Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

February 8th, 2010
February 6th, 2010
February 5th, 2010
February 4th, 2010
February 3rd, 2010
February 2nd, 2010
February 1st, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT

Activist's measure would cap salaries for city of Lodi's non-union employees

Jane Lea also wants to create a commission to set pay and compensation for council members

By Maggie Creamer
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Tuesday, August 11, 2009 6:19 AM PDT

Lodi residents may soon be asked to sign a petition for a ballot measure that would cap the pay of the city's non-union employees. The measure would also create a commission to set pay and compensation for council members.

The measure would limit the salary of the highest paid, non-union employee to 50 percent of the California governor's salary, which is $213,000. That means the city's highest paid employee could only make $106,500.

In 2007, the last year for which figures were readily available, Electric Utility Director George Morrow earned $211,151 in salary, overtime and benefits and was the highest paid employee.

All other non-union employees will be able to receive a maximum of 90 percent of the highest paid employee's salary.

Jane Lea, a local activist who has run for Lodi's City Council twice in the past, submitted the proposed measure to the city clerk's office. Lea did not respond to a request for comment late Monday afternoon.

"It is important for all possible safeguards to be put into place to avoid unnecessary spending," the measure's language reads. "Reducing exempt employee salaries of the city of Lodi's highest paid employees can help maintain programs and services vital to the citizens of Lodi."

The city's non-union employees include the city manager, city attorney, city clerk and department heads. City spokesman Jeff Hood did not know immediately how many employees are non-union.

The measure would also not allow the city to contract out any work that could be completed by a city employee. It would establish a nine-person citizen committee to decide on the benefits and salary the council will receive.

Also, the employee will be responsible for paying any part of their own benefits package that exceeds 50 percent of the employee's salary.

Councilman Bob Johnson called the idea "unbelievable" and said the city would not be able to retain qualified people.

"You may be able to make a case about the level of pay, but this is a draconian response to the problem," he said. "It would drive out all the department heads and many of the mid-managers, and who would you replace them with?"

It could set up a situation where, throughout the state, an average salary for a public works director is significantly higher than the proposed salary cap allows, which would make it hard to recruit, Johnson said. He also does not understand the correlation between department head pay and the governor's pay. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger does not accept his salary. "What are the requirements to be governor for the state of California? To be an Austrian body builder," Johnson said.

Johnson suggested that if people feel the city's spending on employees is out of control, they should target employee pensions, because everyone in the state has been talking about how the system is broken.

Instead of the cap being attached to the governor's salary, former union president Mark Ruggiero would like to see management receive the same raises and cuts as rank-and-file employees.

Ruggiero represented both the maintenance and operators union and the general services union until he left the city a couple weeks ago for another job. He has not seen Lea's measure but said he would support it.

City Manager Blair King said he can understand where the idea is appealing to people at face value, but he pointed out if it were enacted there would be subordinates making more money than their bosses.

Councilwoman Susan Hitchcock said she hopes Lea has the city's best interests in mind, but was surprised that she would propose this idea.

"I know she was a candidate for City Council and had developed a little more background that would make her a little more aware of the challenges such an initiative would present to the city," Hitchcock said.

Without competitive pay, Hitchcock said the city would not be able to retain the quality department heads it has now.

"They would leave and go elsewhere and people would not apply. ... You don't get that kind of talent by paying cheap," she said.

She imagines the measure will make it to the ballot because measures do not require many signatures, she said.

"It's going to end up costing the city of Lodi a lot of money, but I truly think the city of Lodi residents will not think that it is in the city's best interest," Hitchcock said.

Contact reporter Maggie Creamer at maggiec@lodinews.com or read her blog at www.lodi-news.com/blog/citybuzz.

Reader Feedback

yeah you wrote on Aug 16, 2009 8:33 PM:

" Why 50 percent? Why not 10 percent? Now THAT would save some real money! "

2much wrote on Aug 14, 2009 2:06 PM:

" Jane you have lost it! Only union employees make big money? What’s next, all union members will have to drive a Chevy Volt because we have to support the UAW? Welcome to the peoples republic of Jane, uh, make that Lodi. Truly some of the most bizarre thinking in a long time. Next she will want us to all have rock orbs and no lawn in our yards. "

max stanfield wrote on Aug 14, 2009 9:53 AM:

" Review everyone or review no one. Include all forms of compensation. Jane, it seems like you have an axe to grind. "

LodiJoe wrote on Aug 14, 2009 7:54 AM:

