Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

November 21st, 2009
November 20th, 2009
November 19th, 2009
November 18th, 2009
November 17th, 2009
November 16th, 2009
November 14th, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT

Lodi's City Council needs to make a list of clear goals


Monday, October 26, 2009 6:11 AM PDT

Last week, I e-mailed our City Council members with this question: "Can you please provide me with the City Council's goals, as agreed to by all of you, for Lodi?"

Now, before I tell you what the responses were, I need to confess that I knew the overall answer before asking. The answer was "no," because they don't have any.

Also, I know that it wasn't the greatest question, because any of them could have responded with "yes," or since the "by all of you" could have been taken as only a 5-0 vote, I could have gotten a "no." Instead of "yes" or "no" or a list of the goals, I got one really interesting response.

The council member who did respond, and I respect the fact that they responded enough by itself that I will not embarrass them here, stated, "As you know there are 'goals' posted in the council chambers (or used to be)." Way to be on top of what your goals are.

Well, the only part that the person got right was the "used to be" part.

This council member went on to tell me that our city manager is using a list of budget policies and goals adopted in 2003 "as his benchmark for goals and policies to adopt the budget each year." No typo here — they are using goals and policies adopted in 2003.

Can we all agree that we are in different times than 2003? How can those policies and guidelines even apply?

The council member went on to say that "the council should be re-adopting (the goals) annually. Otherwise, I think the council goals have been simply 'keep the ship afloat.'"

No kidding?

If this is something that the council should be doing, why aren't they? How can our council make quality decisions without some goals, both short-term and long-term?

It is this "keep the ship afloat" mentality that must change. Our City Council has been reacting for too long, and it is time for them to become proactive in their thoughts and planning.

The council needs to spend a few Tuesday mornings identifying what their goals are so that they can always work toward them, and so staff can assist them. I think the latter portion of that statement is important, because staff works for the council and should implement council policy. In no way am I pointing this lack of goals and direction at city staff.

Just so you know, prior councils have had goals, and yes, some of those goals used to be listed in the council chamber.

In the 2001-2003 budget, the council listed goals and projects that they wanted to complete. This was continued until the 2003-2005 budget. Did they get them all done? No. Have some of them been completed? Yes — the police building, the veterans' plaza and the skate park are the tangible projects that were completed.

Goals can keep your eye on the ball and make decisions easier — unless you don't revisit them or ask yourself how you are going to accomplish them.

Our council needs to make some short-term and long-term goals. The goals need to be in policy and in tangible things that the public can touch when they are achieved. When they are done making their goals, they should put them on the wall in the council chamber, and they should held accountable for them.

John Johnson, CFA, is a Lodi-based business appraiser. Contact him at john@johnejohnson.com or 369-1451.

Reader Feedback

sam wrote on Oct 29, 2009 8:59 PM:

" So Dogs, it will be a mess to fix the sewer pipes so just let the "stuff" flow downhill into the water supply?

Seriously? "

dogs4you wrote on Oct 29, 2009 7:36 PM:

" My daughter lives in a part of Lodi that has all the utilities, except the gas pipe in the backyard. After looking at what the contractor would have to move, push out of the way to dig a trench to install the new sewer pipe, it`s a wonder anyone would want the job. Since waste flows down hill, no telling how deep the trench will have to be, let along the shoring and spoil storage. It will be a mess. "

sam wrote on Oct 29, 2009 6:26 PM:

" mp, sewer replacement pipes, upgrading the cities infra-structures, a Clean Water Treatment plant and the upgrades of the Sewer Water Treatment plant should ALL be goals of the city.... long term goals.

Seems like the CC loses focus on the real goals to chase their "fantasy goals".

The city NEEDS to focus. "

mp wrote on Oct 29, 2009 1:06 PM:

" Actually, Sam, in early 2000 the city council had a great plan to replace the aging sewer and water lines. Money was collected each month on the utility bills to accomplish this goal.

