Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

February 8th, 2010
February 6th, 2010
February 5th, 2010
February 4th, 2010
February 3rd, 2010
February 2nd, 2010
February 1st, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
Benito Rosales, 8, reads a book across from Nelly Villa, 7, on Monday afternoon at Heritage Elementary School. Students of Nicole Anderson's class consist of second- and third-graders. Due to the budget and continued low enrollment, the number of dual-grade classrooms have increased this year for Lodi Unified School District. (Brian Feulner/News-Sentinel)

More area students in dual-grade classes

Administrators fault class size-reduction, declining enrollment

By Jennifer Bonnett
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Tuesday, August 25, 2009 5:48 AM PDT

There are more dual-grade elementary classrooms in Lodi Unified School District than in years past, partly due to class-size reductions and declining enrollment at some schools.

Last school year, there were 22 combined-grade elementary schools, while there are 36 this year, according to Catherine Pennington, assistant superintendent of primary education.

There can be challenges to teaching two grades at once, especially when it comes to benchmark examinations and ensuring students in each grade are learning the appropriate curriculum for their testing level. Among other things, teachers have to schedule their day to address two grade-level curriculums.

"We are very fortunate to have a very supportive and strong staff that is always willing to assist the teachers with a combo class," Heritage Elementary School Principal Maria Cervantes said of her experiences with dual-grade classes.

At Heritage, where there are two such classes, third-graders go into a third-grade classroom to receive instruction in math, allowing the combo class teacher to provide direct math instruction to second-grade students.

"My role is to provide the highest level of support to the students and teacher," Cervantes said. "Staying focused on academic achievement and addressing the needs of our students is foremost."

At Heritage, there is a combined secondand third-grade classroom, and on Monday, a similar dual-grade class for kindergarten and first-grade started.

Much of the work is done in the front office. Cervantes said a lot goes into determining who will be enrolled in these combination classes. She works closely with the district's intervention teachers to develop the class lists for both of these classes.

"We focus on level maturity and ability to do work independently," she said.

This setup allows students who may be able to do higher level work to do so, or the reverse, in reteaching concepts or skills students have not yet mastered, according to Cervantes.

The principal also chooses students who have good attendance and positive behavior to be placed in these classes.

While the uptick in the number of dual-grade classes is attributed directly to attempting to keep enrollment at lower levels, the district's smaller, rural schools have always had them since there are fewer students per grade on those campuses, according to Pennington. She has not received any feedback from parents or teachers about this year's increase in such classrooms.

Having had more than one child attend Lockeford Elementary School, parent Gary Reiff is unfazed by combined-grade classes.

His eldest, who now attends Houston Middle School as a seventh-grader, went through two combined courses, while his middle child is currently enrolled in a grades four-and-five combination as fifth-grader.

In the beginning, he was concerned that the teacher's time would be split between students and that his child would be affected.

"It didn't affect my kid one bit," Reiff said. "It takes a very skilled teacher to teach a combo class, and we're lucky to have skilled teachers at Lockeford. If you have the right teacher, your student won't be affected at all. A good teacher can handle it."

In Galt Joint Elementary School District, where classes start this week, there will be four combination classrooms — the same as last school year, Superintendent Karen Schauer said.

And at Oak View Elementary School in Acampo, there are only two dual-grade classrooms despite the district's small size, according to Superintendent Michael Scully. Last school year, there were three.

Schauer sees the benefits of a such a set-up far outweigh the potentially negative aspects.

"Students at the lower grade level who hear and see the curriculum above grade level experience 'frontloaded learning' that can help them for greater success in the next school year," she said. "Students at the higher grade level who see and hear curriculum below their grade level have opportunities to review and better remember foundational content standards."

The only drawback, she said, is increased planning time for teachers who must address standards for two different grade levels at one time.

Like Lodi Unified, Judy Bullard, Galt Elementary's director of curriculum and a former school principal, said the administration takes extra efforts to hand-select students who can be successful in such an environment. Most are at grade level or above and are independent learners.

"With proactive placement by the principal, coupled with a strong teacher who has effective planning skills, this experience can be very effective," Schauer said.

