Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

February 8th, 2010
February 6th, 2010
February 5th, 2010
February 4th, 2010
February 3rd, 2010
February 2nd, 2010
February 1st, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT

We need to have a reasonable meeting on health care reform


Tuesday, August 25, 2009 5:55 AM PDT

Isn't it time we had a reasoned debate on health care reform? Shouting down each other in town hall meeting is not solving this issue.

It is quite understandable that Americans are frustrated and confused by the challenges raised pursuing health reform. Additionally, Americans are often resistant to any change in the status quo, especially in serious matters that affect each one of us personally. However, there is a general consensus (by most Americans) that reform is needed.

Here are some facts that lead to that conclusion:

1. At present the United States health system is rated 37th in the world.

2. There are over 45 million uninsured Americans.

3. 22,000 Americans die each year due to lack of health insurance and access to services.

4. Administrative costs are soaring: a. While administrative costs under Medicare (a government program) are around 1 percent, administrative costs by private insurance corporations are about 30 percent. So $30 of every $100 goes to insurance companies rather than paying for providing health care services to Americans. b. Profits of health insurance corporations increased 400 percent between 2000-2007. c. Health insurance corporations are spending millions of dollars every day to lobby against reform. d. A CEO of one insurance company makes approximately $100,000 per hour.

5. Sadly, many members of Congress, Republicans and Democrats alike, are beholden to health care industry lobbyists and depend on them for campaign contributions.

6. Hospitals are required to treat patients in emergency rooms. ER treatment is expensive and is often sought only after an illness has progressed to the point that it is requires extensive and expensive treatment. This treatment is often not reimbursed by the patient, so those costs fall to Americans already insured or to other government agencies. So we are already paying for this type of treatment, much of which could possibly be obviated by preventative care covered by health insurance.

Insurance companies, like any other corporation, are based on profitability. If fewer services are provided, that will naturally lead to more profitability for insurance companies. That is why treatments do not get authorized and why people are excluded from treatment due to pre-existing conditions. Therefore, insurance companies are lobbying mightily against health reform in any way they can.

Freedom of speech is one of our most treasured provision in the Bill of Rights. However, some of the current "shouters" are the ones limiting that freedom by yelling and causing disturbances, preventing serious discussion.

Some have resorted to lies and the ludicrous to stop health care reform. Scare tactics such as saying reform will create "death panels," pay for abortion rather than health care for seniors and give free health care to illegal immigrants are a few.

Although not one of these issues has been included in the present bills to be considered, scare tactics such as these are powerful. Recall how such tactics such as "mushroom clouds," etc., were successful in frightening Americans into supporting the Iraqi War.

If these current protesters are so worried about spending money on health care and increasing the deficit, where were they during the lead up to Bush's war against a country that was absolutely not threat to our country? That war not only cost us billions in dollars, but cost us dearly in the loss of over 4,000 American lives. They money wasted on that war would have paid for health reform several times over.

Many political leaders and legislators who have not supported Social Security and Medicare and who would like to dismantle these programs are the same folks who say they want health care reform, but then just say "no" to any kind of proposal presented to them.

Until they offer a health plan of their own, perhaps we all should listen and question the present proposals reasonably rather than rant and rave.

Cynthia Neely is a retired city attorney.

Reader Feedback

rantraves wrote on Sep 2, 2009 8:11 PM:

" Should I just give-up? Remember the movie "Deer Hunter"? "This is this"? Well, it's all about excepting reality; but that just doesn't seem to matter to a lib now does it? -- because someone must have brought a spare pare of boots, right? Wrong! No boots for you! "

Lodian wrote on Sep 2, 2009 4:47 PM:

" Well, I guess I'd better get my 400 pound butt outta this computer chair and waddle along now. Things to do. Twinkies to gobble. ;-) "

Lodian wrote on Sep 2, 2009 4:44 PM:

" How'd you know my height? ;-) "

Cogito wrote on Sep 2, 2009 12:19 PM:

" Lodian, not if you're 8 foot 3. "

Lodian wrote on Sep 2, 2009 10:26 AM:

" So, Brian, am I fat, big or 400 pounds? I guess it could be relative when saying big or fat when also including 400 pounds in the description. Some may think that 400 pounds in not fat, but I'm pretty sure that most would consider 400 pounds to be fat, or big. So, I think you'll have to pick one, Brian. Choose just one, if your puny little tidbit nut ya call a brain can handle it! lol! ;-) "

Lodian wrote on Sep 2, 2009 10:21 AM:

" Brian: You're confused again. "

Brian wrote on Sep 2, 2009 8:02 AM:

" Ok Lodian,

I'll try to keep my comments simple as to not confuse you. "

Lodian wrote on Sep 1, 2009 11:38 PM:

" Brian: Saying "big, fat and 400 pound" is redundant.