Unfortunately, this last year, with the leadership of the Mayor, the money collected for the replacement program was shifted to the construction of the Water Treatment Plant.

I guess you can't have both Sam. "

sam wrote on Oct 28, 2009 4:09 PM:

" El Rushbo, when I have goals I make sure I know what is required to attain those goals and then go for it. Some goals take weeks, some take decades, but if they are true goals of mine I do NOT lose focus.

I have been listening to Lodi say they need to replace their sewer pipes for over 20 years. One would think they would have a plan, a timeline, and an account dedicated to such a project. "

sam wrote on Oct 28, 2009 4:00 PM:

" Whoa, I was not suggesting any thing like that. I was just asking. "

Whoa Nellie! wrote on Oct 27, 2009 8:27 PM:

" Sam, if you're suggesting that past & current CC members are pulling Kings strings to replace (fire) Department Heads then we do have a major problem. It's called micromanagement.

But don't you think it is also possible for one person to "pull the wool" over another's eyes? It happens all the time. Just look around... "

El Rushbo wrote on Oct 27, 2009 1:26 PM:

" Well so far all I see is Sam`s goal`s for the city. I appreciate your 2-cents Sam but the money for that waste water plant has to come from somewhere, you saying you wanna raise rates to build that plant? New pipes cost money too. Do you have any idea how bad you`d be dragged through the mud for proposing a tax hike or rate increase for those replacing pipes? "

JustTheFacts wrote on Oct 27, 2009 12:12 PM:

" One good article does not a good Councilmember make.
After all... even a stopped clock is right twice a day. "

hicksvilianfromlodi wrote on Oct 26, 2009 11:58 PM:

" Bob please dont try to use this as an excuse to run. "

sam wrote on Oct 26, 2009 7:12 PM:

" Whoa, educate me... does King work at the descrection of the city council? Is he not their puppet? "

Whoa Nellie! wrote on Oct 26, 2009 6:59 PM:

" John writes, "In no way am I pointing this lack of goals and direction at city staff."

OK, but I will. Is Blair King the right man to lead the city as City Manager?

In the "good ol' days" Lodi had wonderful city managers like Hank Glaves and Tom Peterson who had character, ethics, and who loved this town. Sure, the City Manager works for the Council but those two men lead the city and also lead, guided, advised our Council.

That did not happen with Dixon Flynn, and is not happening now with Mr. King. There has been a revolving doors in City Hall since Kings arrival of Department Heads. Why? Talk to any city hall employee and you will learn why.

The city should not change to fit the personality of the City Manager, but the City Manager should fit the city. IMHO, Blair King can't fill the shoes of icons like Glaves and Peterson.

CC- it took you too long to fire Envision, don't make the same mistake twice. "

sam wrote on Oct 26, 2009 6:57 PM:

" El Rushbo, a huge issue would be to build Lodi's water treatment plant. That should be the top priority.

I give the CC the cudos for buying the Woodbrdge water... but now put it to use.

Another biggy would be to rebuild the cities infrastructure... the leaky sewer pipes are destroying the water supply. Wake up. "

El Rushbo wrote on Oct 26, 2009 6:48 PM:

" Ok guys, what exactly should be the city councils` top goals? Besides keeping the city out of bankruptcy. "

dogs4you wrote on Oct 26, 2009 6:46 PM:

" Sam, make enough signs for two, I can vote for him and will. "

sam wrote on Oct 26, 2009 4:30 PM:

" wtf, I agree. I do hope John runs for city council again. I cannot vote for him but I would design signs for him and place them in my vineyard. "

wtf wrote on Oct 26, 2009 11:21 AM:

" Excellent editorial, John. This goes a lo-o-ong way in explaining why our CC is so out of touch with the people here in Lodi i.e., they're operating on an agenda from six years ago. "

Comments on this story are now closed.



Leaf Pickup