Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

February 9th, 2010
February 8th, 2010
February 6th, 2010
February 5th, 2010
February 4th, 2010
February 3rd, 2010
February 2nd, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
Shane Freitas demonstrates how cars are moved at Accurate Adjustments, Inc. (Jennifer M. Howell/News-Sentinel)

Lodi repossessor uses tact, skill to bring in motorcycles, trucks — even a Rolls-Royce

By Layla Bohm
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Thursday, August 13, 2009 6:40 AM PDT

When the gray Chevrolet 3500 pulls out of a Beckman Road driveway, the driver is on a mission: He plans to return with another vehicle in tow.

In all likelihood, he'll arrive at an address, effortlessly lower the towing equipment on the back of his truck and drive off within a minute or two.

The driver is a vehicle repossessor working for Lodi-based Accurate Adjustments. He often works at night, using the darkness to his advantage so he can avoid the vehicle's owner.

There are plenty of vehicles to be repossessed, with the economy likely contributing to skyrocketing statistics: Five years ago, 453 vehicles were taken back from their owners in the fiscal 2003-04 year, according to Lodi police. In the fiscal year ending in June, 814 owners lost their vehicles.

Unlike in television shows, those vehicle owners are rarely the drug-crazed deadbeats who trigger brawls lit by flashing police lights.

What's much more likely is that the car's owners will simply watch the repossession process, resigned to the fact that auto payments got to be too much. Sometimes they cry, asking for one more chance to come up with the money, or to at least get their personal belongings out of the car.

That's the real job of a repossessor, according to Shane Freitas, who owns Accurate Adjustments. The sole goal is to retrieve a vehicle safely.

"I try to train my guys not to judge people. They have to have eyes in the back of their head, but they shouldn't judge," he said. "I like to think people thought they could afford the car."

Freitas, who owned his business for 13 years and previously spent a number of years in the industry, sees his profession as a service. Repossession is a way to recover property while avoiding more costly methods such as the court system.

You need to upgrade your Flash Player This movie requires Flash Player 8 or greater.

"It saves the consumer money and it keeps the interest rates lower," Freitas said. "If they don't get their collateral back, they'll raise rates for (consumers)."

Freitas, 39, has been around the repo business for much of his life.

Born in Hawaii, Freitas lived there until he was 9, after his mother met a man in the military who settled in Arkansas. Then they moved to California to be closer to family. Freitas' dad became an auto mechanic, and his shop was next door to a repo business.

Freitas got to know the owner, named Nick, who gave him some part-time jobs accompanied by a warning: "He told me, whatever you do, make sure you don't get involved in this business."

That advice didn't stick.

Courtesy pays off

Now he owns a large building on the eastern edge of Lodi, complete with a $40,000 alarm system that's constantly monitored and includes motion-detecting cameras.

Freitas has owned his business for 13 years, and in spring 2008 he moved the company from Stockton to Lodi. He said the reason was because Lodi police respond quickly to building alarm calls.

The tan structure is surrounded by a brick wall and black iron fence, but inside, his nine full-time employees have the use of a modern kitchen. Freitas' office desk is partially taken up by three computer monitors, along with a large iced coffee drink.

A map of Hawaii hangs on one wall, and nearby are photos of his wife and two daughters.

Vehicle repossessions in Lodi

By fiscal years ending in June:
2003-04: 453
2004-05: 433
2005-06: 427
2006-07: 542
2007-08: 621
2008-09: 814
The vehicles ranged from motor homes to boats to dirt bikes, and included many sport-utility vehicles, said Lodi Police Lt. Chris Piombo.
Source: Lodi Police Department

About state repossession licenses

California currently has 278 repossessor agencies, which are licensed through the Department of Consumer Affairs.

A total of 775 licensed employees are working for repo companies, and another 291 people are "qualified managers," which means they are responsible for making sure licenses are current and valid, said spokesman Russ Heimerich.

The license process includes a background check and takes about two weeks, he said. Licenses must be renewed every two years, or if the employee moves to a different repo business.

Accurate Adjustments is the only repo company in Lodi, and is one of only three in San Joaquin County. Two new, small ones are based in Thornton and Mountain House, with two licensed repossessors each. Accurate Adjustments has eight licensed repossessors, according to state records.

To check the license of a repossession business or employee, or others in the security industry, go to www.bsis.ca.gov/online_services/verify_license.shtml.

News-Sentinel staff

A spacious, enclosed garage holds cars that have recently been towed, with sport-utility vehicles on one side and sedans on the other.

They're parked more closely than the typical parallel parking job, but even that doesn't present a problem for the tow trucks, which Freitas demonstrated.

He remote-started a tow truck from a button on the key ring, and a computer turned on inside the truck. Cameras mounted on the truck gave Freitas a complete view as he lowered a boom, opened a claw-like device and slid it under a parked car — all as he sat inside the truck.

Then the claws lifted the front end of the car and swiveled it, pulling it effortlessly out from between two cars and then rolling it on its rear tires.

"People are always curious about how we get their cars without damaging them," he said with a slight smile.

That's another aspect of the job — the people whose cars have been taken.

Often they run outside to their vehicle before the repo truck has left. And, TV-related assumptions aside, Freitas said his employees frequently just knock on a door before leaving with the car.

That's the method that three-year employee Mike Deluna prefers. He hooks the car up to his tow truck, which means it has legally been repossessed, and then he often knocks on the door. That gives people a chance to get their personal belongings out of the car, and he can ask for the keys to make life easier for everyone.