Contact reporter Jennifer Bonnett at jenniferb@lodinews.com.

A parent's guide to a combined grade classroom

Schools group students from two grades in one classroom to balance class size across the school and to keep the number of students in primary classes low. Combined-grade classes are not new — they have always been a common part of the school experience.

— Teachers are highly trained to balance individual learning needs.

Walk into any classroom, and you will find children at various stages of social, physical and intellectual development. No two children are exactly the same, even if they're the same age. Each child has unique learning needs — strengths and areas that need improvement. Learning styles and preferences are unique to each student.

That's true of same-grade classrooms, just like combined grade groups.

— Students in a combined grade class follow expectations for their specific grade.

Just as in same-grade classes, teachers in combined grades use a wide range of teaching strategies to make sure they cover all of the curriculum expectations.

Children in combined-grade classes will spend time learning as a whole class, in small groups and individually. Sometimes they will be grouped based on a specific task, and other times the teacher will group them based on their learning needs.

The teacher may have the whole class participate in a common activity, followed by small group or individual work on grade-specific curriculum expectations. For example, in a first-and-second combined grade class, when teaching the life systems strand of science, the teacher might start by showing a video about a specific animal. The first-grade students would do a follow-up activity to identify the characteristics and needs of living things, while the second-grade students would focus on growth and change in animals.

— Students are not always learning new information or concepts — they also need to review, consolidate and refine their learning and build on previous learning to do a more complex task.

In a fifth-sixth combined-grade math class, for example, the teacher might review the concept of place value with the whole class. Then the students would work on the grade-specific expectations. Fifth-grade students would be practicing math problems with place values up to 100,000 and decimals to hundredths, while sixth-grade students would work on problems with place values up to 1,000,000 and decimals to thousandths.

Even in subjects such as social studies and science, which have different topics to cover in different grades, the curriculum expectations in each grade are not just about the facts students are expected to learn. There are many common skills for students to learn, such as research, scientific inquiry, experimentation and problem solving.

The teacher might present research skills to the whole class, then assign grade-specific research projects. At other times, the teacher will present two different lessons to the students, based on the different curriculum for the two grades. While working with one grade level of students, the teacher will have the other students do individual or group projects or work in learning centers in the classroom.

Studies show that students in combined grade classes learn as well as other students.

— You may be concerned about how well your child will learn in a combined-grade class. Years of research show that students in combined grades do just as well academically as students in single-grade classes. In fact, some students actually do better in language and reading.

You may also wonder about the emotional impact on your child — will your child receive the same amount of individual attention from the teacher in a combined grade as in a single-grade class? It's important to understand that the number of students in the class, not the grade structure, determines the amount of time the teacher has to spend with each individual student.

Students in combined classes often do better emotionally and socially as they have been found to foster greater independence, better social skills and increased motivation to learn.

Source: Peel School District in Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Reader Feedback

Lodian wrote on Sep 1, 2009 5:23 PM:

" I believe that in general most kids will fair better in a one grade level class than kids in a combo class, especially if the combo class has 30 or more kids. And most parents I know feel the same as all hoped their kids wouldn't be one of the kids placed in those combo classes. It was always a concern when there was a combo class any given year in elementary school. "

dyan wrote on Sep 1, 2009 4:21 PM:

" nor the opposite. "

Lodian wrote on Sep 1, 2009 1:58 PM:

" Again, back on topic...

Kids in combo classes do not "do better emotionally and socially as they have been found to foster greater independence, better social skills and increased motivation to learn."

Simply not true, or proven. "

dyan wrote on Aug 31, 2009 7:28 PM:

" edumacation: Again, well said. "

edumacation wrote on Aug 31, 2009 4:24 PM:

" dyan: Into Ferraris? Say what? Yugos are really slavic made Fiats which are about the same quality as the other Italian cars (except for the leather seats). I think the LUSD turns basically good kids into needy, anti-competitive and lazy little opportunists.


