Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

February 8th, 2010
February 6th, 2010
February 5th, 2010
February 4th, 2010
February 3rd, 2010
February 2nd, 2010
February 1st, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT

As budgets grow tighter, state and local unions dig in to protect their pay and pensions


Thursday, June 11, 2009 6:34 AM PDT

It is fascinating to watch how the budget struggles in Sacramento are playing out.

The June 4 issue of the Sacramento Bee was replete with examples of how some of our governmental practices have gotten so out of hand that they may sink the entire ship.

According to the Bee study, the average base pay for a state worker (university system excluded) in 2008 was $63,815. Compare that to the federal statistics which show that the average pay in 2008 for all Californians was $48,090.

In a three-month period, unemployment in California went from 10.1 percent to 11.2 percent. While companies in Lodi and throughout California are displacing workers and are shutting facilities, state government grew by 1,362 full-time jobs in the same period.

State and local pension benefits are the most generous of any public pensions in the nation. Sacramento County needs to come up with a staggering $404 million next year to feed its employee pension fund. That is more than double the amount the county paid out in 2006 and 10 times the amount spent in 2001. County retirement formulas allow workers to retire at 55 with full benefits. A worker with 35 years under his belt receives 70 percent of his pension. A deputy sheriff can retire as young as 50. If he has worked 33.3 years, he takes home 100 percent of salary as a retirement benefit. I wonder how many retirees from General Mills have walked out the door with that package in their pocket?

On the state side, the Bee notes that state workers will be owed $48 billion in future retirement benefits. It will take a true magician to meet that number some day down the road.

It is no secret that Lodi is working hard to balance its budget with the least amount of pain to citizens and employees. As difficult as this task may be, it pales in comparison to the problems faced by elected officials in Sacramento.

In the same issue of the Bee, reporter Jim Sanders wrote of another travesty foisted upon us by our state leaders. By a vote of 43-16, the Assembly recently passed legislation requiring cities and counties to obtain state approval before they could file for bankruptcy protection. Advocates of the bill (AB155) have been led by the powerful California Professional Firefighters Union. They and other civil service labor unions are fearful that a bankruptcy filing by a local county or city would void their contracts and seriously damage or eliminate their generous retirement benefits. Some of the convoluted thought behind the bill is that a bankruptcy filing by a local municipality could have an impact on California's credit rating — which is hard to comprehend since the state's credit rating is already in the dumpster.

Sanders notes that only three local governments have ever sought bankruptcy protection. Heaven (am I permitted to use that word?) forbid that Lodi should ever get to that point!

What is ironic is that continual tapping of municipal and county treasuries by the state has upset the stability of local economies. Even when Lodi balances its 2009-10 budget, the state has indicated that it may pluck an additional $1.5 (+/-) million more, of our local dollars to help fix their problems.

Vallejo recently sought bankruptcy protection. From what I have been able to gather, they agonized over the issue and sought pre-eminent legal and financial advice before they made their difficult decision. I can't imagine that any other city or county wouldn't do likewise. To suggest that any agency would require approval from the California Legislature as part of that process is ludicrous. Their mismanagement has driven this state to the brink of insolvency. They are in no position to dictate how any other governmental agency should handle their fiscal problems.

The bill goes to the Senate next — would anyone care to bet me a furlough day it passes?

Bob Johnson is a member of the Lodi City Council.

Reader Feedback

Lodian wrote on Jun 21, 2009 12:47 PM:

" Happy Father's Day to all the great Dad's out there! Enjoy your day. :-) "

mark wrote on Jun 17, 2009 9:15 PM:

" To "tosh conn", my point was directed at the position of deputy sheriffs (which Mr. Johnson specifically claimed could receive 100% retirement benefits). And again, they cannot receive 100% retirement benefits. Mr. Johnson was flat wrong on that point.

But since you mention "fire chiefs, police chiefs and highway patrol heads", I'll just point out that they also are not eligible for 100% retirements.

I'm familiar with the pension "spike" you're referring to, but it was ruled at least 7 years ago that retirement can only be figured on the employee's annual salary (excluding any overtime pay, holiday pay, bonus pay, merit pay, etc – all of which could be used to "spike" the pension).

So the bottom line is, 90% retirement is still the max. And remember, that’s the max. Most people retire with far less than that. If they make it to retirement age at all.