LOL! "

Lodian wrote on Sep 1, 2009 11:36 PM:

" Brian is so easily rattled. He seems like a very unstable man. "

rantraves wrote on Sep 1, 2009 4:30 PM:

" It gets personal, and I don't like it -- unless, of course, I'm the one throwing the honey bucket. "

Brian wrote on Sep 1, 2009 3:04 PM:

" Lodian wrote on Aug 31, 2009 8:39 AM:

" What? Is Brian using yet another handle? OMG! "

-Lodian never tires of being a big fat 400 pound irritant.

Except for that short stint with onelastthing, Brian is my first handle and the only one I have used. "

Bob Hussein Loblaw wrote on Sep 1, 2009 8:31 AM:

" Giovanina angrily guessed: "...it is obvious that you don't know what Jesus would do. He would follow the law."

I am no Jesus expert, but wasn't he crucified because he DIDN'T follow the law? "

Giovanina wrote on Sep 1, 2009 12:04 AM:

" voter wrote on Aug 30, 2009 3:56 PM:

" Cog, for humanitarian reasons, illegals and foreign tourists will both receive emergency treatment whether we reform healthcare or not. Immigration issues have no bearing on healthcare reform.

Do they call undocumented workers "criminal parasites" at your church? What does Jesus recommend we do with them? Allow their children to bleed to death in the hospital parking lot?

Let me say this loud and clear!

THERE IS NO ENFORCEMENT IN THE BILL!!!

What an idiot, almost all countries have a recipricol policy for emergency care, but illegals use the ER for their personal health care. This is why so many hospitals are always on the verge of closing down, and some have.

From your question, it is obvious that you don't know what Jesus would do. He would follow the law.

And "demoncats" is a label that has been around since the early 90's. "

rantraves wrote on Aug 31, 2009 9:50 AM:

" Government can not reform itself. You could fill both houses and the presidency with repugnancans and we'd still move to the left with larger, and more wasteful govt. Trust is disappearing, and along with it goes the revenue. What's at the end of the road? Dollar destruction, chaos, and a constituional crisis that's all. Can such a calamity be avoided? Maybe, but it's going to take a "partnership", and not a government in Washington, to save this beast. In other words, governments are for those who wish to be governed, but a partnership is for free people. What's it going to be people? "

Lodian wrote on Aug 31, 2009 8:39 AM:

" What? Is Brian using yet another handle? OMG! "

voter wrote on Aug 31, 2009 6:19 AM:

" (shaking head)

Brian, there's no need to hide. We all know it's you. "

tosh conn wrote on Aug 30, 2009 9:43 PM:

" Voter....have you been sleeping under a rock ???" Congress stripped all funding and enforcement for the illegals from all the health care bills. Hence, they are toothless window dressing. What did you think they would do when the demoncrats want these votes so desperately. You are a drooling child. "

voter wrote on Aug 30, 2009 7:44 PM:

" "Demoncrats"? Where else have I heard that term used today? Oh yeah. gray cloud likes that word too.

Interesting. "

Cogito wrote on Aug 30, 2009 6:06 PM:

" Voter, YOU were the one who suggested, or brought up the fact the Demoncrats, were NOT going to pay for the parasites crossing our borders. As far as my Church's stance on the criminals, I don't know, and I don't care. Stop their childrens bleeding, fingerprint them (and their parents), photograph the family. deport them, and imprison them should they ever show up again without visas or passports. Deduct their medical costs from their country's foreign aide, and let their country know who they are. "

voter wrote on Aug 30, 2009 3:56 PM:

" Cog, for humanitarian reasons, illegals and foreign tourists will both receive emergency treatment whether we reform healthcare or not. Immigration issues have no bearing on healthcare reform.