After all, it saves company time from having to take a full inventory of a vehicle and store the items, which fill another room at the business.

As a family man with children, Deluna said he sometimes runs into people whose vehicles he repossessed, and the professional attitude makes such encounters much easier.

Very rarely are people actually surprised when the repo truck comes, Freitas said, since finance companies first try to collect payment directly from the debtors.

When it comes down to the actual repo, Freitas emphasizes professionalism to his employees.

"The repossessor's demeanor sets the tone for the whole operation," he said.

From motorcycles to a Rolls

Freitas avoids most accusations and arguments because of the cameras on his trucks. They record audio and video.

One time, Freitas said, he had hooked up a car to a tow truck when a young woman came running out of the nearby mobile home, clad only in a bra and panties. A man followed her, making threats to shoot Freitas.

Sheriff's deputies were called, and in the meantime the woman had gotten into the car. When deputies came, she said she had been there before Freitas arrived, and he was facing arrest for kidnapping.

Freitas told the deputies it was all recorded, and he pressed the "play" button on the computer in his truck. He was no longer threatened with arrest.

In all his years of work, Freitas has seen plenty of interesting situations. There was the time he towed a motor home and his brother-in-law was helping inventory the contents.

"I'm saying, 'Wow, the only thing missing is the kitchen sink,' and then he tosses a sink out," Freitas said with a grin.

One time a man came to the business hoping to get a camera that had been in his vehicle. He was crying because the pictures meant so much to him, and Freitas eventually found the camera that had become wedged under a seat.

"It's all how you treat people," he said. "Sometimes people just fall on hard times."

He's towed all kinds of vehicles, ranging from motor homes to motorcycles to plenty of cars.

The most expensive car he's towed? A $350,000 Rolls-Royce Phantom, for which the driver still owed $275,000.

"I didn't sleep when that thing was here," Freitas said as he stood in the enclosed garage, adding that he was quite relieved when the finance company's truck came to pick up the car.

Facing a gun

In all his years in the repo business, Freitas said he was only hit once, when he let down his guard and a bunch of men surrounded him, with one punching him.

But that's not the only risk.

"We've had guns pointed at us, we've had knives pulled on us. I had bullet holes in the side of a truck, and didn't even know we were being shot at," Freitas said.

The gun-pointing incident isn't something Freitas has forgotten. He still remembers staring at the barrel of the gun, and seeing that the man's finger was in the trigger.

And the man was crying.

Freitas managed to calm the man down and get him to lower the gun and talk. It turned out that the gunman was so upset because he really had made his car payments. Unknown to him, the auto dealer was pocketing the money.

Freitas had been hearing the same story from other repossession victims — though they didn't brandish guns — and knew something was wrong. Freitas said he got state investigators involved, and ultimately 38 cease-and-desist orders were served on car lot owners along Wilson Way in Stockton.

Freitas still tells the story because it's an exception in his line of work, and because it shows that every situation is different.

Contact reporter Layla Bohm at layla@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback

Lee wrote on Aug 22, 2009 4:52 PM:

" Why do you guys get so personal? "

dyan wrote on Aug 21, 2009 10:25 AM:

" and you don't rcognize a parody on yourself when you see one. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 21, 2009 10:24 AM:

" dyan/Brian: It's funny how you blast me for knowing that you post as dyan and Brian while in the same post you call me Lodian/voter. What a hoot! You don't even recognize it! LMAO!!! "

Lodian wrote on Aug 21, 2009 10:20 AM:

" Oops, wrong board. That post was supposed to be posted on the "Wrongly Smeared as Extremists" board. My apologies. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 21, 2009 10:18 AM:

" Brian wrote "Lodian has to often remind us how she stereotypes men in a derogatory way because of her general dislike for men. And then she wonders why men, in general, consider her a skank."

Bryan: Uh...okay. You’re calling me a skank? That’s just lovely, Bryan. Very classy. I see you've made up a new way to attack me. LOL! I've never stereotyped men. And I never wonder what most men think of me as I'm just interested in what one man thinks of me and he's next to me every night. That's makes all right with the world. :-) You see, Bryan, there are men, unlike yourself, that are secure in themselves (and their sexuality) that don't need to verbally attack, slander, belittle, or harass women. Get it? And they certainly don't feel that they should put down women for having breast reconstruction after cancer. These men would never even come close to such comments made by you here, let alone defend such disgusting comments. So, go home and talk to your own wife and daughter this way. Let's see how long they deal with you. You'd better pack your bag first, just in case. :-) "

dyan wrote on Aug 21, 2009 9:38 AM:

" As you can see Aimee, Lodian/voter have these delusions that I am someone named Bryan. If the act like this with no evidence whatsoever, is it any wonder that they have the "opinions" they do? "

Lodian wrote on Aug 20, 2009 11:29 PM:

" Lee: Sorry, this board was hijacked days ago and real discussion on the topic came to a holt due to racist bigoted remarks by edumacation and dyan. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 20, 2009 11:25 PM:

" Aimee: You said you read these blogs a lot and don't comment. Now, how in the world can you miss Brian/dyan's comments when you've read these boards for years? It's impossible. I can email you the racist comments that were made if you like. They cannot be reposted here because the LNS will remove them, thank goodness. Yes, the comments were as racist as one could be on these boards, but I think you know that already. Why would you stick up for a racist, Aimee? "

Aimee wrote on Aug 20, 2009 8:26 PM:

" Voter: Lodian accuses dyan of making prior racist remarks and also posting as Bryan - I don't read every article on this site, so I didn't see that, if true. Is that what you are referring to? If you are willing to use rudeness to make a point, I would gather that you really don't care for dyan that much. I'm not worried too much about who posts as who - there's no way to know anyway, so I just deal with whomever presents themselves and the arguments they make or don't make. But that's me.

dyan: While in law school, I had a chance to practice in criminal law. I really enjoyed it.

