Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- The country's mess is our fault (130)
- Obama is not a moderate (129)
- Sarah Palin's book hits the shelves: Locals react (60)
- Despite budget cuts, some Lodi Unified School District salaries continue to rise (49)
- Lodi City Council plans to cap number of taco trucks at 22 (45)
- Lodi Flames slim playoff chances vanish in setback to Tracy Bulldogs (25)
- Tokay in, traveling to unbeaten No. 3 Grant for football playoffs (25)
- The haves should help the have-nots (25)
- Tokay Tigers blow late 27-point lead in loss to Wolf Pack (22)
- Nightmares about America's future (21)
Three largest area school districts fail to meet state-set progress goals
Lodi Unified met only 34 of its 46 requirements set by the government, compared to 39 of 46 the year before, according to figures released Tuesday in the state's annual Accountability Progress Report.
Find your school's results
The previous year, the district met all but one of the requirements when the so-called growth API figures came out.
The same report this year shows that Lodi's 21,087 tested students as a whole are improving. The district's score, as a whole jumped 9 points, up from the base figure of 720 to 729. Last year, it went up 12 points, from the base figure of 708.
The No Child Left Behind Act requires schools and school districts to meet a variety of academic performance goals in order to reach their Adequate Yearly Progress goals.
None of the area's three largest districts met AYP this year.
In Lodi Unified School District, 15 schools -- or 35 percent -- met their API, while 13 -- or 30 percent -- grew, but did not meet the targets. The remaining stayed the same or declined.
Only schools with a valid 2008 Base API and a valid 2009 Growth API are included in the state summaries.
Comparatively, statewide fewer schools and districts, as a whole, made AYP
than in 2008.
Fifty-one percent of schools made AYP in 2009, a slight decline of one percentage point from 2008. There was a similar decrease in the percentage of districts making AYP, which fell from 41 percent in 2008 to 38 percent in 2009.

Reader Feedback
danielh wrote on Sep 15, 2009 9:01 PM:
In winter and during cool summers, spin doctors don't release very many of their global warming reports.
reporting on school results can be speculative if the scores aren't released yet. "
danielh wrote on Sep 15, 2009 8:59 PM:
jbhiker wrote on Sep 15, 2009 5:19 PM:
Bob Hussein Loblaw wrote on Sep 15, 2009 5:19 PM:
API = state of California ranking
AYP = federal NCLB ranking
API shows overall growth.
AYP shows whether or not schools met proficiency targets outlined in NCLB.
In simple terms, AYP is harsher than API because AYP asks if a school met its federal targets, yes or no? "
kidsalami wrote on Sep 15, 2009 2:31 PM:
http://www.lodinews.com/articles/2009/08/19/news/3_star_090819.txt "
jbhiker wrote on Sep 15, 2009 2:23 PM:
Comments on this story are now closed.