Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

February 8th, 2010
February 6th, 2010
February 5th, 2010
February 4th, 2010
February 3rd, 2010
February 2nd, 2010
February 1st, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT

Lodi, Galt Lutherans have mixed opinions on gay clergy

By Ross Farrow
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Monday, August 31, 2009 6:08 AM PDT

Local Lutheran churches continue to digest whether the largest Lutheran organization made the right decision to allow gays in committed relationships to become priests and to allow for a union among gay couples.

"I've never been more proud to be a Lutheran," D'Arlene Rosenau, a long-time member of St. Paul Lutheran Church in Lodi.

"Me too," said Lorene Freggario, another St. Paul member.

The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, which includes two churches in Lodi and one in Galt, voted on Aug. 21 to allow gays in committed relationships to be pastors and deacons.

The church assembly also voted to allow same-sex couples to be officially blessed by the church. Pastor Mark Price of Lodi's St. Paul Lutheran Church said on Sunday he doesn't know whether the "blessing" will mean marriage a ceremony or some other form of commitment. It may take a couple of years for ELCA leaders to work out the details, Price said.

While some members at St. Paul said they were glad to see the ELCA become more welcoming to gays, congregations of two other ELCA churches — Emanuel in Lodi and Shepherd of the Valley in Galt — were generally disappointed over the ELCA delegates' votes.

What makes the Lutheran church a little confusing is that there are three congregations in Lodi that are not affiliated with the ELCA. Two of them — St. Peter Lutheran and Redeemer — are in what is known as the Lutheran Missouri Synod, and Christ Evangelical Lutheran Church is in the Wisconsin Synod. All share more conservative social values.

Price and Shepherd of the Valley Pastor Mary Sanders said that the more than 1,000 voting delegates at the ELCA assembly in Minneapolis debated the issue with complete respect and without any signs or protesters.

The assembly's vote allows gay pastors and deacons to serve at ELCA churches, but it doesn't force any congregation to accept a gay leader, Price said. When there's an opening for a pastor, the bishop will make a recommendation, but it requires a two-thirds vote by the congregation for the pastor to be accepted, whether or not the person is gay, Price said.

At this time, gay marriage is not allowed in the ELCA. Marriage remains a union between a man and a woman, Price said.

After a meeting of the congregation between St. Paul's two services on Sunday, church member Roger Vincent said he's been amazed why homosexuality and abortion play such a great role at churches since many "rules" stated in the Bible are ignored.

Two examples Vincent cited are the requirements that a woman be stoned if she leaves her husband, and that children be stoned for disobeying their parents.

If homosexuality was so important, why didn't Christ address it, Vincent asked.

"Its absence speaks for itself, in my mind," Vincent said.

Marilyn Maki, another St. Paul member, questioned the interpretation of John 3:16, which states, "For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life."

Maki said, "It doesn't say, 'Any straight person who believes in me.'"

Price and some members of the St. Paul congregation also said on Sunday how glad they are that those who disagree on homosexuality within their faith can still respect each other. Price referred to the term "bound conscience," which means to respect another's opinions that differ from your own.

Some at St. Paul weren't sure what to think about the ELCA assembly's action regarding gays.

"Truthfully, I'm conflicted," St. Paul member Terry Hickey, of Woodbridge, said last week. "I'm trying to understand God's will in this, not mine. I want to approach this with Christ's love in it. We're all sinners, so I guess a sin is a sin. My sin, whatever that is — we're all in the same pool."

Contact reporter Ross Farrow at rossf@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback

Inquisitor wrote on Sep 2, 2009 4:49 PM:

" perspective: I'm not sure where you heard homosexuality being exclusive to pedophiles or slave masters. God's instructions to the Levites (priests) were clear (Lev. 20:13): "If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them."

Here, "man" is transliterated as "iysh" from the Hebrew, as in opposition to woman. "Mankind" is transliterated from "zakar," meaning male. And "lieth" is "mishkab" from the Hebrew, meaning to lie as in "sleep in bed" for sexual intercourse. I provide this information to counter any opposition that the word "man" could mean "man or woman" or that "lieth" could mean "lie down innocently on a beach," or something of that nature. "

Inquisitor wrote on Sep 2, 2009 4:19 PM:

" jessejane: Again, this is a problem with "organized" religion. When you put your faith in one person to tell you what and how to believe, you (by default) accept that person's biases, prejudices, and opinions, which are not based on Biblical fact. You accept one's APPEARANCE as credentials of righteousness, worthy of your following. But you can't know if someone is a pedophile or not -- you just assume what you want to believe, because of appearance. Case in point: the recent scandals of pedophelia in the Catholic church. Put your faith in the word of God instead of the word of man. Study! "

edumacation wrote on Sep 1, 2009 10:43 AM:

" perspective7:32- Say what? And I quote "...about "lifelong, committed, monogamous, same sex relationships" because they didn't exist then..." WHAT? They didn't exist then OR NOW!