Lodian: You haven't answered the question of whether or not you read the articles. Did you or did you not read them and if so, what is your response? I'd like to see you bolster your argument that mulatto has never been a racist word after reading the articles. Seriously, if you're going to make statements like that, at least back them up. "

voter wrote on Aug 20, 2009 8:10 PM:

" Regarding my 8/14/3:09 post. I will repeat: never did I intend to make a racial slur. The remark was intended to slap down what I believe/d to be obvious and disturbing racism--creating a character to further a stereotype and spread bigoted views. And I have no problem with using rudeness to that end. If ANYONE was offended for ANY reason, I offer my apology. "

Lee wrote on Aug 20, 2009 7:23 PM:

" I'm sure it would feel like a severe low point in life when the repo man shows up. This guy's got an interesting job. That's for sure. I bet he meets all kinds of people, good and bad. "

dyan wrote on Aug 20, 2009 6:08 PM:

" Aimee: He does contract law. Has a great sense of humor. An easy going guy. Sometimes gives me ideas for these silly blogs. Can you tell? LOL How about you? "

Lodian wrote on Aug 20, 2009 5:21 PM:

" The stroking between you too is getting weird. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 20, 2009 5:10 PM:

" LOL! "

Aimee wrote on Aug 20, 2009 4:44 PM:

" dyan: LOL! Thanks, but I think your son may have me out-brilliant-ed. What area of law does he practice in? "

Aimee wrote on Aug 20, 2009 4:39 PM:

" Voter: I was not trying to attack you, per se. You had asked for the view of racially mixed people, so I thought you might find the articles interesting. The first one posted is rather academic, but worth reading.

We may not agree on anything but I would like to accord you a measure of respect, regardless. "

dyan wrote on Aug 20, 2009 4:17 PM:

" Aimee: Again I repeat. You really are brilliant. It must be very difficult, shall I use the old expression, "to cast your pearls before swine." Lodian says we don't know what her ethnicity is. This may be true, but one thing is for sure: It ain't African-American!
LOL. Keep up the good fight. Maybe someday, we really shall overcome. "

Aimee wrote on Aug 20, 2009 4:07 PM:

" dyan: I guess stubbornness keeps me going. It's the lawyer in me that likes to discuss and argue the issues. "

Aimee wrote on Aug 20, 2009 3:55 PM:

" Lodian: Set your posturing aside and answer me this - did you read either of those articles?

I am flattered that you are using my posts to make your points....imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. "

dyan wrote on Aug 20, 2009 3:37 PM:

" Aimee: I'm just glad that all white liberals are not as clueless as our friend here. "

dyan wrote on Aug 20, 2009 3:34 PM:

" Aimee: You are talking to a clueless wall. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 20, 2009 1:18 PM:

" Aimee wrote "Further, you show yourself to be the worst kind of white racist..."

You are assuming again. For some reason you seem to think you know something about my ethnicity. Are we on Skype? Do my words show color to you? Perhaps you are the racist among us, Aimee. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 20, 2009 1:07 PM:

" Aime: This is a blog for personal opinions and views, not a court of law. Deal with it. You have such a hard time when one disagrees with you. Even voter told you that she did not mean anything racist with the word, but you crash in here and attack anyway. For some reason you don't attack dyan/brian (and other handles) for a lot worse comments. Why is that, Aimee? You must have some serious ulcers. You're so ridiculously uptight. You may benefit from relaxing those sphincter muscles. And maybe someday you could actually have a normal conversation with someone without personally attacking them for their opinions and views. We'll see. Good luck. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 20, 2009 12:50 PM:

" Aimee: Your insulting comments do not bother me, so you're wasting your time there. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 20, 2009 12:49 PM:

" Aimee: I don't know why I get into these tit-for-tat arguments with you. You're so not worth my time or effort. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 20, 2009 12:47 PM:

" dyan wrote "I'm amazed that Lodian/voter is still trying to justify her racist comment."

You assume way too much, dyan. Aimee does the same. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 20, 2009 12:43 PM:

" dyan wrote "If we can't think or don't understand, we mock."

dyan: Look who is talking! lol! Another keeper quote by dyan. "

dyan wrote on Aug 20, 2009 10:31 AM:

" I'm amazed that Lodian/voter is still trying to justify her racist comment. She obviously is not capable of empathy or understanding of someone with a mixed racial background. Thank you for trying, Aimee, but I'm afraid it's like talking to a wall. "

Aimee wrote on Aug 20, 2009 9:23 AM:

" Mulatto is not comparable to the "n" word; I didn't say that it was. Rather, this example is meant to merely show that depending on the person involved, the "N" word can be offensive (as if used by a white person) or acceptable (as used by a black person). If you had taken the time to read all the information provided and think about what the words meant, you would probably have understood that.

If you had read the articles you would have discoverd that one of the men wrote that the black community should embrace the word "mulatto" as amongst themselves. However, he counseled that white people just can't use the word because then it becomes offensive.

