Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

February 9th, 2010
February 8th, 2010
February 6th, 2010
February 5th, 2010
February 4th, 2010
February 3rd, 2010
February 2nd, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT

LUSD board favors revamp of curriculum department

By Jennifer Bonnett
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Wednesday, July 8, 2009 3:40 PM PDT

The Lodi Unified School District seems ready to replace six laid-off curriculum coordinators and their respective secretaries with two new program administrators in an effort to streamline program improvement oversight and textbook adoptions, among other things.

No decision was made at Tuesday's regular school board meeting, but trustees favored the reorganization idea presented by Associate Odie Douglas. Bonnie Cassel was absent.

"If they can bring in these two people and accommodate the tasks of six people ... I'm all for this recommendation," Trustee Ken Davis said, summing up the words of fellow trustees Joe Nava and Jeff Thompson.

English teacher Jeff Johnston, however, is against the creation of new administrative positions.

"(It) is irresponsible, in my opinion, and in bad faith for our community, our teachers," he said.

The department, which also oversees curriculum in an effort to ensure state and federal mandates are met, was all but eliminated with the district's recent budget adoption. Its department head, Lisa Kotowski, is the only one who remains.

Under the reorganization plan, the district would hire two new program administrators whose tasks would be similar but not the same as the former curriculum coordinators, Douglas said.

"The level of responsibility has increased significantly," he added.

The six employees laid off will have to apply, and it will be a competitive process, he said.

The two new positions were originally included in the 2009-10 budget adopted last month and will be fully funded with categorical money, funding set aside for special programs. Their combined salaries would be $254,256.

Johnston, however, took issue with new administrative positions being added "when you have 130 to 150 teachers still laid off," he said. "From a personal perspective, I think it's an easier pill to swallow to restore someone."

At a study session at the beginning of June, Davis made his pitch to reinstate the department, or at least its function. At the time, he voiced concerns that without a system of delivery to school sites regarding compliance, the district will fall further into program improvement status imposed by the federal government at some of its sites, and there could be issues with future textbook approvals.

"These positions will help us accomplish these tasks more effectively and efficiently," Kotowski said Tuesday.

The department is at the center of a claim filed by former Curriculum Coordinator Anne Cecchetti. Among other things, she claims she was among the women over 50 years old who were targeted for dismissal by the district office.

Because of her tenure, she has since been reassigned, according to her claim sent to the school board at the end of last month.

Earlier in the meeting, the board decided at this time not to move forward with an alternative instrumental music program for elementary-age students because it was cost-prohibitive, a report by Associate Superintendent Catherine Pennington found.

Additionally, due to teacher scheduling conflicts, there was not enough time to launch a pilot program at Silva Elementary for the 2009-10 school year, which begins at the end of the month.

However, the group, whose members include teachers' union president Sue Kenmotsu and music teacher David Collum, will continue to meet with hopes of re-launching the elementary instrumental music program for the 2010-11 school year.

"I don't want to give up on it," Trustee Calvin Young said. "When we look at the budget for next year we will again be looking at our priorities, and I want to make sure instrumental music doesn't get lost in this process."

Contact reporter Jennifer Bonnett at jenniferb@lodinews.com.

In other action



On Tuesday, trustees also:

  • Made changes to the recently adopted budget which included officially reinstating eight paraeducators, four high school librarians and 13.5 elementary library assistants using one-time federal stimulus funding.

    Several classified positions were also reinstated.

  • Heard a brief report from Assistant Superintendent Odie Douglas on the summer school program, which concluded last week. Nearly 3,000 students participated, including 19 who successfully completed their senior projects.

  • Accepted posters from San Joaquin Grassroots Action group for distribution to the high schools for display in each of the district's four high schools. The posters contain a motivational quote from President Obama: "Dropping out of school: it's not just quitting on yourself, it's quitting on your country."

  • Approved the resignation of Lodi Middle School principal Marco Sanchez, among others, effective June 30.

  • Officially accepted $23,749 in donations to various schools for the period from March through May.