" I will be the FIRST to agree that labor unions were a necessary entity at one point in our history. In this global economy there is NO place for unions. All unions have done is increase the price of American products to the point that they forced our manufacturers to go foreign countries in order to keep costs down. Unions, especially in government, do nothing but drive up the cost of government. And who pays? Guess, it isn't the unions. "

what22 wrote on Aug 11, 2009 11:22 PM:

" unions are here to stay and will always make the decisons if not well see how well the company performs thats called democratic rule like this country is ruled not two or three bone heads at the top we all know how republican run companys are run a few rich snob guys at the top we still remember the bush years or have we already forgot its time for the dumb white man who led us to the poor house to step aside "

what22 wrote on Aug 11, 2009 11:15 PM:

" sounds good to me screw those scabs "

Half Full wrote on Aug 11, 2009 10:58 PM:

" Please read this one more time, slowly so you may understand it:

JonB wrote on Aug 11, 2009 7:23 AM: "Good managers cost good money. If there is a problem with an individual manager's performance, then that person's particular pay should be reconsidered. A company without the ability to be creative when enticing top talent quickly becomes ineffective."

I'm guessing most of you who are for this idea have never made over $52Kyr/$25hr. Quality Executive level personnel earn more than $106K. YES, even in LODI, even those in the Public sector. "

lodidian wrote on Aug 11, 2009 9:50 PM:

" Children!
You waste the opportunity for good exchange on an interesting topic by bickering with one another.
Take a breath and put some serious thought into what you write---if you are genuinely interested in this topic. "

wtf wrote on Aug 11, 2009 6:50 PM:

" tosh conn wrote: "Like Tosh C said, it sounds like you want the inmates to run the asylim to everyones detriment."

What is this? You quoting yourself now? LOL! "

wtf wrote on Aug 11, 2009 6:49 PM:

" Gee, tosh conn, you sound awful threatened by this proposal. Why is that? Are you one of the overpaid, under-producing slouchers? LOL! "

tosh conn wrote on Aug 11, 2009 3:57 PM:

" To wtf. You said: "Jane has the right idea: Establish a nine-person citizen committee to decide on the benefits and salary the council will receive." Brilliant-WTF !!! ....what about the hundreds of others employees, some over paid, some underpaid ? Please, WTF, both you and Jane need to go to the eye doctor for a myopia check up. Also ask for a "lack of peripheral vision check". Lacking with both of you. Like Tosh C said, it sounds like you want the inmates to run the asylim to everyones detriment. "

wtf wrote on Aug 11, 2009 3:19 PM:

" sooziesdad wrote: "Can one even imagine what it would be like if Jane and WTF were running the show? Chaos and waste would take on a whole new meaning."

Seeing as you don't know me and made a blanket statement; I will do likewise.

Afraid of being kicked out of a cushy, overpaid job? LOL! Jane has the right idea: Establish a nine-person citizen committee to decide on the benefits and salary the council will receive.

Again, I say to you, sooziesdad, same as I said to jbhiker: Why are protesting so much? The "true" talent we have in place has managed to screw up the city's finances....the only thing over-inflated, besides their salaries, are their egos. LOL! "

Veritas wrote on Aug 11, 2009 3:15 PM:

" Petitions, Referendums and Propositions [PRP's] are a sloppy way to carry out "representative" style government. Pound on your local officials, get people to agree with you [or not]. Your elected officials are called representative government for a reason. [Think Townhalls for a minute]. Go after the people who are causing the damage, but keep out the PRP's. They will just lead to more taxpayer misery and costs. "

sooziesdad wrote on Aug 11, 2009 2:21 PM:

" Agree with Jon B. You get what you pay for. Talented and experienced and effective City Managers and Department Heads are not easy to find. We are very fortunate in that we have some true talent in place. Can one even imagine what it would be like if Jane and WTF were running the show? Chaos and waste would take on a whole new meaning. "

tosh conn wrote on Aug 11, 2009 1:38 PM:

" jbhiker: That is nearly what I said. You said: " Tosh - More Initiatives = MORE WASTED MONEY..I posted: Locking [which is proposed by iniative] this program into city law, could prove disasterous as times change both here and the state level. " [I think i tossed in an incorrect "e" in disasterous. "

dogs4you wrote on Aug 11, 2009 1:32 PM:

" jbhiker, what local of IBEW were you in. From streelworkers to aerospace, that`s some jump for a union to represent. I was in IBEW local 1245 for over 30 years, total waste of money as that union wasn`t worth squat. They took their union dues on a monthly basis and gave nothing in return. "

wtf wrote on Aug 11, 2009 1:00 PM:

" jbhiker your comment at 11:45 AM struck me as just a little of "thous protesteth too much!" LOL!