Do they call undocumented workers "criminal parasites" at your church? What does Jesus recommend we do with them? Allow their children to bleed to death in the hospital parking lot? "

Cogito wrote on Aug 30, 2009 3:36 PM:

" Voter, do you really think that illegals will be denied health care? All the proposed law says to me is that hospitals will not be paid by the government for the treatment of illegals. The hospitals will still have to eat it, and it will continue to drive up costs. When will we start dealing with these criminal parasites, and stop burying our heads in the sand regarding their drain on US resources? "

voter wrote on Aug 30, 2009 11:50 AM:

" Gio, you are incorrect.

From the House bill:
SEC. 246. NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS.

Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States.

From the Senate Bill:
(h) NO FEDERAL FUNDING. -- Nothing in this Act shall allow Federal payments for individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States.

Immigration is a separate issue--an important issue, but a separate issue. "

Giovanina wrote on Aug 30, 2009 9:40 AM:

" This far into the debate, many people have read the bill or sections of it, and her misinformation does show that she is just spewing Howard Dean's talking points.

Please show us where the government has spearheaded any kind of enforcement toward illegal aliens. Agents are being killed and shot at, as they make solo runs along the border.

Take a trip to Thornton and see how many illegals are hiding there, or just go to Walmart of Food4Less on the weekend, when all the Thorntonites come to Lodi. Take a good look because Obamacare WILL cover them. "

ttian wrote on Aug 29, 2009 11:50 PM:

" SSI: If people aren’t given the medical attention they need (unapproved or by lack of medical insurance) the #’s of those on SSI is going to sharply rise. And if they’re lucky, those in need who can’t afford private insurance or are denied coverage and treatment, will struggle to find how to qualify for SSI with untreated illness that have far progressed.

Government is going broke because private industries are reaping in the profits, not treated avoidable health care problems, leaving government to take care of it’s people after the fact, conditions increased in seriousness. Let government take care of it’s people earlier than later, where if and when private insurance won’t and don’t, which is now. Where would those on Medicare/caid and Healthy families be? In the ER! Those of you with health insurance, how much higher would you premiums be without those programs, insurance,

Gold Rule: Treat others as you would like to be treated.
Love your neighbor.
Where are the good Samaritans?
Cynthia, thanks for being one of those good Samaritians! "

ttian wrote on Aug 29, 2009 11:42 PM:

" Half of all bankruptcies are caused by medical bills. Three-quarters of those filings are
people with health insurance.

Administrative costs account for 31 percent of all health care expenditures in the United
States. The average overhead for U.S. private health insurers is 11.7 percent; for
Medicare, it is 3.6 percent; for Canada’s national health insurance program, it is 1.3
percent.
http://www.michaelmoore.com/sicko/_media/SiCKO_sickofactoids.pdf "

ttian wrote on Aug 29, 2009 11:29 PM:

" http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/top.php?indexType=s
Lobbying
Top Spenders (this money didn’t pay for anyone’s medical treatment)
Lobbying Client Total
US Chamber of Commerce
$488,458,180
American Medical Assn
$208,472,500
General Electric
$183,895,000
American Hospital Assn
$172,940,431
AARP
$164,072,064
Pharmaceutical Rsrch & Mfrs of America
$154,533,400
AT&T Inc
$140,516,229
Northrop Grumman
$133,515,253
Edison Electric Institute
$128,645,999
Business Roundtable
$127,980,000
National Assn of Realtors
$127,977,380
Exxon Mobil
$124,626,942
Blue Cross/Blue Shield
$120,491,385
Verizon Communications
$118,344,841
Lockheed Martin
$115,567,888
Boeing Co
$108,728,310
General Motors
$104,774,483
Southern Co
$97,670,694
Freddie Mac
$96,194,048
Altria Group
$88,380,000 "

ttian wrote on Aug 29, 2009 11:29 PM:

" http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Transcript_of_taped_conversation_between_President_Richard_Nixon_and_John_D._Ehrlichman_(1971)_that_led_to_the_HMO_act_of_1973:

