Indexes
February 9th, 2010
February 8th, 2010
February 6th, 2010
February 5th, 2010
February 4th, 2010
February 3rd, 2010
February 2nd, 2010
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Will terrorists be given Miranda warnings? (75)
- Lodi Unified School District president issues warning to speakers over cuts (64)
- President Obama's first year (45)
- Many reject the politics of 'no' (45)
- Islamic symbol in mosaic — what is all the fuss? (44)
- Writer comments on Neely column (42)
- The Home Depot hopes to join Costco at Reynolds Ranch (41)
- Time to shed the convenient sham of 'Don't ask, don't tell' policy (34)
- We need to conduct respectful conversations (30)
- Tasered suspect claims he is Yosemite Sam (25)
ADVERTISEMENT
U.S. citizens aren't willing to pay their debt
Monday, July 13, 2009 12:33 AM PDT
When I have a debt, I want to be responsible for it. Likewise for a nation of U.S. citizens, right?
Last month, I denied that U.S. citizens were willing to pay their debt, and I suggested that there were dire consequences ever since. I cited the War of 1812, the Civil War, the Stock Market crash of 1929, and 70 years of slavery ending in 1999. About a month has gone by, and Lodi hasn't reorganized because of my letter.
This month, Lodi's best public writer, on June 20 wrote, "... activist judges, who do not feel bound by their oaths of office and/or Article VI of the Constitution of the United States ... " Almost the whole of American society follows this self-centered example, believing that an oath of office must certainly refer to the Bill of Rights. This is the failing of every public citizen who crosses the bar in a courtroom, believing that they have constitutional rights, or believing that the judge is bound to uphold them. In court, virtually every public citizen loses without understanding what happened. A citizen who does not acknowledge the debt of the United States corporation has no way of understanding.
Last month, my letter about the United States' debt also referred to Article VI, and now Lodi is seeing that this same Article is about public servants taking an oath of office. How could this be? Public officials take an oath to uphold and respect the public debt. Otherwise, bankers could foreclose and our nation would not exist! If the states and their citizens were notified of this arrangement, would they willfully pay? No! Instead, they waged civil war. Consequently, the victorious federal government was forced to make changes. Unimaginable corruption was ushered into Washington and New York, and the subject U.S. citizens paid the highest price. I would be wasting my time to explain to U.S. citizens who do not acknowledge the debt.
U.S. citizens are notified through Hollywood, but they think "The Wizard of Oz" is a child's story, and that "The Matrix" is an action-drama.
Daniel Hutchins
Acampo
Search for Ads 
Today’s Print Ads 
RSS Feeds
Reader Feedback
Gator wrote on Jul 20, 2009 6:21 PM:
The lunatic is on the grass.
Remembering games and daisy chains and laughs.
Got to keep the loonies on the path….. "
danielh wrote on Jul 19, 2009 2:16 PM:
(I answered your question) "
danielh wrote on Jul 19, 2009 2:16 PM:
all this because Gator said he or she was done talking to me (with the "Gator" name).
Please forgive me if I'm wrong. "
splinter wrote on Jul 19, 2009 1:28 PM:
danielh wrote on Jul 19, 2009 10:43 AM:
Anyway, foreclosure is a huge crime, and when someone beats it, that's a huge battle victory. "
Gator wrote on Jul 19, 2009 8:40 AM:
splinter wrote on Jul 19, 2009 12:07 AM:
danielh wrote on Jul 17, 2009 8:44 PM:
Obviously someone knew to challenge the bank to produce the note. "
danielh wrote on Jul 17, 2009 8:11 PM:
I assure you if you do it correctly, it will work through the banking system, but when the funds get to your bank, they'll keep it.
Whenever you make a fraudulent presentment, the banker is supposed to return it.
Always, they keep the presentments. I haven't gotten one back yet. "
danielh wrote on Jul 17, 2009 8:08 PM:
So, you see, there isn't anything more important to America than its handling of the debt. I can' get a straight answer on what is happening now. "
danielh wrote on Jul 17, 2009 8:04 PM:
If my process is successful, do you really think that I can post it into the public venue?
I will say:
1) There are remedies in the public all over the place. In order to use any of these processes, it is absolutely imperative that the user understands who he/she is, and his/her relationship to the UNITED STATES corporation.
2) People who understand suddenly become a target, and for that reason, I can only throw out suggestions that lead you into study, but in the public, I cannot post the answer. Do you think by now I might have been visited perhaps at the front door?