I don't know why I get into these tit-for-tat arguments with you. You're so not worth my time or effort. "

Aimee wrote on Aug 20, 2009 9:18 AM:

" Your insulting comments do not bother me, so you're wasting your time there.

Further, you show yourself to be the worst kind of white racist - you believe that you accept others no matter what their color but you facilitate the advancement of racism by your very ignorance of a matter that is important to the black community. If you can't recognize that, I'm sure others can see it.

I don't read these article comments all the time but I can assure you if I thought that a racist comment needed to be addressed, I would do so. I don't shrink from controversy when I feel something should be discussed. "

Aimee wrote on Aug 20, 2009 9:14 AM:

" Lodian: I can tell that you didn't take the time to read either of the articles written by these two men describing their view of the use of the word "mulatto", describing the racist origins of the word. But I wouldn't expect you to because you love to just shoot off your mouth with the most stupid and asinine of comments. Your ridiculous and incredibly ignorant observation that the word "mulatto" has NEVER been racist shows that you just shoot from the hip without thinking. I've always thought that but now we all have concrete proof that you just prattle on without a thought to what you say. Why Bob took the time to defend you is beyond me.

And here you are again, taking the poor attacked Lodian role instead of recognizing that your previous statement regarding this word needs to be retracted. But oh, no, it's far easier to deflect, isn't it? "

dyan wrote on Aug 20, 2009 9:13 AM:

" If we can't think or don't understand, we mock. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 20, 2009 9:06 AM:

" Thank you, voter. Again, you hit it right on the head. Some just don't "get it" and never will. "

dyan wrote on Aug 20, 2009 7:52 AM:

" Thank you, Aimee. Again, you hit it right on the head. Some just don't "get it" and never will. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 20, 2009 1:56 AM:

" mulatto:
1 : the first-generation offspring of a black person and a white person
2 : a person of mixed white and black ancestry
--Merriam-Webster


So, Aimee, tell us how this word "mulatto" is like the "n" word.

Mulatto is nothing like saying the "n" word. dyan's outrage, as well as you taking issue here, is completely fake. I tell ya, you sure get your kicks in a weird way here. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 20, 2009 1:41 AM:

" dyan wrote on Aug 17, 2009 7:33 AM:

" your comment was condescending and racist -pure and simple. "




Pot
Kettle
Black


LOL! I'll have to remember this comment by dyan the next time she makes condescending and racist remarks, which will probably be very soon. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 20, 2009 1:29 AM:

" Let's see how fast Aimee jumps online to attack the next poster (we all know who I am speaking of here) that uses the "n" word again and start speaking of how a certain race is completely inferior. Nope, never heard a peep from Aimee all those times we had to endure those racist attacks, and we never will. Hmmm, I wonder why. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 20, 2009 1:17 AM:

" Aimee: You must be really bored as to take this word (mulatto) and make an issue of its use here. Terrible bigotry, homophobia, bullying, threats and talk of an entire group of Americans being wiped off the face of the Earth is all okay with you, but you'll jump on a board and address a word used like "mulatto". You're a piece of work, Aimee. Didn't mommy and daddy love you enough, Aimee? "

Aimee wrote on Aug 19, 2009 10:59 PM:

" Here's another link. A young man of mixed heritage describes the proper and improper use of "mulatto". It's definitely improper in his view when a white person uses the term, but not when another mixed race person uses it.

http://tr.theroot.com/views/audacity-taupe

Very interesting subject. "

Aimee wrote on Aug 19, 2009 10:24 PM:

" Lodian wrote ("grandly" sticking her foot in her mouth at the same time): "The word "mulatto" has never been, nor is it today, a racist term. Anyone taking such grand offense to the word obviously, and simply, does not know the meaning of the word and does not care to even look it up. Maybe he doesn't have a dictionary? Much adoe about nothing. "

Lodian, why don't you look up the "meaning of the word" before YOU speak? Maybe you can't do research on the internet? And then tell us how "it never has been a racist" term. (See link below) After reading it, why don't you tell the author that he simply "doesn't know the meaning of the word and doesn't care to look it up". Words cannot describe how very ridiculous you are when you make such stupid statements, showing yourself to be just the kind of person you claim others are - a sure sign of hypocrisy.

Voter, here's an article written by a man of mixed heritage concerning the word "mulatto".

http://www.popmatters.com/features/040706-mulatto.shtml "

Aimee wrote on Aug 19, 2009 10:00 PM:

" Voter, your argument that "others don't find it offensive" is a weak one. You honestly don't know anything about dyan so you cannot make a judgment on whether or not she has the "right" to be offended or whether or not she should or should not be offended. For every person that claims not to be offended by that word, there are others that are. I liken your argument to one made by the teenager "but, Mom, everyone is doing it, so it must be okay!" It just doesn't hold water.

Older black folk take offense to the "N" word while the younger set use it with impunity. It's common knowledge that many black folk are offended when a white person uses that word - young or old. The time period in which a word is used can dictate whether or not it is considered offensive, but you must also look to the person who the words are meant to describe. Do you think that maybe a person of mixed heritage would appreciate a white person calling them that name in a negative context? I doubt it. "

Aimee wrote on Aug 19, 2009 9:49 PM:

" I thought the comment was rude too. The use of the word, in its context here, was meant to be an insult. This much is obvious to the casual reader. From my perspective, it is not so much the word "mulatto" that was offensive but that it was used in an attempt to deride another poster.

