Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Will terrorists be given Miranda warnings? (72)
- President Obama's first year (67)
- Lodi Unified School District president issues warning to speakers over cuts (64)
- Local business leaders say tourism, Costco, Home Depot may play roles in city's future (60)
- Islamic symbol in mosaic — what is all the fuss? (49)
- Writer comments on Neely column (42)
- The Home Depot hopes to join Costco at Reynolds Ranch (41)
- Many reject the politics of 'no' (40)
- Police: Train victim was a Lodi teen (31)
- Time to shed the convenient sham of 'Don't ask, don't tell' policy (31)
Activist's measure would cap salaries for city of Lodi's non-union employees
Jane Lea also wants to create a commission to set pay and compensation for council members
Lodi residents may soon be asked to sign a petition for a ballot measure that would cap the pay of the city's non-union employees. The measure would also create a commission to set pay and compensation for council members.
The measure would limit the salary of the highest paid, non-union employee to 50 percent of the California governor's salary, which is $213,000. That means the city's highest paid employee could only make $106,500.
In 2007, the last year for which figures were readily available, Electric Utility Director George Morrow earned $211,151 in salary, overtime and benefits and was the highest paid employee.
All other non-union employees will be able to receive a maximum of 90 percent of the highest paid employee's salary.
Jane Lea, a local activist who has run for Lodi's City Council twice in the past, submitted the proposed measure to the city clerk's office. Lea did not respond to a request for comment late Monday afternoon.
"It is important for all possible safeguards to be put into place to avoid unnecessary spending," the measure's language reads. "Reducing exempt employee salaries of the city of Lodi's highest paid employees can help maintain programs and services vital to the citizens of Lodi."
The city's non-union employees include the city manager, city attorney, city clerk and department heads. City spokesman Jeff Hood did not know immediately how many employees are non-union.
The measure would also not allow the city to contract out any work that could be completed by a city employee. It would establish a nine-person citizen committee to decide on the benefits and salary the council will receive.
Also, the employee will be responsible for paying any part of their own benefits package that exceeds 50 percent of the employee's salary.
Councilman Bob Johnson called the idea "unbelievable" and said the city would not be able to retain qualified people.
"You may be able to make a case about the level of pay, but this is a draconian response to the problem," he said. "It would drive out all the department heads and many of the mid-managers, and who would you replace them with?"
It could set up a situation where, throughout the state, an average salary for a public works director is significantly higher than the proposed salary cap allows, which would make it hard to recruit, Johnson said. He also does not understand the correlation between department head pay and the governor's pay. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger does not accept his salary. "What are the requirements to be governor for the state of California? To be an Austrian body builder," Johnson said.
Johnson suggested that if people feel the city's spending on employees is out of control, they should target employee pensions, because everyone in the state has been talking about how the system is broken.
Instead of the cap being attached to the governor's salary, former union president Mark Ruggiero would like to see management receive the same raises and cuts as rank-and-file employees.
Ruggiero represented both the maintenance and operators union and the general services union until he left the city a couple weeks ago for another job. He has not seen Lea's measure but said he would support it.
City Manager Blair King said he can understand where the idea is appealing to people at face value, but he pointed out if it were enacted there would be subordinates making more money than their bosses.
Councilwoman Susan Hitchcock said she hopes Lea has the city's best interests in mind, but was surprised that she would propose this idea.
"I know she was a candidate for City Council and had developed a little more background that would make her a little more aware of the challenges such an initiative would present to the city," Hitchcock said.
Without competitive pay, Hitchcock said the city would not be able to retain the quality department heads it has now.
"They would leave and go elsewhere and people would not apply. ... You don't get that kind of talent by paying cheap," she said.
She imagines the measure will make it to the ballot because measures do not require many signatures, she said.
"It's going to end up costing the city of Lodi a lot of money, but I truly think the city of Lodi residents will not think that it is in the city's best interest," Hitchcock said.
Contact reporter Maggie Creamer at maggiec@lodinews.com or read her blog at www.lodi-news.com/blog/citybuzz.