Mr. Johnson apparently failed to mention all of that. "

Lodi FF wrote on Jun 17, 2009 11:27 AM:

" I think the most disturbing part of this anti-union tirate is the heading. Mr. Johnson where would the City of Lodi be if not for all of Lodi's union employees giving up salary and benefit concessions? The answer is the City would be in dire shape right now. We all recognize this, that is is why we are doing our part to help the City remain solvent. To date your Police and Firefighters have given up a combined $2.1 million in salary and benefit concessions. So to say that any of your local unions are digging their heels in to protect what they have I believe is irresponsible. It is with mutual understanding of the stiuation that we continue to find ways to help the City remain afloat. The situation will not get better overnight and we will continue to try to help the City in these tough financial times until things do turn around. "

tosh conn wrote on Jun 17, 2009 9:54 AM:

" To Mark. A public retiree can receive 100% of their pay. Fire chiefs, police chiefs and highway patrol heads engineer a pay "spike" their final year/s. The 90% + they receive on that amount gives them 100% of the pay they received during their working years prior to the "spike". It was a scandal for years, but I do not know if it is continuing to be pulled off. "

what22 wrote on Jun 17, 2009 9:24 AM:

" thats what gets me about him complaining about pensions they work for them all there life and some a hole comes along takes it away makes every body believe there bad to fix his mistakes in goverment go have another drink bob rosewood opens at 4 "

Jaysam1 wrote on Jun 17, 2009 8:26 AM:

" Bob - You are an idiot. You have no idea what you are talking about. I work for the state and you are wrong on so many levels it would take too long to correct you, but I'll correct your most ignorant points (copied from the SacBee no less - eye roll)
1) According to the Bee study, the average base pay for a state worker (university system excluded) in 2008 was $63,815.

Correction: the average state worker does NOT make that amount - it is top heavy upper management and peace officers that brings that total up. Those classifications are a small portion of the "average" state worker. Additionally - comparing hundreds of thousands of minimum wage jobs to 235,000 govt jobs is skewed in itself.

2) There are NO 100% retirements for ANYONE. Period. Check your facts.

3) State Govt grew by 1300 positions in three months because they needed additional staff to cover the increasing amount of unemployed workers. Check your facts next time and look at which depts actually hired for those three months. "

what22 wrote on Jun 16, 2009 4:11 PM:

" bob oh bob i wonder if he wrote that after his daily trip to the rosewood bar "

OTH wrote on Jun 16, 2009 8:08 AM:

" Cogito

You're all of 50? You devil you! "

alumn95 wrote on Jun 15, 2009 2:17 PM:

" Mark you sound like someone who knows what they're talking about. If these retirements and contracts are so toxic for the city and counties then why are they areeing to them in the first place. It's to easy to blame the unions. How about we blame the cities, and their council members BJ. "

wtf wrote on Jun 15, 2009 11:37 AM:

" Gee, reality, you sound like you have a reading comprehension problem to me. LOL! ***If*** you had actually read my posts, rather than rush to make a "cutesy" post, you would know that my last few posts were not written by me but were excerpts material obtained by the National Association of Chiefs of Police from the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Behavioral Analysis Unit. "

reality wrote on Jun 15, 2009 9:45 AM:

" wtf - you sound just like
Adam Dados "

wtf wrote on Jun 15, 2009 8:22 AM:

" Psychopaths are not sensitive to altruistic interview themes, such as sympathy for their victims or remorse/guilt over their crimes. They do possess certain personality traits that can be exploited, particularly their inherent narcissism, selfishness, and vanity.

....While many political leaders will deny the assessment regarding their similarities with serial killers and other career criminals, it is part of a psychopathic profile that may be used in assessing the behaviors of many officials and lawmakers at all levels of government.

http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-2684-Law-Enforcement-Examiner~y2009m6d12-Serial-killers-and-politicians-share-traits


Corporations also share these tendencies. See the movie, "The Corporation" which can be viewed in 23 chapters on YouTube.

http://www.thecorporation.com/index.cfm?page_id=46 "

wtf wrote on Jun 15, 2009 8:19 AM:

" Interpersonal traits include glibness, superficial charm, a grandiose sense of self-worth, pathological lying, and the manipulation of others. The affective traits include a lack of remorse and/or guilt, shallow affect, a lack of empathy, and failure to accept responsibility. The lifestyle behaviors include stimulation-seeking behavior, impulsivity, irresponsibility, parasitic orientation, and a lack of realistic life goals.