3) News stories are spun in the form of law-enforcement press releases. Lodi recently had one, and nobody in the public figured out the real story. Instead, people ridiculed the innocent person because of the news, in these comment columns. I offered to write a letter on this episode of Lodi history, but the person gave me a definite flat-out, NO! "
danielh wrote on Jul 17, 2009 7:51 PM:
If you try it on your "billing" statement, you could get a collections letter like you've never seen before.
You said, "try it, and let us know how it works."
I'm in the middle of it. "
sven31 wrote on Jul 17, 2009 6:02 PM:
Gator wrote on Jul 17, 2009 9:05 AM:
danielh wrote on Jul 16, 2009 9:44 PM:
danielh wrote on Jul 16, 2009 9:29 PM:
danielh wrote on Jul 16, 2009 9:27 PM:
danielh wrote on Jul 16, 2009 9:26 PM:
The bank sold the promissory note, to generate the funds, to give to us.
Actually, the bank loans $0 out of its own assets, and when we make payments they are not just making money on the interest. They are making money on the principal, because they didn’t loan a single dime of their own money.
If we acknowledge this, and try to hold the bankers accountable for the stolen funds, they will foreclose upon the security.
Pretty tough to find this old law from the Lincoln administration: National Currency Act, ch. 106, 13 Stat. 99, June 3, 1864. Section 27 of this law states that it is illegal for any bank to sell a note. Uh-oh. They bundle them up into billion dollar bundles and sell them to the highest bidder. This is a violation.
Moreover, they put the notes into the photocopy 30times and do it again. "
danielh wrote on Jul 16, 2009 9:10 PM:
When people send you a bill, they are actually trying to pay you interest because you are the principal, and they are trying to pay you interest on the principal, in the form of corporate manufacturing goods. What you think is a bill doesn’t say the word “bill” or anything related thereof on the paper. It is a statement. In other words, they are notifying you of the amount of interest that you have used in your “purchase” of corporate manufacturing goods.
Legally, they are asking you to acknowledge the statement, and if you just sign it and send it back, they are supposed to discharge the debt. The debt does not exist.
However, just about every banker in American society steals these funds, and this is the reason why our fictitious Monopoly economy is crashing.
This is the reason why 3-months ago, I wrote a letter about the gold wealth that really is in Jackson. "
danielh wrote on Jul 16, 2009 9:02 PM:
I've seen a lot of miracles around alcoholism, and I've also seen some lives come to an end. "
Brian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:52 PM:
Although it doesn't apply to me. "
Brian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:50 PM:
Of the U.S. citizens here, a good anount of them are liberals
in denial that there will be more debt on the books if this bill passes. And their excuse to not have to pay their debt is because of their denial. "
danielh wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:49 PM:
I think that's a confession right there.
Alcoholics can't remember how much and when they drink. "
Brian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:45 PM:
Brian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:42 PM:
I'm not going to waste my time critiquing your posts. Perhaps
you do need a drink. Blogging without a little sauce on occasion tends to drive a person crazy. Go ahead Lodian, you need to take the edge off. I won't hold it against you :). I have to run an errand. Have a good one! "
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:38 PM:
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:36 PM:
Brian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:36 PM:
On the occasion that I have unintentionally plagiarized, at least I know what to look for to add to the discussion. Unlike you. :)
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=332548165656854
Chomp on this for a while and then get back to me. If you still think ObamaCare
is a good thing, then you're a bigger fool then I thought you were. "
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:35 PM:
Brian: Yes, I think JRK sounds like Charlie Brown's teacher. All I see you doing is agreeing with JRK without any intelligent responses whatsoever. Agree agree agree. Is that all ya got, AZ boy? "
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:31 PM:
of your enibriation."
Really, Brian? I am always 100% sober. Okay, post what you think is a drunken post of mine and I'll do the same with your drunken comments. Let's see who wins! (chuckle)
Ready set go... "
Brian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:30 PM:
It was a joke. Ya know, those things that go over your head on a daily basis. JRK's offerings are getting what is deserved... nothing serious. "
-Yet another excuse from Lodian when we all know she was serious. Jerome's
views just couldn't jive with Lodian even if she could comprehend them. "
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:27 PM:
regurgitate mine."