Hundreds of studies show that so-called monomogous homosexual relationships are rare. The view of most homo couples is that the "marriage" is only a "base of operations". Each is encouraged to continue the promiscuity and anonymous sex that was present before the marriage. Tha main difference, is that they can insure each other for the various diseases they get because they are now "a couple".

If they need the medical insurance coverage, maybe they can call their relationship some other name. How about roommate, Or bunk buddies?

ROFL: And all of this subterfuge hiding under the pretext of the church.

What ever happened to moral standards? When do we start dismantling the Ten Commandments? Oops, we already have.

Its now called the "Ten Suggestions". "

perspective wrote on Aug 31, 2009 7:32 PM:

" Let me repeat what I said in response to the other article. This is not about the Bible. This is about people wanting an excuse for their bigotry. That's why people like Townsend and Kah aren't coming down equally hard on other "Bible" sins like usury (money earning interest), divorce, or even wearing linen with cotton. Do you realize that the homosexuality references in the Bible were about pedophiles and masters taking advantage of slaves. They were not about "lifelong, committed, monogamous, same sex relationships" because they didn't exist then. Besides, this decision is just a tiny, tiny part of a much larger statement. Find, download, and become educated.http://www.elca.org/What-We-Believe/Social-Issues/Social-Statements-in-Process/JTF-Human-Sexuality.aspx "

voter wrote on Aug 31, 2009 7:08 PM:

" I don't think you read the story jessejane. No one voted to let criminals lead a church. "

jessejane wrote on Aug 31, 2009 6:59 PM:

" I don't think it is a matter of judgment.. it is a matter of who will mind the flock.
You do not hire a pedophile to watch over your kids... or lead your church.
You do not knowingly hire a murderer, an alcoholic, an adulterer or any other 'sinner' or immorally 'acting' person to lead your church.
When that starts happening the church is no longer a church...
Jesus loved the sinner... that is what he was sent to do.
We can love the sinner and not the sin... but it doesn't mean we have them as our leaders!
Personally... not any of the mentioned sinners is the kind of person I want to follow.
Just my thought. "

dogs4you wrote on Aug 31, 2009 2:23 PM:

" The modern day church is nothing more than a business, not a well run business, but a business just the same. Everyone should take into consideration that God doesn`t bail man out from man`s problems. God is a sprit that lives in the minds of the believers, and I am quite sure he wishes he never did tinker with that Adam and Eve thing, which is after all a fable in the first place. "

max stanfield wrote on Aug 31, 2009 2:16 PM:

" How soon will the ELCA delegates gather and endorse man-boy [nambla] relations. My guess is no more than 3 years. What a disgusting bunch of people. "

Inquisitor wrote on Aug 31, 2009 1:32 PM:

" I laugh at how "organized" religions have to invoke a political process to determine Biblical teaching. Perhaps someday they will leave the judging to God rather than themselves. "

edumacation wrote on Aug 31, 2009 12:33 PM:

" Just wondering. How far does the rainbow crowd want us to go? What is the next step? With the rainbow crowd, there is ALWAYS one more inclusion to the list of acceptable "lifestyles".

I don't think that bestiality-rights will be the next progression, but what about polyandry? Two husbands with one wife.

We never want to exclude anyone, so its only time before additional aberrant or illegal behaviors of the past become mainstreamed today. Does it depend on which moral weakness is most politically correct? Lets stay tuned to see what is next. I hope pederasts are not included next. "

veritas wrote on Aug 31, 2009 11:46 AM:

" Glad I dropped out of the ELCA years ago. Had I finished my seminary training, I would certainly have to turn in my smocks today. "

tosh conn wrote on Aug 31, 2009 11:12 AM:

" I will never look at a pul-pit in the same light ever again. "

thinkaboutit wrote on Aug 31, 2009 10:43 AM:

" I was born and raised in Catholic. I have often been disappointed with some of the statements made by the Catholic Church. I think I may have found a new religion. One that interprets the Bible without ridiculous agendas! "

Jenn H wrote on Aug 31, 2009 7:03 AM:

" Bravo! Bravo! It is about time the ECLA took this step. It still has not gone far enough because it has not recognized the right of all persons to marry, but this is definitely a long-overdue step in the right direction. I am impressed by the attitudes of the folks quoted, too. "

Comments on this story are now closed.