Kids point of view: Why do work or study, if you will get an "A" no matter what? You can even drop out of school, and somehow, someway they will figure a way to give you a diploma. "

dyan wrote on Aug 31, 2009 1:45 PM:

" And that's another myth. Where's the evidence that small class size turns Yugos into Ferraris? "

dyan wrote on Aug 31, 2009 1:44 PM:

" Well, it looks like no one can prove it one way or the other, but you sound 110% convinced. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 31, 2009 11:58 AM:

" dyan wrote "Did you read the "parent's guide"?

"Studies show students do as well in combined classes as others."

-----------

There is no proof to that statement and it seems logic is thrown out the window in even suggesting that this is the case. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 31, 2009 11:55 AM:

" dyan: You were arguing the fact that I disagree with the following statement (therefore leading me to believe you agree with said statement)...

"Students in combined classes often do better emotionally and socially as they have been found to foster greater independence, better social skills and increased motivation to learn."

Now you say that you don't know? Which is it?

To say that students do "better" in all these areas in a combo class is just a flat out lie. And, no, these are not the days of "Little House on the Prairie" when there were different age groups in a one room schoolhouse, apples and oranges. We're talking a full 30 to 40 kids in a combo class. This does NOT work well for MOST of the students today. "

dyan wrote on Aug 31, 2009 9:56 AM:

" Did you read the "parent's guide"? "Studies show students do as well in combined classes as others." "

dyan wrote on Aug 31, 2009 9:52 AM:

" Espeically when these abstracts are prefaced with "tend to" and "greater'? "

dyan wrote on Aug 31, 2009 9:50 AM:

" I don't know. Again, how do you measure abstracts such as "independence", "social skills" and "motivation"? "

Lodian wrote on Aug 30, 2009 5:32 PM:

" ....

"Students in combined classes often do better emotionally and socially as they have been found to foster greater independence, better social skills and increased motivation to learn"

So, dyan, then you agree with this statement, right? "

dyan wrote on Aug 30, 2009 5:25 PM:

" How does one measure those abstracts without controlling all variables? Public educators have a built-in bias designed to preserve their own kingdoms. In the real scientific community, educational research is laughed at because it's the only discipline that calls "descriptive" research "science." "

edumacation wrote on Aug 30, 2009 5:24 PM:

" Just remember, in edu-ma-cation, there are waivers for most everything.

What we need to slow down these games is to require a signature block on most documents that says...
UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY, I affirm that ALL THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND COMPLETE representation of the facts.


Watch the budget decrease! No one wants to be held accountable for the billions they are throwing away.

The Board could require it on all financial and personnel documents, but then they would have to be honest as well. "

edumacation wrote on Aug 30, 2009 5:18 PM:

" I can list ten ads in the last few days I have seen, that ANYONE---can get the above mentioned "degree" APPROVED BY THE CCTC via the INTERNET.

Its sounds VERY distinguished. LOL ROFL!

I was thinking of enrolling my dog to see if she could get one as well?

Just sign here---Plus a check for $5,000 says the application. Some at the ESC are alumni. LOL

How can you educrats expect us to take you seriously with HAVING THE next to the lowest ACADEMIC REQUIREMENTS above only cosmetology school?

I have another one for you!

Did you know that the CCTC does NOT require that a public school principal have a teaching credential!

Yet, that same principal can evaluate teachers on teaching methodology they have no knowledge about.

It's true---we have principals in the LUSD who do NOT or NEVER have had a teachers credential. Yet, a district can force a parent who wants to homeschool to have a credential for each subject taught.

This one is just begging for a lawsuit. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 30, 2009 5:16 PM:

" ...

"Students in combined classes often do better emotionally and socially as they have been found to foster greater independence, better social skills and increased motivation to learn"

So, dyan, then you agree with this statement, right? "

Lodian wrote on Aug 30, 2009 5:14 PM:

" dyan: Did your kids have all combo classes? "

edumacation wrote on Aug 30, 2009 4:56 PM:

" Rhodie 3:22 Oh my word---"... is a professor of elementary education..." EEKS---run for the hills.

