Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

November 20th, 2009
November 19th, 2009
November 18th, 2009
November 17th, 2009
November 16th, 2009
November 14th, 2009
November 13th, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
Marie Hall talks about rent stabilization while in her trailer at the Three Palms Mobile Home Estate in Galt. (Dan Evans/News-Sentinel)

Rent control: Proponents

By Maggie Creamer
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Saturday, October 17, 2009 7:05 AM PDT

While sitting in her living room surrounded by artwork of landscapes, some of which she painted, Ruth DeGroot said she and her husband have spent years perfecting their home.

"My husband walked up these steps and said we going to be here until we are in our box," DeGroot said.

Mobile home park living is unique because tenants maintain their property, including landscaping, as a typical home — they just don't own the land, DeGroot said.

Even though DeGroot lives in Galt Mobile Estates, it is a misnomer to say her home is moveable. It would cost tens of thousands of dollars, and even if she could afford to move it, there are few available spaces in California and most would not take her mobile home because it is too old.

She said park owners can make changes without notice. For example, her park went from a quiet senior park to one allowing families, which she said led to drugs coming into the park.

She does not understand why park owners would be so opposed to rent control, because it doesn't prevent them from earning a profit.

"They know when they buy these parks, they are going to be working with fixed income," DeGroot said. "Why are they so greedy?"

When DeGroot and her husband moved in 1991, rent was $195, but now it is more than $400.

One of her main concerns is that she has researched other cities where owners have been priced out or required tenants to buy their land, which many people on fixed incomes cannot afford.

"We are at their mercy," she said. "They can do whatever they want."

DeGroot and Marie Hall, a resident in Three Palms Mobile Home, both said an ordinance would help keep rents under control.

Hall said there are no protections for homeowners, and a 90-day notice doesn't matter if the rent skyrockets, because residents either have to find some way to pay or abandon their home.

Hall knows of many seniors who bought their home 20 or 30 years ago and are on fixed incomes.

"It's not to rob anyone, or cheat anyone," she said. "It's to protect seniors now and in the future — especially in the future."

Contact reporter Maggie Creamer at maggiec@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback

CaptainGort wrote on Oct 17, 2009 8:13 AM:

" The entire problem here seems to be that the "mobile home park" only works fairly (ie, free market) when the homes are indeed "mobile"...like boats in a yacht harbor. Once they cannot simply pick up and move, the tenants become
beholden to the whims of the owner...and we all know greed can often be a basic human nature.
A mobile home park is- by definition- a private enterprise. Somebody has a big piece of property, installs utilities and infrastructure on it, then rents "spaces" where people can place their mobile homes. This is just like a yacht harbor. If ya don't like the place- leave for another. BUT: Most "mobile homes" today are anything but mobile- they are VERY costly and difficult to relocate. So the "move if ya don't like it" option kinda fades away and the park owner has you by the short ones....much like the houseboat harbors in Sausalito! The only solution if for the owners to unite and buy the park...or a government entity buy it. "

Comments on this story are now closed.



Leaf Pickup