Ehrlichman: “… private enterprise one.”
President Nixon: “Well, that appeals to me.”
Ehrlichman: “Edgar Kaiser is running his Permanente deal for profit. And the reason that he can … the reason he can do it … I had Edgar Kaiser come in … talk to me about this and I went into it in some depth. All the incentives are toward less medical care, because …”
President Nixon: [Unclear.]
Ehrlichman: “… the less care they give them, the more money they make.”
President Nixon: “Fine.” [Unclear.]
Ehrlichman: [Unclear] “… and the incentives run the right way.”
President Nixon: “Not bad.”
[Source: University of Virginia Check - February 17, 1971, 5:26 pm - 5:53 pm, Oval Office Conversation 450-23. Look for: tape rmn_e450c.]
http://millercenter.virginia.edu/scripps/digitalarchive/presidentialrecordings
/nixon/oval?PHPSESSID=b813e56b3017d097cd176720bc10fc74
Retrieved from "http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Transcript_of_taped_conversation_between_President_Richard_Nixon_and_John_D._Ehrlichman_(1971)_that_led_to_the_HMO_act_of_1973:" "

ttian wrote on Aug 29, 2009 11:28 PM:

" http://www.forbes.com/static/execpay2005/LIRS5NI.html?passListId=12&passYear=2005&passListType=Person&uniqueId=S5NI&datatype=Person
John W Rowe
$22.2 mil

Why is Fannie May struggling: Greed of Wall Street, and loan officers/real estate agents. "

ttian wrote on Aug 29, 2009 11:27 PM:

" Institute of medicine of the national academies
http://www.iom.edu/?id=19175
Lack of health insurance causes roughly 18,000 unnecessary deaths every year in the United States. Although America leads the world in spending on health care, it is the only wealthy, industrialized nation that does not ensure that all citizens have coverage.

Private Insurance charged with fraudulent claims to US government (medicare) (how about private citizens?) Wonder why Medicare may have difficulties? Greed of private insurances!
http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2003/June/03_civ_386.htm "

ttian wrote on Aug 29, 2009 11:26 PM:

" Census
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/insur200706.pdf

• In 2006, 43.6 million persons of all ages (14.8%) were uninsured at the time of the interview, 54.5 million (18.6%) had been uninsured for at least part of the year prior to the interview, and 30.7 million (10.5%) had been uninsured for more than a year at the time of the interview. • The percentage of children under the age of 18 years who were uninsured at the time of the interview was 9.3% in 2006.
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=245 "

Cogito wrote on Aug 28, 2009 8:28 AM:

" Gray Cloud, you've got my vote. "

stantaves wrote on Aug 27, 2009 3:28 PM:

" Good one, wtf. "

wtf wrote on Aug 27, 2009 1:32 PM:

" Whoa Nellie! wrote: "WTF- honestly one of the best group of postings I have ever read on any newspaper blog.

Yours or did you "borrow" it?"

Thanks! But, I cannot tell a lie....I "borrowed it"...it was just so good, I had to pass it on! "

gray cloud wrote on Aug 27, 2009 12:48 PM:

" Cog: Yeah, my mother told it when I was in high school. Sometimes the time is ripe for an "oldie". Now its time to find out the budget for and the number of employees in the Department of Education and the Department of Energy, toss in the EPA for frosting. When that is done...what have they done for the billions spent and thousands of useless jobs. Health care will be better ? Unlikely. "

stantaves wrote on Aug 27, 2009 11:38 AM:

" Cynthia, how is it that the real facts are always lost on the left? You know facts such as govt never having brought a program in on time and on budget. The realities of govt failure are glaring -- You must have been blinded by the glare right? "

Bob Hussein Loblaw wrote on Aug 27, 2009 10:10 AM:

" Cynthia Neely opined: "...perhaps we all should listen and question the present proposals reasonably rather than rant and rave."

Wishful thinking, based on most of the posts below. "

Cogito wrote on Aug 27, 2009 8:10 AM:

" Gray cloud, it's an old joke, and you should have stated that it wasn't your idea. Right Voter? My favorite old joke, that I didn't make up, is "Why do Lawyers wear neckties? It's to keep the foreskin from going back over their head." "

voter wrote on Aug 27, 2009 6:53 AM:

" Now we know what gray cloud dreams about. "

Cogito wrote on Aug 26, 2009 11:24 PM:

" Hey people, I happen to know Cynthia, and she is an intelligent, classy, compassionate woman. I've had a few one on one conversations with her in the past, so I know how liberal she is. She has a hard time saying "President Bush" without spitting. Trust me, she hates the man. That's why she got off topic in this article to take shots at him. I'd like to see her justify another war we entered into with an enemy who posed no threat to us. A war where over 200,000 Americans lost their lives. Where Kennedy "drew a line in the sand" with the Communists in Vietnam. Then LBJ escalated it, before Nixon ended it. I wonder if she has the same feelings toward JFK and LBJ as she does Bush? But, mark my word, she is a good citizen, and a wonderful human being. "

lodidian wrote on Aug 26, 2009 9:05 PM:

" Max did his homework--Cynthia didn't.
Nice to see so many folks responding to this with common sense and facts. "

gray cloud wrote on Aug 26, 2009 8:39 PM:

" Mommy !! Mommy !! Can people have babies from anal sex ? Of course they can little Johnny, where do you think lawyers come from ? "

Whoa Nellie! wrote on Aug 26, 2009 8:23 PM:

" WTF- honestly one of the best group of postings I have ever read on any newspaper blog.