THAT is an oxymoron ----Guess what Rhodie---I met an LUSD administrator who bragged that they had a "PhD in Pla-Doh". SERIOUSLY! These people get paid to play these moronic little games. P.L.A.Y.D.O.H. What else is there to know. Oh---kids aren't supposed to eat it.

Give me a BREAK! "

dyan wrote on Aug 30, 2009 4:56 PM:

" edumacation: You are right. The research clearly shows retention does nothing to improve individual skills.
They are still Yugos. "

edumacation wrote on Aug 30, 2009 4:50 PM:

" The old saying "The fruit doesn't land far from the tree", seems to be operative in some districts.

In the LUSD, kids actually do worse than expected, not better (considering test scores) and better than expected in grades...which we all know. "

edumacation wrote on Aug 30, 2009 4:40 PM:

" Look at EVERY ONE OF THESE wonderful reasons to home school YOUR child.

Take responsibility for the academic success of your own kids via home schooling. They will be better for it.

You won't be giving your kids "A" grades when they can't read, as public school teachers do today with the requirements for social promotion.

Kids can only be held back once no matter what they NEVER Do. They know it, so why try? Thats the LUSD way, scare the good kids and celebrate the slow kids??? "

dyan wrote on Aug 30, 2009 3:22 PM:

" Lodian: Back to Earth, please. Both of my kids were in the top 3% of their h.s. classes. Both got into Ivy League schools. I don't need to hear educational establishment BS about how we can't make Ferraris out of Yugos if we have combined classes. LOL Give me a break. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 30, 2009 2:25 PM:

" If educators, parents and students alike all thought that "students in combined classes often do better emotionally and socially as they have been found to foster greater independence, better social skills and increased motivation to learn" they would all be clamoring to have these combined classes. Well, they are not clamoring for combo classes. In fact, they try very hard to avoid combo classes as we all know that these classes don't work well for the students or the teachers. Obviously, dyan was not very involved in her children's education, and didn't have in depth conversations with them, or she would know this to be true. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 30, 2009 2:18 PM:

" "Students in combined classes often do better emotionally and socially as they have been found to foster greater independence, better social skills and increased motivation to learn."


This is simply a ridiculous statement. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 30, 2009 2:17 PM:

" dyan: Well, if we go by your reading comprehension, debate skills (even social skills) and understanding of the issues we can certainly conclude that your education, 50 years ago, was not adequate. So, your position doesn't make sense.

Now, try to reread my earlier comments again and actually think. Try to comprehend what is actually being said. Give it a try. Read slowly and if you have any questions, and if you're not being a jerk, I can surely help you understand. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 30, 2009 2:06 PM:

" dyan: First of all, I feel sorry for your kids in that you call them losers. Do they know this about you? Very bad mommy. "

dyan wrote on Aug 30, 2009 11:41 AM:

" Lodian: Please come out of fantasyland. Are you saying that kids from 50 years ago, who often had 1-8 classes combined, could not read, write and spell as well as the losers we are pumping out today? Give me a break! "

Contrapasso wrote on Aug 27, 2009 2:10 PM:

" MJP: you are making generalizations that are completely unfair. There are quite a few top-notch people in the teaching profession. The problems with education should not be attributed solely to the lack of quality educators. Perhaps you can guess that I am a teacher. Many of my colleagues are highly intelligent, motivated individuals.

Moreover, I personally would rather not have to be in a union. But it's a necessary evil, I guess, due to the ridiculous demands of the administrators entrenched in the educational bureauacracy.

Yes, there are some poor teachers out there...but consider the following: The class sizes are very large, many students receive little to no encouragement or discipline from parents, and the overall value of reading and writing clearly is being undermined by the internet and text messaging and popular culture. Ignorance is COOL......

These are not complaints. They are realities. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 26, 2009 12:00 AM:

" ..."Students in combined classes often do better emotionally and socially as they have been found to foster greater independence, better social skills and increased motivation to learn."


This is simply a ridiculous statement. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 25, 2009 11:58 PM:

" ... "Years of research show that students in combined grades do just as well academically as students in single-grade classes."


