Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Will terrorists be given Miranda warnings? (75)
- Lodi Unified School District president issues warning to speakers over cuts (64)
- President Obama's first year (45)
- Many reject the politics of 'no' (45)
- Islamic symbol in mosaic — what is all the fuss? (44)
- Writer comments on Neely column (42)
- The Home Depot hopes to join Costco at Reynolds Ranch (41)
- Time to shed the convenient sham of 'Don't ask, don't tell' policy (34)
- We need to conduct respectful conversations (30)
- Tasered suspect claims he is Yosemite Sam (25)
Should minority dictate matters for majority?
Why does the Lodi City Council allow people and groups with obvious delusions of grandeur to use the forum of its meetings to dictate in local matters such as the traditional practice of prayers for divine guidance and wisdom in making decisions?
Why should an infinitesimally small percentage of the population dictate matters of faith and morals for the rest of the population? All the agnostics, atheists and anti-theists put together can't be more than two-and-a-half percentile of the overall population, yet they want to dictate to the rest of us. Tell them to get lost.
J. Norman Sayles
Lodi

Reader Feedback
Lodian wrote on Oct 28, 2009 9:59 PM:
Lodian wrote on Oct 28, 2009 9:55 PM:
It is not immoral to keep church and state separate. "
Lodian wrote on Oct 28, 2009 9:42 PM:
I have a feeling that there will be a few new faces on the city council next time around. "
MEP wrote on Oct 27, 2009 10:42 PM:
alf wrote on Oct 27, 2009 10:27 PM:
Rhodie wrote on Oct 27, 2009 7:08 PM:
I wonder if anyone has ever done a computer model on the largest our system of government can go before it self-implodes? I mean is there a threshhold where one side or another starts feeling their rights are not being listened to and a revolution results.
On a sort of related line, would two seperate United states work together. Independant conservative and liberal unions with some mutual interest pacts (defense, trade and immigration type things) but where conservative/liberal governing concepts are dominant respectively.
Anyway, just a thought. "
jeff wrote on Oct 27, 2009 5:50 PM:
jeff wrote on Oct 27, 2009 5:49 PM:
http://www.secular.org/constituency.html "
Lodian wrote on Oct 27, 2009 4:55 PM:
dogs4you wrote on Oct 27, 2009 2:21 PM:
jramagic wrote on Oct 27, 2009 12:28 PM:
Acampo_Mom wrote on Oct 27, 2009 7:09 AM:
Comments on this story are now closed.