...Ironically, these same traits exist in men and women who are drawn to high-profile and powerful positions in society including political officeholders....They also lack what most consider a "shame" mechanism. Quite simply, most serial killers and many professional politicians must mimic what they believe, are appropriate responses to situations they face such as sadness, empathy, sympathy, and other human responses to outside stimuli.

(cont) "

wtf wrote on Jun 15, 2009 8:19 AM:

" So glad Larry and Bob, two of my favorite CC members, (yeah, right) have written to the paper. This is for you. LOL!

The following commentary includes material obtained by the National Association of Chiefs of Police from the Federal Bureau of Investigation's Behavioral Analysis Unit.

Although the concept of psychopathy has been known for centuries, the FBI leads the world in the research effort to develop a series of assessment tools, to evaluate the personality traits and behaviors attributable to psychopaths...

(cont) "

reality wrote on Jun 15, 2009 8:17 AM:

" Mark you sound like a city employee! "

mark wrote on Jun 15, 2009 12:14 AM:

" And speaking of math, there are no 100% retirements – not even for someone like a deputy sheriff. The most they could retire with is 3% of their salary for every year they work up to year 30, which would be a max of 90%. (If they make it that long, which the vast majority don’t.)

You think you’d check these things out before writing an article like this for all to see. Guess it wasn’t that important to be that accurate.

And what’s the problem with AB155 Bob? I, personally hope that it does pass. Private citizens have judicial oversight when they opt to file bankruptcy, and I think a municipality should too. More in fact because of how many people it affects. Are you afraid of a little oversight?

To be honest, I don’t know why you’re even writing about this bill. Is Lodi considering bankruptcy? And why are you comparing Lodi to another city (Vallejo) again that doesn’t really reflect this one? Vallejo is a dump and they made a mess of a lot of things when they filed for bankruptcy. Why don’t you worry about Lodi first. "

mark wrote on Jun 15, 2009 12:00 AM:

" This article by Bob Johnson is misleading and full of errors, miscalculations, and/or flat out lies.

First of all, I don't know why Bob spends so much time comparing Lodi to Sacramento County, but since he did, rest assured that Sacramento County's employee pension fund is doing just fine as it is funded by multiple sources - the employer, THE EMPLOYEE, and the investment earnings of the retirement system.

Bob also mentions "that a deputy sheriff can retire as young as age 50, and if he has worked 33.3 years he takes home 100 percent of salary as a retirement benefit." I don't know what else to say about this other than it's just flat out wrong. Hopefully, Bob didn’t intentionally lie in his article and instead he’s just REALLY bad at math and/or grossly misinformed.

I’m trying to give him the benefit of the doubt. But if you have to be at least 21 years old to be hired as a cop, how can you work 33.3 years by the time you’re 50? The math just doesn’t add up Bob. "

Cogito wrote on Jun 14, 2009 10:16 PM:

" OTH, I'm 50, and the latest guy to retire from the Lodi PD was in the class BEHIND me in school. You're preaching to the choir when it comes to public employees. "

OTH wrote on Jun 14, 2009 8:56 PM:

" dogs

I agree with what you say. If 2 people are working someone has to subsidize child care and that falls on the city, which is us. "

dogs4you wrote on Jun 14, 2009 8:33 PM:

" The comment was made, can anyone live on $8 dollars an hour, the answer NO. Now take a look at the non-union markets, along with Target, J C Penny`s, Lowes, Ross, Chili`s, Marshalls, Staples, did I get them all, most likely not but you get the idea. It`s a two pay check family these days, and for all the kids that work fast food, I don`t doubt they live with their folks. Now whats the problem with WalMart. "

OTH wrote on Jun 14, 2009 7:35 PM:

" Sam

You go girl. "

OTH wrote on Jun 14, 2009 7:35 PM:

" Cogito

Why do you think people are retiring at 50? Because cities like Lodi gave them the benefits to do just that. iF DEAR Bob wants to bitch about the unions in Lodi he can start with the firefighters and the police men. Your Mayor is a prime example. These unions are going to break Lodi. It's only a matter of time.

Could you live on $8 dollars an hour in todays economy? "

sam wrote on Jun 14, 2009 3:28 PM:

" Illegal, check out how the county has this greenbelt plan written up. All litigation againt the plan will be directly against Lodi. Interesting.