ALL pay has to be looked at and the citizens of Lodi have to decide if we're getting our money's worth from our public employees. "

reality wrote on Aug 11, 2009 12:57 PM:

" hiker i rest my case. you have demonstrated the true union mentality that is grinding all levels of government to a halt. you and jane "obama" ought to write a book "

Inquisitor wrote on Aug 11, 2009 12:14 PM:

" I read this article and thought it was April 1st. Not because of April Fools Day, but because that's the day I plan on replacing my septic tank. "

jbhiker wrote on Aug 11, 2009 11:47 AM:

" Tosh - More Initiatives = MORE WASTED MONEY. How about you stop wasting your time Blogging and actually get involved in City Politics. I am sure I never saw any of you at the Council Meetings. "

jbhiker wrote on Aug 11, 2009 11:45 AM:

" wtf & reality - I have been in the IBEW, Steelworkers and Machinists and Aerospace Unions for years. None of the BS you are talking about is taking place. Unions are TRUE Democracies where the members have a REAL voice. You people watch too much Crime TV. I have an idea - turn off the TV and video games. Read a book. Remember those when you were in school? I know you stopped when you dropped out but you should try it again. "

tosh conn wrote on Aug 11, 2009 11:41 AM:

" While allowing the inmates run the asylum appeals strongly to the inmates, there are better ways to protest payrates if that is in fact Jane's complaint. "reality" has a better idea. Lets review all levels of pay and ancillary compensation. Then proceed from there. Locking this program into city law, could prove disasterous as times change both here and the state level. "

reality wrote on Aug 11, 2009 10:02 AM:

" hiker - just about everybody in the city has taken a hit. the bargaining units as well as the exempt types have made concessions, taken furlough days etc. but "obama" lea wants to exempt union people from this time forward. if she has a problem with city employee compensation her solution should apply to all city employees not just to her favored few union people "

wtf wrote on Aug 11, 2009 9:50 AM:

" Actually, I agree that the unions should have a closer look. They started out protecting workers; but now they seem interested in maintaining their own status quo at the expense of workers through union dues, etc. "

jbhiker wrote on Aug 11, 2009 9:31 AM:

" reality said "why hasnt she targeted the unions"
Are you kidding? You don't think the Unions have born the brunt of this economic nightmare? Unbelievably stupid remark!?! "

reality wrote on Aug 11, 2009 9:23 AM:

" jane "obama" lea has just taken a brain dump! as a big time union dolly, why hasnt she targeted the unions within the city. why shouldnt all particpate in this program if it is such a good idea "

wtf wrote on Aug 11, 2009 8:27 AM:

" You'd be surprised where you can find "qualified" people....

http://www.forlibertymovie.com/ "

wtf wrote on Aug 11, 2009 8:25 AM:

" Jane Lea is on the right track. You've got my vote! Those who allegedly work for the people have to be reminded, time to time, who their bosses are. Up to this point, all we've done is complain about how these same individuals who are to be held accountable, have screwed the rate payers and citizens of Lodi....and now the posts say they're qualified???!!?

O-O-O-kay.....NOT!

Besides, how do they know "qualified" people won't be found at that price? They don't. They're just covering their *sses and wanting to maintain the status quo.

And in my book, their definition of "qualified" reads: "cronified"

People are fed up....with ***all*** levels of government supping at the trough at taxpayers expense. "

gray cloud wrote on Aug 11, 2009 7:47 AM:

" This is very narrow sighted. The SEIU, and public unionized employees, their costs, benefits and retirements at the state, county and local levels are a major reason for our financial problems. Jane, you have the wrong solution for a real problem. This seems to be more of a "vengeance" petition. "

JonB wrote on Aug 11, 2009 7:23 AM:

" Good managers cost good money. If there is a problem with an individual manager's performance, then that person's particular pay should be reconsidered. A company without the ability to be creative when enticing top talent quickly becomes ineffective. "

Ra wrote on Aug 11, 2009 6:52 AM:

" Why only non union? It's unions that have bankrupt this state. Non union employees are typically the staff who must perform or lose their jobs. If she brings an iniative to end civil service union protection, I'll sign it. Unions represent forced association and now they want to steal the right of private ballot. "

max stanfield wrote on Aug 11, 2009 6:34 AM:

" Governance by proposition is one of the main problems causing the fiscal mess in California today. It would fare no better at a local level. Bad idea. "

al da long wrote on Aug 11, 2009 6:30 AM:

" Do they want to change our flag to a red one with a sickle and hammer on it too?
What they should do is bid out all work, if a private contractor can do it for less, hire it out! "

Observer wrote on Aug 11, 2009 5:55 AM:

" Please tell me your kidding with this proposal. "

Comments on this story are now closed.