From experience I can say that this is absolutely NOT true. In a combo class both grades will suffer in one area or another. My child ended up always helping the younger students, so the combo class wasn't doing anything for my child. We quickly made a change. "

Gator wrote on Aug 25, 2009 6:28 PM:

" dogs4u and I worked for the same Union IBEW Local 1245 and basically the union got just what PG&E let them have not a dime more. That being
Said it was and still is head and shoulders above the CTA. One of my
best friends and one time boss. His wife was a School Teacher in Placerville
and he would joke about how much she was paid. He said all the time teachers put in and all the extra that is expected of them they earn about
4.00 an hour and he said that’s wrong and they don’t have a Union worth
a damn… "

a1sauce wrote on Aug 25, 2009 5:57 PM:

" I am not even sure how they can get away with combo classes because we have to teach a certain amount of time each day for reading and math. There is not enough time to teach each grade level the mandated minutes. There are times we can teach both grades together but it doesn't always work out. It would help to have only 22 students instead of 32 but that is only a dream. So you can say goodbye to science and social science (history) with combo classes. "

Lou wrote on Aug 25, 2009 4:06 PM:

" jnnym,

Ken Davis has been on Lodi Unified's School Board for 17-years. You do the math. "

Lou wrote on Aug 25, 2009 4:04 PM:

" Attention teachers: Your union rep does not represent you, does not have a fiduciary responsibility to you, and is paid by Lodi Unified School District; Wake up!

I talked to a teacher the other day who nearly passed out when I told her that her union rep didn't really represent her. She just wouldn't believe it. She told me that she has been paying these people (the teacher's union) for over 25-years and was under the strong impression that Sue represents her.

Let me assure you dear teachers, she does not represent you. If you don't believe me, pick up the phone and call Burlingame and ask: "Is Sue my rep"...
they will tell you "no she is not."

You folks better wake up before more are fired or cast into the combo class nether-world. I have a better one for ya'...I recently talked to a teacher who was compelled to teach three grades. Yes, it's true!

If there are 1,300 of you "left"...the local CTA takes in about 1.25M every year in dues. What are you paying for? "

Rhodie wrote on Aug 25, 2009 3:22 PM:

" My father in-law is a professor of elementary education (could explain five over achieving kids, one of which I married). A while back our oldest was going to be put in a split 2-3 grade class. He told us to fight it since, in his studies up and down the west coast students in split classrooms test lower. He did clarify that there are a few teachers that do well in dealing with two grades but a vast majority just can't do it properly.

Most of us don't know what it's like to be a teacher but maybe more of us have been coaches of some kind or another. Imagine trying to coach two diferent teams (soccer and lacrosse) at the same time. I have trouble dealing with just one team when I split into seperate groups for drills for a hour. I have no idea how teachers do it. I'd end up like Schwarzenneger in "Kindergarder cop" with a loud whistle and making the little ones cry. "

mjp wrote on Aug 25, 2009 1:49 PM:

" Contrapasso, actually the comment is not silly. Back then there were few acceptable jobs for college educated women and teaching was one of them. That is no longer the case, so you don't get the cream of the crop in teaching anymore, you get Union members instead. A whole different breed of people. "

jnnym wrote on Aug 25, 2009 1:25 PM:

" LUSD was once a great school district. I do mean ONCE, around 15-20 years ago. Explain to me how a person who does not speak english can be taught? Where does the teachers time get used up there? And the school year, remember when you started school in September and finished in June. You didn't have all this crazy time off during the school year like kids have now. What about a dress code? What happen to that? The students are being pushed into learning things in elementary schools that I thought you learned closer to junior high school. LUSD has an obligation to teach our children in the very best way possible. I can't see that they are doing that.They could have cut back on may other things instead of laying off teachers. No wonder parents are taking their kids out of the schools here. I think I will put my granddaughter in a private school.... "

concernedone wrote on Aug 25, 2009 12:57 PM:

" Yes, I do have he union to thank for #1
yes, rural Iowa in the 50's is not the same as LUSD in this day and age
yes, every school is different.
I am not complaining, I am simply pointing out that combo classes are not the rosy picture that was painted in the article. In fact, if combo classes could be what they were in Iowa in the 50's I would want my child in one. "

