Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

February 8th, 2010
February 6th, 2010
February 5th, 2010
February 4th, 2010
February 3rd, 2010
February 2nd, 2010
February 1st, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT

Three largest area school districts fail to meet state-set progress goals

By Jennifer Bonnett
News-Sentinel staff writer
Tuesday, September 15, 2009 11:17 AM PDT

Lodi Unified met only 34 of its 46 requirements set by the government, compared to 39 of 46 the year before, according to figures released Tuesday in the state's annual Accountability Progress Report.

Find your school's results

The previous year, the district met all but one of the requirements when the so-called growth API figures came out.

The same report this year shows that Lodi's 21,087 tested students as a whole are improving. The district's score, as a whole jumped 9 points, up from the base figure of 720 to 729. Last year, it went up 12 points, from the base figure of 708.

The No Child Left Behind Act requires schools and school districts to meet a variety of academic performance goals in order to reach their Adequate Yearly Progress goals.

None of the area's three largest districts met AYP this year.

In Lodi Unified School District, 15 schools -- or 35 percent -- met their API, while 13 -- or 30 percent -- grew, but did not meet the targets. The remaining stayed the same or declined.

Only schools with a valid 2008 Base API and a valid 2009 Growth API are included in the state summaries.

Comparatively, statewide fewer schools and districts, as a whole, made AYP

than in 2008.

Fifty-one percent of schools made AYP in 2009, a slight decline of one percentage point from 2008. There was a similar decrease in the percentage of districts making AYP, which fell from 41 percent in 2008 to 38 percent in 2009.

Reader Feedback

danielh wrote on Sep 15, 2009 9:01 PM:

" jbhiker: Reporting on school results is like global warming.

In winter and during cool summers, spin doctors don't release very many of their global warming reports.

reporting on school results can be speculative if the scores aren't released yet. "

danielh wrote on Sep 15, 2009 8:59 PM:

" jbhiker: figures were released Tuesday in the state's annual Accountability Progress Report. "

jbhiker wrote on Sep 15, 2009 5:19 PM:

" No... I am calling on B.S. on the right people. "

Bob Hussein Loblaw wrote on Sep 15, 2009 5:19 PM:

" It is confusing, and the story made it even more confusing.

API = state of California ranking
AYP = federal NCLB ranking

API shows overall growth.
AYP shows whether or not schools met proficiency targets outlined in NCLB.

In simple terms, AYP is harsher than API because AYP asks if a school met its federal targets, yes or no? "

kidsalami wrote on Sep 15, 2009 2:31 PM:

" Actually you would be calling BS on the state department of education!! These scores are state goals, not requirements. There are a lot of reports that come out this time of yr. Are you talking about this one?
http://www.lodinews.com/articles/2009/08/19/news/3_star_090819.txt "

jbhiker wrote on Sep 15, 2009 2:23 PM:

" Now am I the only one confused? Just a couple of weeks ago the LNS ran a story showing how our schools are ABOVE AVERAGE! Now, we have a report showing we do not even meet the states minimum requirements? I call B.S. on LNS and the Lodi Unified School District. Get your stories straight!! "

Comments on this story are now closed.