    News-Sentinel staff

    Reader Feedback

    Bob Hussein Loblaw wrote on Jul 11, 2009 7:57 PM:

    " I would not be surprised edumacation. These central office types have a very incestuous relationship with each other. "

    edumacation wrote on Jul 11, 2009 5:55 PM:

    " Loblaw: Good info! I have an idea? I heard Odie was a strong supporter of Russom Mesfun before he resigned as principal at CM middle school. Engineer Bill wanted to support Odie and diversity. Maybe Russom has the power to make a new slot for him? That would be a Win Win Win. Win for Oakland, Win for Odie and Win for LUSD and the budget. I hope the Grand Poobah doesn't try to bring over some loyalists from Manteca USD to replace the future vacancy. Maybe SHE has some family members who need a job? LOL sounds like the LUSD? "

    Bob Hussein Loblaw wrote on Jul 11, 2009 2:56 PM:

    " A colleague of mine who works for Sac City Unified said Odie Douglas applied for the open superintendent position but didn't even make it to the final round of interviews. He also had a position lined up in Oakland and was going to take it after the state gave authority back to the school board there, but the position was eliminated by the state overseer before he left. "

    edumacation wrote on Jul 11, 2009 1:16 PM:

    " Jeff; I forgot also include "old codgerettes". LOL "

    edumacation wrote on Jul 11, 2009 1:13 PM:

    " Jeff: Even today, some of the retired edmacators are still involved! Could they really be worried about the statute of limitations? These old codgers are still in the wood pile spreading rumors and controlling policy and people. "

    edumacation wrote on Jul 11, 2009 1:09 PM:

    " Jeff: I don't disagree with you. What is important is to support anyone with inside knowledge of the machinations of the ESC. The reason: "Divide and Conquer". Once anyone of the insiders (Cabinet members LOL) starts talking to the public, its only a matter of time before the whole house of cards implodes.

    Thats the way police investigators work. Squeeze one of them and they will squeal on the rest. That is the main reason for the emphasis on "Loyalty". But "blood oaths" only work in the movies. Once they start telling "secrets", the architects of the scams will have to start lying more. They will get caught. That's why infamous criminals get lower sentences even for heinous crimes, they blab about the higher ups, and the Grand Poobahs will spend all of their time and energy plugging leaks and weaving more webs.

    Engineer Bill and others saw this coming and got out before it got too hot.

    The best policy for any new Superintendent is to NEVER trust the sycophants who come up with suggestions. They are usually the people responsible for the problems. "

    jeff wrote on Jul 11, 2009 12:38 PM:

    " No offense, but I'm not sorry to see Anne go. I've had several colleagues "work" with her on curriculum development/approval and they had very little positive to say in her competence or speed in getting it done. "

    edumacation wrote on Jul 10, 2009 11:27 AM:

    " How to play "Musical Chairs":

    1) Arrange some chairs, back to back, allowing one chair (job) less than the number of players (edumacrats).

    2) Get someone (or yourself) to play a tune.

    3) At once the players (edumacrats) should start to walk or run round the chairs (pretend to work), to the sound of the music.

    4)When the music stops, each player must try to find a seat (job), and as there is one chair short, some one will fail to do so, and is "out". He/She/It must carry a chair away with him/her/it.

    5) Keep repeating the instructions until there is only one person left in, with no chair to sit upon. This person has won the game.

    Wash, rinse and repeat. "

    so sad wrote on Jul 9, 2009 9:51 PM:

    " I would vote for Anne any day! I also feel she could do any job at LUSD!
    She would be an excellent choice for a replacement for Barbara!
    GO for it anne! : ) "

    Bob Hussein Loblaw wrote on Jul 9, 2009 4:45 PM:

    " Still waiting contra.....

    ~crickets~ "

    mom of 2 wrote on Jul 9, 2009 8:24 AM:

    " I agree... Anne on the school board, or taking Barbara Johnson's job. Give the power to her... we trust her with our kids. "

    Lou wrote on Jul 9, 2009 6:31 AM:

    " Anne, hope you're reading this blog...please consider running. We need people on this board who honestly believe that this is public-service not self-service. KLEPTOCRATS NEED NOT APPLY!

    Question: Why in the world has Mr. Davis graced us with his wisdom (as a Board member) for 17-years. Is there such a thing as a career Board member?

    Come on everybody...these folks control the lives of 29,000 students; they control a $245,000,000 budget and nobody will tell us what their top-line administrators do. Please, please, if you know someone is honest, has some common sense and likes children...tell them they need to consider running.

    These crooks need to go and they need to go soon. There are four seats up for re-election in 2010...go for it. "

    Bob Hussein Loblaw wrote on Jul 8, 2009 11:26 PM:

    " Just waiting for your pearls of wisdom on education contra. "

    mom of 2 wrote on Jul 8, 2009 9:49 PM:

    " Other school boards have been voted out completely... like in Groveland this past year. Maybe it is time for LUSD. If the board is not representing the people and the students, then they aren't doing what we need. We are in the business of learning... right??? I agree with Lou! "

    Lou wrote on Jul 8, 2009 8:09 PM:

    " Just a thought. Let's recall the entire Lodi School Board (yeh, all seven of them)... normally, I'd cut someone like Nava some slack, however, sometimes the new broom must sweep clean.