That's pretty funny coming from you, the plagiarism king of the blogs! LOL "
Brian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:26 PM:
I'm quite sober 99.99 percent of the time I blogg. You've been on the sauce so long you have these delusions you are clever poster. Please don't try to pass youself off as sober when your posts are such an obvious indication
of your enibriation. "
danielh wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:25 PM:
Arguing in the comments is one thing, but if you write a letter, you should expect some flack.
Look at me. I get some of the most ridiculous comments from you, and now, Gator.
I have to take it. I'm not going to stop writing just because you are insulting me.
BTW: Your victory over me with the birth certificates is self-proclaimed. You didn't prove anything, except I might have been forced to admit that I didn't dot an "i" or cross a "t." Overally, you did not disprove the final conclusion. Just 2-nights ago, I spoke with someone on the telephone who investigated and was granted passage into the birth certificate archives. Myself, I signed my BC and submitted it to treasury for value. The only reason why this can be done is because the UNITED STATES public is playing Monopoly with funny money. So my signed BC gives me access to funny Monopoly money. "
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:25 PM:
It was a joke. Ya know, those things that go over your head on a daily basis. JRK's offerings are getting what is deserved... nothing serious. "
Brian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:22 PM:
" Brian: What other excuses do you have for not posting with "intelligence" and "dignity"? "
You don't have any good posts to regurgitate. Perhaps YOU could come up with something good so you don't have to
regurgitate mine. "
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:19 PM:
I thought we all agreed that it's your drinking that's the problem. Well, maybe it's just you. And to digress is one thing, but to totally make a complete drunken a55 of yourself is quite another story. The things you divulge, and do, when you get loaded would embarrass most anyone, but I'm sure you don't remember the half of it. "
Brian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:18 PM:
And how did you arrive at the notion
that Jerome's letter are garbled like Charlie Brown's teachers voice? Could it be that his level of thinking is hard for you to comprehend? We'll pray for you. "
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:14 PM:
Brian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:12 PM:
from your pomposity. "
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:11 PM:
Brian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:08 PM:
It takes a lot more than your chickens$%to remarks to get me to change my views.
So you just keep on posting your drivle,
Lodian, if that's what turns you on. "
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:07 PM:
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:04 PM:
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:02 PM:
Digressions? LOL! Is that what you call them? "
Brian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 8:01 PM:
Anytime she hears or reads something that makes since the top of her head blows off.
I'll pray for you Lodian that your interpretation of Conservatism as being the DARK SIDE may change and you will become the happy person you always wanted to be. Shedding one's liberalisms
can be quite euphoric. "
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 7:58 PM:
Well, Brian, it means that your endorsement means squat to most here. "
Brian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 7:46 PM:
It's highly unlikely, except for your cronies, that others don't consider many of your responses of a chickens%$t nature. I can't change you. You have to change yourself. "
Brian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 7:41 PM:
Think about it. You've posted some real keepers.
-Standing on your podium again judging
other who have digressed at times like you're some angel? Chuckle.
Like my digressions has any bearing on how people view Jerome's letters. What other excuses do you have for not posting with intelligence and dignity, Lodian? "
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 7:38 PM:
Brian: Shall we repost some of what you consider not to be your twisted view? "
Brian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 7:35 PM:
How sad it is that you consider Billy's
writings of significance. Does it get you hot under the collar that Jerome
( a capable and talented writer) could get his letters published on a regular basis by the LNS. You should just come out and say it that a disabled Vet doesn't deserve the attention. You made it clear some time back that you don't think Jerome really needs to sponge off the government. I doubt you even have the slightest idea why he is disabled. "
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 7:32 PM:
Brian: No one laps up a bloggers spew like you to JRK. "
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 7:27 PM:
Brian: Really? lol! Shall I now repost some of your debate responses? Do you really want me to go there, Brian? Think about it. You've posted some real keepers. "
Brian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 7:25 PM:
May I suggest you continue to post the adventures of JRK at Blogspot or another free site that LNS can't mess with. I, and I'm sure others, are eager to read what happens to our hero next! No pressure...
-Yes, I'm sure Billy has many who will follow him who enjoy his talent for making a mockery of people and things.
Whatever floats their boat. "
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 7:24 PM:
Brian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 7:21 PM:
You have a twisted view of heated debate. Like I said, you rarely
offer a counter-argument on these bloggs. Or do you ever contribute
anything of substance here. Perhaps you consider your Chickens%$t remarks substance. Another twisted view, of course. "
Brian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 7:16 PM:
THis may be news to you, but most of us do not have the same need as JRK to be in the "spotlight", seeing our name in print, every week (ad nauseum) in the local paper. "
Again Ldodian with her beef with JRK.