Why do you think that dyan is brian? Why does it matter? Why do you care? Why spend so much time on the subject? "

dyan wrote on Aug 19, 2009 8:18 PM:

" Lodian/voter: Way to congratulate yourself on a racist free zone. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 19, 2009 12:12 PM:

" voter: I wouldn't worry about it. You had no intention of making a racist remark, and in fact you did not. No one else took it as a racist remark and the important thing is that YOU did not intend anything you said to be racist. Just consider the source of the attack. Brian/dyan is just barking up this tree because he has no other way of debating you on real issues. It's what he does. "

voter wrote on Aug 18, 2009 7:16 PM:

" Initially, I even checked the term in both of its spelling variations on urban dictionary and individuals claiming mulato as their racial identity said it was non offensive. So??????? "

voter wrote on Aug 18, 2009 7:09 PM:

" dogbark, I appreciate your research, but it's not that simple. There was a time when the "N" word was not racist. There was a time when the term "black" was a slur. Words come in and out of favor and change meaning all the time. Please, is there someone out there of mixed heritage who can give us the low down? The rest of us can speculate all day, but it doesn't quite hold the same weight. "

dogbark wrote on Aug 18, 2009 4:37 PM:

" I was not down-putting southerners, but rather referring to our unique American heritage in that many ante-bellum southern states allowed 'mulattos' to be sold into slavery. This is often referred to as 'the one drop rule' referring to the presence of any non-white blood line.
Today most Americans prefer to use the terms 'multi-racial' or 'bi-racial.' "

dogbark wrote on Aug 18, 2009 4:29 PM:

" The convoluted logic used over the word mulatto would mean that ssince the 'n' word is a corruption of the spanish for 'the black one' it too is not really racist.
Come on.
Mulatto began in the 1500's (beginning age of north american slave trade) was a spanish slur (meaning like a mule; neither horse nor donkey)and applied to children born of one black parent and one white parent, and there is not an honest southerner today that wouldn't agree it was and is a racist word. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 18, 2009 12:41 PM:

" The word "mulatto" has never been, nor is it today, a racist term. Anyone taking such grand offense to the word obviously, and simply, does not know the meaning of the word and does not care to even look it up. Maybe he doesn't have a dictionary? Much adoe about nothing. "

voter wrote on Aug 17, 2009 7:04 PM:

" "dyan"/brian, there was never any intention of making a racial slur. If you knew the lengths I went to check the definition and usage of "mulatto", you'd laugh. If there is anyone reading this who would like to educate all of us further about the usage of the term, I'd be very grateful--and thanks in advance.

As for the context--frustration at Brian/Jerome/occasional others who unsuccessfully invent one ridiculous character after another to ape their indefensible positions, all the while stomping their feet insisting that they are separate individuals. If in fact dyan and Brian are not one and the same, then I am just one of many to be completely fooled by the identical writing styles and meritless talking points. Wouldn't it be interesting if the two of you each had a unique point of view? "

Lodian wrote on Aug 17, 2009 3:52 PM:

" "mulatto" is not a racist term. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 17, 2009 3:51 PM:

" dyan/Brian: No, the way you are reacting is the problem. Voter did not use the word "mulatto" in an inflammatory racist manner. "

dyan wrote on Aug 17, 2009 3:33 PM:

" OK, Lodian/voter. I'll try one more time. It's not the word in itself. It's the context in which you used it. It was meant as a put down. Do you get it now? No. I didn't think so. This is why racism continues in America. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 17, 2009 10:16 AM:

" dyan/brian: The word "mulatto" is not an inflammatory racist comment. Educate yourself and look it up. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 17, 2009 9:49 AM:

" dyan/Brian: voter and I are obviously two different people. It's flattering to me that anyone would think we are the same person.

voter: Sorry that dy/bri has come up with the idea that we are the same person. It's just another attempt by him to force a detour on any topic on the blogs that he can't handle. He's desperate, as usual. sigh "

dyan wrote on Aug 17, 2009 7:40 AM:

" Your arrogance and self-righteousness on this matter is despicable, and you owe me an apology for your infammatory racist comment. That's all I have to say on this matter. "

dyan wrote on Aug 17, 2009 7:33 AM:

" your comment was condescending and racist -pure and simple. "

dyan wrote on Aug 17, 2009 7:31 AM:

" Let me help your with your delusions Voter/Lodian (the fake lawyer). Have you ever referred to Obama as your "mulato" president? "

Lodian wrote on Aug 16, 2009 3:51 PM:

" voter: I have never seen you post anything remotely close to being racist. Brian/dyan has just run out of steam and wants to attack you personally, then cry he is being attacked. It's classic projection, classic Brian/dyan.... and maybe alcoholism??? You are right, someone that talks of an entire race being inferior and goes on to use the "n" word to describe them is not someone that can be taken seriously, especially when accusing others of racism. "

voter wrote on Aug 16, 2009 11:41 AM:

" Give it up, Brian. "

dyan wrote on Aug 16, 2009 10:11 AM:

" Voter: Your twisting and spin will not change your highly inflammatory racist comments on these blogs. Your meaning was to degrade me by using my racial background. I am not Bryan, I do not want to be identified by race, and you need to take a hard look in the mirror about your glaring hypocracy before making another such comment again. "

voter wrote on Aug 16, 2009 7:08 AM:

" dyan/brian, it's hilarious that you feign upset over a generic and socially acceptable term for a specific racial identity and yet toss around the "n" word and rant about the evolutionary inferiority of Africans. You are fooling no one. "

dyan wrote on Aug 15, 2009 6:31 PM:

" voter: would prefer you do not refer to me by your perception of my race. It is despecable. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 15, 2009 4:42 PM:

" I like the way Mr. Freitas conducts his business. Letting people know he is about to remove their car and allowing them to remove personal items from the car is very considerate. "

Lodian wrote on Aug 15, 2009 4:29 PM:

" Huh... lol! "

Lodian wrote on Aug 15, 2009 4:29 PM:

" The job of a repo-man/woman has got to be pretty tough, but it's a job that's got to be done. And somebody has to do it! "

Lodian wrote on Aug 15, 2009 4:26 PM:

" voter: Yes, and RF had very lengthy blogs too. He would often go off on a tangent as well. Interesting comparison. "

voter wrote on Aug 15, 2009 7:08 AM:

" edumacation, I haven't seen that kind of hate posted on these discussion threads since the infamous RF was banished. "

edumacation wrote on Aug 14, 2009 11:00 PM:

" voter: Your question makes no sense. Your question assumes facts not in evidence. The jargon you used is a liberal propaganda "code word" for male homosexual.

"These" people, have already decided their fate. Whining about their plight won't reverse the events that they have initiated against themselves. They are narcissists with a limited time to promote their psychopathic agenda, and they hate everyone for not suffering the same fate.

The living ones aren't worth the time to discuss it. It's a pure waste of time. Using my skydiving metaphor, they have already jumped out of the plane without a parachute. All the rest of us have to do is wait until they silence themselves. ho hum

Darwin wins again! "

voter wrote on Aug 14, 2009 9:34 PM:

" The question may have been simple, edumacation, but you still didn't answer it. What does gay bashing have to do with auto repossessions? "

voter wrote on Aug 14, 2009 9:33 PM:

" dyan/brian, I have never heard anyone use the word mulatto as a prejorative. what would you prefer we call a person of mixed race heritage? None of the dictionaries I consulted list it as a racist term.

Give it up, Brian. We all know you are dyan. "

edumacation wrote on Aug 14, 2009 8:14 PM:

" Voter- Yes, a simple answer to a simple question. I had recently received a viral email and several automated telephone calls concerning the GAY DAY bill lamenting the fact that our Governor was posed to sign Yeah or Nay.

I immediately called my employees together and gave them the rest of the shift off. If they wanted to make their views known, my WATS lines are available since such a GAY DAY would adversely affect my business. Many used our "demon computer dialers" to place uncountable calls to the appropriate listed numbers. I didn't need to ask them which "side" they supported. They thanked me for the opportunity to give their input into the process.

So, if GAY DAY wins, we lose money. I really don't care about it personally. In the USA, over one million people are infected, which translates to one million people with shortened life spans. Most of those infected, were infected because of their OWN BEHAVIOR.

It's like skydiving with no parachute. A short time later---splat!

Why blame me? "homophobia"? NO, Reality! It's time to take responsibility. GROW UP. "

dyan wrote on Aug 14, 2009 8:12 PM:

" voter: I put up with a lot from you, but your racist comment is over the top.
You are a perfect example of what most libs are: hypocrates. I could say something about your background, but I won't stoop that low. "

voter wrote on Aug 14, 2009 3:11 PM:

" edumaction, you seem unable to answer my question. Why did you feel it necessary to interject random hate aimed at gays into a discussion focused on car repossessions? Only someone with an obsession would do that. "

voter wrote on Aug 14, 2009 3:09 PM:

" brian, cut the act. Everybody knows you're dyan, the mulato nurse. "

dyan wrote on Aug 14, 2009 8:49 AM:

" Voter: Try reading the comment rules. "

edumacation wrote on Aug 14, 2009 8:11 AM:

" voter: Imagine a world 200 years from today----? With Natural Selection operating, the incidence of GLBTTT will drop from 3% today to less than 1%.

In Israel in only 50 years, five metabolic diseases have markedly decreased incidence in the population because of voluntary non-reproduction.

Today, we have a disease that is selectively removing a similar population. It won't be the complete demise of them. Humankind will have our own "Do Do" bird" of genetically unworthy and unproductive traits.

Some San Francisco communities could revert to a ghetto of one. "

voter wrote on Aug 14, 2009 7:00 AM:

" Rich and Marty don't care about name calling. Just take a gander at the gay bashing hate they print on the religion page every week. "

dogs4you wrote on Aug 13, 2009 10:24 PM:

" Leonard and voter, Rich and Marty are watching, call it a night and give it a rest. Enough name calling for one night. "

voter wrote on Aug 13, 2009 9:44 PM:

" Laughing . . . ! "

Leonard wrote on Aug 13, 2009 9:21 PM:

" dyan wrote on Aug 13, 2009 9:00 PM:

I wonder what goes through a mind


I'm sure you do.

:) "

Leonard wrote on Aug 13, 2009 9:20 PM:

" edumacation wrote on Aug 13, 2009 8:00 PM:
" Voter: Please look up the word in a dictionary.

"...A bigot (in modern usage) is a prejudiced person who is intolerant of any opinions differing from their own or intolerant of people of different ethnicity, race, or class..."


Chuckle...

The great thing about this post is that the definition edu provides is NOT, in fact, from a dictionary, but rather from Wikipedia.

