Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

February 8th, 2010
February 6th, 2010
February 5th, 2010
February 4th, 2010
February 3rd, 2010
February 2nd, 2010
February 1st, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
(Brian Feulner/News-Sentinel)

Lodi planners say proposal to widen freeway from Stockton ignores wastewater, power plant

By Jordan Guinn
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Wednesday, October 21, 2009 6:13 AM PDT

An environmental impact report by the California Department of Transportation for a proposed freeway interchange on Interstate 5 could signal substantial growth toward Lodi from North Stockton and has city planners concerned because they say it appears to be grossly incomplete.

The council will receive a report tonight regarding an Environmental Impact Report for an interchange that would be located west of Lodi near Eight Mile Road.

The proposed project is part of a plan to widen I-5 from Stockton to the southern limits of Lodi's White Slough Water Pollution Control Facility.

According to the Caltrans report, widening the highway will reduce traffic on the interstate, improve regional mobility and provide a more balanced circulation of traffic.

For Lodi, it means their neighbor to the south could develop agricultural land and be right in the city's backyard in a the following years. The I-5 work could be completed by 2015.

The freeway and interchange improvements will extend from south of Charter Way and Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard to 1.8 miles north of Eight Mile Road. "The project is needed because northwest Stockton has been and is expected to continue experiencing substantial traffic growth," the Caltrans report said.

The topic of contention is the section referred to as North Gateway Boulevard. The interchange would be nearly two miles north of Eight Mile Road, considered a border between Lodi and Stockton.

The proposed expansion is within Stockton's city limits, but very close to the White Slough Wastewater Treatment Facility.

In the 253-page Caltrans report, there is no mention of the White Slough Wastewater Treatment Facility. The Lodi Energy Center, a 280-megawatt natural gas power plant planned to be built next to White Slough, is absent from the Caltrans report as well.

Rad Bartlam, director of community development, is concerned that areas and issues pertaining to Lodi are glossed over in the report.

"The issue areas of the document are not complete and need to be addressed," Bartlam said.

According to Caltrans public information officer Bob Boswell, the areas are not addressed in the Caltrans EIR because it is outside the project's limits and boundaries.

City of Stockton officials were unavailable for comment.

One of Bartlam's biggest concerns is that Measure K funds, which are derived from county sales tax revenue, could be used to subsidize private development. The half-cent sales tax for the benefit of transportation projects was passed in 1990. Bartlam said the expansion of the freeway and the growth of Stockton would go hand in hand.

Stockton's recently-approved general plan accounts for massive growth and development in the coming years. The area north of Eight Mile Road and east of Thorton Road is listed as an area of interest in Stockton's 2035 General Plan.

"It would be difficult to develop that magnitude without dealing with transportation," he said.

If residential developments were created near the wastewater treatment facility, it could pose a problem for Lodi.

"The concern is that there might be pressure on Lodi to pay to eliminate odors," said city spokesman Jeff Hood.

He said it would be in the best interest of Lodi to have developers pay those costs if they build homes near the facility.

The project would take 58 acres of agricultural land in the Stockton sphere of influence and convert them to highway uses.

"The amount of agricultural land to be converted by the project is negligible compared to the total amount of farmland in San Joaquin County or in California," according to the Caltrans report.

Bartlam said while the acreage is not substantial when taken as part of the larger picture, there is still significant loss under the California Environmental Quality Act.

He said mitigation is one avenue that could be taken, in which Lodi is reimbursed the acres lost to freeway development. However, no avenue for mitigation was included in the Caltrans report.

"The way the document is drafted, there is no provision for mitigation," he said. "That's our point."

The staff is also troubled that a Farmland Conversion Impact Rating form is not included in the Caltrans report.

The council will also review the estimated costs of the project. The five-phase project is scheduled to be finished by 2015 at a cost of $589 million.

Stockton's progressive expansion northward is a sticking point for many in Lodi. For more than a decade, a greenbelt has been discussed to buffer Lodi from Stockton. Earlier this year, the effort was scaled back by the city and the process for proceeding was left in the hands of local landowners.

Contact reporter Jordan Guinn at jordang@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback

Lodian wrote on Oct 26, 2009 9:12 AM:

" Opus Dei wrote "Actually I`m Jewish, and you should both move to Gay Francisco..."

Opus: So, as a Jew, where do you live? "

Leonard wrote on Oct 25, 2009 6:18 PM:

" Sam, who in their right mind wouldn't be afraid of Stockton? It is one of the worst cities in the nation in terms of crime.

I won't say that I moved to Texas to get away from Stockton but I certainly will say that it was an added bonus. "

KenH wrote on Oct 22, 2009 2:10 AM:

" I doubt the City of Stockton is going to have homes actually within a 3000ft radius of White Slough, they're a little smarter than that on Growth Development compared to Lodi...even Elk Grove is a bit smarter than Lodi.

