's nuclear power plant which was under construction"

Try 1981. Look it up. 1981 was not part of the 70's.

But this is even funnier:
"You must certainly have seen my thesis on the original debt which was secured by the People with the US Constitution. "

So now your passing yourself off as a constitutional historian? "

danielh wrote on Nov 9, 2009 10:08 PM:

" dogs4you: The debt is responsible for all of American history. "

danielh wrote on Nov 9, 2009 10:06 PM:

" dogs4you: It's good that you are thinking about debt. I suggest to you that the situation is very much more grave than you explained as a $1-Trillion, with China being the "holder in due course."

You must certainly have seen my thesis on the original debt which was secured by the People with the US Constitution. "

sparky595 wrote on Nov 9, 2009 8:27 PM:

" Daniel, you said that you read The New York Times, but then said 'I don't read any trash journalism'. Well, which one is it? "

dogs4you wrote on Nov 9, 2009 8:17 PM:

" danielh, the only thing this country has to deal with is the one trillion dollars + this country is in and digging the hole deeper everyday, you can`t by your way out of a recession. I hope we don`t end up scrubbing toilets in China. "

dogs4you wrote on Nov 9, 2009 8:12 PM:

" danielh, saddam had unlimited money to construct a plant to produce an atomic weapon, as far as fissionable material, ever heard of the USSR, they have it and would sell it to the highest bidder. He needed about five years to rebuild his plant, which was eight years ago. Due the math, Tel Aviv might be the results of a mushroom cloud.

The only reason Plame got noticed is, with a 10 button sweater, she buttoned 8, or was it 7.
If you get your information from CNN you might as well believe everything the Enquirer prints as you wait at the check out stand with a screaming 2 year old. "

citizen wrote on Nov 9, 2009 8:03 PM:

" Wow Daniel Plame really gets around. ha ha. What color is the sky in your world? "

danielh wrote on Nov 9, 2009 7:55 PM:

" sven: I learned about Plame intercepting Nuclear weapon by watching CNN and by reading The New York Times.

I don't read any trash journalism. "

danielh wrote on Nov 9, 2009 7:53 PM:

" dogs4you: Recall iraq has had all sorts of problems in its nuclear weapons technology.

In the 1970's, Israel bombed Iraq's nuclear power plant which was under construction. I think they waited until it was almost finished before they bombed it.

Again, in the 1991 Gulf War, the nuclear power plants were among the highest priority to bomb.

So just how do you propose Saddam was going to obtain fissionable material?



If you think Saddam was developing nuclear weapons, I ask you how he recovered from the 1991 gulf war "

sparky595 wrote on Nov 9, 2009 7:22 PM:

" Obama has WMD's (Weapons of Medical Destruction)...

Pelosi, Reid, Baucus, along with the rest of the democrat congressmen and senators "

sven31 wrote on Nov 9, 2009 6:23 PM:

" As in:
danielh wrote on Nov 9, 2009 3:40 PM
"Valerie Plame intercepted the nuclear warhead..."

Does anyone ever wonder why only danielH seems to know this stuff? "

sven31 wrote on Nov 9, 2009 6:19 PM:

" dogs:

The best line I've ever read here:
"like that little jack-off that runs Iran"

We should get the network news offices to always refer to him as that.

What's he gonna do? Load his atomic bomb into the back seat of an old F14 and drive it to Washington DC and light the fuse?

It's also easier to remember than his name and way easier to pronounce. "

danielh wrote on Nov 9, 2009 6:17 PM:

" dogs. It's truth. Deal with it. "

danielh wrote on Nov 9, 2009 6:17 PM:

" citizen, continued…
4) when plame was exposed, so were her operatives working with / for her. In CIA, on the wall of "fallen agents," there is a star whose date closely matches the date of her exposure.

I think that was due to compromise of the agent. We can only speculate. "

danielh wrote on Nov 9, 2009 6:16 PM:

" citizen: The importance of Valerie Plame was quite significant.

To wit,

1) Pakistani nuclear physicist A. H. Khan, was completely compromised by Valerie Plame. Everything Khan did was under her observation. It is said that Pakistan developed the nuclear weapon by permission from the CIA.

2) Plame was resourceful in preventing North Korea from developing the bomb. Plame was involved in Korea's commitment and expenditure outlay for the WRONG technology. As closely as I could understand, it was the equivalent of developing technology for a "little boy," gun-type device, which would use uranium-235, whereas Korea's nuclear reactors would produce fissionable material for a "fat man" device, which uses plutonium.

3) Iran purchased centrifuge technology which was constructed of the wrong dimensions. Basically, Iran had to go through A.H. Khan, but that was Plame's agent.

continued... "

dogs4you wrote on Nov 9, 2009 6:06 PM:

" danielh: you have been smoking to much of Gray Cloud`s medicine. "

dogs4you wrote on Nov 9, 2009 6:03 PM:

" Plame wasn`t an operative, she was a freaking clerk. I see I am not alone, citizen see`s it the same way I do.