Now, I looked up the word in an ACTUAL DICTIONARY (Merriam Websters) and I found the following definition:

bigot: a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices

The entry goes on to note that this use is especially appropriate in cases of race and ethnicity but it is certainly in no way exclusive of raging homophobia. "

dyan wrote on Aug 13, 2009 9:00 PM:

" I'd like to nominate voter as the best name-caller on these blogs. I wonder what goes through a mind like that? "

voter wrote on Aug 13, 2009 9:00 PM:

" You're a bigot, edumacation, by the standards of ANY dictionary definition.

And again, what sort of obsessed person feels compelled to interject random prejudice into an unrelated discussion? What's your point? "

edumacation wrote on Aug 13, 2009 8:00 PM:

" Voter: Please look up the word in a dictionary.

"...A bigot (in modern usage) is a prejudiced person who is intolerant of any opinions differing from their own or intolerant of people of different ethnicity, race, or class..."

The LGBTTT crowd does not qualify as an inclusion in this definition. Go sue the dictionary companies for not including the lifestyle. Look at the scientific facts. Someday, could some of these people could be almost extinct?

Darwin is going to win this one. "

voter wrote on Aug 13, 2009 7:40 PM:

" I still have no clue what point you are attempting to make, edumaction. You interjected derogatory comments about gays when the discussion was focused on auto repossessions. Only a bigot would do that. "

edumacation wrote on Aug 13, 2009 7:18 PM:

" voter: Name calling is the refuge of the ignorant. Objective data from scientists is not bigotry or homophobia.

The US Centers For Disease Control recently found that in the USA 71% of adult and adolescent HIV/AIDS carriers met the criteruia for the GLBTTT crowd ie "MSM". I am confident that you know this new acronym.

The CDC also found that the number of the "MSM" population that is infected increases each year rather than decreases each year. Statistically there is some point in the future, in the absence of effective treatment, where these people will be a much smaller population than at present.

Its a function of Natural Selection.

If they die off faster than they reproduce, their days are numbered. "

ShaneFre wrote on Aug 13, 2009 7:18 PM:

" One thing I wanted to speak of was the comment made by: Jerome R. Kinderman

If you are referring to the show on TruTV, click here to follow the trail:

Owner of Access Adjusters: http://www2.dca.ca.gov/pls/wllpub/WLLQRYNA$LCEV2.QueryView?P_LICENSE_NUMBER=100695&P_LTE_ID=657

Note Froy & Sonia Tercero "were" registered at one time, under Access Adjusters (which is no longer, cancelled, gone); now Mr Pizarro has his "Qualified Manager's License" tied to: http://www2.dca.ca.gov/pls/wllpub/WLLQRYNA$LCEV2.QueryView?P_LICENSE_NUMBER=1467&P_LTE_ID=655 (All Star Adjusters - Different owner now).

I haven't a clue who "PIZARRO, FAVIOLA C" is as this person is not on the show (maybe that's Lyndah, the daughter?), but where is Matt, where is Sonya, Froy, etc. None of them are registered / licensed to do repo work any longer.

The show is made up of re-enactments. If it were real, well it wouldn't be on the air any longer and Mr Pizzaro would have lost his Qualified Managers License, because us repossessors do have laws we have to follow (CA Business & Professions Codes). "

Great American Trucker wrote on Aug 13, 2009 6:33 PM:

" Hats-off to Repo Men. These are truly Men and Women of Honor who really earn their money.

The wife's ex is the biggest sociopathic deadbeat I've ever known. This guy would brag to his buddies how he stalled the finance company for another month while he hid the pickup at a buddies house. It was a game of keep-away for this guy, to see how much he could make others jump-and-dance and buy his BS stories.

Well, along comes the Repo Man - YES! Finally, ol' Dufus doesn't drive his fancy pickup anymore. At that point, he actually told his buddies that he "sold that piece of junk." What balls.

It's good to maintain a professional demeaner as a Repo Man, but keep in mind, many, MANY of these deadbeats aren't worth going out of your way to be polite with. Good article! "

voter wrote on Aug 13, 2009 6:02 PM:

" I have no clue what point you are trying to make, edumacation, but your bigotry and homophobia come shining through brightly. "

edumacation wrote on Aug 13, 2009 5:58 PM:

" Voter- The governor has not signed the bill yet. So now is not the time to rejoice. We both know that according to CDC statistics about homosexual males, there is a likelihood that Mr. Milk would still be part of the dearly departed. "

edumacation wrote on Aug 13, 2009 5:53 PM:

" dogs4you. I agree! In this economy you should pay cash only. If you don't have cash, you can't afford the expense.

Just today I received two more unsolicited high limit credit card offers. The banks are waiting for you. Don't play their game or Shane could be dropping by to say "hello".

In this way, you only have to pay for insurance, registration, gas and repairs. "

voter wrote on Aug 13, 2009 4:37 PM:

" Edumacation, I guess you just felt that a little gay bashing would brighten your day or what? I missed the connection with auto repossession. "

sam wrote on Aug 13, 2009 4:15 PM:

" Shane, you have a hard job. My heart goes out to you... stay safe ! "

jramagic wrote on Aug 13, 2009 3:57 PM:

" This is what should be done to houses. this is what should be done to defunct businesses. If we are indeed an "efficient capitalist society" as advertised...then the weak MUST be allowed to fail...and not propped up, like "Grandpa" at the dinner table in "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre". We are straying from that principle to our great peril as a Nation. So, I say: Go, Repo man, Go!!! It has certainly kept ME motivated to live within my means. "

Nell wrote on Aug 13, 2009 2:49 PM:

" Shane: I want to thank you for the way you and your staff seem to handle these situations, and agree with you for not judging! "

dogs4you wrote on Aug 13, 2009 2:40 PM:

" Stay current on your car payment and no need to be concerned about the dreaded Repo Man. Hard to believe any lending institution would lend money to anyone that hasen`t had a job for at least 6 months or more, and shows the ability to make payments.