Yours or did you "borrow" it? "

anayud wrote on Aug 26, 2009 6:28 PM:

" Cynthia Neely is a retired city attorney. What is one to expect from a government lawyer? One of the reasons for their existance is figuring how to shaft the citizens legally. I just wonder if the LNS would allow Ron Paul to pen an "Opinion piece" for this paper. I'd like to see that. "

Cogito wrote on Aug 26, 2009 4:35 PM:

" WTF, good comments. But, one thing you may not know about the McDonalds coffee case. The lawyers for the burned woman had documentation that showed that McDonalds knew their coffee was hot enough to do harm, yet chose not to replace the coffee makers due to the high cost of doing so. They chose to take their chances and it came to bite them in the booty. A company memo did them in. Kinda like Ford and the Pinto. "

wtf wrote on Aug 26, 2009 1:38 PM:

" He is survived by his 4 stepbrothers;

I Know My Rights
I Want It Now
Someone Else Is To Blame
I'm A Victim

Not many attended his funeral because so few realized he was gone If you still remember him, pass this on. If not, join the majority and do nothing. "

wtf wrote on Aug 26, 2009 1:38 PM:

" Common Sense finally gave up the will to live, after a woman failed to realize that a steaming cup of coffee was hot. She spilled a little in her lap, and was promptly awarded a huge settlement.

Common Sense was preceded in death, by his parents, Truth and Trust, by his wife, Discretion, by his daughter, Responsibility, and by his son, Reason. "

wtf wrote on Aug 26, 2009 1:37 PM:

" Common Sense lost the will to live as the churches became businesses; and criminals received better treatment than their victims.

Common Sense took a beating when you couldn't defend yourself from a burglar in your own home and the burglar could sue you for assault. "

wtf wrote on Aug 26, 2009 1:37 PM:

" Common Sense lost ground when parents attacked teachers for doing the job that they themselves had failed to do in disciplining their unruly children.

It declined even further when schools were required to get parental consent to administer sun lotion or an aspirin to a student; but could not inform parents when a student became pregnant and wanted to have an abortion. "

wtf wrote on Aug 26, 2009 1:37 PM:

" Common Sense lived by simple, sound financial policies (don't spend more than you can earn) and reliable strategies (adults, not children, are in charge). His health began to deteriorate rapidly when well-intentioned but overbearing regulations were set in place. Reports of a 6-year-old boy charged with sexual harassment for kissing a classmate; teens suspended from school for using mouthwash after lunch; and a teacher fired for reprimanding an unruly student, only worsened his condition. "

wtf wrote on Aug 26, 2009 1:36 PM:

" Today we mourn the passing of a beloved old friend, Common Sense, who has been with us for many years. No one knows for sure how old he was, since his birth records were long ago lost in bureaucratic red tape. He will be remembered as having cultivated such valuable lessons as:

- Knowing when to come in out of the rain;
- Why the early bird gets the worm;
- Life isn't always fair;
- and maybe it was my fault. "

jramagic wrote on Aug 26, 2009 10:55 AM:

" I agree. Its been like a bunch children screaming at each other calling each other names....with cheerleaders on each side egging them on. I've seen way too little mature discussion. I think most all of us middle class people agree that our health system is broken. If you don't agree, you soon will -once you try to get your own PRIVATE policy some day...or get buried alive by the exploding costs. Health care is like the "wild west" at this point...kinda like Enron in its heyday, in the worst cases. "

Inquisitor wrote on Aug 26, 2009 10:30 AM:

" So out-of-touch. So misinformed. So long. "

tosh conn wrote on Aug 25, 2009 6:15 PM:

" Cynthia: In closing, you really need to read up on what is happening. You are reciting Howard Deans talking points. I expect more. "

tosh conn wrote on Aug 25, 2009 6:13 PM:

" Cogito. Congress people like to point to the segment where illegals wont get health care. What they won't tell you is they stripped out the provisions allowing for and funding for enforcement. No enforcement? no prohibitions. Cynthia, do you know why people are screaming ? Because every congress person is lying their eyeballs out about the bill. In addition, they are stuffing themselves with pork, million dollar private jets, circumnavigating the globe on our tax dollars and squandering billions. If you cant see it you are myopic. "

Cogito wrote on Aug 25, 2009 5:33 PM:

" Cynthia, are you saying that under Obama's health plan, illegal immigrants will not be receiving benefits? Because that's an idea I could support. Also, do you consider our elected officials referring to their detractors as "Nazi's", ala our Plastic Fantastic Leader of the House, to be unreasonable? How about Maxine Waters reference to politicians opposed to the public option as "Neanderthals". Is this acceptable behavior from your side of the political aisle, or do you condemn them too? Because you seem to be ignoring the boorish behavior of those on the left. "

tosh conn wrote on Aug 25, 2009 5:16 PM:

" To Neo: She is one of various spokespeople for Osama and the Veterans Affairs. The book is the VA book [that didnt exist] on how to guide a veteran to check out early. "

Neo wrote on Aug 25, 2009 3:41 PM:

" Tosh, who is Roberts and what is "Your Life , Your Choices"? "

wtf wrote on Aug 25, 2009 10:13 AM:

" Good link, max stanfield. ;) Ron Paul has some questions regarding cost as well...such as: **Who's** supposed to pay for all this "healthcare"? (wink, wink)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9ZpnRFTDpo "

max stanfield wrote on Aug 25, 2009 8:54 AM:

" Cynthia, here are some specifics. Well researched and in opposition your conclusions:

http://townhall.com/columnists/JohnHawkins/2009/08/25/5_liberal_lies_about_obamacare "

Cogito wrote on Aug 25, 2009 8:45 AM:

" Well Cynthia, you started out so well, then you began with a bogus statistic. 37th in the world? Do you really believe that? That number was arrived at by the UN/WHO in 2000. They haven't bothered doing another "assessment". Only 25% of the criteria to be met by the study had anything to do with healing the sick. 75% had to do with who and how it was going to be paid for. It was totally loaded against countries with private health care. So theoretically, if you were a country where every patient died, you could get triple the score of a country where every patient lived, as long as all the bills were paid by the government of the dead patients. That particular study is an affront to any reasonable, thinking person, and you are better than using it as gospel. If you were to ask the citizens of a country "are you happy with your current health coverage"? You would be hard fought to find anywhere with the satisfaction of those in the US. If you want to have a "reasonable meeting" on health care reform, leave the ginned up, bogus statistics at home. "

tosh conn wrote on Aug 25, 2009 8:44 AM:

" Death panels ? Yes Mam !! Roberts said that "Your Life, Your Choices "is in a revision process in order to make sure that the document is most inclusive" of all points of view when it comes to end of life issues, and that the revision process includes faith-based and medical groups. She declined to answer for the record whether the revisions are being done because of any objectionable material in the current document.


She also declined to answer whether the VA, in its educational materials, is in the habit of posing to wounded veterans the question of whether their lives are worth living if they are wheelchair-bound or unable to control their bladder -- two of the many scenarios explored in "Your Life, Your Choices." "

max stanfield wrote on Aug 25, 2009 8:40 AM:

" Oops, line deleted:

Fannie Mae was established in 1938 - 71 years to get it right; it is broke.. "

max stanfield wrote on Aug 25, 2009 8:38 AM:

" To start with there are not 47 mill people uninsured. This is a doctored number, the real number is around 12 mil. I can see you lovingly embrace socialized medicine. Try this: The U.S. Postal Service was established in 1775 - 234 years to get it right; it is broke.

Social Security was established in 1935 - 74 years to get it right; it is broke.

71 years to get it right; it is broke..

War on Poverty started in 1964 - 45 years to get it right; $1 trillion of our money is confiscated each year and transferred to "the poor"; it hasn't worked.

Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965 - 44 years to get it right; they're broke

Freddie Mac was established in 1970 - 39 years to get it right; it is broke

Trillions of dollars in the massive political payoff called the TARP bill of 2009 shows NO sign of working.

I dont share your love of mammoth government spending to improve anything. "

Comments on this story are now closed.