Saddam was working on an atomic weapon, he, like that little jack-off that runs Iran only needed more time to prefect his weapon. Had not been stopped he could have held the entire region hostage. All countries agreed that he had to be removed from power, and the reason the amount of countries participated in Desert Storm 1. Scooter Libby should have never spent any time in jail for exposing a clerk "

sparky595 wrote on Nov 9, 2009 4:59 PM:

" Citizen, you should realize by now that when a liberal cannot discuss the topic at hand, they just revert back to the mantra of "blame Bush, blame Chaney". "

citizen wrote on Nov 9, 2009 4:02 PM:

" daniel your joking right? Dear god really? Plame wasnt even a field agent is there anything else that even needs to be said? Why are you being so strange on this blog about healthcare? "

danielh wrote on Nov 9, 2009 3:40 PM:

" dogs: Truth is: Cheney was trying to smuggle a nuclear warhead behind enemy lines into Iraq, so that American troops would "accidentally" discover the warhead, and uphold the Bush-Cheney premise that we were in Iraq to stop Saddam from his nuclear weapons programs.

Well, what happened was CIA field agent Valerie Plame was responsible for nuclear proliferation throughout the world, and noone moves a nuclear warhead anywhere in the world without her knowing about it.

Cheney's plan must have been so secret that he forgot to inform Valerie Plame.

Well...

Valerie Plame intercepted the nuclear warhead as it was travelling through Turkey, and it never got to Iraq. American troops never discovered a nuclear warhead within Iraq, and the whole Bush-Cheney popularity program did not exactly go according to plan.

Valerie Plame was exposed as a CIA operative when it became obvious that she wasn't cooperating with the Bush-Cheney Iran propoganda campaign, either. "

danielh wrote on Nov 9, 2009 3:36 PM:

" dogs: WMD? I know we just got done going around in circles last week, but here goes again...

Do you remember the Valerie Plame - Joseph Wilson saga. Scooter Libby exposed Valerie Plame because Wilson was speaking of his own experience on his visit to Niger, to uncover information on Saddam Hussein's procurement of yellowcake uranium.

Well, wilson didn't find any, and Cheney didn't appreciate Wilson telling his story. Allegedly, Cheney explained that it was unfortunate that he was married to a CIA agent while he was saying these things.

allegedly as the story went, this was the reason Cheney exposed Wilson's wife as a CIA field agent.

Well.... this isn't the whole story.

continued... "

dogs4you wrote on Nov 9, 2009 3:06 PM:

" I totally believe Saddam had WMD. He allowed those buffons permission to look where he knew the WMD were not. As soon as they got to close he ordered them out of the country. The WMD are either in Syria or were buried in the desert under cover of darkness. Because they were never found you cannot say they were never there. Ask all the Kurds that were poisioned and died as a result, thats right you can`t their all dead.

Concerning that 2000 page book on health care, reading the front and back page doesn`t mean the entire book was read. If 86% of the American people are happy with their health care, let the government take care of the 14% that don`t have it, providing they can come up with the money to afford it. The Hale Park bunch don`t have a pot to piss in or a window to through it out of, let Obama take care of them and leave me alone. "

sparky595 wrote on Nov 9, 2009 11:33 AM:

" iambic wrote:

'Granted, I'll admit that I don't know every single detail about this health plan, but then again, secrecy seems to come with the territory of the Presidential seat--Rep. or Dem.'

I can't argue with you about secrecy on both sides. That is why so many Americans are against this healthcare bill. We are tired of the secrecy, double-talk, back-door deals, lies, and misinformation presented to hide the fact that this is a 2000 page government take over of our entire healthcare system. From the second you are born, until your last breath of air, you are at the mercy of the government for ALL of your healthcare needs. "

iambic grape stomp wrote on Nov 9, 2009 11:16 AM:

" Well, Sparky, I would rather see my friends and family--good people--have some coverage than be re-deployed for a stupid cause. Granted, I'll admit that I don't know every single detail about this health plan, but then again, secrecy seems to come with the territory of the Presidential seat--Rep. or Dem. "

sparky595 wrote on Nov 9, 2009 11:13 AM:

" Excellent, Deputy. These are the kind of video clips that liberals have a difficult time watching because they cannot deal with rational thinking. Common sense speakers such as this drive the emotionally driven liberals crazy. "

DeputyChief wrote on Nov 9, 2009 10:39 AM:

" Click on this link to see and listen to a rational explanation(just plain common sense logic), why we cannot afford this government health care plan.

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=G44NCvNDLfc "

sparky595 wrote on Nov 9, 2009 7:42 AM:

" Selling, about healthcare, that is. "

sparky595 wrote on Nov 9, 2009 7:42 AM:

" iambic, do you believe saddam hussein never had WMD's in his possession? And, are you buying what the crooks in Washington are selling? "

iambic grape stomp wrote on Nov 9, 2009 7:26 AM:

" Stan, did you "buy" the WMDs? Because that was quite a pitch. "

sparky595 wrote on Nov 9, 2009 6:16 AM:

" They also like to claim how this bill is 'Paid For'. That sounds great! They make it sound as if it will not add to our debt and it's free, because, well quite frankly people 'It's Paid For'. OK, paid for by who? It's paid for by the taxpayers. So obama can take pride that it is not going to add to the deficit, however, it is still coming out of our wallets and reduced coverage to seniors by slashing medicare.

The liberal obama followers need to scrap the icing off the top and look at the ingredients used to make this cake.

One may enjoy the taste of a big mac, but if you saw the entire process of how it is made, you may not be so inclined to feast on it. "

Billy Rubin wrote on Nov 9, 2009 5:43 AM:

" Why does Stan Taves hate Brian Dockter and Jerome Kinderman so fiercely he would deny them access to basic medical care? "

Comments on this story are now closed.