As for White Slough, is it me or are there many times of the day that a foul stench from there finds its way into the city? Pee yew that's disgusting smelling. "

Ratzinger wrote on Oct 21, 2009 8:15 PM:

" Opus, I stand by my words. As a Christian, you should be ashamed of yourself.



. "

Opus Dei wrote on Oct 21, 2009 7:41 PM:

" Actually I`m Jewish, and you should both move to Gay Francisco... "

Ratzinger wrote on Oct 21, 2009 7:04 PM:

" Opus Dei: A Roman Catholic organization composed of both clergy and lay members and dedicated to fostering Christian principles at all levels of society.

Opus Dei, you are mocking people whose land has lost value because of the economy? What an excellent representation of your "Lodi" Christian values. As a Christian and Catholic, you should be ashamed. Why would you say such garbage? "

sam wrote on Oct 21, 2009 6:32 PM:

" OMG, opus, are you that little man on Port Chelsea Circle who needs protection from the "Big Bad Stockton?"

Too funny. "

sam wrote on Oct 21, 2009 6:18 PM:

" Oh opus... you are so silly. Yes, my land is worth less than it was 2 years ago, but it is worth more than it was 10 years ago. We have been her 75 plus years.

My vineyards and homes are all paid for. I love where I live... NOT IN LODI.

You move to LA opus. I prefer my country living. "

Opus Dei wrote on Oct 21, 2009 6:06 PM:

" Oh, that`s right! All that property is worth less than HALF it did a couple years ago!!! HAHAHAHA!!!!! What a burn, what a cut... you know the reast... "

Opus Dei wrote on Oct 21, 2009 6:04 PM:

" Sam would you please just sell your d### property to Grupe and move to LA?!
PLEASE!!! "

sam wrote on Oct 21, 2009 5:12 PM:

" Dogs, on Stockton's General Plan ( i think) is a 6-8 lane connector from I-5 to 99 at Morse Road (south of Micke Grove... north of 8 Mile Road).

I believe the widening of I-5 is just the beginning. "

dogs4you wrote on Oct 21, 2009 4:46 PM:

" I agree with Nellie concerning an east to west connector from Hwy. 99 to I-5. Eight mile Rd. at times is a 5 MPH parking lot. Look what Stockton did to Hammer Ln. No more waiting for the trains to go by, the inter-change at 99 and Hammer, moves traffic about as good as it can get. Not many roads to choose from around here, Hwy. 12 and Turner are about all there are to work with that already exist. If they were to be improved, first thing, insist engineers submit plans to have traffic either go under or over the RR tracks. "

sam wrote on Oct 21, 2009 4:11 PM:

" LodiFreeThinker, I thought your 12:11 post was quite funny. "

LodiFreeThinker wrote on Oct 21, 2009 3:39 PM:

" sam, I hope you know I was being facetious when I mentioned Woodbridge.

But in regards to Stockton, if it was real growth with housing, city facilities, retail, parks etc... I would be fine with it.

Its not though. Its a bunch of isolated housing developments, that aren't meeting real demand, they are just moving people out of the older developments every few years.

Stockton doesn't grow. It sprawls. "

sam wrote on Oct 21, 2009 3:17 PM:

" This cracks me up... Lodi is so worried about cities growing towards them, yet they could give a darn about their impact on the country-living life-styles surrounding them that are destroyed when they expand their borders.

Lodi, get ready. Stockton is growing whether you like it or not ... you have NO greenbelt ... anywhere. "

Whoa Nellie! wrote on Oct 21, 2009 1:05 PM:

" If our ugly neighbors to the south continue to grow north why do they & Cal-Trans not have the foresight to plan an east-west connector between I-5 & Hwy 99 just south of Eight Mile Road?

Does anyone know what the project Stockton is doing off Lower Sac just north of Bear Creek Church? The construction sign says something about a water storage supply something.... It's a big looking site and I dont recall reading about this project. "

LodiFreeThinker wrote on Oct 21, 2009 12:11 PM:

" I stay awake nights worrying about Woodbridge's growth to the south!

:P "

Rhodie v2.0 wrote on Oct 21, 2009 11:27 AM:

" I wonder if the city of Woodbridge is concerned about Lodi's growth to the north? "

LodiFreeThinker wrote on Oct 21, 2009 9:58 AM:

" Maybe they should consider actually maintaining the roads we have, rather than expanding?

The freeways, highways and city streets throughout San Joaquin county are falling apart. If we've got $600M to spend, how about maintaining what we have instead of creating more demand for more traffic, and more road to maintain with no plan on how to do so. "

Comments on this story are now closed.