    Let's find seven within our citizenry who feel "something" "anything" about helping kids learn. With the exception of one or two, none of these kleptocrats gives a damn about kids, and in the past, have told us so, yes?

    Let's say we run seven people who are teacher-student oriented and who understand that teaching and learning are just different sides of the same coin. Nobody has ever learned anything from an administrator. Therefore, we should have as few administrators and as many teachers as is possible.

    Here's the first plank in the platform of the "new seven"... hire each and every teacher back who lost their jobs and fire as many vice principals, assistant vice principals, assistant to the assistant of the vice principals and kleptocrats at kleptocrat-central as is needed. Wash. Rinse. Repeat.

    I'll betcha' I can find at least 20 million in this formula...yep 20M. So, what say you?

    "Bueller, Bueller...anyone." "

    perspective wrote on Jul 8, 2009 5:46 PM:

    " This probably will save money. Based on the numbers published previously, each of those 6 administrators made over $100K, and the 6+ secretaries made $60-80K each. I just hope the new hires have had recent time teaching in the classroom. It has changed so much in the past 5 years, that you can't make credible decisions unless you have been in the classroom recently. "

    so sad wrote on Jul 8, 2009 3:01 PM:

    " And the beat goes on...... I really wish that these people who make " big" bucks would actually come out to the sites and see how we in the trenches have been cut to the bone!!
    They want to hire more Administrators??
    What a bunch of CRAP~ If you are not "in" with the Good ol Boys then you are "OUT" of the little circle of trust.....We should have a sick out and let them run the entire show! "

    Contrapasso wrote on Jul 8, 2009 2:19 PM:

    " If you think it's goop then why do you bother to read it, Loblaw? "

    commonsense wrote on Jul 8, 2009 2:00 PM:

    " Wait a second! Barbara Johnston resigned so there is another position that was eliminated, brought back, so who will that be????? "

    mom of 2 wrote on Jul 8, 2009 12:05 PM:

    " Be sure o add in the cost of the lawsuit. LUSD will loose. The cost of training the newbe... and the cost of all the law suits that will follow when the supplies for the 504's and IEP's are not fulfilled! "

    mickeyluvr wrote on Jul 8, 2009 11:42 AM:

    " Lets see they got rid of 6 positions/people and want to hire 2 at a whopping cost of $254,256.00 ($127,128.00 per position) for a department that is required by law. I bet they could have kept all the 6 they had, given them a raise and still be way below what they want to hire 2 administrators for. "

    edumacation wrote on Jul 8, 2009 11:23 AM:

    " The action against Anne was a warning shot from "on high". Do not have any opinion about ANYTHING except what you have for lunch, unless you clear it through one of the many Assistant Superintendents. Clear thinking is not allowed in the "Castle on Vine street". "

    mom of 2 wrote on Jul 8, 2009 11:07 AM:

    " It's time the district goes to Anne C., and offer her the job back. They were in a tight spot, but it is nothing compared to hiring two new people who do not know what they are doing. Anne gets the job done, and is not afraid to stand up for what she believes in. She is the curriculum department. "

    edumacation wrote on Jul 8, 2009 9:17 AM:

    " This was all predicted a long time ago. The game of musical chairs continues. First you abolish a few jobs---WITH BIG HEADLINES---"WE SAVED TAXPAYERS MONEY". Then they force the employees in those jobs to REAPPLY for their own jobs. But there is ONE IMPORTANT POINT. Not all of the employees were earning the same salary. That means THESE TWO NEW JOBS are potentially promotions for two of the formerly "pink-slipped" employees.

    The ESC does this all the time. It started years ago, and the practice continues under the guise of "reorganization". The bottom line is that the persons selected will be those who have proved themselves "MOST LOYAL" to the Grand Poobah.

    GO ANNE C. GO! You have seen the edumacrats in action. Women over 50 are targeted to be replaced with younger more compliant sycophants.

    The deception at the LUSD ESC is in plain site.

    There is NO requirement for these curriculum coordinators. Most teachers are teaching highly scripted lessons and independent instruction according to individual student needs has been extinguished. Its called "Cookbook" teaching. "

    Bob Hussein Loblaw wrote on Jul 8, 2009 7:18 AM:

    " I think one of LUSD's biggest problems is their leaders read and react to the goop on these and other boards instead of just doing their jobs. "

    Lou wrote on Jul 8, 2009 7:10 AM:

    " Whoops! The District just found out that it's not only impractical (it is also unlawful) not to have a curriculum department.

    First, they go from six to zero ...now it's back to two. Can anyone say mismanagement. "

    Comments on this story are now closed.