Google Charles Keenan and Half Moon Bay. Chop is a dear friend of mine. The party is just beginning. "

illegalinLodi wrote on Jun 13, 2009 11:45 AM:

" And Sam, you notice that the Lodi news media mentions nary a word about the new Walmart lawsuit? By the way, Sam, when are you going to give the Lodi bullies your land for that greenbelt? "

illegalinLodi wrote on Jun 13, 2009 11:43 AM:

" And the gossip around Sutter Gould building on Harney Lane is that the Lodi city council is fighting them off, apparently for fear of losing their dear old Lodi Memorial Hospital accounts to them. The corruption and protectionism in this politically dirty little town knows no bounds. "

ok wrote on Jun 12, 2009 8:06 PM:

" Mr. Johnson are you getting the same retirement benifets you are complaining about? What about your health insurance that other part time employees don't get. Do you take pay instead of insurance because you don't need it. "

tosh conn wrote on Jun 12, 2009 10:29 AM:

" Excellent Bob. One more little factoid. For many of these "premium" retirements, the people will spend more years in retirement than they did working. Your math points that out. No wonder the state is broke. "

Cogito wrote on Jun 12, 2009 7:56 AM:

" Wow, Sam, I was wrong. I thought "Lodi First" was going to file the suit. I got a heads up from someone involved that this was going to happen. I just thought he was involved with the other group. I don't think a citizens group has the assets to financially wear down a company like Wal Mart. I still think it will be Wal Mart's call. "

sam wrote on Jun 12, 2009 7:31 AM:

" Well no need to worry about those $10 an hour jobs coming to Lodi.

The Stockton Record reports that Citizens For Open Government have filed suit against the Lodi Walmart. "

Cogito wrote on Jun 11, 2009 7:15 PM:

" Illegal, I'm self employed. I don't have any employees. If I had employees, their pay would be based on how much money they made for me, how much I depended on them, and how easy I could replace them for the same money. I might throw in a little for loyalty if they'd worked for me for a long time. Business is business. I'd be the one who took the chances, so I'd be the one who reaped the rewards. "

illegalinLodi wrote on Jun 11, 2009 3:54 PM:

" Cogito, not if they're illegal aliens and there are green cards and documented workers out of work. Do You pay your employees more than minimum wage? "

wtf wrote on Jun 11, 2009 3:22 PM:

" Still say the CC should look into luring Tesla Motors to Lodi. I believe their starting wage is $11.50....you won't be rolling in dough; but you won't be having to supplement your income (hopefully) with government assistance.

http://www.teslamotors.com/ "

Cogito wrote on Jun 11, 2009 1:41 PM:

" So Illegal, you feel that those people would be better off unemployed than making $8.00 an hour? "

illegalinLodi wrote on Jun 11, 2009 10:13 AM:

" Mr. Johnson, you're saying that Lodi needs more $8 an hour Walmart jobs. Tell me what's wrong with unions and organizing and having workers that are paid a decent living wage? Just what have you or the city council or Chamber of Commerce done to bring living wage type jobs here? You give the low and minimum wage employers low cost electricity, land, buildings and long term dirt cheap leases. if you want to give away so many perks to bring these low paying companies to Lodi, how about considering working on some employers that pay decent wages. All your empty buildings at the 3 or 4 scattered industrial areas around your town, you should be able to attract something better than those low paying employers and businesses that're here now. "

Cogito wrote on Jun 11, 2009 8:52 AM:

" As of May 2008, there were 4,820 CalPers retirees earning over $100,000 in pension money. Since then, there have been 120 new retirees per month, every month joining the 6 figure retiree club. Half of them are police, firefighters, and prison guards. This number will grow exponentially. Some of these people are retiring at around 50 years old. That's a lot of money for a lot of years. That's only CalPers, there are 80 other public employee pension plans. http://www.flashreport.org/featured-columns-library0b.php?faID=2009042908422871 "

wtf wrote on Jun 11, 2009 8:42 AM:

" I bet Arnold wishes he had that 9$ BILLION that Davis was suing Enron for when the recall happened. LOL!

Bob, I'll give to you credit for an excellent article; however, regarding yourself and our livable, lovable CC, only three words:

Pot. Kettle. Black. "

16925 wrote on Jun 11, 2009 8:02 AM:

" No one mentions upper management! One retired city manager in the state of california receives over $500,000 in compensation! 1/2 million dollars for one person sitting at a desk!

And you ask what is wrong with state. "

Bulldog wrote on Jun 11, 2009 7:38 AM:

" Great op ed piece. Perhaps we should pass an initiative that requires the state to declare bankruptcy and re-start all those union contracts. "

El Rushbo wrote on Jun 11, 2009 7:22 AM:

" AWESOME!!!!!! "

Comments on this story are now closed.