Whoa Nellie! wrote on Aug 25, 2009 12:27 PM:

" Oh, and I know of one Teacher of about 20yrs who had taught 2nd grade for a long time. She now has a combo 2/3 class, much to her dislike. She's never taught 3rd. Realize that each school site is unique with the number of students, and this year, how many teachers got a pink slip. And I'd bet most parents do not want their child bussed to another campus since most have siblings at the original school. "

Whoa Nellie! wrote on Aug 25, 2009 12:21 PM:

" Concernedone- I agree, combo classes are not benefiting the students. However, in your 6:16am post, item #1, I bet you can thank your union for that. "

Lou wrote on Aug 25, 2009 11:23 AM:

" Conernedone, your comments are absolutely correct. Ms. Pennington use the right word to discribe this educational fiasco "it's not a combo it's a cluster" and anyone with a brain in their head can see this is just more hog-washer propagada and is at least one lightyear from something worth printing or reading.

I have just one question for "anyone" who believes "combo-classes" are anything less than a disaster.

WHAT SCHOOL YOU WENT? "

Contrapasso wrote on Aug 25, 2009 10:34 AM:

" MJP: Rural Iowa in the 1950's and modern day California are apples and oranges.......The comment about teachers being better then is silly...... "

mjp wrote on Aug 25, 2009 8:42 AM:

" I guess I don't see the problem. I never was in a grade school class that was not a combo. Of course, this was in the 50's and 60's in rural Iowa. I even experienced one year where there were 3 classes in one room taught by two immature teachers who argued with each other in front of the students. We still learned and most of us are college graduates. The only down side was that every other year, my older sister and I shared a classroom. But that didn't stop the learning and one thing significant is that while the teacher was teaching the other class, I had time to prepare for my next class and the teacher made sure that I did just that. Maybe the teachers were better back then or something, but I never heard them complain about the situation. "

Bob Hussein Loblaw wrote on Aug 25, 2009 6:41 AM:

" All excellent comments concernedone. "

concernedone wrote on Aug 25, 2009 6:29 AM:

" read the next 3 comments from the bottom up.... "

concernedone wrote on Aug 25, 2009 6:28 AM:

" In closing:
I would consider putting my child into a combo class because I do believe there are benefits to them like the ones mentioned in the article. However, I would never allow my child to be in a combo in LUSD because of the strict restrictions currently placed on teachers with curriculum. In my opinion it is more beneficial to a student to be bussed to another school so that they can receive instruction in a straight grade than for that child to be housed in a combo. "

concernedone wrote on Aug 25, 2009 6:22 AM:

" 3. FIDELITY to the CORE makes it nearly impossible to teach a combo class in the way that it would work well. It takes away the professional choices a teacher would normally make when teaching his/her students and replaces them with curriculum that is put upon a pedestal and championed as the saviour of a district. This curriculum seems to never be CLOSELY looked at by the district office and complaints of areas that are lacking in the curriculum that are made by teachers seem to fall on deaf ears. And again, FIDELITY takes away from individual student time in a combo class. see #2 "

concernedone wrote on Aug 25, 2009 6:16 AM:

" I just finished this article that paints a rosy picture of a combination classroom and I was shocked at its one-sided stance on the subject. Here are some important items the article fails to mention:
1.MOST combo classes are taught by the LEAST experienced teachers. The reason for this is that experienced teachers not only do not want to teach a combo class, there is no preference given to a combo teacher in EITHER grade at the end of the year when NEXT years class set up begins. I am starting my 5th year as a teacher in LUSD. I have had a combo class 2 of those 5 years. In both instances there were teachers on campus who had taught the grade levels of my combos for 20+ years, and yet I, the brand new teacher had this very challenging situation.
2.No matter what, your child will not get as much attention as in a straight grade class. The reason for this is that when 2 curriculums are being taught, one grade must be doing independent work while the teacher introduces work to the other grade. More direct instruction = less individual attention "

Comments on this story are now closed.