Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

February 8th, 2010
February 6th, 2010
February 5th, 2010
February 4th, 2010
February 3rd, 2010
February 2nd, 2010
February 1st, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT

Lodi seeks residents' feedback on General Plan

By Maggie Creamer
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Tuesday, October 13, 2009 6:05 AM PDT

The city of Lodi is requesting feedback from residents on its General Plan, which will guide all of the city's planning decisions for the next 20 years.

On Wednesday, the Planning Commission will receive comments from the public and then discuss the plan. At a future Lodi City Council meeting, the commission will then offer its opinion of the plan.

What is the General Plan?

All cities and counties in the state of California are required to adopt long-term blueprints to guide planning decisions. Lodi has drafted a General Plan that will last for 20 years.

The plan's focus is on how the community will grow and where growth will occur. The plan addresses issues including land use, community design, growth management and transportation, including ways to make Lodi more walkable and bikeable.

Where can I read the General Plan?

The General Plan is available online at www.lodi.gov/community_development/ general_plan/reports.htm. It is downloadable by individual chapters because it is such a large document.

What does the General Plan look like?

The city's overall shape will continue to be squarish and compact with Downtown as the central, focal point.

Downtown will be a mixed-use development combining commercial and residential. Almost all new development will be located within three miles of Downtown.

Any new neighborhoods will be short blocks intermixing retail, housing, offices and parks to create walkable neighborhoods.

The plan also recommends adding more bicycle and pedestrian pathways in both new and old neighborhoods.

Business parks and other commercial growth will be to the east of Highway 99, because there is easy access and it is next to urbanized area.

The Mokelumne River will continue to be the city's northern boundary. The plan also recommends preserving agriculture land to the south of Lodi.

How can you give feedback on the plan?

The Planning Commission will receive public comment at 7 p.m. Wednesday in Carnegie Forum, 305 W. Pine St., Lodi.

You can offer suggestions in writing to:

Rad Bartlam
Community Development Department
City of Lodi
P.O. Box 3006
Lodi, CA 95241

You can also e-mail the Community Development Department at kchadwick@lodi.gov or call them at 333-6711.

Contact reporter Maggie Creamer at maggiec@lodinews.com or read her blog at www.lodinews.com/blogs/citybuzz.

Reader Feedback

sam wrote on Oct 13, 2009 6:12 PM:

" OTH, as for paying for "Hitchcock's folly" who is going to reimburse us for the ten's of thousands we have already been forced to pay in legal fees to stop her illegal land grab?

Sueing Lodi seems more than fair if they continue to illegally label us their Ag Cluster Zone. "

sam wrote on Oct 13, 2009 5:59 PM:

" Hi OTH.

Grow west? That is so funny. Spanos is growing north on I-5 and Grupe owns most of the land from I-5 coming into Lodi. Stockton is going to grow north to Hwy-12 and then east on 12.

As for a lawsuit? How many times do we have to tell Lodi to leave us alone? We are NOT Lodi's Ag cluster zone. If Lodi insists on falsifying their General Plan they deserve deserve to be sued. Enough said. "

sam wrote on Oct 13, 2009 5:52 PM:

" You are welcome, Observer. "

Observer wrote on Oct 13, 2009 11:58 AM:

" Thanks Sam. "

dogs4you wrote on Oct 13, 2009 11:46 AM:

" Some land that has already been committed and annexed into the city starts at that tryangled peice of land that borders the Woodbridge canal and Sergeant Road. I believe K&B homes bought the land that runs from Hwy. 12 to Harney Ln. on the west side of Lower Sac., however those plans are on hold until the economy improves. Also the land in back of Raliey`s on Lower Sac. has been committed in the distant future. I understand 2,500 will be built on the afford mentioned land. However conditions will have to improve greatly before a vineyard is removed and a concrete foundation is added. Thats the General Plan for the next generation to ponder over. Maybe even a WalMart. "

OTH wrote on Oct 13, 2009 11:26 AM:

" Grow to the west. As for the farmers south of the city I wouldn't trust anything that comes out of the citys mouth. They want to do a land grab there so bad they can taste it. If the farmers have to sue then sue. It will only take one or two to win a multi-million dollar judgement and they may change there minds. Go farmers! Keep in mind it is the tax payers who ultimately pay for Hitchcock's Folly. "

sam wrote on Oct 13, 2009 11:12 AM:

" Observer, I live and farm on Armstrong. I was forced to educate myself on General Plans to protect my rights and my land. I also have some great land attornys educating me.

Lodi can only control land INSIDE it's city limits. They can move their city limits, which is what they are doing now with a new general plan. But they can control ONLY the land which they plan on incorporating into the city.

Outside Lodi and Stockton's city limits is under the county's jurisdiction. "

sam wrote on Oct 13, 2009 11:06 AM:

" Observer, the Lodi's General Plan shows where Lodi plans to grow in the next 20 years. Within their new boundaries there are ag parcels that will become residential or commercial properties over the next 20 years. They will become part of Lodi.

Zin is referring to the Ag land outside of Lodi's jurisdiction, land they do NOT want to be part of Lodi.

Zin is correct. If Lodi has no plans on making this land part of Lodi in the next 20 years, they have no right to "label" it whatever they choose. If they do they are knowingly falsifying their legal General Plan document. "

Observer wrote on Oct 13, 2009 11:05 AM:

" Sam, you know a lot more about this than I do.....how far beyond the City limit can a general plan include? "

Observer wrote on Oct 13, 2009 10:50 AM:

" Wouldn't the City then give those parcels of land a designation? Residential, commercial, retail, etc? "

Observer wrote on Oct 13, 2009 10:48 AM:

" Sam, I'm not all that familiar with general plan designations. I do know that a general plan is a planning document for the future (next 20 years or so). I'm just curious where people think we should grow. "

sam wrote on Oct 13, 2009 10:06 AM:

" Observer, I think Zin's point is that Lodi cannot label land outside it's jurisdiction anything it wants. A General Plan is a legal document and should not be taken lightly. "

sam wrote on Oct 13, 2009 10:04 AM:

" Zinfandel, the land south of Lodi's boundary is mis-labelled an Ag zone. I feel a nice lawsuit coming. A dear friend of mine just won an $18 million lawsuit against Half Moon Bay for doing the same thing to his land.

Lodi knows they are mislabelling it and are hoping we do not notice. "

Observer wrote on Oct 13, 2009 8:47 AM:

" T&C, just curious, what are your thoughts on the general plan? We have a 2% growth cap that we haven't come close to since its inception. We can't grow to the north leaving us with east, west and south. I can't think of any major infill land parcels left in town. What do ya think? "

T & C wrote on Oct 13, 2009 8:14 AM:

" I truly believe that the Council as in all other matters has "already made up its mind"! From my point of view, these "Feedback meetings simply are a way of letting us "Let off steam"! The Council knows what it has to do and will do it. I have seen this time and again. "Watch for the outcome neighbors! But let's go anyway! "

Observer wrote on Oct 13, 2009 6:25 AM:

" Land south, north, east or west is under some counties jurisdiction. Zin, chances are your home was under a counties jurisdiction. "

Zinfandel wrote on Oct 13, 2009 5:38 AM:

" Here we go again!!! You cannot preserve what you do not own. Land south of Lodi is under county jurisdiction. "

Comments on this story are now closed.