Read the small print, in most cases it states, to well qualified buyers. If your not qualified, no car for you, or so says the New Car Nazi.

95242, have a hard time sleeping since your post was at 3:21 AM, or maybe your a Repo man and just got home. "

edumacation wrote on Aug 13, 2009 1:27 PM:

" WTF: Good point! I haven't thought about that one.

Many people who were paid for their clunkers to buy a new car really couldn't afford to buy one anyway.

Thats why they are trading in the older car. Or-- they would have bought it the normal way, with their own money, not taxpayers money.

I guess we will soon have a clunker based bubble?

It looks like these repo people will be very busy over the next year as the LUSD fires two hundred additional teachers while giving themselves awards, promotions and fabricating new "make work" educrat positions at the ESC?

I have heard that the ESC staff is planning to hire staff to handle the new K-12 "Gay day" celebrations as soon as the Governor signs the bill praising Gay-Lesbian-Bisexual-Trisexual-Transgender-Transvestite (GLBTTT) advocate Harvey Milk. Have I forgotten anyone? We must be all inclusive?

I know, how about the "Differently Gendered" or DG's.

reference:
http://www.firelily.com/gender/index.html

http://www.debradavis.org/gecpage/gectransinfo.html "

PAL wrote on Aug 13, 2009 12:55 PM:

" 95242, These people did not make their car payment yet you want to blame the repo man? He did not cause the grief. The person not making the car payment caused their own grief. They knew they were not making the payment. They knew if they did not make the payment their car can be repossed. They should have saved everyone the trouble and dropped the car off at the dealership they bought it from "

commentator wrote on Aug 13, 2009 12:23 PM:

" Kudos to Shane Freitas! You are what the economy needs to keep interest rates down! The Clunkers debacle is a governmental problem. Go Shane! "

Jerome R. Kinderman wrote on Aug 13, 2009 12:22 PM:

" While certainly we should be able to "agree to disagree" at any impasse, that shouldn't prohibit us from voicing our opinions.

I have no problem with anyone performing the job of repossessing vehicles or any other property due to nonpayment. Even having a story written in the newspaper seems acceptable.

Where I draw the line is when others' misfortune, irresponsibility or grief is played out for entertainment purposes on television. I wonder about people who enjoy watching the fights and violence that often accompanies the act of repossessing someone's automobile. Granted the majority of repos are the result of folks simply not paying their bills, there are often legitimate reasons behind their financial woes - especially during times of economic uncertainty.

I just think capitalizing on others' unhappiness is just plain wrong. "

wtf wrote on Aug 13, 2009 9:23 AM:

" Well, Shane, your business should start to **really** boom in about six months when all those people who bought new cars in the Cash for Clunkers program can't make payments....sort of an auto repeat of the housing boom we're still recovering from. ;) "

shanefre wrote on Aug 13, 2009 8:51 AM:

" The only other alternative to self-help repossession is due process. Does anyone out there believe our court systems need more cases brought before it, or how about now using our law enforcement officers to go around retrieving collateral securing loans after judgements or a replvin is issued by the courts? What a burden this would place on valuable resources needed for much other important issues.

Repossessors are needed. Their service charges are much, MUCH less than the court costs and law enforcement fees for serving a replevin or enforcing a judgement.

Judge us as you will, but keep in mind we do provide a very valuable service to the lending community. The higher their costs to collect bad debt will reflect higher costs for bank services to their other customers, including interest rates.

Bottom line - financial institutions must retrieve and/or collect bad debt, and if they don't someone has to absorb those costs. So the most efficient & effective way should be appreciated by all.

Shane Freitas
President
Accurate Adjustments, Inc.
Lodi, CA. "

shanefre wrote on Aug 13, 2009 8:51 AM:

" There are many people that cannot do this job; and everyone is entitled to their opinion, so we will just agree to disagree here... "

Gator wrote on Aug 13, 2009 8:18 AM:

" How does one go about blaming the Repo man . They do a very dangerous job. The fact is there ways out of the mess before the Repo man comes Midnight calling… "

mikedudical wrote on Aug 13, 2009 8:10 AM:

" This story is great. There is a website called www.repofinder.com that Credit Unions use to post links to their repossessed inventory. After looking at it you can tell how busy these repo-men are. Who's going to buy all these repossessed cars? "

libraryguy wrote on Aug 13, 2009 7:47 AM:

" Life as a repo man is always intense. "

Leonard wrote on Aug 13, 2009 5:38 AM:

" 95242 wrote on Aug 13, 2009 3:21 AM:
" I couldn't do this job. I wouldn't be able to sleep at night, knowing all the grief I was causing everybody. "


Call me old fashioned, but it seems to me that these people are causing their own grief by failing to pay the bills.

The repo man is just a symptom of their financial disease, not the cause. "

Leonard wrote on Aug 13, 2009 5:36 AM:

" A repo man spends his life getting into tense situations. "

95242 wrote on Aug 13, 2009 3:21 AM:

" I couldn't do this job. I wouldn't be able to sleep at night, knowing all the grief I was causing everybody. "

Comments on this story are now closed.