This may be news to you Lodian, But Jerome has a talent and it is his nature to share it with people. Obviously his work is good enouigh that the LNS prints his letters on a regular basis. I'm looking forward to them putting his picture by his letters like the others who have earned it. It is as a result of his great letters that he is in the spotlight. You couldn't write letters as good as Jerome, Lodian. Anyway, you're not interested in making the slightest effort to post with intelligence. So why don't you go crawl back in your hole and maybe your cronies
will follow suit so the rest of us who have some intelligent responses about Jeromes letters don't have to weed through the drivle of you and your cronies. "
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 6:25 PM:
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 6:23 PM:
Bob Hussein Loblaw wrote on Jul 16, 2009 3:58 PM:
danielh wrote on Jul 16, 2009 3:35 PM:
All of the comments went to zero and reset all over again. "
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 1:51 PM:
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 1:49 PM:
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 1:48 PM:
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 1:35 PM:
And that person will be you, Jerome, with all the whining and trying to get bloggers kicked off and censored because you don’t like our comments and opinions. If you get your way this forum will definitely die. "
Lodian wrote on Jul 16, 2009 1:24 PM:
THis may be news to you, but most of us do not have the same need as JRK to be in the "spotlight", seeing our name in print, every week (ad nauseum) in the local paper. "
danielh wrote on Jul 16, 2009 11:45 AM:
It's amazing how words can go out into the universe and be recorded and remembered and repeated back.
That was something I learned in my studies on how to handle a criminal banker or government-elected official.
It can be used to put a corporation into default, and then we can re-write our own contract. It's called "novation."
The bankers use it against US citizens all the time, and they just don't realize:
We determined that we don't like your payment history, or you are now at-risk, so we're going to raise the interest rate on your account. If you object in such a way that you show that your account is in good-standing, it doesn't matter if your objection is true or not, just that you rebutted the presumption, and they can't legally raise the interest rate.
Generally, if we learn this material, and what's legal, the banks ignore the law and steal money from us anyway. When this happens, we can use the same tools to put a huge, and I mean 9-zeros international lien against them. "
Gator wrote on Jul 16, 2009 10:05 AM:
Bob Hussein Loblaw wrote on Jul 15, 2009 9:00 PM:
Brian wrote on Jul 15, 2009 8:04 PM:
You have this beef with Jerome's views.
Why not start writing your own letters
presenting your views. Or are you afraid
you may have to reveal yourself? There won't be anyone knocking at your door demanding you retract all of the ridiculous things you have written on these bloggs. It's not worth the time. "
Brian wrote on Jul 15, 2009 7:57 PM:
My comment wasn't meant to be a counter argument.
-Of course it wasn't meant to be a counter-argument. I have yet to find
one of your posts on a Jerome letter
being a counter-argument. It seems you have come up with an excuse to not present a counter-argument on his letters with the Charley Brown teacher thing. Why don't you stick with your excuse or better yet, muster up something intelligent as a counter-argument to his letters. "
sven31 wrote on Jul 15, 2009 7:22 PM:
Perhaps if you post this little nugget from danielH it will resolve his conflict with you or he will come to some sort of "settlement".
Post:"What are the damages and what is the restitution that you seek that I have not already given you and which will close the case with prejudice? If you do not both state the damages and state the amount of restitution, then you will automatically be in dishonor if you re-open this case again"
danielH to LodiSafeway on 12-23-08
I knew I was going to be able to use this someday! "
danielh wrote on Jul 15, 2009 3:49 PM:
Has anyone seen what kind of waste of time it is to comment in the Stockton paper?
They have people that change userID's like clothing, and I think they even have people with multiple ID's at the same time. They have a guy named "Brad" who every time he changes his name again, they still know it's him.
Grand sum total, I think there are only about 8 people in the Letters comments. "
Lodian wrote on Jul 15, 2009 3:33 PM:
" Lodian wrote on Jul 13, 2009 5:36 PM:
" JRK often reminds me of Charlie Brown's teacher. "
-Yes Lodian, everyone you disagree with
has garbled speech in your mind. That's your excuse for not having a good counter-argument. A lame one at that. "
----
My comment wasn't meant to be a counter argument. (chuckle @ Brian) "
Lodian wrote on Jul 15, 2009 3:31 PM:
"Brian: Are you a lawyer?"
