Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Will terrorists be given Miranda warnings? (75)
- President Obama's first year (67)
- Lodi Unified School District president issues warning to speakers over cuts (64)
- Local business leaders say tourism, Costco, Home Depot may play roles in city's future (60)
- Islamic symbol in mosaic — what is all the fuss? (49)
- Many reject the politics of 'no' (45)
- Writer comments on Neely column (42)
- The Home Depot hopes to join Costco at Reynolds Ranch (41)
- Time to shed the convenient sham of 'Don't ask, don't tell' policy (34)
- Police: Train victim was a Lodi teen (31)
Help pass BPA legislation
As a longtime Lodi resident, a mother of two young children and a teacher in Galt, I want to thank you for the article in the Aug. 29 Lodi News-Sentinel regarding water bottles and BPA.
I have been doing some "digging" recently about the dangers of BPA, and I have to say, the information is alarming. BPA is used in most plastic products. It can seep out of those products and into our food and drink. Babies and children are at the greatest risk because many baby feeding products, including baby bottles, contain BPA. Because our little ones are growing and developing, they cannot metabolize harmful chemicals as well as we adults can.
BPA has been linked to a frightening list of problems such as breast cancer, early puberty, obesity, and neurological changes, including autism. All of these are on the rise in our community. It seems crazy to me that this chemical is allowed in baby bottles.
State Sen. Fran Pavley is trying to ban BPA from children's feeding products. Other states have already banned BPA. California should follow suit. The health of our children is too important. We as parents, teachers and concerned citizens should demand safe products for our kids.
Please urge our lawmakers to pass this important piece of legislation.
Susan Petersen
Lodi

Reader Feedback
Acampo_Mom wrote on Sep 12, 2009 6:41 PM:
Rhodie, you're right...you die anyway, BUT...I've got two young daughters and it just makes my blood boil to think that when they were babies, I may have been poisoning them every time I heated a bottle for them, or every time they re-used a plastic water bottle (countless times as they are in various sports) before the info was publicly available. Various female cancers run in my family. And learning from the new info that has come out, BPA may be directly involved in the occurrence of those cancers. I'll take my chances with my own health, but when it comes to my kids'...You know what I mean? UGH so frustrating.
Cogito re: your last post: YEP! "
Rhodie wrote on Sep 11, 2009 5:19 PM:
The way I see it, live right, eat right, die anyway. After BPA there will be another and another and another. Soon we'll be drinking out of leaves organically grown. "
Cogito wrote on Sep 11, 2009 9:03 AM:
Acampo_Mom wrote on Sep 11, 2009 8:12 AM:
For the time being I get the 5 gallon bottles of water, but upon investigating I've learned that even those big bottles use unsafe plastic.
I've read, though, that as long as the plastic isn't heated/cooked (such as being left in a hot car, dishwasher, microwave) the contents are safe. I'll have to go with that until I find a better alternative. "
Gator wrote on Sep 10, 2009 7:11 PM:
Tankers from Calistoga, Arrowhead and a number of other Bottled water
Companies take from an aquifer deep beneath the Sierras.. Clean and pure. "
T & C wrote on Sep 10, 2009 7:07 PM:
http://www.fuelforadventure.com/better-bottle-1.html " "
Bob Hussein Loblaw wrote on Sep 10, 2009 3:01 PM:
dogs4you wrote on Sep 10, 2009 12:27 PM:
Believe it or not, the best tasting water for big cities in this country is the stuff that comes from the tap in Los Angles. I`m just a messenger, so don`t shoot me. "
smokeater8 wrote on Sep 10, 2009 8:45 AM:
Cogito wrote on Sep 10, 2009 8:15 AM:
Acampo_Mom wrote on Sep 10, 2009 8:06 AM:
It makes me angry that these industries will gamble with their consumers' health just to save a few bucks. If a company decides to go against the grain and start bottling/canning with BPA free containers...I'll pay the higher price. "
T & C wrote on Sep 10, 2009 7:51 AM:
"The Environmental Working Group tested canned food bought across America and found BPA in more than half of them, at levels they call "200 times the government's traditional safe level of exposure for industrial chemicals." There are no standards for BPA; it is allowed to be put in anything, and billions of pounds are produced each year.".
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/04/bpa-danger-from-cans.php
"The problem is that bisphenol A acts as a "xenoestrogen," which just means it's like the female hormone estrogen, except for two things: 1) it's foreign to the body, which is what "xeno" means, and 2) it is way more harmful than our natural estrogen for everyone, male and female. Breast Cancers are much more of a risk in women who carry a high burden of xenoestrogens."
http://heartspring.net/plastic_xeno_estrogen.html "
T & C wrote on Sep 10, 2009 7:43 AM:
http://www.fuelforadventure.com/better-bottle-1.html "
Comments on this story are now closed.