Reader Feedback
yeah you wrote on Aug 16, 2009 8:33 PM:
2much wrote on Aug 14, 2009 2:06 PM:
max stanfield wrote on Aug 14, 2009 9:53 AM:
LodiJoe wrote on Aug 14, 2009 7:54 AM:
what22 wrote on Aug 11, 2009 11:22 PM:
what22 wrote on Aug 11, 2009 11:15 PM:
Half Full wrote on Aug 11, 2009 10:58 PM:
JonB wrote on Aug 11, 2009 7:23 AM: "Good managers cost good money. If there is a problem with an individual manager's performance, then that person's particular pay should be reconsidered. A company without the ability to be creative when enticing top talent quickly becomes ineffective."
I'm guessing most of you who are for this idea have never made over $52Kyr/$25hr. Quality Executive level personnel earn more than $106K. YES, even in LODI, even those in the Public sector. "
lodidian wrote on Aug 11, 2009 9:50 PM:
You waste the opportunity for good exchange on an interesting topic by bickering with one another.
Take a breath and put some serious thought into what you write---if you are genuinely interested in this topic. "
wtf wrote on Aug 11, 2009 6:50 PM:
What is this? You quoting yourself now? LOL! "
wtf wrote on Aug 11, 2009 6:49 PM:
tosh conn wrote on Aug 11, 2009 3:57 PM:
wtf wrote on Aug 11, 2009 3:19 PM:
Seeing as you don't know me and made a blanket statement; I will do likewise.
Afraid of being kicked out of a cushy, overpaid job? LOL! Jane has the right idea: Establish a nine-person citizen committee to decide on the benefits and salary the council will receive.
Again, I say to you, sooziesdad, same as I said to jbhiker: Why are protesting so much? The "true" talent we have in place has managed to screw up the city's finances....the only thing over-inflated, besides their salaries, are their egos. LOL! "
Veritas wrote on Aug 11, 2009 3:15 PM:
sooziesdad wrote on Aug 11, 2009 2:21 PM:
tosh conn wrote on Aug 11, 2009 1:38 PM:
dogs4you wrote on Aug 11, 2009 1:32 PM:
wtf wrote on Aug 11, 2009 1:00 PM:
ALL pay has to be looked at and the citizens of Lodi have to decide if we're getting our money's worth from our public employees. "
reality wrote on Aug 11, 2009 12:57 PM:
Inquisitor wrote on Aug 11, 2009 12:14 PM:
jbhiker wrote on Aug 11, 2009 11:47 AM:
jbhiker wrote on Aug 11, 2009 11:45 AM:
tosh conn wrote on Aug 11, 2009 11:41 AM:
reality wrote on Aug 11, 2009 10:02 AM:
wtf wrote on Aug 11, 2009 9:50 AM:
jbhiker wrote on Aug 11, 2009 9:31 AM:
Are you kidding? You don't think the Unions have born the brunt of this economic nightmare? Unbelievably stupid remark!?! "
reality wrote on Aug 11, 2009 9:23 AM:
wtf wrote on Aug 11, 2009 8:27 AM:
http://www.forlibertymovie.com/ "
wtf wrote on Aug 11, 2009 8:25 AM:
O-O-O-kay.....NOT!
Besides, how do they know "qualified" people won't be found at that price? They don't. They're just covering their *sses and wanting to maintain the status quo.
And in my book, their definition of "qualified" reads: "cronified"
People are fed up....with ***all*** levels of government supping at the trough at taxpayers expense. "
gray cloud wrote on Aug 11, 2009 7:47 AM:
JonB wrote on Aug 11, 2009 7:23 AM:
Ra wrote on Aug 11, 2009 6:52 AM:
max stanfield wrote on Aug 11, 2009 6:34 AM:
al da long wrote on Aug 11, 2009 6:30 AM:
What they should do is bid out all work, if a private contractor can do it for less, hire it out! "
Observer wrote on Aug 11, 2009 5:55 AM:
Comments on this story are now closed.