lol! "
Lodian wrote on Jul 15, 2009 3:30 PM:
And I have a feeling that destroyer will be you. I can see you complaining to the LNS to the point that they say forget it and pull the plug altogether. I suspect they are strong enough to deal with you, but even the strong get fed up. I think it may already be happening as we speak/blog. Yes, it is very sad when one person wants to enjoy all the freedom of spewing hate yet complains the loudest when he gets what he's dished out. Shameful. You dish it out JRK, so you need to learn to take it. "
Gator wrote on Jul 15, 2009 1:31 PM:
Jerome R. Kinderman wrote on Jul 15, 2009 12:16 PM:
danielh wrote on Jul 15, 2009 11:23 AM:
Life is not about giving "good counter-argument." "
danielh wrote on Jul 15, 2009 11:21 AM:
When you give somebody an offer, you can't say, "This is it for me Amigo, Your ramblings aren’t worth taking my time to answer."
But you did answer, and you notified me ahead of time of yor dishonor.
Dishonor is what the letter above is about.
You are a lien debtor.
This is it for me amigo. "
Brian wrote on Jul 15, 2009 8:13 AM:
" JRK often reminds me of Charlie Brown's teacher. "
-Yes Lodian, everyone you disagree with
has garbled speech in your mind. That's your excuse for not having a good counter-argument. A lame one at that. "
Gator wrote on Jul 14, 2009 10:27 PM:
I read what you write and it makes no sense what so ever, your paranoid
Danielh paranoid as they come… The biggest troublemaker you'll probably ever have to deal with watches you shave his face in the mirror every morning. Get a life, you surely don’t have one now!!! This is it for me Amigo, Your ramblings aren’t worth taking my time to answer,,, "
danielh wrote on Jul 14, 2009 11:31 AM:
danielh wrote on Jul 14, 2009 11:30 AM:
I don't have time for speculation and guessing, except where I try to second-guess what is going to happen to the American economy within a very short period. I don't know when. "
danielh wrote on Jul 14, 2009 11:28 AM:
Gator wrote on Jul 14, 2009 7:35 AM:
danielh wrote on Jul 14, 2009 2:28 AM:
so I won't accept this statement: "The biggest mistake anyone can make is to sell this country short." "
danielh wrote on Jul 14, 2009 2:21 AM:
These two presidents were Lincoln, and Kennedy.
What do these two presidents have in common? "
danielh wrote on Jul 14, 2009 2:20 AM:
danielh wrote on Jul 14, 2009 2:19 AM:
I know, US Dollars were recognized world-wide; but, that was the playing board. "
danielh wrote on Jul 14, 2009 2:17 AM:
British troops set Washington ablaze. This was the military objective for the British who burned America's 13th amendment which was a re-organization attempt to conceal assets from investors.
Your house you live in, does it not have a title of ownership that can be seized if the "owner" does not pay? The attempted version of the 13th amendment, erased from history in the War of 1812, was an attempt to prevent titles of ownership on real property. "
danielh wrote on Jul 14, 2009 2:15 AM:
The Stock Market Crash, intentionally set, came when America's Bankruptcy re-organization expired in 1929, and the debt was still not paid.
FDR was responsible for re-organization to prevent foreclosure, and he seized the gold from the American People.
He put it into Fort Knox, from where it was eventually removed. "
danielh wrote on Jul 14, 2009 2:12 AM:
Former First Lady Hillary visited China back in February and granted permission to the Chinese to do Emminent Domain on American soil. "
danielh wrote on Jul 14, 2009 2:09 AM:
I assure you though, that the broke-a$$ country literally was broke.
Immediately comes to my mind is the advanced technology machine tooling that America built for fighter jets in Ohio (McDonnel-Douglas).
China movers were invited into the plant facility on Sunday and when workers returned to the plant on Monday, the machines were gone.
These were multiple-axis machine tooling for building precision and minimum weight parts for America's advanced technology fighter jets, given to China. "
danielh wrote on Jul 14, 2009 2:05 AM:
8:26 AM is what's called a dishonor in commerce, very disrespectful.
8:14 PM is what's called a counter-offer.
Please don't make fun of my commerce. "
Gator wrote on Jul 13, 2009 8:14 PM:
they are today with money and aid from the US./ We have kept the UN afloat from it’s beginnings with money and troops when needed, We have
doled out aid in the form of food, medical and disaster relief.. Our agriculture fed the world by it’s self. Our manufacturing base was the best
and most profitable at one time. Even with all the off shore things being
made for US companies we still managed to manufacture and sell 14 Trillion dollars worth of hard goods in 2007, not to shabby for a Sorry Broke A**ed Ol Country. The biggest mistake anyone can make is to sell this country short, cause if you do that’s when she will give you the B***h slap of all Times. So if you want to let those demons run lose in your head, go ahead I could care less…. "
Robb wrote on Jul 13, 2009 7:07 PM:
Lodian wrote on Jul 13, 2009 5:36 PM:
Jerome R. Kinderman wrote on Jul 13, 2009 3:24 PM:
And why wouldn't I have taken a look at my birth certificate as you attempted to further your outrageous claims. For those who assert that I don't perform even a modicum of research on my own or don't think for myself, I always attempt to confirm that I haven't made a mistake before putting forth my opinion. That doesn't make your claims any more credible. It only serves to provide proof that you were and usually are in fact, wrong.
And yet, when you were confronted with what I found on my very own birth certificate (that was contrary to your claims), you didn't admit that you were in error. In fact, you called me a liar. After that when it came to your letters and comments, I no longer find it necessary to check on those things I already know to be true; I simply consider the source from whence it comes and typically just move along to the next letter or comment; just as I am about to do now. "
danielh wrote on Jul 13, 2009 3:15 PM:
There is a short, brief passage that exposes fascism as offical US policy.
Can you find it?
What happened immediately after FDR's inauguration in 1933 that is relevant, and how does it explain fascism as the official condition of the UNITED STATES? "
danielh wrote on Jul 13, 2009 3:12 PM:
danielh wrote on Jul 13, 2009 3:11 PM:
I could easily argue that we are in fascism, and it is documented in official public policy passed through congress. "
danielh wrote on Jul 13, 2009 3:06 PM:
Leonard: I don't know who is The Ghost. Sorry. "
danielh wrote on Jul 13, 2009 3:05 PM:
I am glad you don't like my letters.
You said that they don't concern you, but you actually dug out your birth certificate because of my letters. Not very many people look at their BC, including people that don't care about what I write. "
OTH wrote on Jul 13, 2009 2:58 PM:
Back to back they faced each other
Drew their swords and shot each other. "
dogs4you wrote on Jul 13, 2009 2:20 PM:
Leonard wrote on Jul 13, 2009 1:29 PM:
He told me he had stopped blogging altogether.
He said it was because of the Red Chinese spy cams in his toilet paper or something (it was hard to tell because he was mumbling). "
Leonard wrote on Jul 13, 2009 1:22 PM:
" I saw that comment and naturally ignored it. Of course it's entirely up to you if you are affected by it in any way. I take my own advice that I offer to others in like situations and simply ignore that which has no impact upon me.
Naturally I wonder why you bring it up now; but even that is inconsequential to the discussion at hand, don't you think.....
LOL!!!
Methinks the lady doth protest too much.
My apologies to Daniel, though.
Pax. "
Jerome R. Kinderman wrote on Jul 13, 2009 1:10 PM:
Naturally I wonder why you bring it up now; but even that is inconsequential to the discussion at hand, don't you think? My recent comment to you was regarding a different remark offered by someone else. And that question still stands.
But clearly you should understand what I think of most of your letters and theories and therefore must ditto Gator's 11:26 AM comment as it pertains to your letter and subsequent comment made at 9:42 AM. "
danielh wrote on Jul 13, 2009 12:47 PM:
Jerome R. Kinderman wrote on Jul 13, 2009 12:36 PM:
danielh wrote on Jul 13, 2009 12:22 PM:
I'm saying that the UNITED STATES as a corporation has been in bankruptcy since its creation in 1789, and because its people did not want to pay, Americans have paid the highest price: slavery and war.
Bankers have held a security interest with a right to foreclose since 1789, and our presidents and congress have been juggling this debt ever since, until 1999.
If you don't wish to waste a good mind, it might be wise to ask why 1999 was so special. "
Gator wrote on Jul 13, 2009 11:26 AM:
danielh wrote on Jul 13, 2009 9:42 AM:
If this happened to any of us, it wouldn't be a very strong point on our resume when we're trying to impress the opposite sex, unless we can find another like-minded debtor. "
danielh wrote on Jul 13, 2009 9:25 AM:
Gator wrote on Jul 13, 2009 8:26 AM:
wtf wrote on Jul 13, 2009 7:17 AM:
Leonard wrote on Jul 13, 2009 4:50 AM:
Comments on this story are now closed.